Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 607-611.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2025.04.013

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2025-02-25 接受日期:2025-04-27 出版日期:2025-09-28 发布日期:2025-10-11

RichHTML

PDF

补充材料

1

可视化

0
  • 1. Supplemental Data.zip(3456KB)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2025, 32(5): 607-611.

使用本文

推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/j.rsci.2025.04.013

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2025/V32/I5/607

图/表 1

Fig. 1. Salt stress-induced phenotypic and molecular variation in Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176. A, Phenotypic characteristics of three rice varieties (Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176) grown under control (CK) and salt stress (ST, 100 mmol/L NaCl) conditions for one week and two weeks. Scale bars, 10 cm. B, Hierarchical clustering of the top 50 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to salt stress. Clustering was based on Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM)-normalized, log2-transformed expression values. The heatmap shows global expression patterns across genotypes, treatments, and time points. CK, Control; ST, Salt stress; p1, k1, and g1 represent Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176 after one-week salt stress; p2, k2, and g2 represent Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176 after two-week salt stress. C, Venn diagrams showing the overlap of DEGs among varieties at one week and two weeks. Comparisons include P1 (CKp1 vs STp1), K1 (CKk1 vs STk1), G1 (CKg1 vs STg1), and P2 (CKp2 vs STp2), K2 (CKk2 vs STk2), G2 (CKg2 vs STg2). D, Relative expression of five salt-responsive genes in the three varieties under CK and ST conditions, validated by qRT-PCR. Leaf tissues were collected from plants after one-week (1W) and two-week (2W) stress, with Actin used as the internal reference gene for data normalization. Treatments include 1W CK, 2W CK, 1W ST, and 2W ST. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 0.05 level by the Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). E, Haplotype (HAP) analysis of OsMKK4 and OsIPK, showing single nucleotide polymorphisms and Insertions/Deletions between Hap.1 (Reference, 9311) and Hap.2 (Giza 176 allele).

Fig. 1. Salt stress-induced phenotypic and molecular variation in Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176. A, Phenotypic characteristics of three rice varieties (Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176) grown under control (CK) and salt stress (ST, 100 mmol/L NaCl) conditions for one week and two weeks. Scale bars, 10 cm. B, Hierarchical clustering of the top 50 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to salt stress. Clustering was based on Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM)-normalized, log2-transformed expression values. The heatmap shows global expression patterns across genotypes, treatments, and time points. CK, Control; ST, Salt stress; p1, k1, and g1 represent Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176 after one-week salt stress; p2, k2, and g2 represent Pokkali, Kaituodao, and Giza 176 after two-week salt stress. C, Venn diagrams showing the overlap of DEGs among varieties at one week and two weeks. Comparisons include P1 (CKp1 vs STp1), K1 (CKk1 vs STk1), G1 (CKg1 vs STg1), and P2 (CKp2 vs STp2), K2 (CKk2 vs STk2), G2 (CKg2 vs STg2). D, Relative expression of five salt-responsive genes in the three varieties under CK and ST conditions, validated by qRT-PCR. Leaf tissues were collected from plants after one-week (1W) and two-week (2W) stress, with Actin used as the internal reference gene for data normalization. Treatments include 1W CK, 2W CK, 1W ST, and 2W ST. Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters represent significant differences at the 0.05 level by the Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). E, Haplotype (HAP) analysis of OsMKK4 and OsIPK, showing single nucleotide polymorphisms and Insertions/Deletions between Hap.1 (Reference, 9311) and Hap.2 (Giza 176 allele).

参考文献 16

[1] Coca L I R, González M T G, Unday Z G, et al. 2023. Effects of sodium salinity on rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation: A review. Sustainability, 15(3): 1804.
[2] FAO. 2021. The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture: Systems at Breaking Point:Synthesis Report 2021. Rome, Italy: FAO.
[3] Hazman M, Fawzy S, Hamdy A, et al. 2023. Enhancing rice resilience to drought by applying biochar-compost mixture in low-fertile sandy soil. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci, 12(1): 74.
[4] Hoang T M L, Tran T N, Nguyen T K T, et al. 2016. Improvement of salinity stress tolerance in rice: Challenges and opportunities. Agronomy, 6(4): 54.
[5] Jiang C J, Liang Z W, Xie X Z. 2023. Priming for saline-alkaline tolerance in rice: Current knowledge and future challenges. Rice Sci, 30(5): 417-425.
[6] Li Q Y, Zhu P W, Yu X Q, et al. 2024. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of rice tolerance to salt and drought stress: Advances and future directions. Int J Mol Sci, 25(17): 9404.
[7] Liu J G, Shen L, Guo L B, et al. 2023. OsSTS, a novel allele of Mitogen-activated protein Kinase Kinase 4 (OsMKK4), controls grain size and salt tolerance in rice. Rice, 16(1): 47.
[8] Pan Y, Li Q, Wang Z, et al. 2021. Natural variation of OsMKK3 contributes to the ecological differentiation of indica and japonica rice. Plant Cell, 33(1): 1-20.
[9] Ren Z H, Gao J P, Li L G, et al. 2005. A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet, 37(10): 1141-1146.
[10] Thomson M J, de Ocampo M, Egdane J, et al. 2010. Characterizing the Saltol quantitative trait locus for salinity tolerance in rice. Rice, 3(2): 148-160.
[11] Wang P T, Liu W C, Han C, et al. 2024. Reactive oxygen species: Multidimensional regulators of plant adaptation to abiotic stress and development. J Integr Plant Biol, 66(3): 330-367.
[12] Wang X, Zhou Y, Li Z, et al. 2024. Genome-wide haplotype analysis reveals ecotype differentiation and domestication signals in rice MAPK cascade genes. Theor Appl Genet, 137: 65.
[13] Yang H, Bai T L, Zhu C Y, et al. 2023. Analysis of Na+ and K+ homeostasis and SKC1 haplotype of rice germplasm accessions under salt stress. J Plant Genet Resour, 24(4): 1085-1096. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] Yang Y G, Xu Y N, Bai Y R, et al. 2024. Mixed-oligosaccharides promote seedling growth of direct-seeded rice under salt and alkaline stress. Rice Sci, 31(6): 712-724.
[15] Zhang Q P, Teng R, Yuan Z Y, et al. 2023. Integrative transcriptomic analysis deciphering the role of rice bHLH transcription factor Os04g0301500 in mediating responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front Plant Sci, 14: 1266242.
[16] Zhu J K. 2016. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell, 167(2): 313-324.

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: