Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 756-760.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2025.06.004

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2025-03-01 接受日期:2025-06-13 出版日期:2025-11-28 发布日期:2025-12-04

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

0

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2025, 32(6): 756-760.

使用本文

推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/j.rsci.2025.06.004

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2025/V32/I6/756

图/表 1

Fig. 1. Fine mapping of qFLW11 in near-isogenic lines (NILs) and functional analysis of FLW11. A, Fine mapping of qFLW11 on chromosome (Chr.) 11 in NILs (H1-H8). NPB, Nipponbare; Y476, Wild rice (Oryza rufipogon). FLW, Flag leaf width. B, Phenotypes (above) and FLW (below) of NIL-FLW11Y476-90, NIL-FLW11Y476-94, NIL-FLW11NPB-81, and NIL-FLW11NPB-111 (NIL-FLW11Y476-90 and NIL-FLW11Y476-94 lines containing the Y476 fragment in the qFLW11 interval, while NIL-FLW11NPB-81 and NIL-FLW11NPB-111 lines containing the NPB fragment in the qFLW11 interval). Scale bars, 10 cm (above) and 2 cm (below). C, Phenotypes of wild type Zhonghua 11 (ZH11) and knockout mutants (FLW11-KO-1 and FLW11-KO-2) at the heading stage. Scale bar, 30 cm. D and E, FLW of ZH11, FLW11-KO-1, and FLW11-KO-2. Scale bar, 1 cm. In E, data are mean ± SD (n = 10). Differences between ZH11and FLW11-KO were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. F, Cross section of leaves of ZH11, FLW11-KO-1, and FLW11-KO-2 under blue fluorescence with a light-emitting diode wavelength of 470 nm. Scale bars, 200 μm. The red arrow indicates the small vascular bundle. G-I, The number of large vascular bundles (G), distance between large vascular bundles (H), and the number of small vascular bundles (I) for ZH11 and FLW11-KO (FLW11-KO-1 and FLW11-KO-2). Data are mean ± SD (n = 10). Differences between ZH11 and FLW11-KO were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. J, High-density gene-based association analysis and linkage disequilibrium heat map of local Manhattan map, around the peak on chromosome 11. K, Haplotype analysis and genetic structure map of FLW11. L and M, FLW (L) and yield per plant (M) in different FLW11 haplotypes. Data are mean ± SD (n > 50). Significant differences among Hap1, Hap2, and Hap3 were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Fig. 1. Fine mapping of qFLW11 in near-isogenic lines (NILs) and functional analysis of FLW11. A, Fine mapping of qFLW11 on chromosome (Chr.) 11 in NILs (H1-H8). NPB, Nipponbare; Y476, Wild rice (Oryza rufipogon). FLW, Flag leaf width. B, Phenotypes (above) and FLW (below) of NIL-FLW11Y476-90, NIL-FLW11Y476-94, NIL-FLW11NPB-81, and NIL-FLW11NPB-111 (NIL-FLW11Y476-90 and NIL-FLW11Y476-94 lines containing the Y476 fragment in the qFLW11 interval, while NIL-FLW11NPB-81 and NIL-FLW11NPB-111 lines containing the NPB fragment in the qFLW11 interval). Scale bars, 10 cm (above) and 2 cm (below). C, Phenotypes of wild type Zhonghua 11 (ZH11) and knockout mutants (FLW11-KO-1 and FLW11-KO-2) at the heading stage. Scale bar, 30 cm. D and E, FLW of ZH11, FLW11-KO-1, and FLW11-KO-2. Scale bar, 1 cm. In E, data are mean ± SD (n = 10). Differences between ZH11and FLW11-KO were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. F, Cross section of leaves of ZH11, FLW11-KO-1, and FLW11-KO-2 under blue fluorescence with a light-emitting diode wavelength of 470 nm. Scale bars, 200 μm. The red arrow indicates the small vascular bundle. G-I, The number of large vascular bundles (G), distance between large vascular bundles (H), and the number of small vascular bundles (I) for ZH11 and FLW11-KO (FLW11-KO-1 and FLW11-KO-2). Data are mean ± SD (n = 10). Differences between ZH11 and FLW11-KO were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. J, High-density gene-based association analysis and linkage disequilibrium heat map of local Manhattan map, around the peak on chromosome 11. K, Haplotype analysis and genetic structure map of FLW11. L and M, FLW (L) and yield per plant (M) in different FLW11 haplotypes. Data are mean ± SD (n > 50). Significant differences among Hap1, Hap2, and Hap3 were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ns, P > 0.05; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

参考文献 23

[1] Ali M M, Hashim N. 2024. Exploring nutritional compositions, volatile compounds, health benefits, emerging processing technologies, and potential food products of glutinous rice: A review. Rice Sci, 31(3): 251-268.
[2] Chen H J, Shang C Y, Huang M Y, et al. 2023. Research progress on regulating mechanism of leaf angle in rice. Mol Plant Breed, 21(13): 4427-4437. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Chen M L, Luo J, Shao G N, et al. 2012. Fine mapping of a major QTL for flag leaf width in rice, qFLW4, which might be caused by alternative splicing of NAL1. Plant Cell Rep, 31(5): 863-872.
[4] Cho S H, Yoo S C, Zhang H T, et al. 2013. The rice narrow leaf2 and narrow leaf3 loci encode WUSCHEL-related homeobox 3A (OsWOX3A) and function in leaf, spikelet, tiller and lateral root development. New Phytol, 198(4): 1071-1084.
[5] Deng B W, Zhang Y N, Zhang F, et al. 2024. Genome-wide association study of cooked rice textural attributes and starch physicochemical properties in indica rice. Rice Sci, 31(3): 300-316.
[6] Fujino K, Matsuda Y, Ozawa K, et al. 2008. NARROW LEAF 7controls leaf shape mediated by auxin in rice. Mol Genet Genomics, 279(5): 499-507.
[7] Ishiwata A, Ozawa M, Nagasaki H, et al. 2013. Two WUSCHEL-related homeobox genes, narrow leaf2 and narrow leaf3, control leaf width in rice. Plant Cell Physiol, 54(5): 779-792.
[8] Jiang D, Fang J J, Lou L M, et al. 2015. Characterization of a null allelic mutant of the rice NAL1 gene reveals its role in regulating cell division. PLoS One, 10(2): e0118169.
[9] Korte A, Farlow A. 2013. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: A review. Plant Methods, 9: 29.
[10] Li W, Wu C, Hu G C, et al. 2013. Characterization and fine mapping of a novel rice narrow leaf mutant nal9. J Integr Plant Biol, 55(11): 1016-1025.
[11] Lin L H, Zhao Y F, Liu F, et al. 2019. Narrow leaf 1 (NAL1) regulates leaf shape by affecting cell expansion in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 516(3): 957-962.
[12] Qi J, Qian Q, Bu Q Y, et al. 2008. Mutation of the rice narrow leaf1 gene, which encodes a novel protein, affects vein patterning and polar auxin transport. Plant Physiol, 147(4): 1947-1959.
[13] Rakotoson T, Dusserre J, Letourmy P, et al. 2021. Genome-wide association study of nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic traits in upland rice. Rice Sci, 28(4): 379-390.
[14] Uzair M, Long H X, Zafar S A, et al. 2021. Narrow Leaf21, encoding ribosomal protein RPS3A, controls leaf development in rice. Plant Physiol, 186(1): 497-518.
[15] Wang J J, Xu J, Qian Q, et al. 2020. Development of rice leaves: How histocytes modulate leaf polarity establishment. Rice Sci, 27(6): 468-479.
[16] Xu J, Shang L G, Wang J J, et al. 2021. The SEEDLING BIOMASS 1 allele from indica rice enhances yield performance under low-nitrogen environments. Plant Biotechnol J, 19(9): 1681-1683.
[17] Xu J, Wang L, Wang Y X, et al. 2017. Reduction of OsFLW7expression enhanced leaf area and grain production in rice. Sci Bull, 62(24): 1631-1633.
[18] Xu Y C, Yan S Y, Jiang S, et al. 2023. Identification of a rice leaf width gene narrow leaf 22 (NAL22) through genome-wide association study and gene editing technology. Int J Mol Sci, 24(4): 4073.
[19] Xu Y X, Xiao M Z, Liu Y, et al. 2017. The small auxin-up RNA OsSAUR45 affects auxin synthesis and transport in rice. Plant Mol Biol, 94(1/2): 97-107.
[20] You J, Xiao W W, Zhou Y, et al. 2022. The apc/ctad1-wide leaf 1-narrow leaf 1 pathway controls leaf width in rice. Plant Cell, 34(11): 4313-4328.
[21] Zhai L Y, Yan A, Shao K T, et al. 2023. Large Vascular Bundle Phloem Area 4enhances grain yield and quality in rice via source-sink-flow. Plant Physiol, 191(1): 317-334.
[22] Zhang G H, Li S Y, Wang L, et al. 2014. LSCHL4 from japonica cultivar, which is allelic to NAL1, increases yield of indica super rice 93-11. Mol Plant, 7(8): 1350-1364.
[23] Zhu D F, Cheng S H, Zhang Y P, et al. 2010. Analysis of status and constraints of rice production in the world. Sci Agric Sin, 43(3): 474-479. (in Chinese with English abstract)

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: