Rice Science ›› 2016, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 22-32.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2016.01.003
收稿日期:
2014-12-14
接受日期:
2015-09-30
出版日期:
2016-01-20
发布日期:
2015-11-05
. [J]. Rice Science, 2016, 23(1): 22-32.
Treatment | Shoot height (cm) | Leaf area (cm2) | Tiller number per plant | Plant dry weight (g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||
T1 | 16.9 ± 0.9 | 19.2 ± 0.0 | 11.1 ± 1.1 | 13.6 ± 0.6 | 4.36 ± 0.1 | 5.14 ± 0.2 | 110 | 123 | |||
T2 | 19.9 ± 0.3 | 20.8 ± 0.2 | 10.0 ± 0.3 | 12.7 ± 0.9 | 4.67 ± 0.2 | 5.40 ± 0.3 | 136 | 140.8 | |||
T3 | 23.8 ± 0.4 | 24.9 ± 0.6 | 13.8 ± 0.4 | 15.5 ± 1.2 | 4.88 ± 0.3 | 5.70 ± 0.2 | 137.9 | 155.5 | |||
T4 | 22.8 ± 0.8 | 26.2 ± 0.8 | 13.9 ± 2.0 | 16.0 ± 0.8 | 4.70 ± 0.1 | 5.03 ± 0.2 | 151.3 | 176 | |||
T5 | 27.0 ± 0.8 | 30.9 ± 0.8 | 18.1 ± 1.9 | 22.0 ± 0.7 | 4.63 ± 0.2 | 5.90 ± 0.2 | 190 | 202.4 | |||
T6 | 24.9 ± 0.7 | 28.1 ± 0.8 | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 28.1 ± 1.2 | 4.73 ± 0.1 | 4.73 ± 0.0 | 204 | 241 | |||
T7 | 26.4 ± 0.8 | 31.1 ± 0.7 | 16.8 ± 0.3 | 28.6 ± 2.4 | 4.97 ± 0.2 | 4.06 ± 0.2 | 182 | 230.6 | |||
r-value | 0.971 a | ####################### | 0.353 | 0.962 a | |||||||
Significance | 0.002** | 0.030* | 0.077 | 0.008** |
Table 1 Growth and yield of rice grown in graded levels of fly ash amended soils with and without cyanobacteria as supplement (mean ± SD).
Treatment | Shoot height (cm) | Leaf area (cm2) | Tiller number per plant | Plant dry weight (g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||
T1 | 16.9 ± 0.9 | 19.2 ± 0.0 | 11.1 ± 1.1 | 13.6 ± 0.6 | 4.36 ± 0.1 | 5.14 ± 0.2 | 110 | 123 | |||
T2 | 19.9 ± 0.3 | 20.8 ± 0.2 | 10.0 ± 0.3 | 12.7 ± 0.9 | 4.67 ± 0.2 | 5.40 ± 0.3 | 136 | 140.8 | |||
T3 | 23.8 ± 0.4 | 24.9 ± 0.6 | 13.8 ± 0.4 | 15.5 ± 1.2 | 4.88 ± 0.3 | 5.70 ± 0.2 | 137.9 | 155.5 | |||
T4 | 22.8 ± 0.8 | 26.2 ± 0.8 | 13.9 ± 2.0 | 16.0 ± 0.8 | 4.70 ± 0.1 | 5.03 ± 0.2 | 151.3 | 176 | |||
T5 | 27.0 ± 0.8 | 30.9 ± 0.8 | 18.1 ± 1.9 | 22.0 ± 0.7 | 4.63 ± 0.2 | 5.90 ± 0.2 | 190 | 202.4 | |||
T6 | 24.9 ± 0.7 | 28.1 ± 0.8 | 13.8 ± 2.8 | 28.1 ± 1.2 | 4.73 ± 0.1 | 4.73 ± 0.0 | 204 | 241 | |||
T7 | 26.4 ± 0.8 | 31.1 ± 0.7 | 16.8 ± 0.3 | 28.6 ± 2.4 | 4.97 ± 0.2 | 4.06 ± 0.2 | 182 | 230.6 | |||
r-value | 0.971 a | ####################### | 0.353 | 0.962 a | |||||||
Significance | 0.002** | 0.030* | 0.077 | 0.008** |
Treatment | Length of panicle (cm) | No. of seeds per panicle | Grain yield of 100 plants (g) | 1000-grain weight (g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||
T1 | 13.1 ± 0.3 | 14.5 ± 0.3 | 60.3 ± 3.1 | 64.1 ± 2.1 | 262.2 | 265.3 | 19.69 | 20.16 | |||
T2 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 13.9 ± 0.4 | 62.0 ± 2.6 | 66.9 ± 3.6 | 269.8 | 272 | 21.12 | 20.7 | |||
T3 | 16.0 ± 0.3 | 15.9 ± 0.6 | 70.8 ± 4.4 | 78.0 ± 9.5 | 285.3 | 312.4 | 21.95 | 22.38 | |||
T4 | 16.9 ± 0.5 | 18.3 ± 0.9 | 75.5 ± 5.2 | 85.1 ± 6.1 | 310.2 | 342.5 | 23.42 | 23.5 | |||
T5 | 18.7 ± 0.4 | 21.9 ± 1.0 | 84.1 ± 4.5 | 91.3 ± 3.1 | 357.5 | 379 | 23.95 | 24.15 | |||
T6 | 20.2 ± 2.0 | 24.8 ± 0.8 | 85.3 ± 6.3 | 89.5 ± 3.3 | 411.8 | 420.5 | 23.88 | 24.3 | |||
T7 | 20.0 ± 0.6 | 20.7 ± 1.7 | 81.3 ± 4.1 | 83.0 ± 5.0 | 491 | 495.7 | 24.25 | 24.4 | |||
r-value | 0.938 | 0.969 | 0.989 a | 0.985 a | |||||||
Significance | 0.053 | 0.001** | 0.024* | 0.155 |
Table 2 Yield of rice grown in graded levels of fly ash amended soils with and without cyanobacteria supplementation (mean ± SD).
Treatment | Length of panicle (cm) | No. of seeds per panicle | Grain yield of 100 plants (g) | 1000-grain weight (g) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||
T1 | 13.1 ± 0.3 | 14.5 ± 0.3 | 60.3 ± 3.1 | 64.1 ± 2.1 | 262.2 | 265.3 | 19.69 | 20.16 | |||
T2 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 13.9 ± 0.4 | 62.0 ± 2.6 | 66.9 ± 3.6 | 269.8 | 272 | 21.12 | 20.7 | |||
T3 | 16.0 ± 0.3 | 15.9 ± 0.6 | 70.8 ± 4.4 | 78.0 ± 9.5 | 285.3 | 312.4 | 21.95 | 22.38 | |||
T4 | 16.9 ± 0.5 | 18.3 ± 0.9 | 75.5 ± 5.2 | 85.1 ± 6.1 | 310.2 | 342.5 | 23.42 | 23.5 | |||
T5 | 18.7 ± 0.4 | 21.9 ± 1.0 | 84.1 ± 4.5 | 91.3 ± 3.1 | 357.5 | 379 | 23.95 | 24.15 | |||
T6 | 20.2 ± 2.0 | 24.8 ± 0.8 | 85.3 ± 6.3 | 89.5 ± 3.3 | 411.8 | 420.5 | 23.88 | 24.3 | |||
T7 | 20.0 ± 0.6 | 20.7 ± 1.7 | 81.3 ± 4.1 | 83.0 ± 5.0 | 491 | 495.7 | 24.25 | 24.4 | |||
r-value | 0.938 | 0.969 | 0.989 a | 0.985 a | |||||||
Significance | 0.053 | 0.001** | 0.024* | 0.155 |
Treatment | Chlorophyll a | Chlorophyll b | Carotene | Catalase | Peroxidase activity [mmol/(L∙g)] | Protein/carbo- | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mg/g) | (mg/g) | (mg/g) | [mmol/(L∙g)] | hydrate ratio | |||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA +C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||||
T1 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 3.10 ± 0.01 | 3.02 ± 0.16 | 2.49 ± 0.48 | 3.33 ± 0.47 | 6.26 ± 0.45 | 7.02 ± 0.63 | 0.15 | 0.18 | |||||
T2 | 1.19 ± 0.07 | 1.03 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 2.67 ± 0.19 | 3.10 ± 0.43 | 4.66 ± 0.01 | 5.16 ± 0.03 | 9.16 ± 0.09 | 10.65 ± 0.46 | 0.23 | 0.25 | |||||
T3 | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 0.43 ± 0.11 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 3.22 ± 0.62 | 2.98 ± 0.33 | 5.77 ± 0.43 | 6.83 ± 0.28 | 11.85 ± 0.49 | 11.38 ± 0.61 | 0.24 | 0.28 | |||||
T4 | 1.16 ± 0.00 | 1.21 ± 0.10 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 0.59 ± 0.17 | 3.07 ± 0.46 | 3.06 ± 0.30 | 7.38 ± 0.32 | 7.61 ± 0.19 | 12.58 ± 0.18 | 17.97 ± 0.65 | 0.26 | 0.28 | |||||
T5 | 1.30 ± 0.07 | 1.38 ± 0.19 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 3.21 ± 0.63 | 3.00 ± 0.44 | 7.49 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.39 | 14.38 ± 0.78 | 12.66 ± 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.31 | |||||
T6 | 1.52 ± 0.08 | 1.49 ± 0.09 | 0.56 ± 0.19 | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 3.32 ± 0.28 | 3.10 ± 0.76 | 6.88 ± 0.77 | 9.38 ± 0.22 | 15.88 ± 0.98 | 14.65 ± 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |||||
T7 | 1.66 ± 0.11 | 1.69 ± 0.06 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 3.11 ± 0.58 | 3.40 ± 0.57 | 7.53 ± 0.12 | 9.02 ± 0.39 | 16.33 ± 0.48 | 15.00 ± 1.02 | 0.23 | 0.23 | |||||
r-value | 0.934 a | 0.454 | 0.119 | 0.943 a | 0.761 | 0.933 a | |||||||||||
Significance | 0.586 | 0.23 | 0.957 | 0.009* | 0.676 | 0.013* |
Table 3 Biochemical analysis of leaves of rice, grown in soil amended with fly ash and cyanobacteria (mean ± SD).
Treatment | Chlorophyll a | Chlorophyll b | Carotene | Catalase | Peroxidase activity [mmol/(L∙g)] | Protein/carbo- | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mg/g) | (mg/g) | (mg/g) | [mmol/(L∙g)] | hydrate ratio | |||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA +C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||||
T1 | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.02 | 3.10 ± 0.01 | 3.02 ± 0.16 | 2.49 ± 0.48 | 3.33 ± 0.47 | 6.26 ± 0.45 | 7.02 ± 0.63 | 0.15 | 0.18 | |||||
T2 | 1.19 ± 0.07 | 1.03 ± 0.00 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 2.67 ± 0.19 | 3.10 ± 0.43 | 4.66 ± 0.01 | 5.16 ± 0.03 | 9.16 ± 0.09 | 10.65 ± 0.46 | 0.23 | 0.25 | |||||
T3 | 1.20 ± 0.03 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 0.43 ± 0.11 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 3.22 ± 0.62 | 2.98 ± 0.33 | 5.77 ± 0.43 | 6.83 ± 0.28 | 11.85 ± 0.49 | 11.38 ± 0.61 | 0.24 | 0.28 | |||||
T4 | 1.16 ± 0.00 | 1.21 ± 0.10 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 0.59 ± 0.17 | 3.07 ± 0.46 | 3.06 ± 0.30 | 7.38 ± 0.32 | 7.61 ± 0.19 | 12.58 ± 0.18 | 17.97 ± 0.65 | 0.26 | 0.28 | |||||
T5 | 1.30 ± 0.07 | 1.38 ± 0.19 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 3.21 ± 0.63 | 3.00 ± 0.44 | 7.49 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.39 | 14.38 ± 0.78 | 12.66 ± 0.47 | 0.28 | 0.31 | |||||
T6 | 1.52 ± 0.08 | 1.49 ± 0.09 | 0.56 ± 0.19 | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 3.32 ± 0.28 | 3.10 ± 0.76 | 6.88 ± 0.77 | 9.38 ± 0.22 | 15.88 ± 0.98 | 14.65 ± 0.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |||||
T7 | 1.66 ± 0.11 | 1.69 ± 0.06 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 3.11 ± 0.58 | 3.40 ± 0.57 | 7.53 ± 0.12 | 9.02 ± 0.39 | 16.33 ± 0.48 | 15.00 ± 1.02 | 0.23 | 0.23 | |||||
r-value | 0.934 a | 0.454 | 0.119 | 0.943 a | 0.761 | 0.933 a | |||||||||||
Significance | 0.586 | 0.23 | 0.957 | 0.009* | 0.676 | 0.013* |
Treatment | Sand percentage (%) | Silt percentage | Clay percentage (%) | WHC | pH | EC | CEC (mois/kg) | OC (%) | N | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | μmol/(L∙cm) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||
T1 | 83 | 81.6 | 7 | 8.4 | 10 | 10 | 32.85 | 38.01 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 270 | 360 | 2.62 | 2.41 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 0.39 | ||||||||
T2 | 81.5 | 81 | 8 | 9 | 9.5 | 10 | 14.15 | 40.23 | 7.4 | 7.6 | 350 | 423 | 2.32 | 2.89 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.41 | ||||||||
T3 | 79 | 78 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 36.05 | 40.67 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 298 | 316 | 2.84 | 2.06 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.48 | ||||||||
T4 | 74.2 | 72 | 14.3 | 16 | 12.5 | 12 | 41.12 | 42.05 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 427 | 246 | 2.97 | 3.31 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 0.49 | ||||||||
T5 | 70 | 68 | 17.6 | 18 | 12.4 | 14 | 47.42 | 43.27 | 8 | 8.1 | 270 | 206 | 5.54 | 3.48 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.47 | ||||||||
T6 | 65 | 64.3 | 21.2 | 20.7 | 13.8 | 15.3 | 44.15 | 45.93 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 377 | 256 | 5.01 | 2.4 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.37 | 0.51 | ||||||||
T7 | 60.3 | 58 | 25.7 | 26 | 14 | 16 | 47.46 | 48.39 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 300 | 426 | 3.61 | 3.12 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.37 | 0.53 | ||||||||
r-value | 0.997 a | 0.997 a | 0.960 a | 0.656 | 0.984 a | 0.217 | 0.32 | 0.418 | 0.960 a | |||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.002** | 0.036* | 0.093 | 0.22 | 1 | 0.854 | 0.147 | 0.303 | 0.000* |
Table 4 Influence of amendments with fly ash and cyanobacteria on basic soil properties.
Treatment | Sand percentage (%) | Silt percentage | Clay percentage (%) | WHC | pH | EC | CEC (mois/kg) | OC (%) | N | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | μmol/(L∙cm) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||
T1 | 83 | 81.6 | 7 | 8.4 | 10 | 10 | 32.85 | 38.01 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 270 | 360 | 2.62 | 2.41 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.3 | 0.39 | ||||||||
T2 | 81.5 | 81 | 8 | 9 | 9.5 | 10 | 14.15 | 40.23 | 7.4 | 7.6 | 350 | 423 | 2.32 | 2.89 | 0.23 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.41 | ||||||||
T3 | 79 | 78 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 36.05 | 40.67 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 298 | 316 | 2.84 | 2.06 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.48 | ||||||||
T4 | 74.2 | 72 | 14.3 | 16 | 12.5 | 12 | 41.12 | 42.05 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 427 | 246 | 2.97 | 3.31 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.35 | 0.49 | ||||||||
T5 | 70 | 68 | 17.6 | 18 | 12.4 | 14 | 47.42 | 43.27 | 8 | 8.1 | 270 | 206 | 5.54 | 3.48 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.47 | ||||||||
T6 | 65 | 64.3 | 21.2 | 20.7 | 13.8 | 15.3 | 44.15 | 45.93 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 377 | 256 | 5.01 | 2.4 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.37 | 0.51 | ||||||||
T7 | 60.3 | 58 | 25.7 | 26 | 14 | 16 | 47.46 | 48.39 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 300 | 426 | 3.61 | 3.12 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.37 | 0.53 | ||||||||
r-value | 0.997 a | 0.997 a | 0.960 a | 0.656 | 0.984 a | 0.217 | 0.32 | 0.418 | 0.960 a | |||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.002** | 0.036* | 0.093 | 0.22 | 1 | 0.854 | 0.147 | 0.303 | 0.000* |
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||||||||||||||
T1 | 1 250 | 1 280 | 4 000 | 3 805 | 45.5 | 45.1 | 300 | 310 | 65 | 73 | 6.9 | 6.4 | |||||||||||||||
T2 | 1 065 | 1 000 | 4 225 | 4 300 | 58.2 | 45.5 | 305 | 300 | 96 | 84 | 8 | 7.4 | |||||||||||||||
T3 | 1 115 | 1 200 | 4 355 | 4 300 | 68 | 45.8 | 393 | 389 | 98 | 93 | 11.5 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
T4 | 1 150 | 1 100 | 4 410 | 4 500 | 48.5 | 45 | 380 | 390 | 110 | 107 | 12 | 11.7 | |||||||||||||||
T5 | 990 | 1 000 | 5 650 | 5 350 | 90 | 113.6 | 265 | 271 | 125 | 123 | 14.3 | 15.4 | |||||||||||||||
T6 | 990 | 970 | 6 650 | 7 000 | 92.5 | 106.8 | 251 | 259 | 139 | 138 | 16 | 15.9 | |||||||||||||||
T7 | 980 | 956 | 7 300 | 7 500 | 103.3 | 114 | 267 | 270 | 143 | 146 | 17.8 | 16.7 | |||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.920 a | 0.991 a | 0.938 a | 0.994 a | 0.974 a | 0.968 a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.81 | 0.791 | 0.824 | 0.144 | 0.496 | 0.214 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | |||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||||||||||||||
T1 | 4.1 | 4 | 37.4 | 35.3 | 3 | 3.4 | 6.6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||
T2 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 39.1 | 40.1 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.9 | |||||||||||||||
T3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 38.8 | 41 | 6.3 | 7 | 9.6 | 9.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 2 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||
T4 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 42.6 | 46.9 | 8.5 | 8.2 | 11.3 | 13.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
T5 | 8.5 | 10.1 | 47.3 | 48.6 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 13.6 | 17 | 2 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 | |||||||||||||||
T6 | 11.5 | 11.9 | 56.7 | 55.3 | 14.7 | 13.4 | 16.1 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
T7 | 13.1 | 12.6 | 55.4 | 56.1 | 17.6 | 17.1 | 16.8 | 16.7 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.979 a | 0.964 a | 0.995 a | 0.946 a | 0.986 a | 0.81 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.256 | 0.332 | 0.63 | 0.072 | 0.201 | 0.232 |
Table 5 Metal content in soil amended by fly ash without and with cyanobacteria. mg/kg
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||||||||||||||
T1 | 1 250 | 1 280 | 4 000 | 3 805 | 45.5 | 45.1 | 300 | 310 | 65 | 73 | 6.9 | 6.4 | |||||||||||||||
T2 | 1 065 | 1 000 | 4 225 | 4 300 | 58.2 | 45.5 | 305 | 300 | 96 | 84 | 8 | 7.4 | |||||||||||||||
T3 | 1 115 | 1 200 | 4 355 | 4 300 | 68 | 45.8 | 393 | 389 | 98 | 93 | 11.5 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
T4 | 1 150 | 1 100 | 4 410 | 4 500 | 48.5 | 45 | 380 | 390 | 110 | 107 | 12 | 11.7 | |||||||||||||||
T5 | 990 | 1 000 | 5 650 | 5 350 | 90 | 113.6 | 265 | 271 | 125 | 123 | 14.3 | 15.4 | |||||||||||||||
T6 | 990 | 970 | 6 650 | 7 000 | 92.5 | 106.8 | 251 | 259 | 139 | 138 | 16 | 15.9 | |||||||||||||||
T7 | 980 | 956 | 7 300 | 7 500 | 103.3 | 114 | 267 | 270 | 143 | 146 | 17.8 | 16.7 | |||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.920 a | 0.991 a | 0.938 a | 0.994 a | 0.974 a | 0.968 a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.81 | 0.791 | 0.824 | 0.144 | 0.496 | 0.214 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | |||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | ||||||||||||||||
T1 | 4.1 | 4 | 37.4 | 35.3 | 3 | 3.4 | 6.6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||
T2 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 39.1 | 40.1 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 | 1.9 | |||||||||||||||
T3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 38.8 | 41 | 6.3 | 7 | 9.6 | 9.9 | 1 | 0.8 | 2 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||
T4 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 42.6 | 46.9 | 8.5 | 8.2 | 11.3 | 13.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
T5 | 8.5 | 10.1 | 47.3 | 48.6 | 11.3 | 11.6 | 13.6 | 17 | 2 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.1 | |||||||||||||||
T6 | 11.5 | 11.9 | 56.7 | 55.3 | 14.7 | 13.4 | 16.1 | 16.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
T7 | 13.1 | 12.6 | 55.4 | 56.1 | 17.6 | 17.1 | 16.8 | 16.7 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.979 a | 0.964 a | 0.995 a | 0.946 a | 0.986 a | 0.81 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.256 | 0.332 | 0.63 | 0.072 | 0.201 | 0.232 |
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||
T1 | 996 | 1 000 | 4 550 | 4 500 | 5.3 | 6 | 285 | 290 | 17 | 18.5 | 4.2 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||
T2 | 980 | 985 | 4 100 | 4 605 | 7 | 8 | 280 | 293 | 20.2 | 19.5 | 5.7 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||
T3 | 976 | 980 | 4 840 | 5 000 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 288 | 301 | 28 | 21.5 | 7 | 6.1 | ||||||||||||||
T4 | 970 | 970 | 4 800 | 4 950 | 9.2 | 10.5 | 276 | 263 | 33 | 25.2 | 10.4 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
T5 | 980 | 965 | 5 800 | 5 550 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 268 | 270 | 38.3 | 29.6 | 11.2 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
T6 | 955 | 880 | 8 125 | 7 600 | 11.7 | 11.5 | 270 | 265 | 38.7 | 32.5 | 13.9 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||
T7 | 880 | 850 | 8 890 | 8 000 | 11.3 | 13.2 | 263 | 252 | 42.5 | 39.3 | 15.1 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.892 | 0.994 a | 0.943 a | 0.909 a | 0.932 a | 0.988 a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.218 | 0.496 | 0.023 | 0.892 | 0.020* | 0.002** | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | ||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||
T1 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
T2 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 5 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
T3 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 4 | 6 | 6.7 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
T4 | 4 | 3.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||
T5 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 11.1 | 9.5 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
T6 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 11.6 | 10.6 | 13.5 | 12.9 | 5.2 | 5 | 3.4 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
T7 | 7.8 | 7 | 9.6 | 10.5 | 12.4 | 10.8 | 14.1 | 13.6 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 4 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.996 a | 0.978 a | 0.986 a | 0.990 a | 0.977 a | 0.995 a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.000* | 0.35 | 0.169 | 0.433 | 0.047* | 0.033* |
Table 6 Elemental uptake of rice root grown in fly ash amended soil. mg/kg
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||
T1 | 996 | 1 000 | 4 550 | 4 500 | 5.3 | 6 | 285 | 290 | 17 | 18.5 | 4.2 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||
T2 | 980 | 985 | 4 100 | 4 605 | 7 | 8 | 280 | 293 | 20.2 | 19.5 | 5.7 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||
T3 | 976 | 980 | 4 840 | 5 000 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 288 | 301 | 28 | 21.5 | 7 | 6.1 | ||||||||||||||
T4 | 970 | 970 | 4 800 | 4 950 | 9.2 | 10.5 | 276 | 263 | 33 | 25.2 | 10.4 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
T5 | 980 | 965 | 5 800 | 5 550 | 10.3 | 10.3 | 268 | 270 | 38.3 | 29.6 | 11.2 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
T6 | 955 | 880 | 8 125 | 7 600 | 11.7 | 11.5 | 270 | 265 | 38.7 | 32.5 | 13.9 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||
T7 | 880 | 850 | 8 890 | 8 000 | 11.3 | 13.2 | 263 | 252 | 42.5 | 39.3 | 15.1 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.892 | 0.994 a | 0.943 a | 0.909 a | 0.932 a | 0.988 a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.218 | 0.496 | 0.023 | 0.892 | 0.020* | 0.002** | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | ||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||
T1 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2 | 1.9 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
T2 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 5 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
T3 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 4.7 | 4 | 6 | 6.7 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
T4 | 4 | 3.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 8.9 | 8.6 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||||
T5 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 11.1 | 9.5 | 11.9 | 10.5 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
T6 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 7.5 | 8.9 | 11.6 | 10.6 | 13.5 | 12.9 | 5.2 | 5 | 3.4 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||
T7 | 7.8 | 7 | 9.6 | 10.5 | 12.4 | 10.8 | 14.1 | 13.6 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 4 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.996 a | 0.978 a | 0.986 a | 0.990 a | 0.977 a | 0.995 a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.000* | 0.35 | 0.169 | 0.433 | 0.047* | 0.033* |
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 950 | 955 | 5 045 | 5 200 | 23.0 | 22.4 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 229 | 210 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 945 | 945 | 5 020 | 5 050 | 25.6 | 22.1 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 203 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 945 | 945 | 5 160 | 5 200 | 28.5 | 23.4 | 8.0 | 12.7 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 189 | 159 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 980 | 956 | 5 560 | 5 450 | 27.6 | 25.0 | 13.8 | 13.0 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 193 | 179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 982 | 960 | 6 740 | 6 851 | 30.0 | 27.0 | 18.9 | 15.0 | 7.6 | 10.8 | 188 | 220 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 940 | 880 | 9 000 | 8 500 | 31.3 | 30.5 | 26.3 | 20.0 | 10.5 | 9.01 | 217 | 225 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 850 | 840 | 9 500 | 9 200 | 31.8 | 29.6 | 33.0 | 24.3 | 10.8 | 10.0 | 228 | 206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.879 | 0.997 a | 0.890 | 0.955 a | 0.883 | 0.498 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.111 | 0.400 | 0.005** | 0.202 | 0.944 | 0.274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 21.3 | 22.0 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 23.0 | 24.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 25.0 | 24.7 | 4.0 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 5.9 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 30.6 | 20.5 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 40.0 | 23.3 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 45.1 | 35.0 | 9.8 | 9.3 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 11.7 | 10.1 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 7.5 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 49.8 | 36.5 | 10.1 | 13.8 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 6.2 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.805 | 0.929 a | 0.942 a | 0.932 a | 0.388 | 0.907 a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.045 | 0.190 | 0.409 | 0.515 | 0.235 | 0.012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA, Fly ash; C, Cyanobacteria. a indicates the positive correlations between FA and cyanobacteria amendments; **, Significance at 0.01 level by the two-tailed paired sample t-test. |
Table 7. Elemental uptake of rice stem grown in fly ash and cyanobacteria amended soil. mg/kg
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 950 | 955 | 5 045 | 5 200 | 23.0 | 22.4 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 229 | 210 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 945 | 945 | 5 020 | 5 050 | 25.6 | 22.1 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 203 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 945 | 945 | 5 160 | 5 200 | 28.5 | 23.4 | 8.0 | 12.7 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 189 | 159 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 980 | 956 | 5 560 | 5 450 | 27.6 | 25.0 | 13.8 | 13.0 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 193 | 179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 982 | 960 | 6 740 | 6 851 | 30.0 | 27.0 | 18.9 | 15.0 | 7.6 | 10.8 | 188 | 220 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 940 | 880 | 9 000 | 8 500 | 31.3 | 30.5 | 26.3 | 20.0 | 10.5 | 9.01 | 217 | 225 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 850 | 840 | 9 500 | 9 200 | 31.8 | 29.6 | 33.0 | 24.3 | 10.8 | 10.0 | 228 | 206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.879 | 0.997 a | 0.890 | 0.955 a | 0.883 | 0.498 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.111 | 0.400 | 0.005** | 0.202 | 0.944 | 0.274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 21.3 | 22.0 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 23.0 | 24.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 4.3 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.0 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 25.0 | 24.7 | 4.0 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 7.0 | 5.9 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 30.6 | 20.5 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 40.0 | 23.3 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 10.9 | 9.6 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 45.1 | 35.0 | 9.8 | 9.3 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 11.7 | 10.1 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 7.5 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 49.8 | 36.5 | 10.1 | 13.8 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 6.2 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.805 | 0.929 a | 0.942 a | 0.932 a | 0.388 | 0.907 a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.045 | 0.190 | 0.409 | 0.515 | 0.235 | 0.012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA, Fly ash; C, Cyanobacteria. a indicates the positive correlations between FA and cyanobacteria amendments; **, Significance at 0.01 level by the two-tailed paired sample t-test. |
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 925 | 930 | 5 666 | 5 200 | 18.6 | 17.3 | 40.0 | 43.0 | 19.3 | 18.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 900 | 928 | 5 500 | 5 240 | 19.7 | 19.2 | 47.7 | 46.1 | 26.3 | 24.9 | 3.0 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 915 | 905 | 5 550 | 5 860 | 19.6 | 20.3 | 50.0 | 53.6 | 25.1 | 27.7 | 3.6 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 930 | 900 | 7 005 | 6 280 | 22.9 | 21.7 | 62.7 | 60.8 | 28.6 | 27.0 | 6.4 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 940 | 960 | 8 350 | 8 050 | 23.8 | 20.6 | 76.9 | 70.0 | 40.6 | 36.5 | 10.3 | 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 845 | 860 | 10 670 | 11 500 | 24.2 | 22.7 | 85.0 | 65.6 | 44.7 | 40.0 | 12.9 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 891 | 871 | 12 700 | 10 580 | 25.0 | 23.4 | 90.0 | 76.0 | 52.0 | 39.6 | 17.0 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.794 | 0.946 a | 0.895 a | 0.957 a | 0.962 a | 0.981 a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.894 | 0.306 | 0.033 | 0.156 | 0.126 | 0.120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 5.6 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.4 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 7.2 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 10.6 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 13.4 | 10.7 | 7.9 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 5.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 8.0 | 4.6 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 14.1 | 12.1 | 10.0 | 5.4 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.951 a | 0.911 a | 0.887 | 0.880 | 0.986 a | 0.920 a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.027 | 0.969 | 0.202 | 0.262 | 0.015 | 0.729 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA, Fly ash; C, Cyanobacteria. a indicates the positive correlations between FA and cyanobacteria amendments. |
Table 8. Elemental uptake of rice seed grown in fly ash and cyanobacteria amended soil. mg/kg
Treatment | Na | K | P | Fe | Mn | Ni | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 925 | 930 | 5 666 | 5 200 | 18.6 | 17.3 | 40.0 | 43.0 | 19.3 | 18.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 900 | 928 | 5 500 | 5 240 | 19.7 | 19.2 | 47.7 | 46.1 | 26.3 | 24.9 | 3.0 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 915 | 905 | 5 550 | 5 860 | 19.6 | 20.3 | 50.0 | 53.6 | 25.1 | 27.7 | 3.6 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 930 | 900 | 7 005 | 6 280 | 22.9 | 21.7 | 62.7 | 60.8 | 28.6 | 27.0 | 6.4 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 940 | 960 | 8 350 | 8 050 | 23.8 | 20.6 | 76.9 | 70.0 | 40.6 | 36.5 | 10.3 | 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 845 | 860 | 10 670 | 11 500 | 24.2 | 22.7 | 85.0 | 65.6 | 44.7 | 40.0 | 12.9 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 891 | 871 | 12 700 | 10 580 | 25.0 | 23.4 | 90.0 | 76.0 | 52.0 | 39.6 | 17.0 | 12.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.794 | 0.946 a | 0.895 a | 0.957 a | 0.962 a | 0.981 a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.894 | 0.306 | 0.033 | 0.156 | 0.126 | 0.120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment | Co | Zn | Cu | Pb | Cr | Cd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | FA | FA+C | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T3 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 8.0 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T4 | 5.6 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 6.4 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T5 | 7.2 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 10.6 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T6 | 7.8 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 13.4 | 10.7 | 7.9 | 5.0 | 6.3 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 5.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T7 | 8.0 | 4.6 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 14.1 | 12.1 | 10.0 | 5.4 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 5.4 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
r-value | 0.951 a | 0.911 a | 0.887 | 0.880 | 0.986 a | 0.920 a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Significance | 0.027 | 0.969 | 0.202 | 0.262 | 0.015 | 0.729 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FA, Fly ash; C, Cyanobacteria. a indicates the positive correlations between FA and cyanobacteria amendments. |
[1] | Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Clemente R, Lepp N, Dickinson N.2010. Mobility of arsenic, cadmium and zinc in a multi-element contaminated soil profile assessed by in-situ soil pore water sampling, column leaching and sequential extraction.Environ Pollut, 158(1): 155-160. |
[2] | Carlson C L, Adriano D C.1993. Environmental impacts of coal combustion residues.J Environ Qual, 22: 227-247. |
[3] | Cooperband L R.2000. Sustainable use of by-products in land management. In: Bartels J M, Dick W A. Land Application of Agricultural, Industrial and Municipal by-products. Soil Science Society of America. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy: 215-236. |
[4] | Dash N P, Kumar A, Singh P K.2015 Cyanobacteria, pesticides and rice interaction.Biodivers Conserv, 24(4): 955-1005. |
[5] | Dick W A, Hao Y L, Stehouwer R C, Bigham J M, Wolfe W E, Adriano D, Beeghly J H, Haefner R J.2000. Beneficial uses flue gas desulphurization by-products: Examples and case studies of land application. In: Bartels J M, Dick W A. Land Application of Agricultural, Industrial and Municipal by-products. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy: 505-536. |
[6] | Haque M E.2013. Indian coal: Production and ways to increase coal supplies.Int J Sci Res Publ, 3: 1-3. |
[7] | Harper D J, Fileman G F, May P V, Portmann J E.1989. The analysis of trace metals in marine and other samples. In: Aquatic Environment Protocols: Analytical Methods MAFF Direct Fish, Research Lowestoft, UK. 3: 1-38. |
[8] | Jan F A, Ishaq M, Khan S, Shakirullah M, Asim S M, Ahmad I, Mabood F.2011. Bioaccumulation of metals in human blood in industrially contaminated area.J Environ Sci, 23: 2069-2077. |
[9] | Kiran B, Thanasekaran K.2011. Metal tolerance of an indigenous cyanobacterial strain, Lyngbya putealis.Int Biodeter Biodegr, 65(8): 1128-1132. |
[10] | Khan M R, Khan M W.1996. The effect of fly ash on plant growth and yield of tomato.Environ Pollut, 92(2): 105-111. |
[11] | Korcak R F.1995. Utilization of coal combustion by-product in agriculture and horticulture. In: Karlen D L, Wright R J, Kemper W D. Agricultural Utilization of Urban and Industrial by-products. Madison, USA: ASA Special Publication: 107-130. |
[12] | Marchner H.1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. New York: Academic Press: 1-260. |
[13] | Martens D C, Schnappinger M G, Zelazny L W.1970. The plant availability of potassium in fly ash.Proc Soil Sci Soc Am, 34: 453-456. |
[14] | Miller D M, Miller W P, Dudka S, Sumner M E.2000. Characterization of industrial by-products. In: Bartels J M, Dick W A. Land Application of Agricultural, Industrial and Municipal by-products. Madison, USA: Soil Science Society of America: 107-126. |
[15] | Mishra M, Sahu R K, Padhy R N.2005a. Growth, yield, metabolism and elemental status of green gram (Phaseolus aureus) and til (Sesamum indicum) grown in soils amended with fly ash.Fresen Environ Bull, 14: 559-564. |
[16] | Mishra M, Sahu R K, Sahu S K, Padhy R N.2005b. Effect of vermicomposted municipal solid-wastes on growth, yield and heavy metal contents of rice (Oryza sativa).Fresen Environ Bull, 14: 584-590. |
[17] | Mishra M, Sahu R K, Padhy R N.2007. Growth, yield, metabolism and elemental status of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in fly ash amended soils.Ecotoxicol, 16: 271-278. |
[18] | Nayak S, Prasanna R.2007. Soil pH and its role in cyanobacterial abundance and diversity in rice field soils.Appl Ecol Environ Res, 5: 103-113. |
[19] | Padhy R N.1985. Agriculture and environment: Cyanobacteria employed as biofertilizers and waste disposers.Nature, 317: 475-476. |
[20] | Parab N, Mishra S, Bhonde S R.2012. Prospects of bulk utilization of fly ash in agriculture for integrated nutrient management.Bull Nat Inst Ecol, 23: 31-46. |
[21] | Parkinson J A, Allen S E.1975. A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of N and mineral nutrients in biological materials.Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 6(1): 1-11. |
[22] | Paudel Y P, Pradhan S, Pant B, Prasad B N.2012. Role of blue green algae in rice productivity.Agric Biol J North Amer, 3(8): 332-335. |
[23] | Pluss A, Ferrel JR R A Y E.1991. Characterization of lead and other heavy metals in fly ash from municipal waste incinerators.Hazard Waste Hazard Matr, 8(4): 275-292. |
[24] | Rai L C, Gour J P, Kumar H D.1981. Phycology and heavy metal pollution.Biol Rev, 56(2): 99-151. |
[25] | Saadatnia H, Riahi H.2009. Cyanobacteria from paddy fields in Iran as a biofertilizer in rice plants.Plant Soil Environ, 55(5): 207-212. |
[26] | Samy N T, Mishra M, Sahu R K, Padhy R N.2010. Growth, yield and metabolism of rice (Oryza sativa L.) during repeated applications of fly ash on soil.Advan Food Sci, 32(2): 110-117. |
[27] | Schmidt S K, Reed S C, Nemergut D R, Grandy A S, Cleveland C C, Weintraub M N, Hill A W, Costello E K, Meyer A F, Neff J C, Martin A M.2008. The earliest stages of ecosystem succession in high-elevation (5000 metres above sea level), recently deglaciated soils.Proc Rolyal Soc, 275: 2793-2802. |
[28] | Sen S, Kumar A.1995. NTPC’s experience in utilization of coal ash. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Fly Ash Management in the State of Orissa. Bhubaneswar, Orissa: 103-121. |
[29] | Sim J T, Pierzynski G M.2000. Assessing the impacts of agricultural, municipal and industrial by-products on soil quality. In: Bartels J M, Dick W A. Land Application of Agricultural, Industrial and Municipal by-products. Madison, USA: Soil Science Society of America: 215-235. |
[30] | Tripathi R D, Dwivedi S, Shukla M K, Mishra S, Srivastava S, Singh R, Rai U N, Gupta D K.2008. Role of blue green algae biofertilizer in ameliorating the nitrogen demand and fly ash stress to the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants.Chemospher, 70: 1919-1929. |
[31] | U S Environmental Protection Agency, Quality criteria for water.1976. U S Environmental EPA 440/9-76-023. EPA, Washington.Please check it.Rabindra: We checked it and corrected. |
[32] | Warren C J, Dudas M J.1984. Weathering process in relation to leachate properties of alkaline fly ash.J Environ Qual, 13(4): 530-538. |
[33] | Woitke M, Degenhardt B, Gade B, Gimmer H.2001. Content and internal distribution of heavy metals in roots of plants grown at alkaline pH on slag from municipal solid waste incineration.J Appl Bot, 75: 59-66. |
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||