Biochemical Responses Associated with Resistance to Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) in Wild Rice Accessions

doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2020.09.002

摘要/Abstract

. [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(6): 449-453.

图/表 6

参考文献 44

[1]	Bacheller J D, Romeo J T.1992. Biotic and abiotic stress effects on nitrogen chemistry in the salt marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora(Poaceae). Chemoecology, 3: 74-80.
[2]	Balachiranjeevi C H, Prahalada G D, Mahender A, Jamaloddin M, Sevilla M A L, Marfori-Nazarea C M, Vinarao R, Sushanto U, Baehaki S E, Li Z K, Ali J.2019. Identification of a novel locus, Bph38(t), conferring resistance to brown planthopper, 215(11): 185.
[3]	Bhanu K V, Lakshmi V J, Katti G, Reddy A V.2014. Antibiosis and tolerance mechanisms of resistance in rice varieties carrying brown planthopper resistance genes. Asian J Biol Life Sci, 3: 108-113.
[4]	Bhonwong A, Stout M J, Attajarusit J, Tantasawat P.2009. Defensive role of tomato polyphenol oxidases against cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and beet armyworm(Spodoptera exigua). J Chem Ecol, 35(1): 28-38.
[5]	Catindig J L A, Arida G S, Baehaki S E, Bentur J S, Cuong L Q, Norowi M, Rattanakarn W, Sriratanasak W, Xia J, Lu Z.2009. Situation of planthoppers in Asia. In: Heong K L, Hardy B. Planthoppers: New Threats to the Sustainability of Intensive Rice Production Systems in Asia. Los Banos, the Philippines: 191-220.
[6]	Dixit G, Praveen A, Tripathi T, Yadav V K, Verma P C.2017. Herbivore-responsive cotton phenolics and their impact on insect performance and biochemistry. J Asia-Pac Entomol, 20(2): 341-351.
[7]	Du B, Zhang W L, Liu B F, Hu J, Wei Z, Shi Z Y, He R F, Zhu L L, Chen R Z, Han B, He G C.2009. Identification and characterization of Bph14, a gene conferring resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 106: 22163-22168.
[8]	Duan C X, Yu J J, Bai J Y, Zhu Z D, Wang X M.2014. Induced defence responses in rice plants against small brown planthopper infestation. Crop J, 2(1): 55-62.
[9]	Felton G W, Bi J L, Summers C B, Mueller A J, Duffey S S.1994. Potential role of lipoxygenases in defence against insect herbivory. J Chem Ecol, 20: 651-666.
[10]	Fischer M K, Shingleton A W.2001. Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Funct Ecol, 15(4): 544-550.
[11]	Fujita D, Kohli A, Horgan F G.2013. Rice resistance to planthoppers and leafhoppers. Crit Rev Plant Sci, 32(3): 162-191.
[12]	Gangaraju P, Shivashankar T, Lohithaswa H C.2017. Genetic basis of resistance to brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stål) in local landraces of rice. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci, 6: 3388-3393.
[13]	Han Y Q, Wu C, Yang L, Zhang D Y, Xiao Y T.2018. Resistance to Nilaparvata lugens in rice lines introgressed with the resistance genes Bph14 and Bph15 and related resistance types. PLoS One, 13(6): e0198630.
[14]	Hao P Y, Liu C X, Wang Y Y, Chen R Z, Tang M, Du B, Zhu L L, He G C.2008. Herbivore induced callose deposition on the sieve plates of rice: An important mechanism for host resistance. Plant Physiol, 146(4): 1810-1820.
[15]	He J P, Chen F D, Chen S M, Lv G S, Deng Y M, Fang W M, Liu Z L, Guan Z Y, He C Y.2011. Chrysanthemum leaf epidermal surface morphology and antioxidant and defence enzyme activity in response to aphid infestation. J Plant Physiol, 168(7): 687-693.
[16]	Howe G A, Jander G.2008. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Ann Rev Plant Biol, 59: 41-66.
[17]	Huang Z, He G, Shu L, Li X, Zhang Q.2001. Identification and mapping of two brown planthopper resistance genes in rice. Theor Appl Genet, 102: 929-934.
[18]	Jayasimha G T, Nalini R, Chinniah C, Muthamilan M, Mini M L.2015. Evaluation of biochemical constituents in healthy and brown planthopper,Nilaparvata lugens(Stål)(Hemiptera: Delphacidae) damaged rice plants. Curr Biot, 9: 129-136.
[19]	Kaur H, Salh P K, Singh B.2017. Role of defence enzymes and phenolics in resistance of wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) towards aphid complex. J Plant Interact, 12: 304-311.
[20]	Khush G S, Brar D S.1991. Genetics of resistance to insects in crop plants. Adv Agron, 45: 223-274.
[21]	Kumar K, Sarao P S, Bhatia D, Neelam K, Kaur A, Mangat G S, Brar D S, Singh K.2018. High-resolution genetic mapping of a novel brown planthopper resistance locus,Bph34 in Oryza sativa L. × Oryza nivara(Sharma & Shastry) derived interspecific F2 population. Theor Appl Genet, 131(5): 1163-1171.
[22]	Li J, Chen Q H, Wang L Q, Liu J, Shang K K, Hua H X.2011. Biological effects of rice harbouring Bph14 and Bph15 on brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Pest Manag Sci, 67(5): 528-534.
[23]	Nanda U K, Dash D, Rath L K.2000. Biochemical basis of resistance in rice to the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Ind J Entomol, 62: 239-241.
[24]	Rani P U, Jyothsna Y.2010. Biochemical and enzymatic changes in rice as a mechanism of defence. Acta Physiol Plant, 32: 695-701.
[25]	Rani P U, Ravibabu M V.2011. Allelochemicals in castor (Ricinus communis) plants and their impact on pest larval feeding as anti-herbivore defensive. Allel J, 27(2): 263-276.
[26]	Rani P U, Pratyusha S.2014. Role of castor plant phenolics on performance of its two herbivores and their impact on egg parasitoid behaviour. BioControl, 59: 513-524.
[27]	Sarao P S, Sahi G K, Kumari N, Mangat G S, Patra B C, Singh K.2016. Donors for resistance to brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens(Stål) from wild rice species. Rice Sci, 23(4): 219-224.
[28]	Scott M I, Thaler S J, Scott G F.2010. Response of a generalist herbivore Trichoplusia ni to jasmonate-mediated induced defence in tomato. J Chem Ecol, 36: 490-499.
[29]	Seino Y, Suzuki Y, Sogawa K.1996. An ovicidal substance produced by rice plants in response to oviposition by the whitebacked planthopper,Sogatella furcifera(HORVATH) (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool, 31(4): 467-473.
[30]	Sogawa K.1982. The rice brown planthopper: Feeding physiology and host plant interactions. Ann Rev Entomol, 27: 49-73.
[31]	Sogawa K, Liu G J, Zhu C G.2003. Inheritance of whitebacked planthopper resistance in Chinese japonica rice Chunjiang 06. Chin J Rice Sci, 17: 73-76. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	Taggar G K, Gill R S, Gupta A K, Singh S.2014. Induced changes in the antioxidative compounds of Vigna mungo genotypes due to infestation by Bemisia tabaci(Gennadius). J Environ Biol, 35(6): 1037-1045.
[33]	Tallamy D W, Stull J, Ehresman N P, Gorski P M, Mason C E.1997. Cucurbitacins as feeding and oviposition deterrents to insects. Environ Entomol, 26(3): 678-683.
[34]	Vanitha K, Suresh S, Gunathilagaraj K.2011. Influence of brown planthopper, Nilaparvava lugens(Stål) feeding on nutritional biochemistry of rice plant. Oryza, 48: 142-146.
[35]	War A R, Paulraj M G, War M Y, Ignacimuthu S.2012. Herbivore induced resistance in different groundnut germplasm lines to Asian armyworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Acta Physiol Plant, 34: 343-352.
[36]	War A R, Paulraj M G, Ignacimuthu S, Sharma H C.2013. Defensive responses in groundnut against chewing and sap- sucking insects. J Plant Growth Regul, 32: 259-272.
[37]	War A R, Paulraj M G, Ignacimuthu S, Sharma H C.2015. Induced resistance to Helicoverpa armigera through exogenous application of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid in groundnut, Arachis hypogaea. Pest Manag Sci, 71(1): 72-82.
[38]	War A R, Taggar G K, Hussain B, Taggar M S, Nair R M, Sharma H C.2018. Plant defence against herbivory and insect adaptations. AoB Plants, 10: ply037.
[39]	Win S S, Muhamad R, Ahmad Z A M, Adam N A.2011. Population fluctuations of brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens Stal. and whitebacked planthopper Sogatella furcifera Horvath on rice. J Entomol, 8(2): 183-190.
[40]	Yamasaki M, Yoshimura A, Yasui H.2003. Genetic basis of ovicidal response to whitebacked planthopper (Sogatella furcifera Horvath) in rice(Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breeding, 12: 133-143.
[41]	Yang Y L, Xu J, Leng Y J, Xiong G S, Hu J, Zhang G H, Huang L C, Wang L, Guo L B, Li J Y, Chen F, Qian Q, Zeng D L.2014. Quantitative trait loci identification, fine mapping and gene expression profiling for ovicidal response to whitebacked planthopper (Sogatella furcifera Horvath) in rice(Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol, 14: 145.
[42]	Yang L, Han Y Q, Li P, Wen L Z, Hou M L.2017. Silicon amendment to rice plants impairs sucking behaviors and population growth in the phloem feeder Nilaparvata lugens(Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Sci Rep, 7: 1101.
[43]	Zhao L Y, Chen J L, Cheng D F, Sun J R, Liu Y, Tian Z.2009. Biochemical and molecular characterizations of Sitobion avenae-induced wheat defence responses. Crop Prot, 28(5): 435-442.
[44]	Zhou S, Lou Y R, Tzin V, Jander G.2015. Alternation of plant primary metabolism in response to insect herbivory. Plant Physiol, 169(3): 1488-1498.

Accession	Modified seed box score	Categorization on the basis of SES	Excreted honeydew area (mm²)	Weight of filter paper with honeydew (mg)	Watery lesion
IRGC99577 (O. punctata)	2.17 ± 0.30	Resistant	74.10 ± 1.10 a	9.50 ± 0.30 a	2.70 ± 0.10 e
IRGC105270 (O. australiensis)	3.43 ± 0.43	Resistant	101.50 ± 1.10 b	13.50 ± 0.50 b	2.50 ± 0.10 de
IRGC105275 (O. australiensis)	4.60 ± 0.40	Moderately resistant	123.70 ± 1.30 c	16.40 ± 0.20 c	2.10 ± 0.10 c
IRGC104646 (O. nivara)	2.85 ± 0.40	Resistant	113.90 ± 1.90 c	14.80 ± 0.40 bc	2.30 ± 0.10 cd
CR100204 (O. nivara)	5.03 ± 0.30	Moderately resistant	147.90 ± 6.30 d	20.00 ± 1.20 d	1.70 ± 0.10 b
Ptb33 (Resistant check)	2.30 ± 0.30	Resistant	78.60 ± 1.20 a	10.10 ± 0.30 a	2.60 ± 0.00 de
TN1 (Susceptible check)	9.00 ± 0.00	Susceptible	412.70 ± 4.30 e	52.40 ± 1.00 e	0.30 ± 0.10 a
LSD_0.05	1.12		0.84	2.21	0.31
SES, Standard evaluation system. Data are Mean ± SE (n = 30 for modified seed box score and 5 for honeydew area and watery lesion). Means within a column followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.

Accession	Modified seed box score	Categorization on the basis of SES	Excreted honeydew area (mm²)	Weight of filter paper with honeydew (mg)	Watery lesion
IRGC99577 (O. punctata)	2.17 ± 0.30	Resistant	74.10 ± 1.10 a	9.50 ± 0.30 a	2.70 ± 0.10 e
IRGC105270 (O. australiensis)	3.43 ± 0.43	Resistant	101.50 ± 1.10 b	13.50 ± 0.50 b	2.50 ± 0.10 de
IRGC105275 (O. australiensis)	4.60 ± 0.40	Moderately resistant	123.70 ± 1.30 c	16.40 ± 0.20 c	2.10 ± 0.10 c
IRGC104646 (O. nivara)	2.85 ± 0.40	Resistant	113.90 ± 1.90 c	14.80 ± 0.40 bc	2.30 ± 0.10 cd
CR100204 (O. nivara)	5.03 ± 0.30	Moderately resistant	147.90 ± 6.30 d	20.00 ± 1.20 d	1.70 ± 0.10 b
Ptb33 (Resistant check)	2.30 ± 0.30	Resistant	78.60 ± 1.20 a	10.10 ± 0.30 a	2.60 ± 0.00 de
TN1 (Susceptible check)	9.00 ± 0.00	Susceptible	412.70 ± 4.30 e	52.40 ± 1.00 e	0.30 ± 0.10 a
LSD_0.05	1.12		0.84	2.21	0.31
SES, Standard evaluation system. Data are Mean ± SE (n = 30 for modified seed box score and 5 for honeydew area and watery lesion). Means within a column followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.

Accession	PAL [μg/(h·mg)]				PPO [U/(min·mg)]
	Leaf blade		Leaf sheath		Leaf blade		Leaf sheath
	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level
IRGC99577	2.23 ± 0.05 e	2.36 ± 0.05 c	1.91 ± 0.04 d	2.16 ± 0.07 d	0.19 ± 0.00 e	0.21 ± 0.01 e	0.16 ± 0.01 d	0.18 ± 0.01 d
IRGC105270	2.02 ± 0.05 d	2.17 ± 0.05 b	1.80 ± 0.03 c	1.94 ± 0.06 c	0.15 ± 0.02 cde	0.17 ± 0.01 cd	0.11 ± 0.00 c	0.13 ± 0.01 bc
IRGC105275	1.80 ± 0.03 bc	1.92 ± 0.02 a	1.51 ± 0.02 b	1.65 ± 0.04 b	0.13 ± 0.01 bc	0.15 ± 0.00 c	0.08 ± 0.00 b	0.12 ± 0.01 bc
IRGC104646	1.93 ± 0.06 cd	2.11 ± 0.06 b	1.71 ± 0.04 c	1.84 ± 0.03 c	0.15 ± 0.01 cd	0.17 ± 0.01 c	0.12 ± 0.01 c	0.13 ± 0.01 c
CR100204	1.75 ± 0.04 b	1.87 ± 0.04 a	1.45 ± 0.03 b	1.60 ± 0.04 b	0.11 ± 0.01 b	0.13 ± 0.01 b	0.08 ± 0.00 b	0.09 ± 0.01 ab
Ptb33	2.25 ± 0.04 e	2.40 ± 0.04 c	1.93 ± 0.03 d	2.20 ± 0.05 d	0.17 ± 0.01 de	0.19 ± 0.01 de	0.14 ± 0.01 d	0.17 ± 0.01 d
TN1	1.57 ± 0.02 a	1.76 ± 0.04 a	1.30 ± 0.02 a	1.39 ± 0.01 a	0.07 ± 0.01 a	0.09 ± 0.00 a	0.05 ± 0.00 a	0.06 ± 0.01 a
LSD_0.05
Accession (A)	0.05		0.04		0.09		0.09
Infestation (I)	0.10		0.08		0.02		0.18
A × I	Not significant		Not significant		Not significant		Not significant
Values are Mean ± SE (n = 3). Means within a column followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.

Accession	PAL [μg/(h·mg)]				PPO [U/(min·mg)]
	Leaf blade		Leaf sheath		Leaf blade		Leaf sheath
	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level
IRGC99577	2.23 ± 0.05 e	2.36 ± 0.05 c	1.91 ± 0.04 d	2.16 ± 0.07 d	0.19 ± 0.00 e	0.21 ± 0.01 e	0.16 ± 0.01 d	0.18 ± 0.01 d
IRGC105270	2.02 ± 0.05 d	2.17 ± 0.05 b	1.80 ± 0.03 c	1.94 ± 0.06 c	0.15 ± 0.02 cde	0.17 ± 0.01 cd	0.11 ± 0.00 c	0.13 ± 0.01 bc
IRGC105275	1.80 ± 0.03 bc	1.92 ± 0.02 a	1.51 ± 0.02 b	1.65 ± 0.04 b	0.13 ± 0.01 bc	0.15 ± 0.00 c	0.08 ± 0.00 b	0.12 ± 0.01 bc
IRGC104646	1.93 ± 0.06 cd	2.11 ± 0.06 b	1.71 ± 0.04 c	1.84 ± 0.03 c	0.15 ± 0.01 cd	0.17 ± 0.01 c	0.12 ± 0.01 c	0.13 ± 0.01 c
CR100204	1.75 ± 0.04 b	1.87 ± 0.04 a	1.45 ± 0.03 b	1.60 ± 0.04 b	0.11 ± 0.01 b	0.13 ± 0.01 b	0.08 ± 0.00 b	0.09 ± 0.01 ab
Ptb33	2.25 ± 0.04 e	2.40 ± 0.04 c	1.93 ± 0.03 d	2.20 ± 0.05 d	0.17 ± 0.01 de	0.19 ± 0.01 de	0.14 ± 0.01 d	0.17 ± 0.01 d
TN1	1.57 ± 0.02 a	1.76 ± 0.04 a	1.30 ± 0.02 a	1.39 ± 0.01 a	0.07 ± 0.01 a	0.09 ± 0.00 a	0.05 ± 0.00 a	0.06 ± 0.01 a
LSD_0.05
Accession (A)	0.05		0.04		0.09		0.09
Infestation (I)	0.10		0.08		0.02		0.18
A × I	Not significant		Not significant		Not significant		Not significant
Values are Mean ± SE (n = 3). Means within a column followed by the same lowercase letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.

Accession	Total phenol (mg/g)				Flavonol (mg/g)				Total free amino acid (mg/g)
	Leaf blade		Leaf sheath		Leaf blade		Leaf sheath		Leaf blade		Leaf sheath
	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level	Constitutive level	Induced level
IRGC99577	6.18 ± 0.06 d	6.36 ± 0.05 d	2.63 ± 0.08 d	2.87 ± 0.03 c	2.49 ± 0.07 e	2.97 ± 0.06 e	0.73 ± 0.07 ab	1.27 ± 0.04 b	1.15 ± 0.12 a	1.30 ± 0.12 a	1.11 ± 0.10 a	1.26 ± 0.13 a
IRGC105270	5.58 ± 0.09 c	5.94 ± 0.05 c	2.16 ± 0.06 c	2.72 ± 0.04 c	1.85 ± 0.13 cd	2.61 ± 0.07 d	0.67 ± 0.08 ab	1.08 ± 0.16 ab	1.44 ± 0.12 abc	1.69 ± 0.11 abc	1.23 ± 0.11 a	1.44 ± 0.15 ab
IRGC105275	5.06 ± 0.06 b	5.30 ± 0.04 b	1.87 ± 0.04 b	2.25 ± 0.07 b	1.68 ± 0.07 bc	1.99 ± 0.06 b	0.62 ± 0.07 ab	0.95 ± 0.09 ab	1.53 ± 0.09 bc	1.80 ± 0.11 bcd	1.25 ± 0.11 a	1.47 ± 0.16 ab
IRGC104646	5.97 ± 0.04 d	6.21 ± 0.06 d	2.18 ± 0.06 c	2.78 ± 0.03 c	2.02 ± 0.04 d	2.34 ± 0.05 c	0.64 ± 0.07 ab	1.02 ± 0.13 ab	1.44 ± 0.11 abc	1.67 ± 0.13 abc	1.22 ± 0.10 a	1.42 ± 0.13 ab
CR100204	4.61 ± 0.07 a	5.16 ± 0.07 b	1.79 ± 0.07 b	2.09 ± 0.07 b	1.49 ± 0.14 b	1.87 ± 0.13 b	0.57 ± 0.05 ab	0.82 ± 0.08 a	1.52 ± 0.07 bc	1.85 ± 0.13 cd	1.31 ± 0.08 a	1.56 ± 0.12 ab
Ptb33	7.62 ± 0.11 e	7.79 ± 0.13 e	2.72 ± 0.07 d	3.77 ± 0.05 d	2.75 ± 0.06 e	3.07 ± 0.06 e	0.78 ± 0.07 b	1.30 ± 0.06 b	1.24 ± 0.07 ab	1.40 ± 0.08 ab	1.16 ± 0.06 a	1.32 ± 0.10 ab
TN1	4.35 ± 0.10 a	4.90 ± 0.03 a	1.42 ± 0.09 a	1.69 ± 0.06 a	1.15 ± 0.08 a	1.52 ± 0.07 a	0.52 ± 0.05 a	0.83 ± 0.11 a	1.70 ± 0.09 c	2.14 ± 0.13 d	1.42 ± 0.11 a	1.76 ± 0.13 b
LSD (P = 0.05)
Accession	0.08		0.07		0.10		0.10		0.12		0.13
Infestation	0.16		0.13		0.18		0.19		0.22		NS
Accession × Infestation	NS		0.19		NS		NS		NS		NS

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 44

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

Regression equation	Coefficient of determination (R²)
Y₁ = -51.05 - 17.39X₁ + 208.48X₂ - 24.87X₃ + 105.65X₄ + 37.08X₅	0.99
Y₂ = -2156.32 + 193.31X₃ - 267.66X₄+ 1667.12X₅	0.81
Y₃ = 19.06 - 18.75X₂ + 1.14X₃ - 3.29X₄ - 12.32X₅	0.92
Y₁ = Damage score, Y₂ = Honeydew excretion, Y₃ = Ovicidal response, X₁ = Phenylalanine ammonia lyase, X₂ = Polyphenol oxidase, X₃ = Total phenols, X₄ = Flavonols, X₅ = Free amino acids.