Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 243-256.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2021.04.004

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2021-01-12 接受日期:2021-03-01 出版日期:2021-05-28 发布日期:2021-05-28

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

0

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(3): 243-256.

使用本文

0
    /   推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.04.004

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2021/V28/I3/243

图/表 13

Fig. 1. Phenotypes of panicles in wild type (WT) and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants. A, Panicles of the WT and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants with spikelets on the branches. Bars are 5 cm. B, Panicles of the WT and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants without spikelets on the branches. Bars are 5 cm. C?H, Numbers of primary branches per panicle (C), numbers of secondary branches per panicle (D), numbers of tertiary branches per panicle (E), numbers of spikelets per panicle (F), numbers of grains per panicle (G) and seed-setting rates (H) of WT and sb1-1/2/3/4/5.The wild type plants and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants were grown in standard paddy field under conventional cultivation conditions. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 10). The Student’s t-test was used to generate the P values. **, P < 0.01.

Fig. 1. Phenotypes of panicles in wild type (WT) and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants. A, Panicles of the WT and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants with spikelets on the branches. Bars are 5 cm. B, Panicles of the WT and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants without spikelets on the branches. Bars are 5 cm. C?H, Numbers of primary branches per panicle (C), numbers of secondary branches per panicle (D), numbers of tertiary branches per panicle (E), numbers of spikelets per panicle (F), numbers of grains per panicle (G) and seed-setting rates (H) of WT and sb1-1/2/3/4/5.The wild type plants and sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants were grown in standard paddy field under conventional cultivation conditions. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 10). The Student’s t-test was used to generate the P values. **, P < 0.01.

Fig. S1. scanning electron microscopy analysis of young panicles of sb1-1 mutant and wild type. A, Wild type panicles. B, Magnified figure of A. C, sb1-1 panicles. D, Magnified figure of C.E, Expression of LAX1, RCN1, OSH1 and MOC3. bm, branch meristem; sm, spikelet meristem. Bars are 500μm. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3). The Student’s t-test was used to generate the P values. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01.

Fig. S1. scanning electron microscopy analysis of young panicles of sb1-1 mutant and wild type. A, Wild type panicles. B, Magnified figure of A. C, sb1-1 panicles. D, Magnified figure of C.E, Expression of LAX1, RCN1, OSH1 and MOC3. bm, branch meristem; sm, spikelet meristem. Bars are 500μm. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3). The Student’s t-test was used to generate the P values. *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01.

Fig. S2. Sequence of motifs predicted by MEME.

Fig. S2. Sequence of motifs predicted by MEME.

Fig. S3. Protein sequence analysis of SHI/LRP/SRS protein family in rice, maize and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Fig. S3. Protein sequence analysis of SHI/LRP/SRS protein family in rice, maize and Arabidopsis thaliana.

Fig. 2. Map-based cloning of SB1. A, Fine mapping of SB1 on chromosome 9. B, Structure of SB1 and mutation sites of sb1-1/2/3/4/5. C, Structure of the SB1-GFP fusion complementary vector. D, Phenotypes of the wild type, sb1-1 and sb1-1-GFP transgenic plant. Bars are 5 cm.ORF, Open reading frame; SB1-comF and SB1-comR, Cloning primers of SB1 for complementary test.

Fig. 2. Map-based cloning of SB1. A, Fine mapping of SB1 on chromosome 9. B, Structure of SB1 and mutation sites of sb1-1/2/3/4/5. C, Structure of the SB1-GFP fusion complementary vector. D, Phenotypes of the wild type, sb1-1 and sb1-1-GFP transgenic plant. Bars are 5 cm.ORF, Open reading frame; SB1-comF and SB1-comR, Cloning primers of SB1 for complementary test.

Fig. 3. SB1 encodes a RING-like zinc finger protein.A, Phylogenetic tree analysis. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor- joining method based on the Jone-Taylor- Thornton matrix-based model, and bootstrap support values calculated from 1 000 replicates are given at the branch nodes. At, Arabidopisis thaliana; Os, Oryza sativa; Zm, Zea mays. B, Location of conserved domains of the genes in the phylogeny tree.

Fig. 3. SB1 encodes a RING-like zinc finger protein.A, Phylogenetic tree analysis. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor- joining method based on the Jone-Taylor- Thornton matrix-based model, and bootstrap support values calculated from 1 000 replicates are given at the branch nodes. At, Arabidopisis thaliana; Os, Oryza sativa; Zm, Zea mays. B, Location of conserved domains of the genes in the phylogeny tree.

Fig. S4. Subcellular location of SB1 by observing the GFP signal in SB1P:SB1: GFP transgenic plants. A, GFP signals in cells of branch meristem. B, DAPI signal in nucleus. C, Merged fluorescence signal of GFP and DAPI.Bars are 50 μm.

Fig. S4. Subcellular location of SB1 by observing the GFP signal in SB1P:SB1: GFP transgenic plants. A, GFP signals in cells of branch meristem. B, DAPI signal in nucleus. C, Merged fluorescence signal of GFP and DAPI.Bars are 50 μm.

Fig. 4. Expression pattern of SB1. A, qPCR analysis of SB1 in root, shoot, leaf, sheath, tiller bud and panicles of different length. Panicles 1, 2 and 3 refer to panicles with the lengths of < 0.5, 0.5?1.0 and 1.1?2.0 cm, respectively. OsActin was used as a reference gene. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3).B?M, GFP signal indicating SB1 expression in complementary transgenic plants harboring the construct SB1P: SB1:GFP. B and C, Panicles at the stage In2; D and E, Panicles at the stage In3; F and G, Panicles at the stage In4; H and I were the magnification figure of a PBM in F and G; J and K, Panicles at the stage In5; L and M were the magnification figure of a PBM in J and K. PBM, Primary branch meristem; SBM, Secondary branch meristem; SM, Spikelet meristem. In2, 3, 4 and 5 refer to the four inflorescence stages of rice during which the branch meristems formed. Bars are 100 μm.

Fig. 4. Expression pattern of SB1. A, qPCR analysis of SB1 in root, shoot, leaf, sheath, tiller bud and panicles of different length. Panicles 1, 2 and 3 refer to panicles with the lengths of < 0.5, 0.5?1.0 and 1.1?2.0 cm, respectively. OsActin was used as a reference gene. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3).B?M, GFP signal indicating SB1 expression in complementary transgenic plants harboring the construct SB1P: SB1:GFP. B and C, Panicles at the stage In2; D and E, Panicles at the stage In3; F and G, Panicles at the stage In4; H and I were the magnification figure of a PBM in F and G; J and K, Panicles at the stage In5; L and M were the magnification figure of a PBM in J and K. PBM, Primary branch meristem; SBM, Secondary branch meristem; SM, Spikelet meristem. In2, 3, 4 and 5 refer to the four inflorescence stages of rice during which the branch meristems formed. Bars are 100 μm.

Fig. 5. Interaction of SB1 with corepressors of OsSEU1 and OsLUG1. A, Autoactivation analysis of SB1 protein. PGBKT7-FZP was used as a positive control and PGBKT7-empty as a negative control. B, SB1 interacted with OsSEU1 and OsLUG1 in yeast cells by a yeast two- hybrid assay. C, SB1 interacted with OsSEU1 and OsLUG1 in epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana by a bimolecular fluorescent complimentary (BiFC) assay. YFP, Yellow fluorescent protein; ChlA, Chlorophyll A; DAPI, 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Bars are 20 μm.

Fig. 5. Interaction of SB1 with corepressors of OsSEU1 and OsLUG1. A, Autoactivation analysis of SB1 protein. PGBKT7-FZP was used as a positive control and PGBKT7-empty as a negative control. B, SB1 interacted with OsSEU1 and OsLUG1 in yeast cells by a yeast two- hybrid assay. C, SB1 interacted with OsSEU1 and OsLUG1 in epidermal cells of Nicotiana benthamiana by a bimolecular fluorescent complimentary (BiFC) assay. YFP, Yellow fluorescent protein; ChlA, Chlorophyll A; DAPI, 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Bars are 20 μm.

Table S1. Interacting proteins of SB1 identified by yeast two-hybrid screening.
No. ID Description
1 Os09g0552800 No apical meristem protein, putative
2 Os12g0580700 Zinc finger, C3HC4 type domain containing protein
3 Os05g0103500 CHCH domain containing protein
4 Os03g0685600 WD40 repeat-like domain containing protein
5 Os01g0231000 OsIAA3 - Auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene family member
6 Os02g0757100 Cell cycle gene
7 Os09g0567000 DUF1618 domain containing protein
8 Os02g0170500 Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C
9 Os02g0261100 Licitor-responsive ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
10 Os04g0510200 Transcriptional corepressor LEUNIG
11 Os06g0160400 Heading and grain weight regulat gene
12 Os02g0203000 bZIP transcription factor domain containing protein
13 Os04g0548000 Ethylene-responsive element-binding protein, putative
14 Os06g0142600 Heading date gene,
15 Os03g0177400 Elongation factor Tu
16 Os03g0192400 NADH dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 13
17 Os02g0255500 Pyrabactin resistance-like abscisic acid receptor
18 Os04g0386900 Transcriptional factor B3 family protein
19 Os10g0575900 Expressed protein
20 Os05g0411300 bZIP transcription factor
21 Os04g0550600 Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase
22 Os04g0615000 Narrow leaf NAL1,
23 Os05g0573500 Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit B
24 Os07g0600400 WD repeat-containing protein 12
25 Os06g0126000 Transcriptional corepressor SEUSS
26 Os02g0170500 Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C
27 Os09g0369050 Similar to DRE binding factor 2
28 Os03g0775500 Expressed protein
29 Os02g0723700 SWI/SNF-related regulator
30 Os02g0122000 Histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP18
31 Os03g0122100 Helix-loop-helix DNA-binding domain containing protein

Table S1. Interacting proteins of SB1 identified by yeast two-hybrid screening.

No. ID Description
1 Os09g0552800 No apical meristem protein, putative
2 Os12g0580700 Zinc finger, C3HC4 type domain containing protein
3 Os05g0103500 CHCH domain containing protein
4 Os03g0685600 WD40 repeat-like domain containing protein
5 Os01g0231000 OsIAA3 - Auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene family member
6 Os02g0757100 Cell cycle gene
7 Os09g0567000 DUF1618 domain containing protein
8 Os02g0170500 Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C
9 Os02g0261100 Licitor-responsive ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
10 Os04g0510200 Transcriptional corepressor LEUNIG
11 Os06g0160400 Heading and grain weight regulat gene
12 Os02g0203000 bZIP transcription factor domain containing protein
13 Os04g0548000 Ethylene-responsive element-binding protein, putative
14 Os06g0142600 Heading date gene,
15 Os03g0177400 Elongation factor Tu
16 Os03g0192400 NADH dehydrogenase 1 alpha subcomplex subunit 13
17 Os02g0255500 Pyrabactin resistance-like abscisic acid receptor
18 Os04g0386900 Transcriptional factor B3 family protein
19 Os10g0575900 Expressed protein
20 Os05g0411300 bZIP transcription factor
21 Os04g0550600 Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase
22 Os04g0615000 Narrow leaf NAL1,
23 Os05g0573500 Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit B
24 Os07g0600400 WD repeat-containing protein 12
25 Os06g0126000 Transcriptional corepressor SEUSS
26 Os02g0170500 Nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C
27 Os09g0369050 Similar to DRE binding factor 2
28 Os03g0775500 Expressed protein
29 Os02g0723700 SWI/SNF-related regulator
30 Os02g0122000 Histone deacetylase complex subunit SAP18
31 Os03g0122100 Helix-loop-helix DNA-binding domain containing protein
Fig. 6. SB1 directly repressed expression of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1. A, Binding peaks of SB1 with DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 by chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequence (ChIP-seq) using an anti-GFP antibody.B, Relative expression of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 in the wild type (WT) and sb1 panicles, respectively.C, ChIP-qPCR for P1 and P2 sites of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 with anti-GFP antibody, respectively. ChIP enrichment compared with the input sample was tested by qPCR. D, ChIP-qPCR for several sites of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 with a H3K9Ac antibody, respectively. ChIP enrichment compared with the IgG sample was tested by qPCR.Pro, Promoter; P1 to P6 represent primers for ChIP-qPCR. Error bars indicated SD of three repeats. The Student’s t-test was used to generate the P values. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Fig. 6. SB1 directly repressed expression of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1. A, Binding peaks of SB1 with DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 by chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequence (ChIP-seq) using an anti-GFP antibody.B, Relative expression of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 in the wild type (WT) and sb1 panicles, respectively.C, ChIP-qPCR for P1 and P2 sites of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 with anti-GFP antibody, respectively. ChIP enrichment compared with the input sample was tested by qPCR. D, ChIP-qPCR for several sites of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 with a H3K9Ac antibody, respectively. ChIP enrichment compared with the IgG sample was tested by qPCR.Pro, Promoter; P1 to P6 represent primers for ChIP-qPCR. Error bars indicated SD of three repeats. The Student’s t-test was used to generate the P values. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Fig. 7. Model of SB1 gene regulating rice panicle architecture. In the wild type plants, SB1 interacts with the corepressors OsSEU1 and OsLUG1 to form the repression complex and repress DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 by downregulating the acetylation levels of histone on chromosome. In the sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants, the repression complex cannot work, resulting in the increased acetylation levels and the expression levels of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1, which enables the formation of the increased numbers of branches and spikelets.HDACs, Histone deacetylases; BM, Branch meristem; PB, Primary branch; SB, Secondary branch; TB, Tertiary branch.

Fig. 7. Model of SB1 gene regulating rice panicle architecture. In the wild type plants, SB1 interacts with the corepressors OsSEU1 and OsLUG1 to form the repression complex and repress DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1 by downregulating the acetylation levels of histone on chromosome. In the sb1-1/2/3/4/5 mutants, the repression complex cannot work, resulting in the increased acetylation levels and the expression levels of DEP1, TAW1, MOC1 and IPA1, which enables the formation of the increased numbers of branches and spikelets.HDACs, Histone deacetylases; BM, Branch meristem; PB, Primary branch; SB, Secondary branch; TB, Tertiary branch.

Table S2. Primers used in the study.
Purpose Primer name Sequence
Mapping SSR1-F CAGTGGCGTGGAGAGAAATTTGG
SSR1-R CTCACCTGCGACAGCAAGATCG
SSR2-F TGAGCACCATGCAATAACTGTCG
SSR2-R ACCATCTATCGCCACATCTCACC
SNP-1-F CGGGACATTCTTAGCTTTGCTTTGAT
SNP-1-R GAAAGTAGTAGTCTCACCATGCTTTGCCAC
SNP-2-F CCCACACTGACTGGGACTCACTCG
SNP-2-R GATTAGCGTCTCGTCCTCGCAGC
Candidate gene cloning SB1-F GCAATGGCACAAGTGACACTACAAGA
SB1-R CTCCGATCAGTTCACGCAAAGTCG
Complementation test SB1-com-F GTATTTGTCTGTGCTGGATCCGTGTGCGAAGGGATACATGATGAAGC
SB1-com-R CGCCCTTGCTCACCATACTAGTCGGCCGCGGGTGGCC
qPCR Actin-F TGCTATGTACGTCGCCATCCAG
Actin-R AATGAGTAACCACGCTCCGTCA
RT-SB1-F AACGCCACTACAATCTCTCACTCGC
RT-SB1-R AGTCTAAAGGGTTCGCCTGCCTAA
RT- MOC1-F CTGTGGTTGCATGACACAGATGCAC
RT- MOC1-R CCTTGGATGGAATGTCTCAGTCCC
RT- DEP1-F CCGTTTCTCGTTCTGGAT
RT- DEP1-R ATCTGTGCCTCCTTCTCT
RT-IPA1-F TCTTCTGTCAACCCAGCCAT
RT-IPA1-R GCCATCAAAGCTGGTGGTAG
RT-TAW1-F GACTGGAACACGTTCGGGCAGTAC
RT-TAW1-R CACCTTGGTCTTGCCGAACTGGT
RT-LAX1-F TGACGACGCTGGAGATGGCG
RT-LAX1-R GGAGGCAGCTGATGAGCGCC
RT-RCN11-F GACAGCAACCTGCTCAAGGTCATCTC
RT-RCN1-R GCTGGTCGATTAGCTCCTTCACCC
RT-OSH1-F CAGGACCTGGAGCTTCGCCAG
RT-OSH1-R GGAGAGCGTGTTGAGCTGCGTCT
RT-MOC3-F GGATCAGGCCAACGTCGTCAACT
RT-MOC3-R CGACTGGGAAGAGTGGAAGCGTCT
Two-Hybrid System SB1-BD-F1 ATGGGCAGCGGCGGCGGT
SB1-BD-R1 GAACATCCCACGGTTTGGAGGTT
SEU-AD-F1 ATGTCCAACCTCCAAACCGTGGG
SEU-AD-R1- CTAAGATCCACAGATGGACATGGAGAG
LEU-AD-F1 ATGTCGTCGCTCAGCCGGGAG
LEU-AD-R1 CTATCTTTGGATTTGGTCTGCAGCT
BiFC assay SB1-YC-F CAATTACAGGTACCCGGGGATCCATGGCGGGGTTCCCTCTAGGC
SB1-YC-R TGCACGCTGCCACCGCCGTCGACCGGCCGCGGGTGGCCGTGGAA
OsLUG1-YN-F CATCGAGGACGCCGGCGGATCCATGGCGCAGAGCAACTGGGAAG
OsLUG1-YN-R GAACGAAAGCTCTGCAGGTCGACCTTCCACAGCTTGACAGAGTTGTCG
OsSEU1-YN-F CATCGAGGACGCCGGCGGATCCATGTCTGGGGCGCCATGCTC
OsSEU1-YN-R GAACGAAAGCTCTGCAGGTCGACCATGTTCCATGAGTAGCCACCACCT
ChIP-qPCR DEP1-P1-F CGCCCACACACAACACAGCTAG
DEP1-P1-R GACCGGGAACACACGTTGTCA
DEP1-P2-F AGCTCAACTGAACGCTGGCTG
DEP1-P2-R CCACCACTGCTGCTACTGCCTA
DEP1-P3-F ACGAAGGATCGGCTTTGCAT
DEP1-P3-R CGAGCCTACGTTGGATACGCT
DEP1-P4-F GGAGCTACCCGCTACTGCAAG
DEP1-P4-R CGTGATTCACCTCCGCCTAGA
DEP1-P5-F CCTGCATCATAACGTTCCTAGTGGT
DEP1-P5-R CTCAGGACTGTGAGCTGTAATATGG
DEP1-P6-F GCTGTAGTCCAGACTGCTGCTCATG
DEP1-P6-R GTTGCACTGGGACTTGAAGCATG
TAW1-P1-F TGGACCAGTTCGGCAAGACCAAG
TAW1-P1-R TGCTCGCGGACCTCGCGGAGGTAG
TAW1-P2-F TCGAGTCATGTCAGCACTGTGGC
TAW1-P2-R GCATCACTCTCTTAACGCTGCTGC
TAW1-P3-F TCTCTCTCTCTCTTGGACCACTGCG
TAW1-P3-R CGAACTCCATCGTCGATCTGCAC
TAW1-P4-F CGAGCAGGTACGAGTCGCAGAAG
TAW1-P4-R CTTGGTCTTGCCGAACTGGTCC
TAW1-P5-F ACTCCACTCCACTCCACTCCACTATG
TAW1-P5-R TAGTAGACGAGACGACGTGCGAGAG
TAW1-P6-F CTCTCTCTCTGCTGCTGCAACAAG
TAW1-P6-R CTGCCTGACTGACTGACTCTCTCTG
MOC1-P1-F GAGTGGCACTTGCTACTGTGCATG
MOC1-P1-R TGATGATGGCCTCCAGATAACTTCC
MOC1-P2-F TATGGCACAAACAGTCACAGCTGC
MOC1-P2-R TGCTCATTCCTTGATGAGAGAGTGAG
MOC1-P4-F GTGGAGAGCCGGAATCAACACTGT
MOC1-P4-R GACATATAATGATACTCCGGCCATCTC
MOC1-P5-F GCTGGGATTGCACAGTGAAGCTAG
MOC1-P5-R GCACGTCCAACATCTGGGCTT
MOC1-P6-F TACCTGGCGTTCAACCAGATCG
MOC1-P6-R CGTCGAGGTCGAGGATGTGGAC
IPA1-P1-F GAGTGGCACTTGCTACTGTGCATG
IPA1-P1-R TGATGATGGCCTCCAGATAACTTCC
IPA1-P2-F TATGGCACAAACAGTCACAGCTGC
IPA1-P2-R TGCTCATTCCTTGATGAGAGAGTGAG
IPA1-P3-F CCAGTTACAACCCTCCACCATTCAC
IPA1-P3-R TGTGGCAGTGCCCACAGTGTGT
IPA1-P6-F GACGTGGCGTGTGGCAATGTAG
IPA1-P6-R TACTCCGACGAGCCTCCTTTCTCT

Table S2. Primers used in the study.

Purpose Primer name Sequence
Mapping SSR1-F CAGTGGCGTGGAGAGAAATTTGG
SSR1-R CTCACCTGCGACAGCAAGATCG
SSR2-F TGAGCACCATGCAATAACTGTCG
SSR2-R ACCATCTATCGCCACATCTCACC
SNP-1-F CGGGACATTCTTAGCTTTGCTTTGAT
SNP-1-R GAAAGTAGTAGTCTCACCATGCTTTGCCAC
SNP-2-F CCCACACTGACTGGGACTCACTCG
SNP-2-R GATTAGCGTCTCGTCCTCGCAGC
Candidate gene cloning SB1-F GCAATGGCACAAGTGACACTACAAGA
SB1-R CTCCGATCAGTTCACGCAAAGTCG
Complementation test SB1-com-F GTATTTGTCTGTGCTGGATCCGTGTGCGAAGGGATACATGATGAAGC
SB1-com-R CGCCCTTGCTCACCATACTAGTCGGCCGCGGGTGGCC
qPCR Actin-F TGCTATGTACGTCGCCATCCAG
Actin-R AATGAGTAACCACGCTCCGTCA
RT-SB1-F AACGCCACTACAATCTCTCACTCGC
RT-SB1-R AGTCTAAAGGGTTCGCCTGCCTAA
RT- MOC1-F CTGTGGTTGCATGACACAGATGCAC
RT- MOC1-R CCTTGGATGGAATGTCTCAGTCCC
RT- DEP1-F CCGTTTCTCGTTCTGGAT
RT- DEP1-R ATCTGTGCCTCCTTCTCT
RT-IPA1-F TCTTCTGTCAACCCAGCCAT
RT-IPA1-R GCCATCAAAGCTGGTGGTAG
RT-TAW1-F GACTGGAACACGTTCGGGCAGTAC
RT-TAW1-R CACCTTGGTCTTGCCGAACTGGT
RT-LAX1-F TGACGACGCTGGAGATGGCG
RT-LAX1-R GGAGGCAGCTGATGAGCGCC
RT-RCN11-F GACAGCAACCTGCTCAAGGTCATCTC
RT-RCN1-R GCTGGTCGATTAGCTCCTTCACCC
RT-OSH1-F CAGGACCTGGAGCTTCGCCAG
RT-OSH1-R GGAGAGCGTGTTGAGCTGCGTCT
RT-MOC3-F GGATCAGGCCAACGTCGTCAACT
RT-MOC3-R CGACTGGGAAGAGTGGAAGCGTCT
Two-Hybrid System SB1-BD-F1 ATGGGCAGCGGCGGCGGT
SB1-BD-R1 GAACATCCCACGGTTTGGAGGTT
SEU-AD-F1 ATGTCCAACCTCCAAACCGTGGG
SEU-AD-R1- CTAAGATCCACAGATGGACATGGAGAG
LEU-AD-F1 ATGTCGTCGCTCAGCCGGGAG
LEU-AD-R1 CTATCTTTGGATTTGGTCTGCAGCT
BiFC assay SB1-YC-F CAATTACAGGTACCCGGGGATCCATGGCGGGGTTCCCTCTAGGC
SB1-YC-R TGCACGCTGCCACCGCCGTCGACCGGCCGCGGGTGGCCGTGGAA
OsLUG1-YN-F CATCGAGGACGCCGGCGGATCCATGGCGCAGAGCAACTGGGAAG
OsLUG1-YN-R GAACGAAAGCTCTGCAGGTCGACCTTCCACAGCTTGACAGAGTTGTCG
OsSEU1-YN-F CATCGAGGACGCCGGCGGATCCATGTCTGGGGCGCCATGCTC
OsSEU1-YN-R GAACGAAAGCTCTGCAGGTCGACCATGTTCCATGAGTAGCCACCACCT
ChIP-qPCR DEP1-P1-F CGCCCACACACAACACAGCTAG
DEP1-P1-R GACCGGGAACACACGTTGTCA
DEP1-P2-F AGCTCAACTGAACGCTGGCTG
DEP1-P2-R CCACCACTGCTGCTACTGCCTA
DEP1-P3-F ACGAAGGATCGGCTTTGCAT
DEP1-P3-R CGAGCCTACGTTGGATACGCT
DEP1-P4-F GGAGCTACCCGCTACTGCAAG
DEP1-P4-R CGTGATTCACCTCCGCCTAGA
DEP1-P5-F CCTGCATCATAACGTTCCTAGTGGT
DEP1-P5-R CTCAGGACTGTGAGCTGTAATATGG
DEP1-P6-F GCTGTAGTCCAGACTGCTGCTCATG
DEP1-P6-R GTTGCACTGGGACTTGAAGCATG
TAW1-P1-F TGGACCAGTTCGGCAAGACCAAG
TAW1-P1-R TGCTCGCGGACCTCGCGGAGGTAG
TAW1-P2-F TCGAGTCATGTCAGCACTGTGGC
TAW1-P2-R GCATCACTCTCTTAACGCTGCTGC
TAW1-P3-F TCTCTCTCTCTCTTGGACCACTGCG
TAW1-P3-R CGAACTCCATCGTCGATCTGCAC
TAW1-P4-F CGAGCAGGTACGAGTCGCAGAAG
TAW1-P4-R CTTGGTCTTGCCGAACTGGTCC
TAW1-P5-F ACTCCACTCCACTCCACTCCACTATG
TAW1-P5-R TAGTAGACGAGACGACGTGCGAGAG
TAW1-P6-F CTCTCTCTCTGCTGCTGCAACAAG
TAW1-P6-R CTGCCTGACTGACTGACTCTCTCTG
MOC1-P1-F GAGTGGCACTTGCTACTGTGCATG
MOC1-P1-R TGATGATGGCCTCCAGATAACTTCC
MOC1-P2-F TATGGCACAAACAGTCACAGCTGC
MOC1-P2-R TGCTCATTCCTTGATGAGAGAGTGAG
MOC1-P4-F GTGGAGAGCCGGAATCAACACTGT
MOC1-P4-R GACATATAATGATACTCCGGCCATCTC
MOC1-P5-F GCTGGGATTGCACAGTGAAGCTAG
MOC1-P5-R GCACGTCCAACATCTGGGCTT
MOC1-P6-F TACCTGGCGTTCAACCAGATCG
MOC1-P6-R CGTCGAGGTCGAGGATGTGGAC
IPA1-P1-F GAGTGGCACTTGCTACTGTGCATG
IPA1-P1-R TGATGATGGCCTCCAGATAACTTCC
IPA1-P2-F TATGGCACAAACAGTCACAGCTGC
IPA1-P2-R TGCTCATTCCTTGATGAGAGAGTGAG
IPA1-P3-F CCAGTTACAACCCTCCACCATTCAC
IPA1-P3-R TGTGGCAGTGCCCACAGTGTGT
IPA1-P6-F GACGTGGCGTGTGGCAATGTAG
IPA1-P6-R TACTCCGACGAGCCTCCTTTCTCT

参考文献 52

[1] Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S Y, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, Nishimura A, Angeles E R, Qian Q, Kitano H, Matsuoka M. 2005. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science, 309: 741‒745.
[2] Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E. 1997. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science, 275: 80‒83.
[3] Conner J, Liu Z. 2000. LEUNIG, a putative transcriptional corepressor that regulates AGAMOUS expression during flower development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 97(23): 12902‒12907.
[4] Duan E C, Wang Y H, Li X H, Lin Q B, Zhang T, Wang Y P, Zhou C L, Zhang H, Jiang L, Wang J L, Lei C L, Zhang X, Guo X P, Wang H Y, Wan J M. 2019. OsSHI1 regulates plant architecture through modulating the transcriptional activity of IPA1 in rice. Plant Cell, 31(5): 1026.
[5] Franks R G, Wang C X, Levin J Z, Liu Z C. 2002. SEUSS, a member of a novel family of plant regulatory proteins, represses floral homeotic gene expression with LEUNIG. Development, 129(1): 253‒263.
[6] Fridborg I, Kuusk S, Robertson M, Sundberg E. 2001. The Arabidopsis protein SHI represses gibberellin responses in Arabidopsis and barley. Plant Physiol, 127(3): 937‒948.
[7] Gao X C, Liang W Q, Yin C S, Ji S M, Wang H M, Su X, Guo C C, Kong H Z, Xue H W, Zhang D B. 2010. The SEPALLATA-like gene OsMADS34 is required for rice inflorescence and spikelet development. Plant Physiol, 153(2): 728‒740.
[8] Gonzalez D, Bowen A J, Carroll T S, Conlan R S. 2007. The transcription corepressor LEUNIG interacts with the histone deacetylase HDA19 and mediator components MED14 (SWP) and CDK8 (HEN3) to repress transcription. Mol Cell Biol, 27(15): 5306‒5315.
[9] Guo S Y, Sun B, Looi L S, Xu Y F, Gan E S, Huang J B, Ito T. 2015. Co-ordination of flower development through epigenetic regulation in two model species: Rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol, 56(5): 830‒842.
[10] Hu B, Wang W, Ou S J, Tang J Y, Li H, Che R H, Zhang Z H, Chai X Y, Wang H R, Wang Y Q, Liang C Z, Liu L C, Piao Z Z, Deng Q Y, Deng K, Xu C, Liang Y, Zhang L H, Li L G, Chu C C. 2015. Variation in NRT1. 1B contributes to nitrate-use divergence between rice subspecies. Nat Genet, 47(7): 834‒838.
[11] Huang W T, Bai G X, Wang J, Zhu W, Zeng Q S. 2018. Two splicing variants of OsNPF7.7 regulate shoot branching and nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice. Front Plant Sci, 9: 300.
[12] Huang X Z, Qian Q, Liu Z B, Sun H Y, He S Y, Luo D, Xia G M, Chu C C, Li J Y, Fu X D. 2009. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet, 41(4): 494‒497.
[13] Ikeda-Kawakatsu K, Maekawa M, Izawa T, Itoh J I, Nagato Y. 2012. ABERRANT PANICLE ORGANIZATION 2/RFL, the rice ortholog of Arabidopsis LEAFY, suppresses the transition from inflorescence meristem to floral meristem through interaction with APO1. Plant J, 69(1): 168‒180.
[14] Jiao Y Q, Wang Y H, Xue D W, Wang J, Yan M X, Liu G F, Dong G J, Zeng D L, Lu Z F, Zhu X D, Qian Q, Li J Y. 2010. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat Genet, 42(6): 541‒544.
[15] Kobayashi K, Maekawa M, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kyozuka J. 2010. PANICLE PHYTOMER2 (PAP2), encoding a SEPALLATA subfamily MADS-box protein, positively controls spikelet meristem identity in rice. Plant Cell Physiol, 51(1): 47‒57.
[16] Kurakawa T, Ueda N, Maekawa M, Kobayashi K, Kojima M, Nagato Y, Sakakibara H, Kyozuka J. 2007. Direct control of shoot meristem activity by a cytokinin-activating enzyme. Nature, 445: 652‒655.
[17] Kuusk S, Sohlberg J J, Long J A, Fridborg I, Sundberg E. 2002. STY1 and STY2 promote the formation of apical tissues during Arabidopsis gynoecium development. Development, 129(20): 4707‒4717.
[18] Kuusk S, Sohlberg J J, Eklund D M, Sundberg E. 2010. Functionally redundant SHI family genes regulate Arabidopsis gynoecium development in a dose-dependent manner. Plant J, 47(1): 99‒111.
[19] Li F, Liu W B, Tang J Y, Chen J F, Tong H N, Hu B, Li C L, Fang J, Chen M S, Chu C C. 2010. Rice DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE 2 is essential for determining panicle outgrowth and elongation. Cell Res, 20(7): 838‒849.
[20] Li M, Tang D, Wang K J, Wu X R, Lu L L, Yu H X, Gu M H, Yan C J, Cheng Z K. 2011. Mutations in the F-box gene LARGER PANICLE improve the panicle architecture and enhance the grain yield in rice. Plant Biotechnol J, 9(9): 1002‒1013.
[21] Li S B, Qian Q, Fu Z M, Zeng D L, Meng X B, Kyozuka J, Maekawa M, Zhu X D, Zhang J, Li J Y, Wang Y H. 2009. Short panicle1 encodes a putative PTR family transporter and determines rice panicle size. Plant J, 58(4): 592‒605.
[22] Li S Y, Zhao B R, Yuan D Y, Duan M J, Qian Q, Tang L, Wang B, Liu X Q, Zhang J, Wang J, Sun J Q, Liu Z, Feng Y Q, Yuan L P, Li C Y. 2013. Rice zinc finger protein DST enhances grain production through controlling Gn1a/OsCKX2 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110(8): 3167‒3172.
[23] Li W Q, Wu J G, Weng S L, Zhang Y J, Zhang D P, Shi C H. 2010. Identification and characterization of dwarf 62, a loss-of- function mutation in DLT/OsGRAS-32 affecting gibberellin metabolism in rice. Planta, 232(6): 1383‒1396.
[24] Li X G, Qian Q, Fu Z M, Wang Y H, Xiong G S, Zeng D L, Wang X Q, Liu X F, Teng S, Hiroshi F, Yuan M, Luo D, Han B, Li J Y. 2003. Control of tillering in rice. Nature, 422: 618‒621.
[25] Li Z K, Pinson S R M, Stansel J W, Paterson A H. 1998. Genetic dissection of the source-sink relationship affecting fecundity and yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breeding, 4(5): 419‒426.
[26] Liu Z C, Karmarkar V. 2008. Groucho/Tup1 family co-repressors in plant development. Trends Plant Sci, 13(3): 137‒144.
[27] Lu Z F, Yu H, Xiong G S, Wang J, Jiao Y Q, Liu G F, Jing Y H, Meng X B, Hu X M, Qian Q, Fu X D, Wang Y H, Li J Y. 2013. Genome-wide binding analysis of the transcription activator IDEAL PLANT ARCHITECTURE1 reveals a complex network regulating rice plant architecture. Plant Cell, 25(10): 3743‒3759.
[28] Mimida N, Goto K, Kobayashi Y, Araki T, Ahn J H, Weigel D, Murata M, Motoyoshi F, Sakamoto W. 2001. Functional divergence of the TFL1-like gene family in Arabidopsis revealed by characterization of a novel homologue. Genes Cells, 6(4): 327‒336.
[29] Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song X J, Ito M, Asano K, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Ashikari M. 2010. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet, 42(6): 545‒549.
[30] Nakagawa M, Shimamoto K, Kyozuka J. 2002. Overexpression of RCN1 and RCN2, rice TERMINAL FLOWER 1/CENTRORADIALIS homologs, confers delay of phase transition and altered panicle morphology in rice. Plant J, 29(6): 743‒750.
[31] Rao N N, Prasad K, Kumar P R, Vijayraghavan U. 2008. Distinct regulatory role for RFL, the rice LFY homolog, in determining flowering time and plant architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(9): 3646‒3651.
[32] Ratcliffe O J, Bradley D J, Coen E S. 1999. Separation of shoot and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Development, 126(6): 1109‒1120.
[33] Sheng P K, Wu F Q, Tan J J, Zhang H, Ma W W, Chen L P, Wang J C, Wang J, Zhu S S, Guo X P, Wang J L, Zhang X, Cheng Z J, Bao Y Q, Wu C Y, Liu X M, Wan J M. 2016. A CONSTANS-like transcriptional activator, OsCOL13, functions as a negative regulator of flowering downstream of OsphyB and upstream of Ehd1 in rice. Plant Mol Biol, 92(1): 209‒222.
[34] Shi B H, Zhang C, Tian C H, Wang J, Wang Q, Xu T F, Xu Y, Ohno C, Sablowski R, Heisler M G, Theres K, Wang Y, Jiao Y L. 2016. Two-step regulation of a meristematic cell population acting in shoot branching in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet, 12(7): e1006168.
[35] Sitaraman J, Bui M, Liu Z C. 2008. LEUNIG_HOMOLOG and LEUNIG perform partially redundant functions during Arabidopsis embryo and floral development. Plant Physiol, 147(2): 672‒681.
[36] Skirpan A, Wu X T, McSteen P. 2008. Genetic and physical interaction suggest that BARREN STALK1 is a target of BARREN INFLORESCENCE2 in maize inflorescence development. Plant J, 55(5): 787‒797.
[37] Sridhar V V, Surendrarao A, Gonzalez D, Steven Conlan R, Liu Z C. 2004. Transcriptional repression of target genes by LEUNIG and SEUSS, two interacting regulatory proteins for Arabidopsis flower development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101(31): 11494‒11499.
[38] Tabuchi H, Zhang Y, Hattori S, Omae M, Shimizu-Sato S, Oikawa T, Qian Q, Nishimura M, Kitano H, Xie H, Fang X H, Yoshida H, Kyozuka J, Chen F, Sato Y. 2011. LAX PANICLE2 of rice encodes a novel nuclear protein and regulates the formation of axillary meristems. Plant Cell, 23(9): 3276‒3287.
[39] Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol, 28(10): 2731‒2739.
[40] Teng S, Qian Q, Zeng D L, Kunihiro Y, Huang D N, Zhu L H. 2002. QTL analysis of rice peduncle vascular bundle system and panicle traits. Acta Bot Sin, 44(3): 301‒306. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41] Wang L, Zeng X Q, Zhuang H, Shen Y L, Chen H, Wang Z W, Long J C, Ling Y H, He G H, Li Y F. 2017. Ectopic expression of OsMADS1 caused dwarfism and spikelet alteration in rice. Plant Growth Regul, 81(3): 433‒442.
[42] Wang W, Hu B, Yuan D Y, Liu Y Q, Che R H, Hu Y C, Ou S J, Liu Y X, Zhang Z H, Wang H R, Li H, Jiang Z M, Zhang Z L, Gao X K, Qiu Y H, Meng X B, Liu Y X, Bai Y, Liang Y, Wang Y Q, Zhang L H, Li L G, Sodmergen S, Jing H C, Li J Y, Chu C C. 2018. Expression of the nitrate transporter gene OsNRT1.1A/ OsNPF6.3 confers high yield and early maturation in rice. Plant Cell, 30(3): 638‒651.
[43] Wang Y H, Li J Y. 2011. Branching in rice. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 14(1): 94‒99.
[44] Wei X J, Xu J F, Guo H N, Jiang L, Chen S H, Yu C, Zhou Z L, Hu P S, Zhai H Q, Wan J M. 2010. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol, 153(4): 1747‒1758.
[45] Wu Y, Wang Y, Mi X F, Shan J X, Li X M, Xu J L, Lin H X. 2016. The QTL GNP1 encodes GA20ox1, which increases grain number and yield by increasing cytokinin activity in rice panicle meristems. PLoS Genet, 12(10): e1006386.
[46] Xiao H, Tang J F, Li Y F, Wang W M, Li X B, Jin L, Xie R, Luo H F, Zhao X F, Meng Z, He G H, Zhu L H. 2009. STAMENLESS 1, encoding a single C2H2 zinc finger protein, regulates floral organ identity in rice. Plant J, 59(5): 789‒801.
[47] Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, Zhao Y, Tang W J, Wang L, Zhou H J, Yu S B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F. 2008. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet, 40(6): 761‒767.
[48] Yan W H, Wang P, Chen H X, Zhou H J, Li Q P, Wang C R, Ding Z H, Zhang Y S, Yu S B, Xing Y Z, Zhang Q F. 2011. A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice. Mol Plant, 4(2): 319‒330.
[49] Yang J, Cho L H, Yoon J, Yoon H, Wai A H, Hong W J, Han M, Sakakibara H, Liang W Q, Jung K H, Jeon J S, Koh H J, Zhang D B, An G. 2019. Chromatin interacting factor OsVIL2 increases biomass and rice grain yield. Plant Biotechnol J, 17(1): 178‒187.
[50] Yoshida A, Sasao M, Yasuno N, Takagi K, Daimon Y, Chen R H, Yamazaki R, Tokunaga H, Kitaguchi Y, Sato Y, Nagamura Y, Ushijima T, Kumamaru T, Iida S, Maekawa M, Kyozuka J. 2013. TAWAWA1, a regulator of rice inflorescence architecture, functions through the suppression of meristem phase transition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110(2): 767‒772.
[51] Zhang T, Li Y F, Ma L, Sang X C, Ling Y H, Wang Y T, Yu P, Zhuang H, Huang J Y, Wang N, Zhao F M, Zhang C W, Yang Z L, Fang L K, He G H. 2017. LATERAL FLORET 1 induced the three-florets spikelet in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 114: 9984‒9989.
[52] Zhuang H, Wang H L, Zhang T, Zeng X Q, Chen H, Wang Z W, Zhang J, Zheng H, Tang J, Ling Y H, Yang Z L, He G H, Li Y F. 2020. NONSTOP GLUMES1 encodes a C2H2 zinc finger protein that regulates spikelet development in rice. Plant Cell, 32(2): 392‒413.

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: