Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 700-711.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2024.08.004

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2024-05-27 接受日期:2024-08-26 出版日期:2024-11-28 发布日期:2024-12-10

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

0

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2024, 31(6): 700-711.

使用本文

推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/j.rsci.2024.08.004

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2024/V31/I6/700

图/表 8

Fig. 1. Nucleotide polymorphisms of Bsr-d1 in japonica, indica, and wild rice. A, Composition of 827 rice accessions used for analysis. B, Nucleotide diversity of Bsr-d1 in japonica, indica, and wild rice. N indicates sample size; Nt indicates the number of sites in the analyzed sequence; S indicates the number of polymorphic sites; θ indicates silent nucleotide polymorphism; π indicates nucleotide diversity based on silent sites; Tajima’s D statistic is based on the differences between the number of segregating sites and the average number of nucleotide differences. C, Sliding window of nucleotide diversity (p) of Bsr-d1 in three subgroups. The X-axis represents the nucleotide position along Bsr-d1, and the Y-axis indicates the value of nucleotide diversity per site. The sliding window is 100 bp with a step size of 10 bp. The promoter, 5ʹ UTR (untranslated region), CDS (coding sequence), 3ʹ UTR, and downstream regions are marked on the corresponding region below the sliding windows in their respective areas.

Fig. 1. Nucleotide polymorphisms of Bsr-d1 in japonica, indica, and wild rice. A, Composition of 827 rice accessions used for analysis. B, Nucleotide diversity of Bsr-d1 in japonica, indica, and wild rice. N indicates sample size; Nt indicates the number of sites in the analyzed sequence; S indicates the number of polymorphic sites; θ indicates silent nucleotide polymorphism; π indicates nucleotide diversity based on silent sites; Tajima’s D statistic is based on the differences between the number of segregating sites and the average number of nucleotide differences. C, Sliding window of nucleotide diversity (p) of Bsr-d1 in three subgroups. The X-axis represents the nucleotide position along Bsr-d1, and the Y-axis indicates the value of nucleotide diversity per site. The sliding window is 100 bp with a step size of 10 bp. The promoter, 5ʹ UTR (untranslated region), CDS (coding sequence), 3ʹ UTR, and downstream regions are marked on the corresponding region below the sliding windows in their respective areas.

Table 1. Nucleotide polymorphisms of Bsr-d1 in different gene regions.
Group Component S θ π Tajima’s D
All Promoter 63 0.02262 0.01376 0.96874
5ʹ UTR 3 0.01287 0.00284 0.51108
CDS 5 0.00437 0.00142 0.04525
3ʹ UTR 2 0.00547 0.00472 1.02496
Downstream region 5 0.00679 0.00410 0.85622
Wild rice Promoter 60 0.02262 0.01387 0.94544
5ʹ UTR 3 0.01359 0.00572 0.12206
CDS 5 0.00437 0.00257 0.36591
3ʹ UTR 1 0.00547 0.00507 0.76849
Downstream region 5 0.00679 0.00389 0.61085
Indica Promoter 10 0.01124 0.00624 0.15972
5ʹ UTR 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
CDS 1 0.00425 0.00049 0.54851
3ʹ UTR 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Downstream region 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Japonica Promoter 12 0.00654 0.00278 0.09672
5ʹ UTR 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
CDS 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
3ʹ UTR 1 0.00353 0.00104 1.04530
Downstream region 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

Table 1. Nucleotide polymorphisms of Bsr-d1 in different gene regions.

Group Component S θ π Tajima’s D
All Promoter 63 0.02262 0.01376 0.96874
5ʹ UTR 3 0.01287 0.00284 0.51108
CDS 5 0.00437 0.00142 0.04525
3ʹ UTR 2 0.00547 0.00472 1.02496
Downstream region 5 0.00679 0.00410 0.85622
Wild rice Promoter 60 0.02262 0.01387 0.94544
5ʹ UTR 3 0.01359 0.00572 0.12206
CDS 5 0.00437 0.00257 0.36591
3ʹ UTR 1 0.00547 0.00507 0.76849
Downstream region 5 0.00679 0.00389 0.61085
Indica Promoter 10 0.01124 0.00624 0.15972
5ʹ UTR 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
CDS 1 0.00425 0.00049 0.54851
3ʹ UTR 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Downstream region 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Japonica Promoter 12 0.00654 0.00278 0.09672
5ʹ UTR 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
CDS 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
3ʹ UTR 1 0.00353 0.00104 1.04530
Downstream region 0 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
Fig. 2. Origin and evolution of Bsr-d1 haplotypes. A, Haplotype network of Bsr-d1. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of samples for a given haplotype. Red boxes represent resistance haplotypes. The highly susceptible rice variety Lijiangxintuanheigu (LTH) is classified under Hap_3, while the highly resistant rice variety Digu is classified under Hap_19. B, Geographic distribution of Oryza nivara belonging to Hap_27. Orange dots represent the geographical distribution of Hap_27. The area enclosed by the blue ellipse highlights the region adjacent to the the Indian Peninsula and the Indochina Peninsula.

Fig. 2. Origin and evolution of Bsr-d1 haplotypes. A, Haplotype network of Bsr-d1. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of samples for a given haplotype. Red boxes represent resistance haplotypes. The highly susceptible rice variety Lijiangxintuanheigu (LTH) is classified under Hap_3, while the highly resistant rice variety Digu is classified under Hap_19. B, Geographic distribution of Oryza nivara belonging to Hap_27. Orange dots represent the geographical distribution of Hap_27. The area enclosed by the blue ellipse highlights the region adjacent to the the Indian Peninsula and the Indochina Peninsula.

Table 2. Nucleotide information of 28 haplotypes of Bsr-d1.
Haplotype Sequence
Reference TCAGTTGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_1 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_2 TCAGTTGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_3 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_4 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_5 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_6 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_7 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_8 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_9 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGTGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_10 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCACGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_11 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_12 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACACTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_13 TAACACGCGTTCGCCCGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACACTATGTCTTGGGCCAACCCCGGGTGCTCTCGTACGGC
Hap_14 TAACACGCGTTCGCCCGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACACTATGTCTCGGGCCAACCCCGGGTGCTCTCGTACGGC
Hap_15 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_16 TAAGACGCTTTGGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_17 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTTGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_18 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGCCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_19 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGATGCGATCGAGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGCGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_20 TAAGACGCGTTCCCCTGAGGTGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_21 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGATGCGATCGAGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGTGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_22 TAACACGCGTTCGTCCGGGGTGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACGCTATGTCTCGGGCCATCCCCGGGTGCTCTCGTACGGC
Hap_23 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGATGCGATCGGGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGCGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_24 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGGTGCGATCGAGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGCGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_25 TATGACACGCTAGTCTGGGGTGCGACCGAGAACTCCCGACGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_26 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTTGGGATGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_27 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCCGGGGTGCGATCGAGGACCCCCGACGCTGTGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_28 TCAGTCGCTCTAGCCTGGGACACGACCGAGGACCCTCGGCGCCACGCCACGGGGACAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA

Table 2. Nucleotide information of 28 haplotypes of Bsr-d1.

Haplotype Sequence
Reference TCAGTTGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_1 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_2 TCAGTTGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_3 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_4 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_5 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_6 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGGTGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_7 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_8 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Hap_9 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGTGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_10 TCAGTCGAGCTAGCCTGGGATGCGACCAAGGCTCCCTGGCGCCACGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_11 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_12 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACACTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_13 TAACACGCGTTCGCCCGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACACTATGTCTTGGGCCAACCCCGGGTGCTCTCGTACGGC
Hap_14 TAACACGCGTTCGCCCGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACACTATGTCTCGGGCCAACCCCGGGTGCTCTCGTACGGC
Hap_15 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_16 TAAGACGCTTTGGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_17 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTTGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_18 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCTGAGATGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGCCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_19 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGATGCGATCGAGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGCGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_20 TAAGACGCGTTCCCCTGAGGTGCGACCGAGGACCCTCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_21 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGATGCGATCGAGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGTGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_22 TAACACGCGTTCGTCCGGGGTGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACGCTATGTCTCGGGCCATCCCCGGGTGCTCTCGTACGGC
Hap_23 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGATGCGATCGGGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGCGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_24 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTCGGGGTGCGATCGAGGACCCCCTACGCTGTGCGTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_25 TATGACACGCTAGTCTGGGGTGCGACCGAGAACTCCCGACGCCATGCCACGGGGCCAACTCGGGTGCTCCCACGCGGA
Hap_26 TAAGACGCGTTCGCTTGGGATGCGACCGAGGACCCCCGACGCTATGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_27 TAAGACGCGTTCGCCCGGGGTGCGATCGAGGACCCCCGACGCTGTGCCTCGGGCCCACCTCGGGTGCTCCCGTACGGC
Hap_28 TCAGTCGCTCTAGCCTGGGACACGACCGAGGACCCTCGGCGCCACGCCACGGGGACAACTCGGGTGCTCCCGCGCGGA
Table 3. Nucleotide diversity of Bsr-d1 in Oryza nivara, indica landraces, and indica major inbred cultivars.
Group N Nt S θ π Tajima’s D
Oryza nivara 167 3 102 74 0.01323 0.00896 0.76345
Indica landrace 33 3 102 11 0.00946 0.00543 0.14335
Indica major inbred cultivar 193 3 102 9 0.00621 0.00354 0.08786

Table 3. Nucleotide diversity of Bsr-d1 in Oryza nivara, indica landraces, and indica major inbred cultivars.

Group N Nt S θ π Tajima’s D
Oryza nivara 167 3 102 74 0.01323 0.00896 0.76345
Indica landrace 33 3 102 11 0.00946 0.00543 0.14335
Indica major inbred cultivar 193 3 102 9 0.00621 0.00354 0.08786
Fig. 3. Rice blast resistance analysis of four bsr-d1 resistance haplotypes. A, Nucleotide sequence alignment of four resistance haplotypes. Sites with different nucleotides among the four resistance haplotypes are marked in red font. The reported resistance site (G) is highlighted in yellow. Sites located in the promoter region are shaded in grey.B, Blast resistance of bsr-d1 resistance haplotype plants assessed by spray inoculation. Three-week-old rice plants were spray-inoculated, and photographs were taken at 7 d post-inoculation. Rice variety names are indicated below the photographs, with Lijiangxintuanheigu (LTH) as a susceptible variety control. C, Fungal growth measured as MoPot2 by qRT-PCR in the inoculated leaves, normalized to OsUbq DNA. Lowercase letters above the bars indicate multiple significant differences detected by two-way analysis of variance. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3). D, qRT-PCR analyses performed on resistant haplotype rice accessions at 48 h post-inoculation with or without (mock) Magnaporthe oryzae. Total RNA was extracted from leaf blades of three-week-old rice plants. Ubiquitin 5 (Ubq5) was used as an internal control. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3). P-values were determined by Student’s t-test (**, P < 0.002). Detailed information of rice cultivars is given in Table S7.

Fig. 3. Rice blast resistance analysis of four bsr-d1 resistance haplotypes. A, Nucleotide sequence alignment of four resistance haplotypes. Sites with different nucleotides among the four resistance haplotypes are marked in red font. The reported resistance site (G) is highlighted in yellow. Sites located in the promoter region are shaded in grey.B, Blast resistance of bsr-d1 resistance haplotype plants assessed by spray inoculation. Three-week-old rice plants were spray-inoculated, and photographs were taken at 7 d post-inoculation. Rice variety names are indicated below the photographs, with Lijiangxintuanheigu (LTH) as a susceptible variety control. C, Fungal growth measured as MoPot2 by qRT-PCR in the inoculated leaves, normalized to OsUbq DNA. Lowercase letters above the bars indicate multiple significant differences detected by two-way analysis of variance. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3). D, qRT-PCR analyses performed on resistant haplotype rice accessions at 48 h post-inoculation with or without (mock) Magnaporthe oryzae. Total RNA was extracted from leaf blades of three-week-old rice plants. Ubiquitin 5 (Ubq5) was used as an internal control. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 3). P-values were determined by Student’s t-test (**, P < 0.002). Detailed information of rice cultivars is given in Table S7.

Fig. 4. Application of bsr-d1 resistance alleles in China. A, Geographic distribution of bsr-d1 resistance and susceptibility alleles among 384 major inbred cultivars in China. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of samples in each province. B, Frequency distribution of bsr-d1 resistance and susceptibility alleles in major inbred cultivars. C, Distribution of bsr-d1 resistance and susceptibility alleles in major inbred cultivars across different years. 21c, 21st century.

Fig. 4. Application of bsr-d1 resistance alleles in China. A, Geographic distribution of bsr-d1 resistance and susceptibility alleles among 384 major inbred cultivars in China. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of samples in each province. B, Frequency distribution of bsr-d1 resistance and susceptibility alleles in major inbred cultivars. C, Distribution of bsr-d1 resistance and susceptibility alleles in major inbred cultivars across different years. 21c, 21st century.

Fig. 5. Identification of bsr-d1 resistance alleles by molecular markers. A, Primer set (Bsr-d1-F/R) designed to target the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) site distinguishing resistance and susceptibility alleles, with an expected PCR-amplified product of 530 bp. The number shown at the left of each sequence is the rice variety code. The nucleotide polymorphic site of rice cultivars 1-7, tightly associated with rice blast resistance, is guanine (G), highlighted in red font. Varieties 8‒34 with adenine (A) are susceptible varieties. Detailed information of rice varieties is given in Table S8.B, PCR-based validation of the primer set in 34 rice varieties (30 PCR cycles). Rice varieties 1-34 are referenced in Table S8. OsActin1 (LOC_Os03g50885) was used as a control to ensure that the extracted rice genome is of good quality. M, Marker.

Fig. 5. Identification of bsr-d1 resistance alleles by molecular markers. A, Primer set (Bsr-d1-F/R) designed to target the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) site distinguishing resistance and susceptibility alleles, with an expected PCR-amplified product of 530 bp. The number shown at the left of each sequence is the rice variety code. The nucleotide polymorphic site of rice cultivars 1-7, tightly associated with rice blast resistance, is guanine (G), highlighted in red font. Varieties 8‒34 with adenine (A) are susceptible varieties. Detailed information of rice varieties is given in Table S8.B, PCR-based validation of the primer set in 34 rice varieties (30 PCR cycles). Rice varieties 1-34 are referenced in Table S8. OsActin1 (LOC_Os03g50885) was used as a control to ensure that the extracted rice genome is of good quality. M, Marker.

参考文献 34

[1] Chen H L, Li C R, Liu L P, Zhao J Y, Cheng X Z, Jiang G H, Zhai W X. 2016. The Fd-GOGAT1 mutant gene lc7 confers resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae in rice. Sci Rep, 6: 26411.
[2] Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K A. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol, 9(10): 1657-1659.
[3] Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers C A, Banks E, DePristo M A, Handsaker R E, Lunter G, Marth G T, Sherry S T, McVean G, Durbin R,1000 Genomes Project Analysis Group. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27(15): 2156-2158.
[4] Das A, Soubam D, Singh P K, Thakur S, Singh N K, Sharma T R. 2012. A novel blast resistance gene, Pi54rh cloned from wild species of rice, Oryza rhizomatis confers broad spectrum resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae. Funct Integr Genomics, 12(2): 215-228.
[5] Dean R, van Kan J A L, Pretorius Z A, Hammond-Kosack K E, Di Pietro A, Spanu P D, Rudd J J, Dickman M, Kahmann R, Ellis J, Foster G D. 2012. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol, 13(4): 414-430.
[6] Dean R A, Talbot N J, Ebbole D J, Farman M L, Mitchell T K, Orbach M J, Thon M, Kulkarni R, Xu J R, Pan H Q, Read N D, Lee Y H, Carbone I, Brown D, Oh Y Y, Donofrio N, Jeong J S, Soanes D M, Djonovic S, Kolomiets E, Rehmeyer C, Li W X, Harding M, Kim S, Lebrun M H, Bohnert H, Coughlan S, Butler J, Calvo S, Ma L J, Nicol R, Purcell S, Nusbaum C, Galagan J E, Birren B W. 2005. The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Nature, 434: 980-986.
[7] Deng Y W, Zhai K R, Xie Z, Yang D Y, Zhu X D, Liu J Z, Wang X, Qin P, Yang Y Z, Zhang G M, Li Q, Zhang J F, Wu S Q, Milazzo J, Mao B Z, Wang E T, Xie H A, Tharreau D, He Z H. 2017. Epigenetic regulation of antagonistic receptors confers rice blast resistance with yield balance. Science, 355: 962-965.
[8] DePristo M A, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella K V, Maguire J R, Hartl C, Philippakis A A, del Angel G, Rivas M A, Hanna M, McKenna A, Fennell T J, Kernytsky A M, Sivachenko A Y, Cibulskis K, Gabriel S B, Altshuler D, Daly M J. 2011. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next- generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet, 43(5): 491-498.
[9] Fisher M C, Henk D A, Briggs C J, Brownstein J S, Madoff L C, McCraw S L, Gurr S J. 2012. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature, 484: 186-194.
[10] Hong Y B, Liu Q E, Cao Y R, Zhang Y, Chen D B, Lou X Y, Cheng S H, Cao L Y. 2019. The OsMPK15 negatively regulates Magnaporthe oryza and Xoo disease resistance via SA and JA signaling pathway in rice. Front Plant Sci, 10: 752.
[11] Hu S L. 2014. Analysis of the dynamics and fluctuations in the prevalence of rice blast disease in China. Liaoning Econ, (12): 90-91. (in Chinese)
[12] Innan H, Kim Y. 2004. Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101(29): 10667-10672.
[13] Jing C Y, Zhang F M, Wang X H, Wang M X, Zhou L, Cai Z, Han J D, Geng M F, Yu W H, Jiao Z H, Huang L, Liu R, Zheng X M, Meng Q L, Ren N N, Zhang H X, Du Y S, Wang X, Qiang C G, Zou X H, Gaut B S, Ge S. 2023. Multiple domestications of Asian rice. Nat Plants, 9(8): 1221-1235.
[14] Kou Y J, Wang S P. 2010. Broad-spectrum and durability: Understanding of quantitative disease resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 13(2): 181-185.
[15] Leigh J W, Bryant D. 2015. Popart: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol, 6(9): 1110-1116.
[16] Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res, 49(W1): W293-W296.
[17] Li J B, Sun Y D, Liu H, Wang Y Y, Jia Y L, Xu M H. 2015. Natural variation of rice blast resistance gene Pi-d2. Genet Mol Res, 14(1): 1235-1249.
[18] Li W, Zhong S H, Li G J, Li Q, Mao B Z, Deng Y W, Zhang H J, Zeng L J, Song F M, He Z H. 2011. Rice RING protein OsBBI1 with E3 ligase activity confers broad-spectrum resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae by modifying the cell wall defence. Cell Res, 21(5): 835-848.
[19] Li W T, Liu Y, Wang J, He M, Zhou X G, Yang C, Yuan C, Wang J C, Chern M, Yin J J, Chen W L, Ma B T, Wang Y P, Qin P, Li S G, Ronald P, Chen X W. 2016. The durably resistant rice cultivar Digu activates defence gene expression before the full maturation of Magnaporthe oryzae appressorium. Mol Plant Pathol, 17(3): 354-368.
[20] Li W T, Zhu Z W, Chern M, Yin J J, Yang C, Ran L, Cheng M P, He M, Wang K, Wang J, Zhou X G, Zhu X B, Chen Z X, Wang J C, Zhao W, Ma B T, Qin P, Chen W L, Wang Y P, Liu J L, Wang W M, Wu X J, Li P, Wang J R, Zhu L H, Li S G, Chen X W. 2017. A natural allele of a transcription factor in rice confers broad-spectrum blast resistance. Cell, 170(1): 114-126.e15.
[21] Li W T, Wang K, Chern M, Liu Y C, Zhu Z W, Liu J, Zhu X B, Yin J J, Ran L, Xiong J, He K W, Xu L T, He M, Wang J, Liu J L, Bi Y, Qing H, Li M W, Hu K, Song L, Wang L, Qi T, Hou Q Q, Chen W L, Li Y, Wang W M, Chen X W. 2020. Sclerenchyma cell thickening through enhanced lignification induced by OsMYB30 prevents fungal penetration of rice leaves. New Phytol, 226(6): 1850-1863.
[22] Liao Y X, Bai Q, Xu P Z, Wu T K, Guo D M, Peng Y B, Zhang H Y, Deng X S, Chen X Q, Luo M, Ali A, Wang W M, Wu X J. 2018. Mutation in rice Abscisic Acid2 results in cell death, enhanced disease-resistance, altered seed dormancy and development. Front Plant Sci, 9: 405.
[23] Liu Z Q, Zhu Y J, Shi H B, Qiu J H, Ding X H, Kou Y J. 2021. Recent progress in rice broad-spectrum disease resistance. Int J Mol Sci, 22(21): 11658.
[24] Ma J, Lei C L, Xu X T, Hao K, Wang J L, Cheng Z J, Ma X D, Ma J, Zhou K N, Zhang X, Guo X P, Wu F Q, Lin Q B, Wang C M, Zhai H Q, Wang H Y, Wan J M. 2015. Pi64, encoding a novel CC-NBS-LRR protein, confers resistance to leaf and neck blast in rice. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 28(5): 558-568.
[25] Park C H, Chen S B, Shirsekar G, Zhou B, Khang C H, Songkumarn P, Afzal A J, Ning Y S, Wang R Y, Bellizzi M, Valent B, Wang G L. 2012. The Magnaporthe oryzae effector AvrPiz-t targets the RING E3 ubiquitin ligase APIP6 to suppress pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity in rice. Plant Cell, 24(11): 4748-4762.
[26] Price M N, Dehal P S, Arkin A P. 2010. FastTree 2: Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One, 5(3): e9490.
[27] Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio J C, Messeguer X, Rozas R. 2003. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics, 19(18): 2496-2497.
[28] Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics, 123(3): 585-595.
[29] Xie Z, Yan B X, Shou J Y, Tang J, Wang X, Zhai K R, Liu J Y, Li Q, Luo M Z, Deng Y W, He Z H. 2019. A nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat receptor pair confers broad-spectrum disease resistance through physical association in rice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 374: 20180308.
[30] Ye J H, Zhang M C, Yuan X P, Hu D X, Zhang Y Y, Xu S L, Li Z, Li R S, Liu J R, Sun Y F, Wang S, Feng Y, Xu Q, Yang Y L, Wei X H. 2022. Genomic insight into genetic changes and shaping of major inbred rice cultivars in China. New Phytol, 236(6): 2311-2326.
[31] Zhao H J, Wang X Y, Jia Y L, Minkenberg B, Wheatley M, Fan J B, Jia M H, Famoso A, Edwards J D, Wamishe Y, Valent B, Wang G L, Yang Y N. 2018. The rice blast resistance gene Ptr encodes an atypical protein required for broad-spectrum disease resistance. Nat Commun, 9(1): 2039.
[32] Zhao Q, Feng Q, Lu H Y, Li Y, Wang A H, Tian Q L, Zhan Q L, Lu Y Q, Zhang L, Huang T, Wang Y C, Fan D L, Zhao Y, Wang Z Q, Zhou C C, Chen J Y, Zhu C R, Li W J, Weng Q J, Xu Q, Wang Z X, Wei X H, Han B, Huang X H. 2018. Pan-genome analysis highlights the extent of genomic variation in cultivated and wild rice. Nat Genet, 50(2): 278-284.
[33] Zhu Z W, Yin J J, Chern M, Zhu X B, Yang C, He K W, Liu Y C, He M, Wang J, Song L, Wang L, Wei Y J, Wang J C, Liu J L, Qing H, Bi Y, Li M W, Hu K, Qi T, Hou Q Q, Chen X W, Li W T. 2020. New insights into bsr-d1-mediated broad-spectrum resistance to rice blast. Mol Plant Pathol, 21(7): 951-960.
[34] Zhu Z W, Xiong J, Shi H, Liu Y C, Yin J J, He K W, Zhou T Y, Xu L T, Zhu X B, Lu X, Tang Y Y, Song L, Hou Q Q, Xiong Q, Wang L, Ye D H, Qi T, Zou L J, Li G B, Sun C H, Wu Z Y, Li P L, Liu J L, Bi Y, Yang Y H, Jiang C X, Fan J, Gong G S, He M, Wang J, Chen X W, Li W T. 2023. Magnaporthe oryzae effector MoSPAB1 directly activates rice Bsr-d1 expression to facilitate pathogenesis. Nat Commun, 14(1): 8399.

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: