Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 15-20.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2025.08.012

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2025-04-25 接受日期:2025-08-01 出版日期:2026-01-28 发布日期:2026-02-03

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

0

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2026, 33(1): 15-20.

使用本文

推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/j.rsci.2025.08.012

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2026/V33/I1/15

图/表 1

Fig. 1. QTLs for brown spot resistance on rice chromosomes 4, 6, 8, and 12 identified in F2:3 population of PAU 10845-1-1-1-1 (PMS-18-B) × RP patho-17 (RP Path 77) using QTLseqr and activity of different defence enzymes in parental lines (PMS-18-B and RP Path 77) and selected subsets of resistant (F3-21 and F3-33) and susceptible progeny lines (F3-4 and F3-18). A, Distribution of Δ SNP index with significant thresholds i.e., confidence intervals (P < 0.05 in red and P < 0.01 in blue). B and C, Distribution of genome-wide G statistics (G’) value and -log10(P-value). The red line in each chart indicated the significance threshold for false discovery rate (FDR, 0.01) and genomic region where the G’ value or -log10(P-value) crosses the threshold value was considered as significant QTL. D, Peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity are plotted on left y-axis, and catalase (CAT) and disease score (DS) are plotted on right y-axis.

Fig. 1. QTLs for brown spot resistance on rice chromosomes 4, 6, 8, and 12 identified in F2:3 population of PAU 10845-1-1-1-1 (PMS-18-B) × RP patho-17 (RP Path 77) using QTLseqr and activity of different defence enzymes in parental lines (PMS-18-B and RP Path 77) and selected subsets of resistant (F3-21 and F3-33) and susceptible progeny lines (F3-4 and F3-18). A, Distribution of Δ SNP index with significant thresholds i.e., confidence intervals (P < 0.05 in red and P < 0.01 in blue). B and C, Distribution of genome-wide G statistics (G’) value and -log10(P-value). The red line in each chart indicated the significance threshold for false discovery rate (FDR, 0.01) and genomic region where the G’ value or -log10(P-value) crosses the threshold value was considered as significant QTL. D, Peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity are plotted on left y-axis, and catalase (CAT) and disease score (DS) are plotted on right y-axis.

参考文献 38

[1] Asnaghi C, Roques D, Ruffel S, et al. 2004. Targeted mapping of a sugarcane rust resistance gene (Bru1) using bulked segregant analysis and AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet, 108(4): 759-764.
[2] Barnwal M K, Kotasthane A, Magculia N, et al. 2013. A review on crop losses, epidemiology and disease management of rice brown spot to identify research priorities and knowledge gaps. Eur J Plant Pathol, 136(3): 443-457.
[3] Belkhadir Y, Subramaniam R, Dangl J L. 2004. Plant disease resistance protein signaling: NBS-LRR proteins and their partners. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 7(4): 391-399.
[4] Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B, 57: 289-300.
[5] Chen C Q, Bélanger R R, Benhamou N, et al. 2000. Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 56(1): 13-23.
[6] Chen Q, Song J, Du W P, et al. 2017. Identification, mapping, and molecular marker development for Rgsr8.1: A new quantitative trait locus conferring resistance to Gibberella stalk rot in maize (Zea mays L.). Front Plant Sci, 8: 1355.
[7] Dallagnol L J, Rodrigues F A, DaMatta F M, et al. 2011. Deficiency in silicon uptake affects cytological, physiological, and biochemical events in the rice: Bipolaris oryzae interaction. Phytopathology, 101(1): 92-104.
[8] Das S, Upadhyaya H D, Bajaj D, et al. 2015. Deploying QTL-seq for rapid delineation of a potential candidate gene underlying major trait-associated QTL in chickpea. DNA Res, 22(3): 193-203.
[9] Das S, Singh M, Srivastava R, et al. 2016. mQTL-seq delineates functionally relevant candidate gene harbouring a major QTL regulating pod number in chickpea. DNA Res, 23(1): 53-65.
[10] Deborah S D, Palaniswami A, Vidhyasekaran P, et al. 2001. Time-course study of the induction of defense enzymes, phenolics and lignin in rice in response to infection by pathogen and non-pathogen. Z Pflanzenk Pflanzens-J Plant Dis Prot, 108(2): 204-216.
[11] Dorneles K R, Refatti J P, Pazdiora P C, et al. 2020. Biochemical defenses of rice against Bipolaris oryzae increase with high atmospheric concentration of CO2. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 110: 101484.
[12] Goel R K, Bala Ritu, Singh K. 2006. Genetic characterization of resistance to brown leaf spot caused by Drechslera oryzae in some wild rice (Oryza sativa) lines. Indian J Agric Sci, 76(11): 705-707.
[13] Hait G N, Sinha A K. 1987. Biochemical changes associated with induction of resistance in rice seedlings to Helminthosporium oryzae by seed treatment with chemicals. Z Pflanzenk Pflanzens-J Plant Dis Protect, 94(4): 360-368.
[14] Halldén C, Säll T, Olsson K, et al. 1997. The use of bulked segregant analysis to accumulate RAPD markers near a locus for beet cyst nematode resistance in Beta vulgaris. Plant Breed, 116(1): 18-22.
[15] Hossain I, Dey P, Hossain M Z. 2011. Efficacy of Bion, Amistar and Tilt in controlling brown spot and narrow brown spot of rice cv. BR11 (Mukta). J Bangladesh Agric Univ, 9(2): 201-204.
[16] Ito S, Kuribayashi K. 1927. Production of the ascigerous stage in culture of Helminthosporium oryzae. Jpn J Phytopathol, 2(1): 1-8.
[17] Katara J L, Sonah H, Deshmukh R K, et al. 2010. Molecular analysis of QTLs associated with resistance to brown spot in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed, 70: 17-21.
[18] Kumar H, Ahmad S, Zacharia S, et al. 2017. Impact of different fungicides combination against brown leaf spot (Drechslera oryzae) of rice under the in vitro and in vivo. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 6: 341-344.
[19] Liu S Z, Yeh C T, Tang H M, et al. 2012. Gene mapping via bulked segregant RNA-Seq (BSR-Seq). PLoS One, 7(5): e36406.
[20] Lu H F, Lin T, Klein J, et al. 2014. QTL-seq identifies an early flowering QTL located near flowering locus T in cucumber. Theor Appl Genet, 127(7): 1491-1499.
[21] Magwene P M, Willis J H, Kelly J K. 2011. The statistics of bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing. PLoS Comput Biol, 7(11): e1002255.
[22] Mansfeld B N, Grumet R. 2018. QTLseqr: An R package for bulk segregant analysis with next-generation sequencing. Plant Genome, 11(2): 180006.
[23] Matsumoto K, Ota Y, Seta S, et al. 2017. Identification of QTLs for rice brown spot resistance in backcross inbred lines derived from a cross between Koshihikari and CH45. Breed Sci, 67(5): 540-543.
[24] Ou S H. 1985. Rice Diseases 2nd edn. P370. Surrey, England: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
[25] Sato H, Ando I, Hirabayashi H, et al. 2008a. QTL analysis of brown spot resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Breed Sci, 58(1): 93-96.
[26] Sato H, Ando I, Takeuchi Y, et al. 2008b. Genetic analysis of brown spot resistance in rice using the 39 chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) derived from crossing Koshihikari and Kasalath. Breed Res, 10: 274.
[27] Savary S, Willocquet L, Elazegui F A, et al. 2000. Rice pest constraints in tropical Asia: Characterization of injury profiles in relation to production situations. Plant Dis, 84(3): 341-356.
[28] Shoemaker R A. 1959. Nomenclature of Drechslera and Bipolaris, grass parasites segregated from ‘Helminthosporium’. Can J Plant Pathol, 28: S212-S220.
[29] Sreedharan A, Menon M R. 1974. Effect of repeated culture and change in the cultural environment on the virulence of Helminthosporium oryzae Indian Phytopathol, 27: 131-133.
[30] Subramanian C V, Jain B L. 1966. A revision of some graminicolous helminthosporia. Curr Sci, 35: 352-355.
[31] Sun J, Yang L M, Wang J G, et al. 2018. Identification of a cold-tolerant locus in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using bulked segregant analysis with a next-generation sequencing strategy. Rice, 11(1): 24.
[32] Takagi H, Abe A, Yoshida K, et al. 2013. QTL-seq: Rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J, 74(1): 174-183.
[33] Vanitha S C, Niranjana S R, Umesha S. 2009. Role of phenylalanine ammonia lyase and polyphenol oxidase in host resistance to bacterial wilt of tomato. J Phytopathol, 157(9): 552-557.
[34] Walton J D. 1996. Host-selective toxins: Agents of compatibility. Plant Cell, 8(10): 1723-1733.
[35] Wang L, An C, Qian W, et al. 2004. Detection of the putative cis-region involved in the induction by a Pyricularia oryzae elicitor of the promoter of a gene encoding phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in rice. Plant Cell Rep, 22(7): 513-518.
[36] Wu W, Wan X J, Shah F, et al.2014. The role of antioxidant enzymes in adaptive responses to sheath blight infestation under different fertilization rates and hill densities. Sci World J, 2014(1): 502134.
[37] Yang Z M, Huang D Q, Tang W Q, et al. 2013. Mapping of quantitative trait loci underlying cold tolerance in rice seedlings via high-throughput sequencing of pooled extremes. PLoS One, 8(7): e68433.
[38] Zhang Y X, Gang Q, Ma Q Q, et al. 2020. Identification of major locus Bph35 resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Rice Sci, 27(3): 237-245.

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: