Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2026, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 499-513.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2026.04.004

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2025-12-23 接受日期:2026-04-07 出版日期:2026-07-28 发布日期:2026-08-06

RichHTML

PDF

补充材料

1

可视化

0
  • 1. Supplemental Data.pdf(674KB)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2026, 33(4): 499-513.

使用本文

推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/j.rsci.2026.04.004

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2026/V33/I4/499

图/表 9

Fig. 1. Changes in the number of approved rice varieties in southern (A) and northern (B) China.

Fig. 1. Changes in the number of approved rice varieties in southern (A) and northern (B) China.

Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of approved hybrid varieties per restorer line.

Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of approved hybrid varieties per restorer line.

Fig. 3. Rice planted area from 1985 to 2022. A, Total planted area of inbred rice, two-line hybrid rice, and three-line hybrid rice. B, Number of rice varieties with planted area > 2 × 105 hm2 per year, including inbred rice, two-line hybrid rice, and three-line hybrid rice.

Fig. 3. Rice planted area from 1985 to 2022. A, Total planted area of inbred rice, two-line hybrid rice, and three-line hybrid rice. B, Number of rice varieties with planted area > 2 × 105 hm2 per year, including inbred rice, two-line hybrid rice, and three-line hybrid rice.

Table 1. Dominant three hybrid rice in the South China Rice Region per five-year period. × 103 hm2
Variety name Cumulative planted area
1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2023
Youxiangyoulongsimiao 44 105
Yexiangyoulisi 133 157
Jifengyou 1002 119 127
Zhongzheyou 8 53 218 117
Shenyou 9516 243 163 39
Zhongzheyou 1 208 96 22
Wuyou 308 11 225 83 27
Tianyou 998 37 521 188 23
Bo III you 273 8 215 111
Qiuyou 998 80 244 46
Boyou 998 215 306 79
Jinyou 207 23 303 137
Boyou 253 85 375 209
Boyougui 99 101 265
Boyou 3550 118 263
Boyou 903 435 554
Teyou 63 14 674 1 005 508 221 24
Shanyou 63 1 921 1 563 803 90
Shanyougui 99 73 1 107 379
Boyou 64 447 1 215 374
Shanyou 64 1 195 351 47
Weiyou 64 856 295 64
Shanyougui 34 814 93
Shanyougui 33 1 091 278

Table 1. Dominant three hybrid rice in the South China Rice Region per five-year period. × 103 hm2

Variety name Cumulative planted area
1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2023
Youxiangyoulongsimiao 44 105
Yexiangyoulisi 133 157
Jifengyou 1002 119 127
Zhongzheyou 8 53 218 117
Shenyou 9516 243 163 39
Zhongzheyou 1 208 96 22
Wuyou 308 11 225 83 27
Tianyou 998 37 521 188 23
Bo III you 273 8 215 111
Qiuyou 998 80 244 46
Boyou 998 215 306 79
Jinyou 207 23 303 137
Boyou 253 85 375 209
Boyougui 99 101 265
Boyou 3550 118 263
Boyou 903 435 554
Teyou 63 14 674 1 005 508 221 24
Shanyou 63 1 921 1 563 803 90
Shanyougui 99 73 1 107 379
Boyou 64 447 1 215 374
Shanyou 64 1 195 351 47
Weiyou 64 856 295 64
Shanyougui 34 814 93
Shanyougui 33 1 091 278
Table 2. Dominant three hybrid rice in the Upper Yangtze Rice River region per five-year period. × 103 hm2
Variety name Cumulative planted area
1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2023
Taiyou 808 95
Chuanzhongyou 3877 29 50
Shennongyou 228 34 31
Deyou 4727 20 139 31
Yixiang 4245 44 165 33
Chuanyou 6203 139 379 143
Yixiangyou 2115 166 501 294
F you 498 121 143
Nei 5 you 39 99 109
Dexiang 4103 39 155 89
Chuanxiang 9838 83 130 18
Q you 6 343 157
Gangyou 188 339 325 83 9
Fuyou 838 22 187 181 30
Yixiang 1577 185 122
Chuanxiangyou 2 199 37
D you 68 36 276 9
II you 7 61 493 95
II you 725 49 293 44
II you 162 54 371 67
D you 527 9 478 104 17
Gangyou 527 49 956 236 39
Gangyou 725 247 1 225 507 207 64 10
Gangyou 151 193 346 13
II you 838 5 1 023 1 071 252 109 59 22
II you 501 37 339 110
Shanyouduoxi 1 533 993
Gangyou 22 597 3 354 877 17
Gangyou 12 687 339 11
II you 63 607 165
D you 63 2 003 1 763 100
Shanyou 63 5 300 5 087 923 157 47
Shanyou 2 1 223

Table 2. Dominant three hybrid rice in the Upper Yangtze Rice River region per five-year period. × 103 hm2

Variety name Cumulative planted area
1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2023
Taiyou 808 95
Chuanzhongyou 3877 29 50
Shennongyou 228 34 31
Deyou 4727 20 139 31
Yixiang 4245 44 165 33
Chuanyou 6203 139 379 143
Yixiangyou 2115 166 501 294
F you 498 121 143
Nei 5 you 39 99 109
Dexiang 4103 39 155 89
Chuanxiang 9838 83 130 18
Q you 6 343 157
Gangyou 188 339 325 83 9
Fuyou 838 22 187 181 30
Yixiang 1577 185 122
Chuanxiangyou 2 199 37
D you 68 36 276 9
II you 7 61 493 95
II you 725 49 293 44
II you 162 54 371 67
D you 527 9 478 104 17
Gangyou 527 49 956 236 39
Gangyou 725 247 1 225 507 207 64 10
Gangyou 151 193 346 13
II you 838 5 1 023 1 071 252 109 59 22
II you 501 37 339 110
Shanyouduoxi 1 533 993
Gangyou 22 597 3 354 877 17
Gangyou 12 687 339 11
II you 63 607 165
D you 63 2 003 1 763 100
Shanyou 63 5 300 5 087 923 157 47
Shanyou 2 1 223
Table 3. Dominant three hybrid rice in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River Rice Region per 5-year period. × 103 hm2
Variety name Cumulative planted area
1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2023
Quanyou 1606 117
Yexiangyoulisi 69 171
Yexiangyouhang 1573 87 53
Quanyou 822 159 293
Quanyousimiao 177 238
Hanyou 73 161 137
Taoyouxiangzhan 189 162
Yongyou 1540 198 149
Taiyou 390 83 457 242
Xinrongyouhuazhan 98 243 47
Wuyouhuazhan 123 151 35
Rongyouhuazhan 141 190 59
H you 518 141 153 28
Zhongzheyou 8 133 161 77
Wuyou 308 36 613 311 47
Tianyouhuazhan 79 537 471 156
Yongyou 9 72 230 150 29
Wufengyou T025 93 291 37
Ganxin 203 208 195 38
Fengyuanyou 299 16 251 259 73
Yueyou 9113 31 605 521 134 34
T you 207 77 395 142 41
II youming 86 224 304 73 6
Jinyou 463 350 505 166 48
Jinyou 207 92 1 635 887 196 15
Jinyou 974 131 702 451 25
Jinyou 402 332 1 319 835 153
II you 501 746 374 30
Jinyougui 99 265 658 87
Shanyou 46 383 942 525 31
Weiyou 77 633 690 121 5
Weiyou 46 15 979 1 002 495 294
Xieyou 46 33 635 922 255 11
Xieyou 63 35 479 1 066 579 150 5
Shanyou 63 7 571 9 683 5 829 1 227 173
Shanyou 64 2 434 2 775 1 017 167
Weiyou 64 3 453 2 125 607
Weiyou 6 2 631 113
Shanyou 6 2 852 30
Shanyou 2 1 152

Table 3. Dominant three hybrid rice in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River Rice Region per 5-year period. × 103 hm2

Variety name Cumulative planted area
1985-1990 1991-1995 1996-2000 2001-2005 2006-2010 2011-2015 2016-2020 2021-2023
Quanyou 1606 117
Yexiangyoulisi 69 171
Yexiangyouhang 1573 87 53
Quanyou 822 159 293
Quanyousimiao 177 238
Hanyou 73 161 137
Taoyouxiangzhan 189 162
Yongyou 1540 198 149
Taiyou 390 83 457 242
Xinrongyouhuazhan 98 243 47
Wuyouhuazhan 123 151 35
Rongyouhuazhan 141 190 59
H you 518 141 153 28
Zhongzheyou 8 133 161 77
Wuyou 308 36 613 311 47
Tianyouhuazhan 79 537 471 156
Yongyou 9 72 230 150 29
Wufengyou T025 93 291 37
Ganxin 203 208 195 38
Fengyuanyou 299 16 251 259 73
Yueyou 9113 31 605 521 134 34
T you 207 77 395 142 41
II youming 86 224 304 73 6
Jinyou 463 350 505 166 48
Jinyou 207 92 1 635 887 196 15
Jinyou 974 131 702 451 25
Jinyou 402 332 1 319 835 153
II you 501 746 374 30
Jinyougui 99 265 658 87
Shanyou 46 383 942 525 31
Weiyou 77 633 690 121 5
Weiyou 46 15 979 1 002 495 294
Xieyou 46 33 635 922 255 11
Xieyou 63 35 479 1 066 579 150 5
Shanyou 63 7 571 9 683 5 829 1 227 173
Shanyou 64 2 434 2 775 1 017 167
Weiyou 64 3 453 2 125 607
Weiyou 6 2 631 113
Shanyou 6 2 852 30
Shanyou 2 1 152
Fig. 4. Yield, quality, and blast resistance performance of 1 493 three-line hybrid rice varieties over four decades. A, Yield performance of three-line hybrid varieties of rice over four decades. B, Percentage of premium-quality hybrid rice varieties over four decades. C, Percentage of three-line hybrid rice varieties over four decades with different blast resistances. HR, Highly resistant; R, Resistant; MR, Moderately resistant; MS, Moderately susceptible; S, Susceptible; HS, Highly susceptible Data are from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China.

Fig. 4. Yield, quality, and blast resistance performance of 1 493 three-line hybrid rice varieties over four decades. A, Yield performance of three-line hybrid varieties of rice over four decades. B, Percentage of premium-quality hybrid rice varieties over four decades. C, Percentage of three-line hybrid rice varieties over four decades with different blast resistances. HR, Highly resistant; R, Resistant; MR, Moderately resistant; MS, Moderately susceptible; S, Susceptible; HS, Highly susceptible Data are from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China.

Fig. 5. Approved rice varieties underwent significant changes in major agronomic traits, such as morphological trains (A), yield component traits (B), and grain quality indicators (C). A1-A3, Early-season indica rice (South China) before 2003 (A1), 2004-2013 (A2), and 2014-2023 (A3); B1-B3, Late-season indica rice (South China) before 2003 (B1), 2004-2013 (B2), and 2014-2023 (B3); C1-C3, Mid-season indica rice (Upper Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (C1), 2004-2013 (C2), and 2014-2023 (C3); D1-D3, Early-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (D1), 2004-2013 (D2), and 2014-2023 (D3); E1-E3, Mid-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (E1), 2004-2013 (E2), and 2014-2023 (E3); F1-F3, Late-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (F1), 2004-2013 (F2), and 2014-2023 (F3); G1-G3, Single-crop late-season japonica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (G1), 2004-2013 (G2), and 2014-2023 (G3). The data values are normalized to the range [0,1] using min-max normalization. The size of the colored solid circles represents the magnitude of the corresponding values.

Fig. 5. Approved rice varieties underwent significant changes in major agronomic traits, such as morphological trains (A), yield component traits (B), and grain quality indicators (C). A1-A3, Early-season indica rice (South China) before 2003 (A1), 2004-2013 (A2), and 2014-2023 (A3); B1-B3, Late-season indica rice (South China) before 2003 (B1), 2004-2013 (B2), and 2014-2023 (B3); C1-C3, Mid-season indica rice (Upper Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (C1), 2004-2013 (C2), and 2014-2023 (C3); D1-D3, Early-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (D1), 2004-2013 (D2), and 2014-2023 (D3); E1-E3, Mid-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (E1), 2004-2013 (E2), and 2014-2023 (E3); F1-F3, Late-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (F1), 2004-2013 (F2), and 2014-2023 (F3); G1-G3, Single-crop late-season japonica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) before 2003 (G1), 2004-2013 (G2), and 2014-2023 (G3). The data values are normalized to the range [0,1] using min-max normalization. The size of the colored solid circles represents the magnitude of the corresponding values.

Fig. 6. Evolution of blast resistance in the 2 470 representative varieties. A, Percentage of rice blast resistance across three decades. B-H, Percentage of rice blast resistance varieties in different ecotypes: early-season indica rice (South China) (B), late-season indica rice (South China) (C), mid-season indica rice (Upper Yangtze Basin) (D), early-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (E), mid-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (F), late-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (G), and single-crop late-season japonica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (H). Grades 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, Highly resistant, resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible, and highly susceptible.

Fig. 6. Evolution of blast resistance in the 2 470 representative varieties. A, Percentage of rice blast resistance across three decades. B-H, Percentage of rice blast resistance varieties in different ecotypes: early-season indica rice (South China) (B), late-season indica rice (South China) (C), mid-season indica rice (Upper Yangtze Basin) (D), early-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (E), mid-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (F), late-season indica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (G), and single-crop late-season japonica rice (Middle-Lower Yangtze Basin) (H). Grades 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, Highly resistant, resistant, moderately resistant, moderately susceptible, susceptible, and highly susceptible.

参考文献 46

[1] Cai S X. 2001. Breeding of CMS line Y Huanong a with Y-type cytoplasm in rice. Hybrid Rice, 16(6): 9-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Chen Y J, Xie C H, Zhang J R, et al. 2008. Breeding of cytoplasmic male sterile line derived from Oryza sativa subsp. javanica cv. Wanilava and its AFLP fingerprints. Chin J Rice Sci, 22(1): 28-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Cheng S H, Zhuang J Y, Fan Y Y, et al. 2007. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: A super-domesticate in China. Ann Bot, 100(5): 959-966.
[4] Gu Z L, Gong J Y, Zhu Z, et al. 2023. Structure and function of rice hybrid genomes reveal genetic basis and optimal performance of heterosis. Nat Genet, 55(10): 1745-1756.
[5] Hu J, Zhu R S, Li S Q, et al. 2016. Discovery, utilization and perspective of Honglian cytoplasmic male sterile rice. Chin Sci Bull, 61: 3813-3821.
[6] Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Wu W R, et al. 2003. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100(5): 2574-2579.
[7] Huang X H, Yang S H, Gong J Y, et al. 2015. Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis. Nat Commun, 6: 6258.
[8] Huang X H, Yang S H, Gong J Y, et al. 2016. Genomic architecture of heterosis for yield traits in rice. Nature, 537: 629-633.
[9] Li S G, Li H Y, Zhou K D, et al. 1995. Studies on selection and utilization of a new CMS Gang 46a in hybrid rice. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 13(4): 432-436. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Liang J Y, Shao D Y, Peng H F, et al. 2019. Ruanhuayou 55, a new three-line indica hybrid rice combination. Hybrid Rice, 34(3): 73-74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] Liang S H, Li C G, Li S G, et al. 2011. Breeding of good quality early indica CMS line Shengshi a in rice. Hybrid Rice, 26(6): 6-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Lin S C, Yuan L P. 1980. Hybrid rice breeding in China. In: IRRI. Innovative Approaches to Rice Breeding. Manila, the Phillipines: International Rice Research Institute: 35-51.
[13] Lin S C, Min S K. 1992. Rice Varieties and their Genealogy in China. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Science and Technology Press: 282-292. (in Chinese)
[14] Lin T Z, Zhou C, Chen G M, et al. 2020. Heterosis-associated genes confer high yield in super hybrid rice. Theor Appl Genet, 133(12): 3287-3297.
[15] Lv Q M, Li W G, Sun Z Z, et al. 2020. Resequencing of 1, 143 indica rice accessions reveals important genetic variations and different heterosis patterns. Nat Commun, 11(1): 4778.
[16] Ma G H, Yuan L P. 2015. Hybrid rice achievements, development and prospect in China. J Integr Agric, 14(2): 197-205.
[17] Ma R R, Xu D H, Wang X Y, et al. 2007. Heterosis on plant morphology of Yongyou 6, an indica-japonica inter-subspecific super high-yielding hybrid rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 21(3): 281-286. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Mao H L, Sun S Y, Yao J L, et al. 2010. Linking differential domain functions of the GS 3 protein to natural variation of grain size in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107(45): 19579-19584.
[19] NY/T 2646-2014. 2014. Technical specification for identification and evaluation of blast resistance in rice variety regional test. [2025-10-25]. Beijing, China: Ministry of Agriculture. (in Chinese)
[20] Ren G J, Yan L A, Xie H A. 2016. Retrospective and perspective on indica three-line hybrid rice breeding research in China. Chin Sci Bull, 61: 3748-3760.
[21] Song X W, Lin J R, Wu M G. 2016. Review and prospect on utilization of heterosis between indica-japonica rice subspecies. Chin Sci Bull, 61: 3778-3786.
[22] Sun Z Z, Peng J X, Lv Q M, et al. 2023. Dissecting the genetic basis of heterosis in elite super-hybrid rice. Plant Physiol, 192(1): 307-325.
[23] Wang M Y, Wang J B. 2022a. Non-coding RNA expression analysis revealed the molecular mechanism of flag leaf heterosis in inter-subspecific hybrid rice. Front Plant Sci, 13: 990656.
[24] Wang M Y, Wang J B. 2022b. Transcriptome and DNA methylome analyses provide insight into the heterosis in flag leaf of inter-subspecific hybrid rice. Plant Mol Biol, 108(1/2): 105-125.
[25] Wang P F, Qi F X, Yao H L, et al. 2022. Fixation of hybrid sterility genes and favorable alleles of key yield-related genes with dominance contribute to the high yield of the Yongyou series of intersubspecific hybrid rice. J Genet Genomics, 49(5): 448-457.
[26] Wang W M, Wen H C, Yuan G L, et al. 1996. Breeding and research of K-type hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice, 11(6): 11-13. (in Chinese)
[27] Wei X, Qiu J, Yong K C, et al. 2021. A quantitative genomics map of rice provides genetic insights and guides breeding. Nat Genet, 53(2): 243-253.
[28] Wu J, Deng Q Y, Yuan D Y, et al. 2016. Progress of super hybrid rice research in China. Chin Sci Bull, 61: 3787-3796.
[29] Wu R X. 1986. Breeding of a dwarf abortive type early season indica rice sterility line Xieqingzao. Hybrid Rice, 4: 9-13. (in Chinese)
[30] Xiao X C, Wang Y J, Xiao S J, et al. 2001. Breeding of new cytoplasmic male sterile line ‘Dong B11A’ from Dongxiang wild rice. Acta Agric Jiangxi, 13: 8-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, et al. 2008. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet, 40(6): 761-767.
[32] Yang Z Y, Chen Q B, Chen R F, et al. 1982. Breeding of Keng type hybrid rice Liyu 57. Sci Agric Sin, 15(1): 38-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] Yang Z Y, Gao Y, Zhao Y C, et al. 1996. Progress in research on utilization of vigor in hybrids between indica and japonica rice subspecies. Acta Agron Sin, 22(4): 422-429. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] Yang Z Y, Li Z B, Dong L, et al. 2016. Development and prospect of hybrid japonica rice in China. Chin Sci Bull, 61: 3770-3777.
[35] Yu S B, Li J X, Tan Y F, et al. 1997. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94(17): 9226-9231.
[36] Yu S B, Li J X, Xu C G, et al. 1998. Epistasis plays an important role as genetic basis of heterosis in rice. Sci China Life Sci, 41(3): 293-302.
[37] Yuan L P. 1966. The sterile line of rice. Chin Sci Bull, 6: 185-188. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38] Yuan L P. 1986. Chinese hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice, 4(1): 5-10. (in Chinese)
[39] Zhan W, Yuan M Q, Xing Y Z. 2016. Progress in understanding molecular genetic basis of heterosis in rice. Chin Sci Bull, 61: 3842-3849.
[40] Zhang H L, Shen X H. 2007. Discovery and utilization of ID-type CMS in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci Agric Sin, 40: 2995-3002. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41] Zhang Q, Zhang G L, Zhu D L, et al. 2022. Spatiotemporal patterns of paddy rice production change in China during 1980-2018. Resour Sci, 44(4): 687-700. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[42] Zhao Z, Ding Z, Huang J J, et al. 2023. Copy number variation of the restorer Rf4 underlies human selection of three-line hybrid rice breeding. Nat Commun, 14(1): 7333.
[43] Zhou G, Chen Y, Yao W, et al. 2012. Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109(39): 15847-15852.
[44] Zhou K D, Li H Y, Li R D. 1987. D-type hybrid rice breeding and utilization. Hybrid Rice, 1: 11-16. (in Chinese)
[45] Zhu R S, Yu J H, Ding J P, et al. 2010. Research and practice of Honglian type hybrid rice. Hybrid Rice, 25(S1): 12-16. (in Chinese)
[46] Zhu Y G, Yu J H, Xu S H, et al. 1993. Studies on Ma Xie A of Ma Wei Zhan CMS in native rice variety of China. J Wuhan Univ Nat Sci Ed, 39(6): 110-115. (in Chinese with English abstract)

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: