Search for Dispersed Repeats in Oryza sativa Genome Using Iterative Procedure Method

doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2025.04.008

Rice Science ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 472-474.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2025.04.008

• Letters • Previous Articles Next Articles

Search for Dispersed Repeats in Oryza sativa Genome Using Iterative Procedure Method

Valentina Rudenko(), Eugene Korotkov

Institute of Bioengineering, Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119071, Russia

Received:2024-12-25 Accepted:2025-04-18 Online:2025-07-28 Published:2025-08-06
Contact: Valentina Rudenko

Abstract

Valentina Rudenko, Eugene Korotkov. Search for Dispersed Repeats in Oryza sativa Genome Using Iterative Procedure Method[J]. Rice Science, 2025, 32(4): 472-474.

Figures/Tables 1

References 18

[1]	Bao W D, Kojima K K, Kohany O. 2015. Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob DNA, 6: 11.
[2]	Bariah I, Keidar-Friedman D, Kashkush K. 2020. Where the wild things are: Transposable elements as drivers of structural and functional variations in the wheat genome. Front Plant Sci, 11: 585515.
[3]	Crooks G E, Hon G, Chandonia J M, et al. 2004. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res, 14(6): 1188-1190.
[4]	Durán-Meza G, López-García J, del Río-Correa J L. 2019. The self-similarity properties and multifractal analysis of DNA sequences. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci, 4(1): 267-278.
[5]	Flynn J M, Hubley R, Goubert C, et al. 2020. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 117(17): 9451-9457.
[6]	Gu W J, Castoe T A, Hedges D J, et al. 2008. Identification of repeat structure in large genomes using repeat probability clouds. Anal Biochem, 380(1): 77-83.
[7]	Jeong H H, Yalamanchili H K, Guo C W, et al. 2018. An ultra-fast and scalable quantification pipeline for transposable elements from next generation sequencing data. Pac Symp Biocomput, 23: 168-179.
[8]	Kohany O, Gentles A J, Hankus L, et al. 2006. Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor. BMC Bioinformatics, 7: 474.
[9]	Korotkov E, Suvorova Y, Kostenko D, et al. 2023. Search for dispersed repeats in bacterial genomes using an iterative procedure. Int J Mol Sci, 24(13): 10964.
[10]	Li R Q, Ye J, Li S G, et al. 2005. ReAS: Recovery of ancestral sequences for transposable elements from the unassembled reads of a whole genome shotgun. PLoS Comput Biol, 1(4): e43.
[11]	Nicolas J, Tempel S, Fiston-Lavier A S, et al. 2022. Finding and characterizing repeats in plant genomes. Methods Mol Biol, 2443: 327-385.
[12]	Orozco-Arias S, Isaza G, Guyot R. 2019. Retrotransposons in plant genomes: Structure, identification, and classification through bioinformatics and machine learning. Int J Mol Sci, 20(15): 3837.
[13]	Rudenko V, Korotkov E. 2024. Study of dispersed repeats in the Cyanidioschyzon merolae genome. Int J Mol Sci, 25(8): 4441.
[14]	Schnable P S, Ware D, Fulton R S, et al. 2009. The B73 maize genome: Complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science, 326: 1112-1115.
[15]	Storer J, Hubley R, Rosen J, et al. 2021. The Dfam community resource of transposable element families, sequence models, and genome annotations. Mob DNA, 12(1): 2.
[16]	Storer J M, Hubley R, Rosen J, et al. 2022. Methodologies for the de novo discovery of transposable element families. Genes, 13(4): 709.
[17]	Sun X P, Xiang Y L, Dou N N, et al. 2023. The role of transposon inverted repeats in balancing drought tolerance and yield-related traits in maize. Nat Biotechnol, 41: 120-127.
[18]	Yin C C. 2017. Identification of repeats in DNA sequences using nucleotide distribution uniformity. J Theor Biol, 412: 138-145.

Chr.	Size (bp)	Forward strand (bp)	Reverse strand (bp)	Sum strand (bp)	Coverage length by DR (bp)	Coverage percentage by DR (%)
1	43 270 923	58 622	57 948	116 570	28 506 833	65.9
2	35 937 250	46 078	46 875	92 953	23 016 863	64.0
3	36 413 819	47 082	46 919	94 001	23 406 275	64.3
4	35 502 694	47 810	48 794	96 604	24 046 268	67.7
5	29 958 434	41 084	41 227	82 311	20 261 347	67.6
6	31 248 787	42 039	41 226	83 265	21 116 089	67.6
7	29 697 621	39 747	38 891	78 638	19 851 381	66.8
8	28 443 022	38 406	37 968	76 374	19 077 932	67.1
9	23 012 720	30 346	30 227	60 573	15 143 124	65.8
10	23 207 287	31 599	32 542	64 141	15 890 885	68.5
11	29 021 106	38 552	37 491	76 043	19 485 282	67.1
12	27 531 856	35 397	35 869	71 266	18 111 191	65.8
Total	373 245 519	496 762	495 977	992 739	247 913 470	66.4

Chr.	Size (bp)	Forward strand (bp)	Reverse strand (bp)	Sum strand (bp)	Coverage length by DR (bp)	Coverage percentage by DR (%)
1	43 270 923	58 622	57 948	116 570	28 506 833	65.9
2	35 937 250	46 078	46 875	92 953	23 016 863	64.0
3	36 413 819	47 082	46 919	94 001	23 406 275	64.3
4	35 502 694	47 810	48 794	96 604	24 046 268	67.7
5	29 958 434	41 084	41 227	82 311	20 261 347	67.6
6	31 248 787	42 039	41 226	83 265	21 116 089	67.6
7	29 697 621	39 747	38 891	78 638	19 851 381	66.8
8	28 443 022	38 406	37 968	76 374	19 077 932	67.1
9	23 012 720	30 346	30 227	60 573	15 143 124	65.8
10	23 207 287	31 599	32 542	64 141	15 890 885	68.5
11	29 021 106	38 552	37 491	76 043	19 485 282	67.1
12	27 531 856	35 397	35 869	71 266	18 111 191	65.8
Total	373 245 519	496 762	495 977	992 739	247 913 470	66.4

Search for Dispersed Repeats in Oryza sativa Genome Using Iterative Procedure Method

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 1

References 18

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics