Research Papers

Suppressors of Cytokinin Receptor Mutant pal1/ohk4 Confer Favorable Alleles of Grain Number 1a (Gn1a) for Improving Grain Yield in japonica Rice

Expand
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    2Biobreeding Institute, Xianghu Laboratory, Hangzhou 311231, China
    3College of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Fiji National University, Nausori 1544, the Fiji Islands
    4Institute of Wetland Agriculture and Ecology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan 250100, China
First author contact:# These authors contributed equally to this work
Li Xueyong (lixueyong@caas.cn)

Received date: 2025-07-24

  Accepted date: 2025-10-21

  Online published: 2026-02-03

Abstract

Panicle number per plant, grain number per panicle, and grain weight are three key factors influencing rice grain yield. Gn1a, a major QTL for grain number per panicle, encodes the cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase (CKX) OsCKX2. While the use of elite Gn1a alleles has been well documented in indica rice cultivars, their potential in japonica rice remains largely unexplored. In this study, we characterized three suppressor mutants of the rice cytokinin receptor mutant pal1/ohk4 and found that all causal genes were novel alleles of Gn1a identified through the MutMap approach. These three suppressor mutants caused single amino acid substitutions in the FAD-binding domain (G556D and G156D) and the cytokinin-binding domain (Y357C), resulting in significantly reduced enzymatic activity of OsCKX2 and elevated cytokinin levels in the panicle. Haplotype analysis of Gn1a using a natural population from the 3K Rice Genomes Project showed that G556D, G156D, and Y357C were novel alleles of Gn1a. G556, G156, and Y357 were highly conserved, whereas four natural variants G54A, A105V, H116R, and N535K identified in different haplotypes of Gn1a showed extremely low conservation. By backcrossing the suppressor mutants with their original wild-type Huaidao 5, an elite japonica rice variety, we developed improved lines carrying only the gn1a mutation. The improved lines showed a significant increase in grain number per panicle, grain weight, panicle number per plant, plant height, and stem thickness, leading to a 25.7%-28.7% increase in grain yield per plot compared with Huaidao 5. This study provides valuable Gn1a alleles ‌for synergistic improvement of the three key yield factors and offers germplasm resources for high-yielding breeding in japonica rice.

Cite this article

Jia Huichao, Chun Yan, Ashmit Kumar, Mo Tianyu, Wang Haifeng, Guo Shengyuan, Fang Jingjing, Zhao Jinfeng, Sun Wei, Zhang Shiyong, Yuan Shoujiang, Li Xueyong . Suppressors of Cytokinin Receptor Mutant pal1/ohk4 Confer Favorable Alleles of Grain Number 1a (Gn1a) for Improving Grain Yield in japonica Rice[J]. Rice Science, 2026 , 33(1) : 81 -98 . DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2025.10.008

References

[1] Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, et al. 2012. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap. Nat Biotechnol, 30(2): 174-178.
[2] Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, et al. 2024. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature, 630: 493-500.
[3] Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S Y, et al. 2005. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science, 309: 741-745.
[4] Bae E, Bingman C A, Bitto E, et al. 2008. Crystal structure of Arabidopsis thaliana cytokinin dehydrogenase. Proteins, 70(1): 303-306.
[5] Brownlee B G, Hall R H, Whitty C D. 1975. 3-Methyl-2-butenal: An enzymatic degradation product of the cytokinin, N6-(∆2-isopentenyl) adenine. Can J Biochem, 53(1): 37-41.
[6] Burr C A, Sun J J, Yamburenko M V, et al. 2020. The HK5 and HK6 cytokinin receptors mediate diverse developmental pathways in rice. Development, 147(20): dev191734.
[7] Chun Y, Kumar A, Li X Y. 2022. Genetic and molecular pathways controlling rice inflorescence architecture. Front Plant Sci, 13: 1010138.
[8] Chun Y, Fang J J, Savelieva E M, et al. 2023. The cytokinin receptor OHK4/OsHK4 regulates inflorescence architecture in rice via an IDEAL PLANT ARCHITECTURE1/WEALTHY FARMER’S PANICLE-mediated positive feedback circuit. Plant Cell, 36(1): 40-64.
[9] D’Agostino I B, Deruère J, Kieber J J. 2000. Characterization of the response of the Arabidopsis response regulator gene family to cytokinin. Plant Physiol, 124(4): 1706-1717.
[10] Dabravolski S A, Isayenkov S V. 2021. Evolution of the cytokinin dehydrogenase (CKX) domain. J Mol Evol, 89(9/10): 665-677.
[11] Deveshwar P, Prusty A, Sharma S, et al. 2020. Phytohormone-mediated molecular mechanisms involving multiple genes and QTL govern grain number in rice. Front Genet, 11: 586462.
[12] Duan J B, Yu H, Yuan K, et al. 2019. Strigolactone promotes cytokinin degradation through transcriptional activation of CYTOKININ OXIDASE/DEHYDROGENASE 9 in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 116(28): 14319-14324.
[13] Fekih R, Takagi H, Tamiru M, et al. 2013. MutMap+: Genetic mapping and mutant identification without crossing in rice. PLoS One, 8(7): e68529.
[14] Feng X M, Wang C, Nan J Z, et al. 2017. Updating the elite rice variety Kongyu 131 by improving the Gn1a locus. Rice, 10(1): 35.
[15] Fraaije M W, van Berkel W J, Benen J A, et al. 1998. A novel oxidoreductase family sharing a conserved FAD-binding domain. Trends Biochem Sci, 23(6): 206-207.
[16] Frébort I, Šebela M, Galuszka P, et al. 2002. Cytokinin oxidase/ cytokinin dehydrogenase assay: Optimized procedures and applications. Anal Biochem, 306(1): 1-7.
[17] Frébort I, Kowalska M, Hluska T, et al. 2011. Evolution of cytokinin biosynthesis and degradation. J Exp Bot, 62(8): 2431-2452.
[18] Frébortová J, Fraaije M W, Galuszka P, et al. 2004. Catalytic reaction of cytokinin dehydrogenase: Preference for quinones as electron acceptors. Biochem J, 380(Pt 1): 121-130.
[19] Guo T, Chen K, Dong N Q, et al. 2018. GRAIN SIZE AND NUMBER1 negatively regulates the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMPK6 cascade to coordinate the trade-off between grain number per panicle and grain size in rice. Plant Cell, 30(4): 871-888.
[20] Guo T, Lu Z Q, Shan J X, et al. 2020. ERECTA1 acts upstream of the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMPK6 cascade to control spikelet number by regulating cytokinin metabolism in rice. Plant Cell, 32(9): 2763-2779.
[21] Han Y C, Hu Q F, Gong N, et al. 2024. Natural variation in MORE GRAINS 1 regulates grain number and grain weight in rice. J Integr Plant Biol, 66(7): 1440-1458.
[22] Heyl A, Schmülling T. 2003. Cytokinin signal perception and transduction. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 6(5): 480-488.
[23] Hiei Y, Komari T. 2008. Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of rice using immature embryos or calli induced from mature seed. Nat Protoc, 3(5): 824-834.
[24] Hirose N, Makita N, Kojima M, et al. 2007. Overexpression of a type-A response regulator alters rice morphology and cytokinin metabolism. Plant Cell Physiol, 48(3): 523-539.
[25] Howell S H, Lall S, Che P. 2003. Cytokinins and shoot development. Trends Plant Sci, 8(9): 453-459.
[26] Huang X Z, Qian Q, Liu Z B, et al. 2009. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet, 41(4): 494-497.
[27] Hwang I, Sheen J. 2001. Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature, 413(6854): 383-389.
[28] Joerger A C, Fersht A R. 2007. Structure-function-rescue: The diverse nature of common p 53 cancer mutants. Oncogene, 26(15): 2226-2242.
[29] Joerger A C, Ang H C, Veprintsev D B, et al. 2005. Structures of p53 cancer mutants and mechanism of rescue by second-site suppressor mutations. J Biol Chem, 280(16): 16030-16037.
[30] Joerger A C, Ang H C, Fersht A R. 2006. Structural basis for understanding oncogenic p53 mutations and designing rescue drugs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103(41): 15056-15061.
[31] Kellogg E A. 2022. Genetic control of branching patterns in grass inflorescences. Plant Cell, 34(7): 2518-2533.
[32] Kopecný D, Sebela M, et al.2005. High-level expression and characterization of Zea mays cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biochimie, 87(11): 1011-1022.
[33] Kopečný D, Šebela M, Briozzo P, et al. 2008. Mechanism-based inhibitors of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase attack FAD cofactor. J Mol Biol, 380(5): 886-899.
[34] Kopečný D, Briozzo P, Popelková H, et al. 2010. Phenyl- and benzylurea cytokinins as competitive inhibitors of cytokinin oxidase/ dehydrogenase: A structural study. Biochimie, 92(8): 1052-1062.
[35] Kopečný D, Končitíková R, Popelka H, et al. 2016. Kinetic and structural investigation of the cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase active site. FEBS J, 283(2): 361-377.
[36] Kurakawa T, Ueda N, Maekawa M, et al. 2007. Direct control of shoot meristem activity by a cytokinin-activating enzyme. Nature, 445(7128): 652-655.
[37] Liu D P, Zhao H, Xiao Y H, et al. 2022. A cryptic inhibitor of cytokinin phosphorelay controls rice grain size. Mol Plant, 15(2): 293-307.
[38] Liu Z, Wei F, Feng Y Q. 2010. Determination of cytokinins in plant samples by polymer monolith microextraction coupled with hydrophilic interaction chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Methods, 2(11): 1676-1685.
[39] Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 25(4): 402-408.
[40] Ma X L, Liu Y G. 2016. CRISPR/Cas9-based multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Curr Protoc Mol Biol, 115(1): 31.6.1-31.6.21.
[41] Malito E, Coda A, Bilyeu K D, et al. 2004. Structures of Michaelis and product complexes of plant cytokinin dehydrogenase: Implications for flavoenzyme catalysis. J Mol Biol, 341(5): 1237-1249.
[42] Mok D W, Mok M C. 2001. Cytokinin metabolism and action. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 52: 89-118.
[43] Morris R O, Bilyeu K D, Laskey J G, et al. 1999. Isolation of a gene encoding a glycosylated cytokinin oxidase from maize. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 255(2): 328-333.
[44] Naeem M, Ali Z, Khan A, et al. 2022. Omics: A tool for resilient rice genetic improvement strategies. Mol Biol Rep, 49(6): 5075-5088.
[45] Peng H, Wang K, Chen Z, et al. 2020. MBKbase for rice: An integrated omics knowledgebase for molecular breeding in rice. Nucleic Acids Res, 48(D1): D1085-D1092.
[46] Rashid A, Achary V M M, Abdin M Z, et al. 2024. Cytokinin oxidase2-deficient mutants improve panicle and grain architecture through cytokinin accumulation and enhance drought tolerance in indica rice. Plant Cell Rep, 43(8): 207.
[47] Rezaei E E, Webber H, Asseng S, et al. 2023. Climate change impacts on crop yields. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 4(12): 831-846.
[48] Riou-Khamlichi C, Huntley R, Jacqmard A, et al. 1999. Cytokinin activation of Arabidopsis cell division through a D-type cyclin. Science, 283(5407): 1541-1544.
[49] Rong C Y, Liu Y X, Chang Z Y, et al. 2022. Cytokinin oxidase/ dehydrogenase family genes exhibit functional divergence and overlap in rice growth and development, especially in control of tillering. J Exp Bot, 73(11): 3552-3568.
[50] Růžička K, Šimášková M, Duclercq J, et al. 2009. Cytokinin regulates root meristem activity via modulation of the polar auxin transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 106(11): 4284-4289.
[51] Schmülling T, Werner T, Riefler M, et al. 2003. Structure and function of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase genes of maize, rice, Arabidopsis and other species. J Plant Res, 116(3): 241-252.
[52] Su W, Howell S H. 1992. A single genetic locus, Ckr1, defines Arabidopsis mutants in which root growth is resistant to low concentrations of cytokinin. Plant Physiol, 99(4): 1569-1574.
[53] Sun L J, Zhang Q, Wu J X, et al. 2014. Two rice authentic histidine phosphotransfer proteins, OsAHP1 and OsAHP2, mediate cytokinin signaling and stress responses in rice. Plant Physiol, 165(1): 335-345.
[54] Takeda S, Matsuoka M. 2008. Genetic approaches to crop improvement: Responding to environmental and population changes. Nat Rev Genet, 9(6): 444-457.
[55] Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol, 38(7): 3022-3027.
[56] Taniguchi M, Kiba T, Sakakibara H, et al. 1998. Expression of Arabidopsis response regulator homologs is induced by cytokinins and nitrate. FEBS Lett, 429(3): 259-262.
[57] To J P C, Deruère J, Maxwell B B, et al. 2007. Cytokinin regulates type-A Arabidopsis response regulator activity and protein stability via two-component phosphorelay. Plant Cell, 19(12): 3901-3914.
[58] Tu B, Tao Z, Wang S G, et al. 2022. Loss of Gn1a/OsCKX2 confers heavy-panicle rice with excellent lodging resistance. J Integr Plant Biol, 64(1): 23-38.
[59] Ueda Y, Siddique S, Frei M. 2015. A novel gene, OZONE-RESPONSIVE APOPLASTIC PROTEIN1, enhances cell death in ozone stress in rice. Plant Physiol, 169(1): 873-889.
[60] Ueguchi C, Sato S, Kato T, et al. 2001. The AHK4 gene involved in the cytokinin-signaling pathway as a direct receptor molecule in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol, 42(7): 751-755.
[61] Wang H M, Tong X H, Tang L Q, et al. 2022. RLB (RICE LATERAL BRANCH) recruits PRC2-mediated H3K27 tri-methylation on OsCKX4 to regulate lateral branching. Plant Physiol, 188(1): 460-476.
[62] Wang J, Xu H X, Li N W, et al. 2015. Artificial selection of Gn1a plays an important role in improving rice yields across different ecological regions. Rice, 8(1): 37.
[63] Wang S G, Ma B T, Gao Q, et al. 2018. Dissecting the genetic basis of heavy panicle hybrid rice uncovered Gn1a and GS3 as key genes. Theor Appl Genet, 131(6): 1391-1403.
[64] Wang T, Zou T, He Z Y, et al. 2019. GRAIN LENGTH AND AWN 1 negatively regulates grain size in rice. J Integr Plant Biol, 61(10): 1036-1042.
[65] Wang W S, Mauleon R, Hu Z Q, et al. 2018. Genomic variation in 3, 010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature, 557(7703): 43-49.
[66] Wang Y H, Li J Y. 2008. Molecular basis of plant architecture. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 59: 253-279.
[67] Worthen J M, Yamburenko M V, Lim J, et al. 2019. Type-B response regulators of rice play key roles in growth, development and cytokinin signaling. Development, 146(13): dev174870.
[68] Wu B, Meng J H, Liu H B, et al. 2023. Suppressing a phosphohydrolase of cytokinin nucleotide enhances grain yield in rice. Nat Genet, 55(8): 1381-1389.
[69] Xing Y Z, Zhang Q F. 2010. Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 61: 421-442.
[70] Xu R, Duan P G, Yu H Y, et al. 2018. Control of grain size and weight by the OsMKKK10-OsMKK4-OsMAPK 6 signaling pathway in rice. Mol Plant, 11(6): 860-873.
[71] Yamburenko M V, Kieber J J, Schaller G E. 2017. Dynamic patterns of expression for genes regulating cytokinin metabolism and signaling during rice inflorescence development. PLoS One, 12(4): e0176060.
[72] Yeh S Y, Chen H W, Ng C Y, et al. 2015. Down-regulation of cytokinin oxidase 2 expression increases tiller number and improves rice yield. Rice, 8(1): 36.
[73] Yoon J, Jeong H J, Baek G, et al. 2021. A VIN3-like protein OsVIL1 is involved in grain yield and biomass in rice. Plants, 11(1): 83.
[74] Zhang J H, Lin Q B, Wang X, et al. 2024. The DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE1-GRAIN NUMBER ASSOCIATED module enhances rice yield by repressing CYTOKININ OXIDASE 2 expression. Plant Cell, 37(1): koae309.
[75] Zheng X L, Zhang S T, Liang Y L, et al. 2023. Loss-function mutants of OsCKX gene family based on CRISPR-Cas systems revealed their diversified roles in rice. Plant Genome, 16(2): e20283.
[76] Zürcher E, Liu J C, di Donato M, et al. 2016. Plant development regulated by cytokinin sinks. Science, 353(6303): 1027-1030.
Outlines

/

浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
Copyright © Editorial office of Rice Science
Tel: 0571-63371017 E-mail: crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.
Total visitors:  Visitors of today:  Now online: