
High Throughput 3D Phenotyping of Canopy Occupation Volume as Major Predictor of Rice Canopy Photosynthesis
Received date: 2025-05-21
Accepted date: 2025-08-21
Online published: 2026-02-03
Canopy photosynthesis, rather than leaf photosynthesis, is highly related to plant biomass and yield formation. Studying canopy photosynthesis and identifying the parameters that control it can help optimize agricultural management and achieve crop yield potential. Compared with traditional parameters, canopy occupation volume (COV) offers an integrative parameter on canopy architecture related to canopy photosynthetic rates. In this study, we developed a high-throughput method to derive COV for different rice varieties. We first used multi-perspective two-dimensional imaging to reconstruct three-dimensional point clouds of rice plants and developed a suite of pipelines to calculate plant height, leaf number, tiller number, and biomass, with R2 values of 91.8%, 95.9%, 82.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. We further employed point cloud data to reconstruct the surfaces of rice plants and construct a virtual canopy model of the rice population. Light distribution was simulated using a ray-tracing algorithm and canopy photosynthetic rates were simulated via photosynthetic rate-incident light intensity curve fitting. Furthermore, we systematically explored the relationships between canopy phenotypes and photosynthetic rates, and found that COV was the most effective predictor of canopy photosynthesis, achieving an R2 value of 92.1%. Adjustment in atmospheric transmittance showed that COV strongly correlated with canopy photosynthesis under different light conditions, with higher accuracy observed under diffuse light. Variations in planting density confirmed that this correlation remained strong at the community level. In summary, this study demonstrates that COV is closely linked to simulated canopy photosynthesis and the developed pipeline can support future agronomic and breeding research.
Zhou Jiaren, Song Qingfeng, Li Wanwan, Zhang Mengqi, Zhang Man, Zhu Xinguang, Wang Minjuan . High Throughput 3D Phenotyping of Canopy Occupation Volume as Major Predictor of Rice Canopy Photosynthesis[J]. Rice Science, 2026 , 33(1) : 99 -112 . DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2025.10.002
| [1] | Arya S, Sandhu K S, Singh J, et al. 2022. Deep learning: As the new frontier in high-throughput plant phenotyping. Euphytica, 218: 47. |
| [2] | Bannari A, Khurshid K S, Staenz K, et al. 2007. A comparison of hyperspectral chlorophyll indices for wheat crop chlorophyll content estimation using laboratory reflectance measurements. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 45(10): 3063-3074. |
| [3] | Camino C, Gonzalez-Dugo V, Hernandez P, et al. 2019. Radiative transfer Vcmax estimation from hyperspectral imagery and SIF retrievals to assess photosynthetic performance in rainfed and irrigated plant phenotyping trials. Remote Sens Environ, 231: 111186. |
| [4] | Chang T G, Zhao H, Wang N, et al. 2019. A three-dimensional canopy photosynthesis model in rice with a complete description of the canopy architecture, leaf physiology, and mechanical properties. J Exp Bot, 70(9): 2479-2490. |
| [5] | Chen L H, Xu M, Cheng Z X, et al. 2024. Effects of nitrogen deficiency on the photosynthesis, chlorophyll a fluorescence, antioxidant system, and sulfur compounds in Oryza sativa. Int J Mol Sci, 25(19): 10409. |
| [6] | Chen Q M, Zheng B Y, Chenu K, et al.2022. Unsupervised plot-scale LAI phenotyping via UAV-based imaging, modelling, and machine learning. Plant Phenomics, 2022: 9768253. |
| [7] | Chen T W, Nguyen T M N, Kahlen K, et al. 2014. Quantification of the effects of architectural traits on dry mass production and light interception of tomato canopy under different temperature regimes using a dynamic functional-structural plant model. J Exp Bot, 65(22): 6399-6410. |
| [8] | Deng R L, Jiang Y, Tao M, et al. 2020. Deep learning-based automatic detection of productive tillers in rice. Comput Electron Agric, 177: 105703. |
| [9] | Evers J B, Vos J, Fournier C, et al. 2005. Towards a generic architectural model of tillering in Gramineae, as exemplified by spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytol, 166(3): 801-812. |
| [10] | Fageria N K, Santos A B, Cutrim V A. 2008. Dry matter and yield of lowland rice genotypes as influence by nitrogen fertilization. J Plant Nutr, 31(4): 788-795. |
| [11] | Gu S H, Wen W L, Xu T J, et al. 2022. Use of 3D modeling to refine predictions of canopy light utilization: A comparative study on canopy photosynthesis models with different dimensions. Front Plant Sci, 13: 735981. |
| [12] | Hickey L T, Hafeez A N, Robinson H, et al. 2019. Breeding crops to feed 10 billion. Nat Biotechnol, 37(7): 744-754. |
| [13] | Hwang I, Yoon S, Kim D, et al. 2023. Evaluation of the effects of supplemental lighting and stem number on greenhouse sweet pepper growth and yield via ray-tracing simulation with 3D plant models. Biosyst Eng, 226: 252-265. |
| [14] | Jin S C, Sun X L, Wu F F, et al. 2021. Lidar sheds new light on plant phenomics for plant breeding and management: Recent advances and future prospects. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 171: 202-223. |
| [15] | Kawamura K, Asai H, Yasuda T, et al. 2020. Field phenotyping of plant height in an upland rice field in Laos using low-cost small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Plant Prod Sci, 23(4): 452-465. |
| [16] | Li Y. 2021. Morphological and structural phenotypes extraction of maize using multi-source data and deep learning. Changchun, China: Jilin Agricultural University. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [17] | Li Y L, Zhan X H, Liu S Y, et al. 2023. Self-supervised plant phenotyping by combining domain adaptation with 3D plant model simulations: Application to wheat leaf counting at seedling stage. Plant Phenomics, 5: 0041. |
| [18] | Liu F S, Song Q F, Zhao J K, et al. 2021a. Canopy occupation volume as an indicator of canopy photosynthetic capacity. New Phytol, 232(2): 941-956. |
| [19] | Liu F S, Hu P C, Zheng B Y, et al. 2021b. A field-based high-throughput method for acquiring canopy architecture using unmanned aerial vehicle images. Agric For Meteor, 296: 108231. |
| [20] | Liu S Y, Martre P, Buis S, et al. 2019. Estimation of plant and canopy architectural traits using the digital plant phenotyping platform. Plant Physiol, 181(3): 881-890. |
| [21] | Mattoccia S, Poggi M. 2015. A passive RGBD sensor for accurate and real-time depth sensing self-contained into an FPGA. In:Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras. Seville, Spain: ACM: 146-151. |
| [22] | Nex F, Remondino F. 2014. UAV for 3D mapping applications: A review. Appl Geomat, 6(1): 1-15. |
| [23] | Oikawa S, Ainsworth E A. 2016. Changes in leaf area, nitrogen content and canopy photosynthesis in soybean exposed to an ozone concentration gradient. Environ Pollut, 215: 347-355. |
| [24] | Qiu R C, Zhang M, He Y. 2022. Field estimation of maize plant height at jointing stage using an RGB-D camera. Crop J, 10(5): 1274-1283. |
| [25] | Raj T, Hashim F H, Huddin A B, et al. 2020. A survey on LiDAR scanning mechanisms. Electronics, 9(5): 741. |
| [26] | Ren M M, Huang M H, Qiu H Y, et al. 2021. Genome-wide association study of the genetic basis of effective tiller number in rice. Rice, 14(1): 56. |
| [27] | Schönberger J L, Frahm J M. 2016. Structure-from-motion revisited. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). June 27-30, 2016. Las Vegas, NV, USA: IEEE: 4104-4113. |
| [28] | Snavely N, Seitz S M, Szeliski R. 2008. Modeling the world from Internet photo collections. Int J Comput Vis, 80(2): 189-210. |
| [29] | Song Q F, Zhang G L, Zhu X G. 2013. Optimal crop canopy architecture to maximise canopy photosynthetic CO2 uptake under elevated CO2: A theoretical study using a mechanistic model of canopy photosynthesis. Funct Plant Biol, 40(2): 108-124. |
| [30] | Song Q F, Liu F S, Bu H Y, et al. 2023. Quantifying contributions of different factors to canopy photosynthesis in 2 maize varieties: Development of a novel 3D canopy modeling pipeline. Plant Phenomics, 5: 0075. |
| [31] | Sonobe R, Yamashita H, Mihara H, et al. 2020. Estimation of leaf chlorophyll a, b and carotenoid contents and their ratios using hyperspectral reflectance. Remote Sens, 12(19): 3265. |
| [32] | Sreekanta S, Haaning A, Dobbels A, et al. 2024. Variation in shoot architecture traits and their relationship to canopy coverage and light interception in soybean (Glycine max). BMC Plant Biol, 24(1): 194. |
| [33] | Wu C Y, Niu Z, Tang Q, et al. 2008. Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices: Modeling and validation. Agric For Meteor, 148(8/9): 1230-1241. |
| [34] | Wu D. 2019. Research on 3D reconstruction of rice plant. Wuhan, China: Huazhong Agricultural University. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [35] | Xiao S F, Ye Y L, Fei S P, et al. 2023a. High-throughput calculation of organ-scale traits with reconstructed accurate 3D canopy structures using a UAV RGB camera with an advanced cross-circling oblique route. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 201: 104-122. |
| [36] | Xiao S F, Fei S P, Li Q, et al. 2023b. The importance of using realistic 3D canopy models to calculate light interception in the field. Plant Phenomics, 5: 0082. |
| [37] | Xu X X, Zhang X, Ni W, et al. 2024. Nitrogen-potassium balance improves leaf photosynthetic capacity by regulating leaf nitrogen allocation in apple. Hortic Res, 11(1): uhad253. |
| [38] | Yang M, Cho S I. 2021. High-resolution 3D crop reconstruction and automatic analysis of phenotyping index using machine learning. Agriculture, 11(10): 1010. |
| [39] | Yang Y, Li M. 2020. A point cloud denoising method based on a hybrid filtering and density clustering. Metrol Test Technol, 47: 24-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [40] | Yao Y J, Liu Q, Liu Q H. 2009. Canopy modeling and validation for row planted crops of key growth stages. In: 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. July 12-17, 2009. Cape Town, South Africa: IEEE: 686-689. |
| [41] | Zhang T Y, Suen C Y. 1984. A fast parallel algorithm for thinning digital patterns. Commun ACM, 27(3): 236-239. |
| [42] | Zhi X Y, Massey-Reed S R, Wu A, et al.2022. Estimating photosynthetic attributes from high-throughput canopy hyperspectral sensing in sorghum. Plant Phenomics, 2022: 9768502. |
| [43] | Zhu X G, Long S P. 2009. Can increase in rubisco specificity increase carbon gain by whole canopy? A modeling analysis. In: Laisk A, Nedbal L, Govindjee. Photosynthesis in Silico: Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration, Vol 29. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer: 401-416. |
| [44] | Zhu X G, Song Q F, Ort D R. 2012. Elements of a dynamic systems model of canopy photosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 15(3): 237-244. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |