
Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties among Rural Farm Households in Central Nepal
Received date: 2014-01-23
Accepted date: 2014-07-20
Online published: 2014-11-26
The use of improved high yielding crop varieties is an important avenue for reducing hunger and food insecurity in developing countries. Using cross-sectional data obtained from a survey conducted during 2013 crop season, we performed a probit model (plot-level analysis) to determine the probability of adopting new improved rice varieties (NIRVs) by smallholder farmers particularly from two main agro-ecological regions (hills and tropical plain terai regions) of Central Nepal. The results revealed that education, extension services and seed access play significant roles in adoption decisions. Additionally, farm and field characteristic variables such as farm size, endowment of favorable land type (e.g. lowlands), and animal power (e.g. oxen) are the key factors influencing the probability of adopting NIRVs. The results showed that technology specific variables (e.g. yield potential and acceptability) are significant for explaining adoption behavior, implying that it is important to take farmers’ preferences to varietal characteristics into consideration in the design of a research and development program. Given the significant role played by extension and access related variables, increased emphasis on information dissemination, field demonstration, and farmers’ participatory research and training programs to popularize new rice varieties and enhance their adoption rate are required.This also suggests that policy intervention should be made on improving the educational status of farming households, and developing programs on varietal package of rice seed which offer farmers a variety of choices among the appropriate pools of germplasm. Such programs ultimately help farmers develop more profit-oriented behavior which are necessary to enhance adoption rate, production and food security in the long run.
Ghimire Raju, Wen-chi Huang, Shrestha RudraBahadur . Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties among Rural Farm Households in Central Nepal[J]. Rice Science, 2015 , 22(1) : 35 -43 . DOI: 10.1016/S1672-6308(14)60278-X
| 1 | Adesina A A, Zinnah M M.1993. Technology characteristics, farmers’ perceptions and adoption decisions: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone.Agric Econ, 9(4):297-311. |
| 2 | Asfaw S, Shiferaw B, Simtowe F, Lipper L.2012. Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia.Food Policy, 37(3): 283-295. |
| 3 | Becerril J, Abdulai A.2010. The impact of improved maize varieties on poverty in mexico: A propensity score-matching approach.World Dev,38(7): 1024-1035. |
| 4 | Besley T, Case A.1993. Modeling technology adoption in developing countries.Am Econ Rev, 83(2): 396-402. |
| 5 | Bohle HG, Adhikari J.1998. Rural livelihoods at risk: How Nepalese farmers cope with food insecurity.Mountain Res Dev, 18(4): 321-332. |
| 6 | CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics). 2011. Nepal Living Standard Survey. National Planning Commission Secretariat, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. |
| 7 | Cunguara B, Darnhofer I.2011. Assessing the impact of improved agricultural technologies on household income in rural Mozambique.Food Policy, 36(3):378-390. |
| 8 | Doss C R.2006. Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies:Limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement.Agric Econ, 34(3):207-219. |
| 9 | Doss C R, Morris. M L.2000. How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations?Agric Econ, 25(1):27-39. |
| 10 | Faltermeier L, Abdulai A.2009. The impact of water conservation and intensification technologies: Empirical evidence for rice farmers in Ghana.Agric Econ,40(3): 365-379. |
| 11 | FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2010. Assessment of Food Security and Nutrition Situation in Nepal. A Report Prepared for National Medium: Term Priority Framework (NMTPF), Kathmandu, Nepal. |
| 12 | Feder G, JustR E, Zilberman D.1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey.Econ Dev Cul Change, 33(2):255-298. |
| 13 | Feleke S, Zegeye T.2006. Adoption of improved maize varieties in Southern Ethiopia: Factors and strategy options.Food Policy, 31(5): 442-457. |
| 14 | Foster AD, Rosenzweig M R.2010. Microeconomics of technology adoption.AnnRev Econ,2(1):395-424. |
| 15 | Gao X, Wailes E J, Cramer G L.1995. Double-hurdle model with bivariate normal errors: An application to US rice demand.J Agric ApplEcon, 27(2):363-376. |
| 16 | Gauchan D, Panta H K, Gautam S, Nepali M B.2012. Patterns of adoption of improved rice varieties and farm-level impacts in stress-prone rainfed areas of Nepal. In: Patterns of Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties and Farm-Level Impacts in Stress-Prone Rainfed Areas in South Asia. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute: 37-103. |
| 17 | Gittelsohn J, Mookherji S, Pelto G.1998. Operationalizing household food security in rural Nepal.Food Nutri Bull, 19(3):210-222. |
| 18 | Greene W H.2012. Econometric Analysis. 7th edn. Princeton Hall: New York University. |
| 19 | Gumma M K, Gauchan D, Nelson A, Pandey S, Rala A.2011. Temporal changes in rice-growing area and their impact on livelihood over a decade: A case study of Nepal.Agric Ecosyst Environ, 142(3/4):382-392. |
| 20 | Janvry D A, Dustan A, Sadoulet E.. |
| 21 | Joshi G R, Pandey S.2006. Farmers’ perceptions and adoption of modern rice varieties in Nepal.Quart J Int Agric, 45(2):171. |
| 22 | Joshi K D, Conroy C, Witcombe J R.2012. Agriculture, seed, and innovation in Nepal: Industry and policy issues for the future. In: International food Policy Research Institure Project Paper: 60. |
| 23 | Just R E, Zilberman D.1988. The effects of agricultural development policies on income distribution and technological change in agriculture.J Dev Econ,28(2): 193-216. |
| 24 | Karanja D D, Renkow M, Crawford E W.2003. Welfare effects of maize technologies in marginal and high potential regions of Kenya.Agric Econ,29(3): 331-341. |
| 25 | Kassie M, Shiferaw B, Muricho G.2011. Agricultural technology, crop income, and poverty alleviation in Uganda.World Dev,39(10): 1784-1795. |
| 26 | Kohansal M R, Firoozzare A.2013. Applying multinomial logit model for determining socio-economic factors affecting major choice of consumers in food purchasing: The case of Mashhad.JAgric SciTechnol, 15:1307-1317. |
| 27 | Langyintuo A S, Mungoma C.2008. The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia.Food Policy,33(6): 550-559. |
| 28 | Launio C, Redondo G, Beltran J,Morooka Y.2008. Adoption and spatial diversity of later generation modern rice varieties in the Philippines.Agron J, 100(5):1380-1389. |
| 29 | Mariano M J, Villano R, Fleming E.2012. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines.Agric Syst, 110:41-53. |
| 30 | Mendola M.2007. Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: A propensity-score matching analysis for rural Bangladesh.Food Policy,32(3): 372-393. |
| 31 | Mignouna D B, Manyong V M, Rusike J, Mutabazi K D S, Senkondo E M.2011. Determinants of adopting imazapyr-resistant maize technologies and its impact on household income in Western Kenya.AgBioForum,14(3):158-163. |
| 32 | MOAD (Ministry of Agriculture Development). 2012. Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal. |
| 33 | Newman C, Henchion M, Matthews A.2003. A double-hurdle model of Irish household expenditure on prepared meals.Appl Econ, 35(9):1053-1061. |
| 34 | Noltze M, Schwarze S, Qaim M.2012. Understanding the adoption of system technologies in smallholder agriculture: The system of rice intensification (SRI) in Timor Leste.Agric Syst, 108:64-73. |
| 35 | Pandey S, Gauchan D, Malabayabas M, Bool-Emerick M, Hardy B.2012. Patterns of adoption of improved rice varieties and farm-level impacts in stress-prone rainfed areas of Nepal. In: Patterns of Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties and Farm-Level Impacts in Stress-Prone Rainfed Areas in South Asia. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. |
| 36 | Poudel M P, Chen SE, Ghimire R.2013. Rice yield distribution and risk assessment in South Asian countries: A statistical investigation.Int J Agric Manag Dev,3(1): 53-63. |
| 37 | Pyakuryal B, Roy D, Thapa Y.2010. Trade liberalization and food security in Nepal.Food Policy, 35(1):20-31. |
| 38 | Sall S, Norman D, Featherstone A M.2000. Quantitative assessment of improved rice variety adoption: The farmer’s perspective.Agric Syst, 66(2):129-144. |
| 39 | Sanogo I, Maliki A M.2010. Rice market integration and food security in Nepal: The role of cross-border trade with India.Food Policy, 35(4): 312-322. |
| 40 | Seddon D, Adhikari J.2003. Conflict and food security in Nepal: A preliminary analysis. A report to Rural Reconstruction Nepal, Kathmandu. |
| 41 | Uaiene R N, Arndt C, Masters W A.2009. Determinants of Agricultural Technology Adoption in Mozambique. Discussion papers(67E).National Directorate of Studies and Policy Analysis, Ministry of Planning and Development, Republic of Mozambique: 1-31. |
| 42 | Yen S T, Jones A M.1997. Household consumption of cheese: An inverse hyperbolic sine double-hurdle model with dependent errors.Am J Agric Econ,79(1):246-251. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |