Letter

Different Hypotheses for Resistance Loss of Rice Varieties to Magnaporthe oryzae

Expand
  • China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China

Received date: 2020-03-16

  Accepted date: 2020-04-22

  Online published: 2021-01-28

Cite this article

Kehan Zhao, Shiwen Huang . Different Hypotheses for Resistance Loss of Rice Varieties to Magnaporthe oryzae[J]. Rice Science, 2021 , 28(1) : 11 -12 . DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2020.11.003

References

[1] Feng D G, Peng G L, Luo Q M, Huang H. 1995. The relationship between resistance variations of rice varieties and pthogenicity variations of rice blast fungus. Acta Phytopath Sin, 2: 184. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Ou S H. 1985. Rice Diseases. 2nd edn. Kew, UK: Commonwealth Mycological Institute: 109-201.
[3] Shi M L. 2014. Relationship of Magnaporthe oryzae diversity and rice varieties and geographical distribution. [Master Thesis]. Nanjing, China: Nanjing Agricultural University. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Silué D, Notteghem J L, Tharreau D. 1992. Evidence of a gene for gene relationship in the Oryza sativa-Magnaporthe grisea pathosystem. Phytopathology, 82(5): 577-580.
[5] Zeng F S, Xiang L B, Yang L J, Yang X L, Yang J S, Yu D Z. 2011. Diversity analysis for resistance of 251 rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties (lines) to rice blast disease. Acta Phytopath Sin, 4: 399-410. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Zhu D. 2014. Analysis of avirulence gene of Magnaporthe oryzae, genotype of rice resistance to blast and resistance identification in fields in Hubei Province. [Master Thesis]. Wuhan, China: Huazhong Agricultural University. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Outlines

/

浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
Copyright © Editorial office of Rice Science
Tel: 0571-63371017 E-mail: crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co., Ltd.
Total visitors:  Visitors of today:  Now online: