Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2015, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 171-179.DOI: 10.1016/S1672-6308(14)60295-X

• • 上一篇    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2015-03-07 接受日期:2015-04-21 出版日期:2015-07-28 发布日期:2015-05-27

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

0

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2015, 22(4): 171-179.

使用本文

0
    /   推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/S1672-6308(14)60295-X

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2015/V22/I4/171

图/表 6

Table Genetic and physical characteristics of reduced epicuticular wax mutants.
M1 line M2 line Seed source Mutagenesis Phenotype of M3 Single gene recessive mutation Mutant designation
6-1 6-1A 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 16 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Nd wsl3
6-1 6-1B 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 16 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd
7-17 7-17A 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 16 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl4
11-39 11-39A 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd wsl5
26 26.1 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl6
264 264.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Nd wsl7
524 524.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl8
680 680.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl9
843 843.1 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl10
1064 1064.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd wsl11
1086 1086.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd wsl12
1558 1558.1 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Intermediate Nd
1558 1558.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Intermediate Nd wsl13
Phenotypic ratios of segregating M3 populations were evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-square test for goodness-of-fit to the 3:1 (wild-type:mutant) ratio expected for single gene recessive mutations.
Nd, Not determined; wsl, Wax crystal-sparse leaf.

Table Genetic and physical characteristics of reduced epicuticular wax mutants.

M1 line M2 line Seed source Mutagenesis Phenotype of M3 Single gene recessive mutation Mutant designation
6-1 6-1A 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 16 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Nd wsl3
6-1 6-1B 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 16 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd
7-17 7-17A 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 16 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl4
11-39 11-39A 2009 1 mmol/L NaN3 / 20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd wsl5
26 26.1 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl6
264 264.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Nd wsl7
524 524.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl8
680 680.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl9
843 843.1 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy segregating Yes wsl10
1064 1064.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd wsl11
1086 1086.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Wet leaf/glossy Nd wsl12
1558 1558.1 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Intermediate Nd
1558 1558.2 2011 2 mmol/L NaN3 / 16-20 h presoak Intermediate Nd wsl13
Phenotypic ratios of segregating M3 populations were evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-square test for goodness-of-fit to the 3:1 (wild-type:mutant) ratio expected for single gene recessive mutations.
Nd, Not determined; wsl, Wax crystal-sparse leaf.
Fig. 1. Wet leaf/glossy and intermediate-type mutant phenotypes. Leaves were subjected to a fine misting with water from a spray bottle. Water droplets adhere to the leaves of mutants and coalesce resulting in a wet, glossy appearance. A, Comparison of wild-type Sabine and the three mutants 6-1A, 7-17A, and 11-39A. Booting-stage flag leaves are shown; B, Comparison of the wild-type Sabine and the mutants 1558.2 and 6-1A. Fifth fully-expanded leaves from the base are shown. Unlike the other mutants, water droplets adhere to 1558.2 but do not coalesce and the leaves do not appear wet or glossy.

Fig. 1. Wet leaf/glossy and intermediate-type mutant phenotypes. Leaves were subjected to a fine misting with water from a spray bottle. Water droplets adhere to the leaves of mutants and coalesce resulting in a wet, glossy appearance. A, Comparison of wild-type Sabine and the three mutants 6-1A, 7-17A, and 11-39A. Booting-stage flag leaves are shown; B, Comparison of the wild-type Sabine and the mutants 1558.2 and 6-1A. Fifth fully-expanded leaves from the base are shown. Unlike the other mutants, water droplets adhere to 1558.2 but do not coalesce and the leaves do not appear wet or glossy.

Table 2 Segregation of wet leaf/glossyphenotype in four M3 populations.
Population M3 seeds planted a M3 plants phenotyped a Segregation ratio (wild-type:mutant) Pearson’s Chi-square test (3:1)
χ2 P value
26.1 77 57 40:17 0.708 0.400
680.2 77 61 43:18 0.661 0.416
843.1 77 73 53:20 0.224 0.636
524.2 95 68 53:15 0.314 0.575
a includes initial screening of M3 plants.

Table 2 Segregation of wet leaf/glossyphenotype in four M3 populations.

Population M3 seeds planted a M3 plants phenotyped a Segregation ratio (wild-type:mutant) Pearson’s Chi-square test (3:1)
χ2 P value
26.1 77 57 40:17 0.708 0.400
680.2 77 61 43:18 0.661 0.416
843.1 77 73 53:20 0.224 0.636
524.2 95 68 53:15 0.314 0.575
a includes initial screening of M3 plants.
Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of wild-type Sabine and 11 reduced epicuticular wax mutants.Adaxial leaf blade surface shown (knob-like structures are papillae). Scale bars, 10 μm.

Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of wild-type Sabine and 11 reduced epicuticular wax mutants.Adaxial leaf blade surface shown (knob-like structures are papillae). Scale bars, 10 μm.

Table 3 Total epicuticular wax content of wild-type and wsl mutant lines by weight method.
Line Wax content (mg/g) Reduction in wax content (%)
Sabine (wild-type) 3.01 ± 0.49
6-1A/B a 0.91 ± 0.31 ** 69.77
7-17A 0.68 ± 0.42 ** 77.41
11-39A 1.38 ± 0.10 ** 54.15
Values are given as mean ± SD with four replicates except where noted.
a, Due to insufficient tissue from 6-1A M3 mutants, additional samples were taken from 6-1B M3 mutants and content was determined using a total of five replicates (three from 6-1A plants, two from 6-1B plants included).
** means significant difference between mean values at P < 0.01 by t-test between the wild-type and each of the mutant line.

Table 3 Total epicuticular wax content of wild-type and wsl mutant lines by weight method.

Line Wax content (mg/g) Reduction in wax content (%)
Sabine (wild-type) 3.01 ± 0.49
6-1A/B a 0.91 ± 0.31 ** 69.77
7-17A 0.68 ± 0.42 ** 77.41
11-39A 1.38 ± 0.10 ** 54.15
Values are given as mean ± SD with four replicates except where noted.
a, Due to insufficient tissue from 6-1A M3 mutants, additional samples were taken from 6-1B M3 mutants and content was determined using a total of five replicates (three from 6-1A plants, two from 6-1B plants included).
** means significant difference between mean values at P < 0.01 by t-test between the wild-type and each of the mutant line.
Fig. 3. Cuticle membrane permeability of three wax mutants. A, Water loss rate from detached leaves over time; B, Chlorophyll loss over time. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of two independent assays (two replicates for wild-type and four replicates for each mutant). Levels of significance between wild-type Sabine and each mutant were determined by t-test for unequal variance; * and ** mean significant difference from wild-type at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.

Fig. 3. Cuticle membrane permeability of three wax mutants. A, Water loss rate from detached leaves over time; B, Chlorophyll loss over time. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of two independent assays (two replicates for wild-type and four replicates for each mutant). Levels of significance between wild-type Sabine and each mutant were determined by t-test for unequal variance; * and ** mean significant difference from wild-type at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.

参考文献 27

1 Abe A, Kosugi S, Yoshida K, Natsume S, Takagi H, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Mitsuoka C, Tamiru M, Innan H, Cano L, Kamoun S, Terauchi R.2012. Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap.Nat Biotechnol, 30(2): 174-178.
2 Baker E A.1982. Chemistry and morphology of plant epicuticular waxes. In: Cutler D F, Alvin K L, Price C E. The Plant Cuticle. London: Academic Press: 139-165.
3 Clark J B, Lister G R.1975. Photosynthetic action spectra of trees: II. The relationship of cuticle structure to the visible and ultraviolet spectral properties of needles from four coniferous species.Plant Physiol, 55(2): 407-413.
4 Fiebig A, Mayfield J A, Miley N L, Chau S, Fischer R L, Preuss D.2000. Alterations in CER6, a gene identical to CUT1, differentially affect long-chain lipid content on the surface of pollen and stems.Plant Cell, 12(10): 2001-2008.
5 Islam M A, Du H, Ning J, Ye H Y, Xiong L Z.2009. Characterization of Glossy1-homologous genes in rice involved in leaf wax accumulation and drought resistance.Plant Mol Biol, 70(4): 443-456.
6 Jenks M A, Joly R J, Peters P J, Rich P J, Axtell J D, Ashworth E N.1994. Chemically induced cuticle mutation affecting epidermal conductance to water vapor and disease susceptibility in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.Plant Physiol, 105(4): 1239-1245.
7 Jenks M A, Tuttle H A, Eigenbrode S D, Feldmann K A.1995. Leaf epicuticular waxes of the eceriferum mutant in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol, 108: 369-377.
8 Jenks M A, Eigenbrode S D, Lemieux B.2002. Cuticular waxes of Arabidopsis. In: Somerville C R, Meyerowitz E M. The Arabidopsis book/American Society of Plant Biologists.
9 Jung K H, Han M J, Lee D Y, Lee Y S, Schreiber L, Franke R, Faust A, Yephremov A, Saedler H, Kim Y W, Hwang I, An G.2006. Wax-deficient anther1 is involved in cuticle and wax production in rice anther walls and is required for pollen development.Plant Cell, 18: 3015-3032.
10 Kerstiens G.1996. Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance.J Exp Bot, 47(12): 1813-1832.
11 Lolle S J, Cheung A Y, Sussex I M.1992. Fiddlehead: An Arabidopsis mutant constitutively expressing an organ fusion program that involves interactions between epidermal cells.Dev Biol, 152: 383-392.
12 Lolle S J, Berlyn G P, Engstrom E M, Krolikowski K A, Reiter W D, Pruitt R E.1997. Developmental regulation of cell interactions in the Arabidopsis fiddlehead-1 mutant: A role for the epidermal cell wall and cuticle.Dev Biol, 189: 311-321.
13 Mao B G, Cheng Z J, Lei C L, Xu F H, Gao S W, Ren Y L, Wang J L, Zhang X, Wang J, Wu F Q, Guo X P, Liu X P, Wu C Y, Wang H Y, Wan J M.2012. Wax crystal-sparse leaf2, a rice homologue of WAX2/GL1, is involved in synthesis of leaf cuticular wax.Planta, 235: 39-52.
14 Nordström K J V, Albani M C, Velikkakam James G, Gutjahr C, Hartwig B, Turck F, Paszkowski U, Coupland G, Schneeberger K.2013. Mutation identification by direct comparison of whole-genome sequencing data from mutant and wild-type individuals using k-mers.Nat Biotechnol, 31(4): 325-330.
15 Preuss D, Lemieux B, Yen G, Davis R W.1993. A conditional sterile mutation eliminates surface components from Arabidopsis pollen and disrupts cell signaling during fertilization.Genes Dev, 7(6): 974-985.
16 Post-Beittenmiller D.1996. Biochemistry and molecular biology of wax production in plants.Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 47: 405-430.
17 Qin B X, Tang D, Huang J, Li M, Wu X R, Lu L L, Wang K J, Yu H X, Chen J M, Gu M H, Cheng Z K.2011. Rice OsGL1-1 is involved in leaf cuticular wax and cuticle membrane.Mol Plant, 4: 985-995.
18 Riederer M.2006. Biology of the Plant Cuticle. Oxford, Blackwell: 1-8.
19 Samuels L, Kunst L, Jetter R.2008. Sealing plant surfaces: Cutiicular wax formation by epidermal cells.Plant Biol, 59: 683-707.
20 Schneeberger K, Weigel D.2011. Fast-forward genetics enabled by new sequencing technologies.Trends Plant Sci, 16: 282-288.
21 Schneeberger K.2014. Using next-generation sequencing to isolate mutant genes from forward genetic screens.Nat Rev Genet, 15: 662-676.
22 Sieber P, Schorderet M, Ryser U, Buchala A, Kolattukudy P, Métraux J P, Nawrath C.2000. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing a fungal cutinase show alterations in the structure and properties of the cuticle and postgenital organ fusions.Plant Cell, 12: 721-737.
23 Serrano M, Coluccia F, Torres M, L’Haridon F, Métraux J P.2014. The cuticle and plant defense to pathogens.Front Plant Sci, 5: 1-8.
24 Yeats T H, Rose J K C.2013. The formation and function of plant cuticles.Plant Physiol, 163: 5-20.
25 Yu D, Ranathunge K, Huang H, Pei Z, Franke R, Schreiber L, He C.2008. Wax crystal-sparse leaf1 encodes a β-ketoacyl CoA synthase involved in biosynthesis of cuticular waxes on rice leaf.Planta, 228: 675-685.
26 Zhou L Y, Ni E D, Yang J W, Zhou H, Liang H, Li J, Jiang D G, Wang Z H, Liu Z L, Zhuang C X.2013. Rice OsGL1-6 is involved in leaf cuticular wax accumulation and drought resistance.PLoS One, 8: e65139.
27 (Managing Editor: Wang Caihong)

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: