Rice Science
  • 首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
  • 学术伦理
  • 投稿指南
  • 期刊订阅
  • 联系我们
  • English

Rice Science ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 359-363.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2022.12.002

• •    下一篇

  • 收稿日期:2022-10-25 接受日期:2022-12-19 出版日期:2023-09-28 发布日期:2023-08-10

RichHTML

PDF

补充材料

1

可视化

0
  • 1. Supplemental data for 2022-0178.pdf(2730KB)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

. [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 359-363.

使用本文

0
    /   推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.ricesci.org/CN/10.1016/j.rsci.2022.12.002

               http://www.ricesci.org/CN/Y2023/V30/I5/359

图/表 2

Fig. 1. Comparison of grain shape of near-isogenic lines (NILs) and analysis of relevant influencing factors. A and B, Performances of grain length (A) and grain width (B) of NILs. Scale bars, 5 mm. C?E, Comparisons of grain length (C), grain width (D) and grain length to width ratio (E) of NILs. F?H, Comparisons of glume epidermal cell size (F), cell length (G) and cell width (H) of NILs. Scale bar, 10 μm. I?K, Comparisons of the levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (I), gibberellin A3 (GA3) (J) and brassinolide (BR) (K) in developing glumes of NILs. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 9). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 determined by the Student- Newman-Keuls test.

Fig. 1. Comparison of grain shape of near-isogenic lines (NILs) and analysis of relevant influencing factors. A and B, Performances of grain length (A) and grain width (B) of NILs. Scale bars, 5 mm. C?E, Comparisons of grain length (C), grain width (D) and grain length to width ratio (E) of NILs. F?H, Comparisons of glume epidermal cell size (F), cell length (G) and cell width (H) of NILs. Scale bar, 10 μm. I?K, Comparisons of the levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (I), gibberellin A3 (GA3) (J) and brassinolide (BR) (K) in developing glumes of NILs. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 9). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 determined by the Student- Newman-Keuls test.

Fig. 2. Comparison of chalkiness degree of near-isogenic lines (NILs) and analysis of releted influencing factors. A and B, Comparisons of chalkiness degree in endosperms of NILs. Scale bar, 5 mm. C, Average grain filling rate of NILs. D?G, Comparisons of enzyme activities of adenosine diphosphate glucose (ADPG) (D), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) (E), starch branching enzymes (SBE) (F) and soluble starch synthase (SSS) (G) in endosperms of NILs. H?L, Comparisons of hormone levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (H), abscisic acid (ABA) (I), cytokinins (CTK) (J), zeatin (ZT) (K) and zeatin riboside (ZR) (L) in endosperms of NILs. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 9). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 determined by the Student- Newman-Keuls test.

Fig. 2. Comparison of chalkiness degree of near-isogenic lines (NILs) and analysis of releted influencing factors. A and B, Comparisons of chalkiness degree in endosperms of NILs. Scale bar, 5 mm. C, Average grain filling rate of NILs. D?G, Comparisons of enzyme activities of adenosine diphosphate glucose (ADPG) (D), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) (E), starch branching enzymes (SBE) (F) and soluble starch synthase (SSS) (G) in endosperms of NILs. H?L, Comparisons of hormone levels of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (H), abscisic acid (ABA) (I), cytokinins (CTK) (J), zeatin (ZT) (K) and zeatin riboside (ZR) (L) in endosperms of NILs. Data are Mean ± SD (n = 9). Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 determined by the Student- Newman-Keuls test.

参考文献 19

[1] Chen M J, Liu G F, Yu H, Wang B, Li J Y. 2018. Towards molecular design of rice plant architecture and grain quality. Chin Sci Bull, 63: 1276-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Chen W F, Xu Z J, Tang L. 2012. Advances and prospects of rice breeding for super high yield in China. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 43(6): 643-649. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Hao J Q, Wang D K, Wu Y B, Huang K, Duan P G, Li N, Xu R, Zeng D L, Dong G J, Zhang B L, Zhang L M, Inzé D, Qian Q, Li Y H. 2021. The GW2-WG1-OsbZIP47 pathway controls grain size and weight in rice. Mol Plant, 14(8): 1266-1280.
PMID
[4] Huang H Y, Qian Q. 2017. Progress in genetic research of rice grain shape and breeding achievements of long-grain shape and good quality japonica rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 31(6): 665-672. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Madoka Y, Murakami N, Hara N, Onodera H, Kashiwagi T, Ujiie K, Shimizu B I, Onishi A, Miyagawa H, Katoh E. 2013. Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice grain weight and increases yield. Nat Genet, 45(6): 707-711.
PMID
[6] Kan Y, Mu X R, Zhang H, Gao J, Shan J X, Ye W W, Lin H X. 2022. TT2 controls rice thermotolerance through SCT1-dependent alteration of wax biosynthesis. Nat Plants, 8(1): 53-67.
PMID
[7] Lestari P, Ham T H, Lee H H, Woo M O, Jiang W Z, Chu S H, Kwon S W, Ma K, Lee J H, Cho Y C, Koh H J. 2009. PCR marker-based evaluation of the eating quality of japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Agric Food Chem, 57(7): 2754-2762.
[8] Li N, Xu R, Duan P G, Li Y H. 2018. Control of grain size in rice. Plant Reprod, 31(3): 237-251.
PMID
[9] Li Y B, Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Yun P, Luo L J, Yan B, Peng B, Xie W B, Wang G W, Li X H, Xiao J H, Xu C G, He Y Q. 2014. Chalk5 encodes a vacuolar H+-translocating pyrophosphatase influencing grain chalkiness in rice. Nat Genet, 46(4): 398-404.
[10] Liu Q, Han R X, Wu K, Zhang J Q, Ye Y F, Wang S S, Chen J F, Pan Y J, Li Q, Xu X P, Zhou J W, Tao D Y, Wu Y J, Fu X D. 2018. G-protein βγ subunits determine grain size through interaction with MADS-domain transcription factors in rice. Nat Commun, 9: 852.
PMID
[11] Mao T, Zhu M D, Sheng Z H, Shao G N, Jiao G A, Mawia A M, Ahmad S, Xie L H, Tang S Q, Wei X J, Hu S K, Hu P S. 2021. Effects of grain shape genes editing on appearance quality of erect-panicle geng/japonica rice. Rice, 14(1): 74.
[12] Sun S Y, Wang L, Mao H L, Shao L, Li X H, Xiao J H, Ouyang Y D, Zhang Q F. 2018. A G-protein pathway determines grain size in rice. Nat Commun, 9: 851.
PMID
[13] Tao Y J, Wang J, Xu Y, Wang F Q, Li W, Jiang Y J, Chen Z H, Fan F J, Zhu J P, Li X, Jie Y. 2023. Rational design of grain size to improve rice yield and quality. Rice Sci, 30(1): 1-5.
[14] Wang E T, Wang J J, Zhu X D, Hao W, Wang L Y, Li Q, Zhang L X, He W, Lu B R, Lin H X, Ma H, Zhang G Q, He Z H. 2008. Control of rice grain-filling and yield by a gene with a potential signature of domestication. Nat Genet, 40(11): 1370-1374.
PMID
[15] Wang S K, Wu K, Yuan Q B, Liu X Y, Liu Z B, Lin X Y, Zeng R Z, Zhu H T, Dong G J, Qian Q, Zhang G Q, Fu X D. 2012. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat Genet, 44(8): 950-954.
[16] Wang S K, Li S, Liu Q, Wu K, Zhang J Q, Wang S S, Wang Y, Chen X B, Zhang Y, Gao C X, Wang F, Huang H X, Fu X D. 2015. The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality. Nat Genet, 47(8): 949-954.
[17] Xu Q, Xu N, Xu H, Tang L, Liu J, Sun J, Wang J Y. 2014. Breeding value estimation of the application of IPA1 and DEP1 to improvement of Oryza sativa L. Mol Breed, 34(4): 1933-1942.
[18] Xu Z J, Chen W F. 2016. Research progress and related problems on japonica super rice in northern China. Sci Agric Sin, 49(2): 239-250. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Yi C D, Wang D R, Wei J, Li W, Cheng X J, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Liang G H, Gu M H. 2016. Development of functional markers and identification of haplotypes for rice grain shape gene GW8. Acta Agron Sin, 42(9): 1297. (in Chinese with English abstract)

相关文章 0

No related articles found!

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数
全文


摘要

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文章
  • 编辑推荐
  • Metrics
回顶部
浙ICP备05004719号-15   公安备案号:33010302003355
版权所有 © 《Rice Science》编辑部
地址:浙江省杭州市体育场路359号 邮编:310006 电话:0571-63371017 E-mail:crrn@fy.hz.zn.cn; cjrs278@gmail.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
总访问量: 今日访问: 在线人数: