Protist and Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Interaction Alters GH3-2 Expression and Enhances Nutrient Content in Rice

doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2023.12.001

Abstract

Komal A. Chandarana, Natarajan Amaresan. Protist and Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Interaction Alters GH3-2 Expression and Enhances Nutrient Content in Rice[J]. Rice Science, 2024, 31(2): 134-138.

Figures/Tables 2

References 32

[1]	Abel S, Theologis A. 1996. Early genes and auxin action. Plant Physiol, 111(1): 9-17.
[2]	Aloni R, Aloni E, Langhans M, Ullrich C I. 2006. Role of cytokinin and auxin in shaping root architecture: Regulating vascular differentiation, lateral root initiation, root apical dominance and root gravitropism. Ann Bot, 97(5): 883-893.
[3]	Ambreetha S, Chinnadurai C, Marimuthu P, Balachandar D. 2018. Plant-associated Bacillus modulates the expression of auxin- responsive genes of rice and modifies the root architecture. Rhizosphere, 5: 57-66.
[4]	Asiloglu R, Shiroishi K, Suzuki K, Turgay O C, Murase J, Harada N. 2020. Protist-enhanced survival of a plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, Azospirillum sp. B510, and the growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Appl Soil Ecol, 154: 103599.
[5]	Bonkowski M, Brandt F. 2002. Do soil protozoa enhance plant growth by hormonal effects? Soil Biol Biochem, 34(11): 1709-1715.
[6]	Bonkowski M, Jentschke G, Scheu S. 2001. Contrasting effects of microbial partners in the rhizosphere: Interactions between Norway Spruce seedlings (Picea abies Karst.), mycorrhiza (Paxillus involutus (Batsch) Fr.) and naked amoebae (protozoa). Appl Soil Ecol, 18(3): 193-204.
[7]	Chandarana K A, Amaresan N. 2022. Soil protists: An untapped microbial resource of agriculture and environmental importance. Pedosphere, 32(1): 184-197.
[8]	Chandarana K A, Pramanik R S, Amaresan N. 2022a. Interaction between ciliate and plant growth promoting bacteria influences the root structure of rice plants, soil PLFAs and respiration properties. Rhizosphere, 21: 100466.
[9]	Chandarana K A, Pramanik R S, Amaresan N. 2022b. Predatory activity of Acanthamoeba sp genotype T4 on different plant growth-promoting bacteria and their combined effect on rice seedling growth. Eur J Protistol, 82: 125858.
[10]	Cheng Y H, Jiang Y, Wu Y, Valentine T A, Li H X. 2016. Soil nitrogen status modifies rice root response to nematode-bacteria interactions in the rhizosphere. PLoS One, 11(2): e0148021.
[11]	Clarholm M. 1985. Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem, 17(2): 181-187.
[12]	Compant S, Samad A, Faist H, Sessitsch A. 2019. A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J Adv Res, 19: 29-37.
[13]	Ekelund F, Saj S, Vestergård M, Bertaux J, Mikola J. 2009. The “soil microbial loop” is not always needed to explain protozoan stimulation of plants. Soil Biol Biochem, 41(11): 2336-2342.
[14]	Farrar J, Hawes M, Jones D, Lindow S. 2003. How roots control the flux of carbon to the rhizosphere. Ecology, 84: 827-837.
[15]	Fu J, Yu H H, Li X H, Xiao J H, Wang S P. 2011. Rice GH3 gene family: Regulators of growth and development. Plant Signal Behav, 6(4): 570-574.
[16]	Gao Z L, Karlsson I, Geisen S, Kowalchuk G, Jousset A. 2019. Protists: Puppet masters of the rhizosphere microbiome. Trends Plant Sci, 24(2): 165-176.
[17]	Geisen S, Mitchell E A D, Adl S, Bonkowski M, Dunthorn M, Ekelund F, Fernández L D, Jousset A, Krashevska V, Singer D, Spiegel F W, Walochnik J, Lara E. 2018. Soil protists: A fertile frontier in soil biology research. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 42(3): 293-323.
[18]	Gray W M. 2004. Hormonal regulation of plant growth and development. PLoS Biol, 2(9): E311.
[19]	Henkes G J, Kandeler E, Marhan S, Scheu S, Bonkowski M. 2018. Interactions of mycorrhiza and protists in the rhizosphere systemically alter microbial community composition, plant shoot-to-root ratio and within-root system nitrogen allocation. Front Environ Sci, 6: 117.
[20]	Jeyanthi V, Kanimozhi S. 2018. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-prospective and mechanisms: A review. J Pure Appl Microbiol, 12(2): 733-749.
[21]	Jousset A. 2017. Application of protists to improve plant growth in sustainable agriculture. In: Mehnaz S. Rhizotrophs: Plant Growth Promotion to Bioremediation. Singapore: Springer: 263-273.
[22]	Kartik V P, Jinal H N, Amaresan N. 2016. Characterization of cadmium-resistant bacteria for its potential in promoting plant growth and cadmium accumulation in Sesbania bispinosa root. Int J Phytorem, 18(11): 1061-1066.
[23]	Kreuzer K, Adamczyk J, Iijima M, Wagner M, Scheu S, Bonkowski M. 2006. Grazing of a common species of soil protozoa (Acanthamoeba castellanii) affects rhizosphere bacterial community composition and root architecture of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Soil Biol Biochem, 38(7): 1665-1672.
[24]	Krome K, Rosenberg K, Bonkowski M, Scheu S. 2009. Grazing of protozoa on rhizosphere bacteria alters growth and reproduction of Arabidopsis thaliana . Soil Biol Biochem, 41(9): 1866-1873.
[25]	Krome K, Rosenberg K, Dickler C, Kreuzer K, Ludwig-Müller J, Ullrich-Eberius C, Scheu S, Bonkowski M. 2010. Soil bacteria and protozoa affect root branching via effects on the auxin and cytokinin balance in plants. Plant Soil, 328(1): 191-201.
[26]	Kuikman P J, Jansen A G, van Veen J A, Zehnder A J B. 1990. Protozoan predation and the turnover of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the presence of plants. Biol Fertil Soils, 10(1): 22-28.
[27]	Malamy J E. 2005. Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture. Plant Cell Environ, 28(1): 67-77.
[28]	Munir N, Hanif M, Abideen Z, Sohail M, El-Keblawy A, Radicetti E, Mancinelli R, Haider G. 2022. Mechanisms and strategies of plant microbiome interactions to mitigate abiotic stresses. Agronomy, 12(9): 2069.
[29]	Nakano M, Omae N, Tsuda K. 2022. Inter-organismal phytohormone networks in plant-microbe interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 68: 102258.
[30]	Prittesh P, Avnika P, Kinjal P, Jinal H N, Sakthivel K, Amaresan N. 2020. Amelioration effect of salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria on growth and physiological properties of rice (Oryza sativa) under salt-stressed conditions. Arch Microbiol, 202(9): 2419-2428.
[31]	Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J, Remans R. 2007. Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 31(4): 425-448.
[32]	Zhang R S, Baloch A M, Li S H, Liu Z H, Jiang C Y, Wang H, Baloch A W, Diao G P. 2018. Improvement in biomass, IAA levels and auxin signaling-related gene expression in shanxin poplar seedlings (Populusd avidiana × P. alba var. pyramidalis) induced by Trichoderma asperellum. Pak J Bot, 50(4): 1629-1636.

Treatment	Root length (cm)	Shoot length (cm)	Fresh root weight (g)	Fresh shoot weight (g)	Dry root weight (g)
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 c	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 b	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.030 ± 0.010 c
Pr	9.98 ± 0.35 b	17.83 ± 0.17 c	0.17 ± 0.05 b	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.060 ± 0.000 ab
A9Pr	11.44 ± 0.55 ab	21.13 ± 1.04 b	0.31 ± 0.02 a	0.29 ± 0.05 a	0.077 ± 0.003 a
C2Pr	12.44 ± 0.52 a	24.13 ± 0.55 a	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.34 ± 0.01 a	0.053 ± 0.017 ab
C5Pr	11.45 ± 0.23 ab	22.07 ± 0.72 ab	0.25 ± 0.01 ab	0.30 ± 0.02 a	0.050 ± 0.012 ab
C12Pr	10.75 ± 0.32 ab	16.65 ± 0.36 c	0.36 ± 0.02 a	0.37 ± 0.03 a	0.047 ± 0.007 ab
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 d	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 e	0.25 ± 0.02 d	0.030 ± 0.010 c
St	8.74 ± 0.73 cd	17.87 ± 0.35 c	0.42 ± 0.01 abc	0.26 ± 0.01 d	0.033 ± 0.003 c
A9St	11.97 ± 0.68 ab	22.71 ± 1.52 b	0.29 ± 0.05 d	0.50 ± 0.03 bc	0.040 ± 0.000 b
A34St	10.29 ± 0.01 bc	17.33 ± 1.04 c	0.39 ± 0.02 bcd	0.66 ± 0.02 a	0.063 ± 0.012 abc
C1St	11.43 ± 0.02 ab	22.43 ± 0.64 b	0.33 ± 0.01 cd	0.45 ± 0.04 c	0.077 ± 0.009 a
C2St	11.20 ± 0.52 ab	18.33 ± 0.53 c	0.33 ± 0.02 cd	0.48 ± 0.01 bc	0.070 ± 0.006 ab
C5St	10.61 ± 0.07 bc	22.29 ± 0.57 b	0.48 ± 0.01 ab	0.53 ± 0.03 bc	0.053 ± 0.003 abc
C12St	13.20 ± 0.31 a	27.87 ± 0.29 a	0.51 ± 0.01 a	0.58 ± 0.00 ab	0.073 ± 0.003 ab
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 c	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 c	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.030 ± 0.010 ab
Mo	9.34 ± 0.19 b	17.57 ± 1.08 abc	0.23 ± 0.03 bc	0.40 ± 0.01 a	0.027 ± 0.003 b
A9Mo	10.05 ± 0.18 b	17.48 ± 1.24 bc	0.31 ± 0.03 ab	0.44 ± 0.06 a	0.033 ± 0.003 ab
A34Mo	12.47 ± 0.61 a	20.75 ± 1.03 ab	0.31 ± 0.02 ab	0.30 ± 0.01 a	0.047 ± 0.003 a
C1Mo	10.20 ± 0.01 b	19.56 ± 0.67 abc	0.23 ± 0.01 bc	0.26 ± 0.02 a	0.030 ± 0.015 ab
C2Mo	10.62 ± 0.39 b	20.95 ± 0.60 ab	0.17 ± 0.01 c	0.43 ± 0.01 a	0.033 ± 0.009 ab
C5Mo	10.63 ± 0.32 b	21.65 ± 0.56 a	0.36 ± 0.04 a	0.47 ± 0.04 a	0.037 ± 0.012 ab
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 d	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 d	0.25 ± 0.02 c	0.030 ± 0.010 ab
Lb	8.83 ± 0.79 cd	18.55 ± 0.73 b	0.25 ± 0.04 bc	0.32 ± 0.04 bc	0.025 ± 0.001 ab
A9Lb	12.23 ± 0.32 ab	27.33 ± 0.96 a	0.29 ± 0.05 bc	0.52 ± 0.03 a	0.023 ± 0.001 b
A34Lb	11.30 ± 0.21 ab	26.53 ± 0.65 a	0.29 ± 0.01 bc	0.39 ± 0.01 ab	0.026 ± 0.000 ab
C2Lb	12.53 ± 0.19 a	29.33 ± 0.56 a	0.43 ± 0.03 a	0.23 ± 0.01 c	0.028 ± 0.002 ab
C5Lb	11.41 ± 0.69 ab	26.99 ± 0.28 a	0.34 ± 0.06 b	0.50 ± 0.04 a	0.044 ± 0.004 a
C12Lb	10.00 ± 0.46 bc	18.40 ± 0.15 b	0.26 ± 0.03 bc	0.30 ± 0.03 bc	0.021 ± 0.001 b

Treatment	Root length (cm)	Shoot length (cm)	Fresh root weight (g)	Fresh shoot weight (g)	Dry root weight (g)
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 c	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 b	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.030 ± 0.010 c
Pr	9.98 ± 0.35 b	17.83 ± 0.17 c	0.17 ± 0.05 b	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.060 ± 0.000 ab
A9Pr	11.44 ± 0.55 ab	21.13 ± 1.04 b	0.31 ± 0.02 a	0.29 ± 0.05 a	0.077 ± 0.003 a
C2Pr	12.44 ± 0.52 a	24.13 ± 0.55 a	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.34 ± 0.01 a	0.053 ± 0.017 ab
C5Pr	11.45 ± 0.23 ab	22.07 ± 0.72 ab	0.25 ± 0.01 ab	0.30 ± 0.02 a	0.050 ± 0.012 ab
C12Pr	10.75 ± 0.32 ab	16.65 ± 0.36 c	0.36 ± 0.02 a	0.37 ± 0.03 a	0.047 ± 0.007 ab
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 d	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 e	0.25 ± 0.02 d	0.030 ± 0.010 c
St	8.74 ± 0.73 cd	17.87 ± 0.35 c	0.42 ± 0.01 abc	0.26 ± 0.01 d	0.033 ± 0.003 c
A9St	11.97 ± 0.68 ab	22.71 ± 1.52 b	0.29 ± 0.05 d	0.50 ± 0.03 bc	0.040 ± 0.000 b
A34St	10.29 ± 0.01 bc	17.33 ± 1.04 c	0.39 ± 0.02 bcd	0.66 ± 0.02 a	0.063 ± 0.012 abc
C1St	11.43 ± 0.02 ab	22.43 ± 0.64 b	0.33 ± 0.01 cd	0.45 ± 0.04 c	0.077 ± 0.009 a
C2St	11.20 ± 0.52 ab	18.33 ± 0.53 c	0.33 ± 0.02 cd	0.48 ± 0.01 bc	0.070 ± 0.006 ab
C5St	10.61 ± 0.07 bc	22.29 ± 0.57 b	0.48 ± 0.01 ab	0.53 ± 0.03 bc	0.053 ± 0.003 abc
C12St	13.20 ± 0.31 a	27.87 ± 0.29 a	0.51 ± 0.01 a	0.58 ± 0.00 ab	0.073 ± 0.003 ab
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 c	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 c	0.25 ± 0.02 a	0.030 ± 0.010 ab
Mo	9.34 ± 0.19 b	17.57 ± 1.08 abc	0.23 ± 0.03 bc	0.40 ± 0.01 a	0.027 ± 0.003 b
A9Mo	10.05 ± 0.18 b	17.48 ± 1.24 bc	0.31 ± 0.03 ab	0.44 ± 0.06 a	0.033 ± 0.003 ab
A34Mo	12.47 ± 0.61 a	20.75 ± 1.03 ab	0.31 ± 0.02 ab	0.30 ± 0.01 a	0.047 ± 0.003 a
C1Mo	10.20 ± 0.01 b	19.56 ± 0.67 abc	0.23 ± 0.01 bc	0.26 ± 0.02 a	0.030 ± 0.015 ab
C2Mo	10.62 ± 0.39 b	20.95 ± 0.60 ab	0.17 ± 0.01 c	0.43 ± 0.01 a	0.033 ± 0.009 ab
C5Mo	10.63 ± 0.32 b	21.65 ± 0.56 a	0.36 ± 0.04 a	0.47 ± 0.04 a	0.037 ± 0.012 ab
Control	7.00 ± 0.15 d	15.51 ± 0.40 c	0.18 ± 0.02 d	0.25 ± 0.02 c	0.030 ± 0.010 ab
Lb	8.83 ± 0.79 cd	18.55 ± 0.73 b	0.25 ± 0.04 bc	0.32 ± 0.04 bc	0.025 ± 0.001 ab
A9Lb	12.23 ± 0.32 ab	27.33 ± 0.96 a	0.29 ± 0.05 bc	0.52 ± 0.03 a	0.023 ± 0.001 b
A34Lb	11.30 ± 0.21 ab	26.53 ± 0.65 a	0.29 ± 0.01 bc	0.39 ± 0.01 ab	0.026 ± 0.000 ab
C2Lb	12.53 ± 0.19 a	29.33 ± 0.56 a	0.43 ± 0.03 a	0.23 ± 0.01 c	0.028 ± 0.002 ab
C5Lb	11.41 ± 0.69 ab	26.99 ± 0.28 a	0.34 ± 0.06 b	0.50 ± 0.04 a	0.044 ± 0.004 a
C12Lb	10.00 ± 0.46 bc	18.40 ± 0.15 b	0.26 ± 0.03 bc	0.30 ± 0.03 bc	0.021 ± 0.001 b

Protist and Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Interaction Alters GH3-2 Expression and Enhances Nutrient Content in Rice

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References 32

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics