Chak-hao, Forbidden Rice of Manipur and Its Sustainable Protection from Post-Harvest Storage Pests Using Indigenous Botanical Plant Powders

doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2025.04.001

Abstract

Arati Ningombam, Aruna Beemrote, Romila Akoijam, Sushmita Thokchom, C. H. Basudha, C. H. Sonia, C. H. Premabati, N. Ajitkumar Singh, L. Langlentombi Chanu, Y. Prabhabati Devi, H. Lembisana Devi, A. Gangarani Devi. Chak-hao, Forbidden Rice of Manipur and Its Sustainable Protection from Post-Harvest Storage Pests Using Indigenous Botanical Plant Powders[J]. Rice Science, 2025, 32(3): 298-302.

Figures/Tables 3

References 24

[1]	Asem I D, Imotomba R K, Mazumder P B, et al. 2015. Anthocyanin content in the black scented rice (Chakhao): Its impact on human health and plant defense. Symbiosis, 66(1): 47-54.
[2]	Berenbaum M, Neal J J. 1985. Synergism between myristicin and xanthotoxin, a naturally cooccurring plant toxicant. J Chem Ecol, 11(10): 1349-1358.
[3]	Bhuvaneswari S, Gopala Krishnan S, Bollinedi H, et al. 2020. Genetic architecture and anthocyanin profiling of aromatic rice from Manipur reveals divergence of Chakhao landraces. Front Genet, 11: 570731.
[4]	Chen W, Isman M B, Chiu S F. 1995. Antifeedant and growth inhibitory effects of the limonoid toosendanin and Melia toosendan extracts on the variegated cutworm, Peridroma saucia (Lep., Noctuidae). J Appl Ent, 119: 367-370.
[5]	Devi M B, Devi N V, Singh S N. 2014. Effects of six plant extracts on rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae L. in the stored wheat grains. Int J Agric Innov Res, 1: 2-6.
[6]	Feng R, Isman M B. 1995. Selection for resistance to azadirachtin in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Experientia, 51(8): 831-833.
[7]	Khanal D, Neupane S B, Bhattarai A, et al. 2021. Evaluation of botanical powders for the management of rice weevil (Sitophilus Oryzae L. Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in rupandehi, Nepal. Adv Agric, 2021: 8878525.
[8]	Kong L Y, Wang Y, Cao Y H. 2008. Determination of Myo-inositol and d-chiro-inositol in black rice bran by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection. J Food Compos Anal, 21(6): 501-504.
[9]	Kushwaha U K S. 2016. Black rice cultivation. In: Kushwaha U K S. Black Rice Research, History and Development. Springer, Cham, Germany: 115-150.
[10]	Nasser T A, Nasser A A, Kadhim N A, et al. 2024. The repellent effects of some plant powders on Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on stored rice in Thi-Qar province, southern Iraq. UTJsci, 11(1): 207-210.
[11]	Negi J S, Bisht V K, Bhandari A K, et al. 2011. Chemical constituents and biological activities of the genus Zanthoxylum: A review. Afr J Pure Appl Chem, 5(12): 412-416.
[12]	Ningombam A, Akoijam R, Beemrote A, et al. 2021. Bioefficacy of Zanthoxylum acanthopodium and its combination with Plectranthus ternifolius as a grain protectant against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae. Biol Forum-An Int J, 13: 295-299.
[13]	Ningombam A, Akoijam R, Beemrote A, et al. 2024. Scientific validation of two indigenous plants used for traditional storage pest management in Manipur. Indian J Tradit Knowl, 23(10): 939-947.
[14]	Pavela R. 2005.Insecticidal activity of some essential oils against larvae of Spodoptera littoralis Fitoterapia, 76(7/8): 691-696.
[15]	Pham M Q, Le T T H, Do T T, et al. 2020. PTP1B inhibitors from Isodon ternifolius collected in Vietnam. Vietnam J Sci Technol, 58: 533-540.
[16]	Rajeswari R, Srinivasan M R. 2019. Efficacy of different botanicals against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in stored paddy seeds. Madras Agric J, 106(7): 533-536.
[17]	Ram S G, Thiruvengadam V, Vinod K K. 2007. Genetic diversity among cultivars, landraces and wild relatives of rice as revealed by microsatellite markers. J Appl Genet, 48(4): 337-345.
[18]	Research and Market. 2024. Anthocyanin Market by Distribution Channel, Form, Application, Source: Global Forecast to 2030. [2024-07-24]. https://www.Researchandmarkets.com/report/anthocyanin.
[19]	Saljoqi A U R, Afridi M K, Khan S A, et al. 2006. Effect of six plants extracts on rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L) in the stored wheat grain. J Agric Biol Sci, 1: 1-5.
[20]	Schoonhoven L M, van Loon J J A. 2002. An inventory of taste in caterpillars: Each species its own key. Acta Zool Acad Sci H, 48(S1): 215-263.
[21]	Tang C C, Thomas D C, Saunders R M K. 2015. Molecular and morphological data supporting phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus Goniothalamus (Annonaceae), including a reassessment of previous infrageneric classifications. Data Brief, 4: 410-421.
[22]	Tapondjou L A, Adler C, Bouda H, et al. 2002. of powder and essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves as post-harvest grain protectants against six-stored product beetles. J Stored Prod Res, 38(4): 395-402.
[23]	Yang D S, Lee K S, Kays S J. 2010. Characterization and discrimination of premium-quality, waxy, and black-pigmented rice based on odor-active compounds. J Sci Food Agric, 90(15): 2595-2601.
[24]	Yankanchi S R, Gadache A H. 2010. Grain protectant efficacy of certain plant extracts against rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Biopestic, 3(2): 511-513.

Plant powder/Combination	Regression equation	P-value	GI₅₀(mg/g)	Order of efficacy
Isodon ternifolius	y = 38.38x - 36.29	0.009	9.49	8
Goniothalamus sesquipedalis	y = 51.80x - 43.92	0.007	6.11	6
Zanthoxylum acanthopodium	y = 64.65x - 78.05	0.0006	7.24	7
50:50 (I. ternifolius: Z. acanthopodium)	y = 25.18x + 23.78	0.039	18.73	9
60:40 (I. ternifolius: Z. acanthopodium)	y = 58.07x - 19.62	0.0007	3.32	3
70:30 (I. ternifolius: Z. acanthopodium)	y = 23.35x + 50.47	0.00005	0.98	1
80:20 (I. ternifolius : Z. acanthopodium)	y = 57.18x - 47.82	0.047	5.53	5
50:50 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	y = 54.99x - 29.51	0.021	2.68	2
60:40 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	y = 48.15x - 9.97	0.038	3.49	4
70:30 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
80:20 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
50:50 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
60:40 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
70:30 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
80:20 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%

Plant powder/Combination	Regression equation	P-value	GI₅₀(mg/g)	Order of efficacy
Isodon ternifolius	y = 38.38x - 36.29	0.009	9.49	8
Goniothalamus sesquipedalis	y = 51.80x - 43.92	0.007	6.11	6
Zanthoxylum acanthopodium	y = 64.65x - 78.05	0.0006	7.24	7
50:50 (I. ternifolius: Z. acanthopodium)	y = 25.18x + 23.78	0.039	18.73	9
60:40 (I. ternifolius: Z. acanthopodium)	y = 58.07x - 19.62	0.0007	3.32	3
70:30 (I. ternifolius: Z. acanthopodium)	y = 23.35x + 50.47	0.00005	0.98	1
80:20 (I. ternifolius : Z. acanthopodium)	y = 57.18x - 47.82	0.047	5.53	5
50:50 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	y = 54.99x - 29.51	0.021	2.68	2
60:40 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	y = 48.15x - 9.97	0.038	3.49	4
70:30 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
80:20 (I. ternifolius : G. sesquipedalis)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
50:50 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
60:40 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
70:30 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%
80:20 (G. sesquipedalis : Z. acanthopodium)	Highest dose gave growth inhibition less than 50%

Dose (g)	Treated by Isodon ternifolius (%)		Treated by Goniothalamus sesquipedalis (%)		Treated by Zanthoxylum acanthopodium (%)
Dose (g)	At 1st week	At 2nd week	At 1st week	At 2nd week	At 1st week	At 2nd week
0.50	56.67	80.00	50.00	83.33	46.00	80.00
1.00	60.00	83.33	50.00	83.33	73.00	80.00
1.25	73.33	93.33	63.00	80.00	70.00	86.67
1.50	70.00	86.67	50.00	83.33	73.00	83.33
1.75	53.33	86.67	66.67	83.33	63.00	86.67
2.00	66.00	80.00	60.00	86.67	76.00	86.67
2.50	56.66	83.33	60.00	83.33	66.00	80.00

Dose (g)	Treated by Isodon ternifolius (%)		Treated by Goniothalamus sesquipedalis (%)		Treated by Zanthoxylum acanthopodium (%)
Dose (g)	At 1st week	At 2nd week	At 1st week	At 2nd week	At 1st week	At 2nd week
0.50	56.67	80.00	50.00	83.33	46.00	80.00
1.00	60.00	83.33	50.00	83.33	73.00	80.00
1.25	73.33	93.33	63.00	80.00	70.00	86.67
1.50	70.00	86.67	50.00	83.33	73.00	83.33
1.75	53.33	86.67	66.67	83.33	63.00	86.67
2.00	66.00	80.00	60.00	86.67	76.00	86.67
2.50	56.66	83.33	60.00	83.33	66.00	80.00

Chak-hao, Forbidden Rice of Manipur and Its Sustainable Protection from Post-Harvest Storage Pests Using Indigenous Botanical Plant Powders

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 24

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics