Straw Burning Dilemma in Modern Agriculture: A Systematic Review of Driving Factors, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Solutions
Received date: 2025-02-02
Accepted date: 2025-06-16
Online published: 2025-07-04
Straw burning has emerged as a persistent and multifaceted challenge within global agricultural systems, particularly across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This review reframes straw burning not as an isolated behavioral issue, but as the outcome of interlinked structural, technological, and socio-cultural constraints embedded in modern agricultural transitions. Drawing on a synthesis of recent empirical studies, we identify four conceptual turning points that reshape the understanding of straw burning: the structural consequences of mechanization, the trade-offs between high- and low-tech solutions, the cultural legitimacy of burning practices, and the need for systems-based, climate-aligned management paradigms. The analysis reveals that interventions focusing solely on technical innovation often overlook the deeper institutional and cultural factors that sustain burning as a rational choice under constrained conditions. We advocate for hybrid, place-based strategies that combine accessible agronomic practices with long-term investments in infrastructure, policy alignment, and community engagement. Moving beyond fragmented solutions and adopting an integrated systems lens enables this study to contribute a forward-looking framework for sustainable straw management that is environmentally just, socially legitimate, and economically viable.
Ghada Abd Elsattar Mohammed Oraby, Fadillah Putra, M. Halim Natsir, Dian Siswanto, Meshal M. Abdullah, Ammar Abulibdeh . Straw Burning Dilemma in Modern Agriculture: A Systematic Review of Driving Factors, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Solutions[J]. Rice Science, 2025 , 32(5) : 637 -648 . DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2025.06.007
| [1] | Akbari M Z, Thepnuan D, Wiriya W, et al. 2021. Emission factors of metals bound with PM2.5 and ashes from biomass burning simulated in an open-system combustion chamber for estimation of open burning emissions. Atmos Pollut Res, 12(3): 13-24. |
| [2] | Arunrat N, Sereenonchai S, Sansupa C, et al. 2023. Effect of rice straw and stubble burning on soil physicochemical properties and bacterial communities in central Thailand. Biology, 12(4): 501. |
| [3] | Asadi H, Ghorbani M, Rezaei-Rashti M, et al. 2021. Application of rice husk biochar for achieving sustainable agriculture and environment. Rice Sci, 28(4): 325-343. |
| [4] | Ayesh A. 2023. Burned agricultural biomass, air pollution and crime. J Environ Econ Manag, 122: 102887. |
| [5] | Beig G, Sahu S K, Rathod A, et al. 2021. Role of meteorological regime in mitigating biomass induced extreme air pollution events. Urban Clim, 35: 100756. |
| [6] | Bhattacharyya P, Bisen J, Bhaduri D, et al. 2021. Turn the wheel from waste to wealth: Economic and environmental gain of sustainable rice straw management practices over field burning in reference to India. Sci Total Environ, 775: 145896. |
| [7] | Carmona-Yáñez M D, Francos M, Miralles I, et al. 2023. Short-term impacts of wildfire and post-fire mulching on ecosystem multifunctionality in a semi-arid pine forest. For Ecol Manag, 541: 121000. |
| [8] | Chang S S, Lee W J, Holsen T M, et al. 2014. Emissions of polychlorinated-p-dibenzo dioxin, dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) from rice straw biomass burning. Atmos Environ, 94: 573-581. |
| [9] | Chen H, Wang H Y, Zhou S S. 2023. Farmers’ cognition of and satisfaction with policy affect willingness of returning straw to field: Based on evolutionary game perspective. Sustainability, 15(21): 15227. |
| [10] | Chen Q Q, Yang Q, Ye D M. 2020. Regional environment, family’s endowment and straw disposal behavior: A case study of dry farming areas in Gansu Province, China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 31(2): 563-572. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [11] | Connor M, de Guia A H, Quilloy R, et al. 2020. When climate change is not psychologically distant: Factors influencing the acceptance of sustainable farming practices in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam. World Dev Perspect, 18: 100204. |
| [12] | de Aquino G S, de Conti Medina C, da Costa D C, et al. 2017. Sugarcane straw management and its impact on production and development of ratoons. Ind Crops Prod, 102: 58-64. |
| [13] | Dong C F, Cai Q S, Wang C L, et al. 2008. QTL analysis for traits associated with feeding value of straw in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice Sci, 15(3): 195-200. |
| [14] | Dong W J, Xu M D, Yang X W, et al. 2024. Rice straw ash and amphibian health: A deep dive into microbiota changes and potential ecological consequences. Sci Total Environ, 926: 171651. |
| [15] | El-Sobky E S E A. 2017. Effect of burned rice straw, phosphorus and nitrogen fertilization on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ann Agric Sci, 62(1): 113-120. |
| [16] | Fernández C, Vega J A, Fontúrbel T. 2016. Reducing post-fire soil erosion from the air: Performance of heli-mulching in a mountainous area on the coast of NW Spain. Catena, 147: 489-495. |
| [17] | Fushimi A, Saitoh K, Hayashi K, et al. 2017. Chemical characterization and oxidative potential of particles emitted from open burning of cereal straws and rice husk under flaming and smoldering conditions. Atmos Environ, 163: 118-127. |
| [18] | Gao R, Jiang W, Gao W D, et al. 2017. Emission inventory of crop residue open burning and its high-resolution spatial distribution in 2014 for Shandong Province, China. Atmos Pollut Res, 8(3): 545-554. |
| [19] | Giang N C, Chien N Q, Khac D V. 2024. Estimation of greenhouse gas emission due to open burning of rice straw using sentinel data. Vietnam J Earth Sci, 46(3): 381-398. |
| [20] | Giannoccaro G, de Gennaro B C, de Meo E, et al. 2017. Assessing farmers’ willingness to supply biomass as energy feedstock: Cereal straw in Apulia (Italy). Energy Econ, 61: 179-185. |
| [21] | Guo H P, Xu S, Wang X T, et al. 2021. Driving mechanism of farmers’ utilization behaviors of straw resources: An empirical study in Jilin Province, the main grain producing region in the northeast part of China. Sustainability, 13(5): 2506. |
| [22] | Guo S Q. 2021. How does straw burning affect urban air quality in China? Am J Agric Econ, 103(3): 1122-1140. |
| [23] | He G J, Liu T, Zhou M G. 2020. Straw burning, PM2.5, and death: Evidence from China. J Dev Econ, 145: 102468. |
| [24] | Holder A L, Gullett B K, Urbanski S P, et al. 2017. Emissions from prescribed burning of agricultural fields in the Pacific Northwest. Atmos Environ, 166: 22-33. |
| [25] | Huang L, Zhu Y H, Wang Q, et al. 2021. Assessment of the effects of straw burning bans in China: Emissions, air quality, and health impacts. Sci Total Environ, 789: 147935. |
| [26] | Jeong C Y, Dodla S K, Wang J J. 2016. Fundamental and molecular composition characteristics of biochars produced from sugarcane and rice crop residues and by-products. Chemosphere, 142: 4-13. |
| [27] | Jha P, Hati K M, Dalal R C, et al. 2020. Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a vertisol following 50?years of no-tillage, crop stubble retention and nitrogen fertilization. Geoderma, 358: 113996. |
| [28] | Kajina W, Rousset P, Chen W H, et al. 2018. Coupled effect of torrefaction and blending on chemical and energy properties for combustion of major open burned agriculture residues in Thailand. Renew Energy, 118: 113-121. |
| [29] | Kim Oanh N T, Permadi D A, Hopke P K, et al. 2018. Annual emissions of air toxics emitted from crop residue open burning in Southeast Asia over the period of 2010-2015. Atmos Environ, 187: 163-173. |
| [30] | Laskar A H, Maurya A S, Singh V, et al. 2020. A new perspective of probing the level of pollution in the megacity Delhi affected by crop residue burning using the triple oxygen isotope technique in atmospheric CO2. Environ Pollut, 263: 114542. |
| [31] | Limmer M A, Linam F A, Seyfferth A L. 2023. The effect of rice residue management on rice paddy Si, Fe, As, and methane biogeochemistry. Sci Total Environ, 903: 166496. |
| [32] | Lin H Y, Zheng J, Zhou M H, et al. 2025. Crop straw incorporation increases the soil carbon stock by improving the soil aggregate structure without stimulating soil heterotrophic respiration. J Integr Agric, 24(4): 1542-1561. |
| [33] | Liu Y Z, Zhang J, Zhuang M H. 2021. Bottom-up re-estimations of greenhouse gas and atmospheric pollutants derived from straw burning of three cereal crops production in China based on a national questionnaire. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 28(46): 65410-65415. |
| [34] | Lopes A A, Viriyavipart A, Tasneem D. 2020. The role of social influence in crop residue management: Evidence from Northern India. Ecol Econ, 169: 106563. |
| [35] | Mohammad L, Bandyopadhyay J, Sk R, et al. 2023. Estimation of agricultural burned affected area using NDVI and dNBR satellite-based empirical models. J Environ Manag, 343: 118226. |
| [36] | Morsy F A, El-Sheikh S M, Barhoum A. 2019. Nano-silica and SiO2/ CaCO3 nanocomposite prepared from semi-burned rice straw ash as modified papermaking fillers. Arab J Chem, 12(7): 1186-1196. |
| [37] | Mothe S, Polisetty V R, Sridhar P, et al. 2022. Comparison of GHG emissions from open field burning and anaerobic digestion of rice straw. Environ Technol, 2022: 2153749. |
| [38] | Mueller-Niggemann C, Lehndorff E, Amelung W, et al. 2016. Source and depth translocation of combustion residues in Chinese agroecosystems determined from parallel polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and black carbon (BC) analysis. Org Geochem, 98: 27-37. |
| [39] | Nguyen M N, Dam T T N, Nguyen A T Q, et al. 2021. Arsenic in rice straw phytoliths: Encapsulation and release properties. Appl Geochem, 127: 104907. |
| [40] | Niang A, Pernollet C A, Gauthier-Clerc M, et al. 2016. A cost-benefit analysis of rice field winter flooding for conservation purposes in Camargue, Southern France. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 231: 193-205. |
| [41] | Ortuzar-Iragorri M A, Aizpurua A, Castellón A, et al. 2015. What can be done with cereal straw in Alava? In: Edwards D, Olroyd G. Agriculture and Climate Change:Adapting Crops to Increased Uncertainty (AGRI 2015). 4th International Conference on Agriculture and Horticulture (AGRI), February 15-17, 2015. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Procedia Environmental Sciences, 29: 221-222. |
| [42] | Parihar D S, Narang M K, Dogra B, et al. 2023. Rice residue burning in Northern India: An assessment of environmental concerns and potential solutions: A review. Environ Res Commun, 5(6): 062001. |
| [43] | Park J, Lee Y, Ryu C, et al. 2014. Slow pyrolysis of rice straw: Analysis of products properties, carbon and energy yields. Bioresour Technol, 155: 63-70. |
| [44] | Park S, Yu G H, Bae M S. 2020. Effects of combustion condition and biomass type on the light absorption of fine organic aerosols from fresh biomass burning emissions over Korea. Environ Pollut, 265: 114841. |
| [45] | Quispe I, Navia R, Kahhat R. 2019. Life cycle assessment of rice husk as an energy source: A Peruvian case study. J Clean Prod, 209: 1235-1244. |
| [46] | Ren J Q, Yu P X, Xu X H. 2019. Straw utilization in China: Status and recommendations. Sustainability, 11(6): 1762. |
| [47] | Röder M, Jamieson C, Thornley P. 2020. (Stop) burning for biogas. Enabling positive sustainability trade-offs with business models for biogas from rice straw. Biomass Bioenergy, 138: 105598. |
| [48] | Romasanta R R, Sander B O, Gaihre Y K, et al. 2017. How does burning of rice straw affect CH4 and N2O emissions? A comparative experiment of different on-field straw management practices. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 239: 143-153. |
| [49] | Roper M M, Kerr R, Ward P R, et al. 2021. Changes in soil properties and crop performance on stubble-burned and cultivated water-repellent soils can take many years following reversion to no-till and stubble retention. Geoderma, 402: 115361. |
| [50] | Sakhiya A K, Vijay V K, Kaushal P. 2023. Development of rice straw biochar through pyrolysis to improve drinking water quality in arsenic and manganese contaminated areas. Surf Interfaces, 36: 102582. |
| [51] | Schjønning P. 2023. Straw management in small grain cereal crop production: The long-term effects on soil carbon and soil pore characteristics. Geoderma, 435: 116499. |
| [52] | Shao S, Zhang B, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Dry biorefinery conversion of cadmium-contaminated rice grain and straw to ethanol with complete collection and recycling of cadmium. Ind Crops Prod, 197: 116550. |
| [53] | Shen G F. 2016. Changes from traditional solid fuels to clean household energies: Opportunities in emission reduction of primary PM2.5 from residential cookstoves in China. Biomass Bioenergy, 86: 28-35. |
| [54] | Singh D, Kundu N, Ghosh S. 2021. Mapping rice residues burning and generated pollutants using Sentinel-2 data over northern part of India. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ, 22: 100486. |
| [55] | Singh G, Gupta M K, Chaurasiya S, et al. 2021. Rice straw burning: A review on its global prevalence and the sustainable alternatives for its effective mitigation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 28: 32125-32155. |
| [56] | Singh J, Bhattu M, Liew R K, et al. 2025. Transforming rice straw waste into biochar for advanced water treatment and soil amendment applications. Environ Technol Innov, 37: 103932. |
| [57] | Sun J, Cui L H, Gao Y H, et al. 2021. Environmental application of magnetic cellulose derived from Pennisetum sinese Roxb for efficient tetracycline removal. Carbohydr Polym, 251: 117004. |
| [58] | Szufa S, Piersa P, Junga R, et al. 2023. Numerical modeling of the co-firing process of an in situ steam-torrefied biomass with coal in a 230 MW industrial-scale boiler. Energy, 263: 125918. |
| [59] | Trivedi A, Verma A R, Kaur S, et al. 2017. Sustainable bio-energy production models for eradicating open field burning of paddy straw in Punjab, India. Energy, 127: 310-317. |
| [60] | Vega J A, Fernández C, Fonturbel T, et al. 2014. Testing the effects of straw mulching and herb seeding on soil erosion after fire in a gorse shrubland. Geoderma, 223: 79-87. |
| [61] | Wang W Y, Akhtar K, Ren G X, et al. 2019. Impact of straw management on seasonal soil carbon dioxide emissions, soil water content, and temperature in a semi-arid region of China. Sci Total Environ, 652: 471-482. |
| [62] | Xia L L, Lam S K, Wolf B, et al. 2018. Trade-offs between soil carbon sequestration and reactive nitrogen losses under straw return in global agroecosystems. Glob Chang Biol, 24(12): 5919-5932. |
| [63] | Xu C, You C. 2023. Agricultural expansion dominates rapid increases in cropland fires in Asia. Environ Int, 179: 108189. |
| [64] | Yang Q, Wang T, Wang J W, et al. 2021. Combustion, emission and slagging characteristics for typical agricultural crop straw usage in heating plants. Thermochim Acta, 702: 178979. |
| [65] | Zealand A M, Roskilly A P, Graham D W. 2017. Effect of feeding frequency and organic loading rate on biomethane production in the anaerobic digestion of rice straw. Appl Energy, 207: 156-165. |
| [66] | Zhang H F, Hu J, Qi Y X, et al. 2017. Emission characterization, environmental impact, and control measure of PM2.5 emitted from agricultural crop residue burning in China. J Clean Prod, 149: 629-635. |
| [67] | Zhang N, Zhou P, Kung C C. 2015. Total-factor carbon emission performance of the Chinese transportation industry: A bootstrapped non-radial Malmquist index analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 41: 584-593. |
| [68] | Zhang T R, Wooster M J, Green D C, et al. 2015. New field-based agricultural biomass burning trace gas, PM2.5, and black carbon emission ratios and factors measured in situ at crop residue fires in Eastern China. Atmos Environ, 121: 22-34. |
| [69] | Zhang Y, Li J H, Tan J Y, et al. 2023. An overview of the direct and indirect effects of acid rain on plants: Relationships among acid rain, soil, microorganisms, and plants. Sci Total Environ, 873: 162388. |
| [70] | Zhu H, Ao Y B, Xu H, et al. 2021. Determinants of farmers’ intention of straw recycling: A comparison analysis based on different pro-environmental publicity modes. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18(21): 11304. |
| [71] | Zhu Y H, Huang L, Li Y M, et al. 2022. Greenhouse gas emissions from open biomass burning and the co-reduction due to straw burning bans in China. Acta Sci Circumstantiae, 42(10): 160-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [72] | Zhuang M H, Zhang J, Kong Z Y, et al. 2020. Potential environmental benefits of substituting nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer with usable crop straw in China during 2000-2017. J Clean Prod, 267: 122125. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |