Rice Science ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 270-278.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2018.04.004
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yamuangmorn Supaporn1, Dell Bernard2, Prom-u-thai Chanakan1,3()
Received:
2018-01-16
Accepted:
2018-04-20
Online:
2018-09-28
Published:
2018-06-11
Yamuangmorn Supaporn, Dell Bernard, Prom-u-thai Chanakan. Effects of Cooking on Anthocyanin Concentration and Bioactive Antioxidant Capacity in Glutinous and Non-Glutinous Purple Rice[J]. Rice Science, 2018, 25(5): 270-278.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Cooking method | Rice type | Soaking time (h) | Grain water ratio | Cooking time (min) |
---|---|---|---|---|
WC | NGR | 0 | 1:4 | 25 |
GR | 0 | 1:5 | 25 | |
S-WC | NGR | 12 | 1:3 | 20 |
GR | 12 | 1:3 | 20 |
Table 1 Description of cooking method in experiment 1.
Cooking method | Rice type | Soaking time (h) | Grain water ratio | Cooking time (min) |
---|---|---|---|---|
WC | NGR | 0 | 1:4 | 25 |
GR | 0 | 1:5 | 25 | |
S-WC | NGR | 12 | 1:3 | 20 |
GR | 12 | 1:3 | 20 |
Cooking method | Rice cooker | Soaking time (h) | Cooking time (min) |
---|---|---|---|
WC | ERC | 0 | 30 |
PRC | 0 | 25 | |
SC | ERC | 4 | 60 |
8 | 45 | ||
12 | 40 | ||
PRC | 4 | 35 | |
8 | 30 | ||
12 | 25 |
Table 2 Description of cooking method in experiment 2.
Cooking method | Rice cooker | Soaking time (h) | Cooking time (min) |
---|---|---|---|
WC | ERC | 0 | 30 |
PRC | 0 | 25 | |
SC | ERC | 4 | 60 |
8 | 45 | ||
12 | 40 | ||
PRC | 4 | 35 | |
8 | 30 | ||
12 | 25 |
Rice type | Genotype | Raw rice | Cooking method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SR (Reduction percentage) | WC (Reduction percentage) | S-WC (Reduction percentage ) | |||
NGR | HN | 400 a | 160 d (60%) | 50 fgh (88%) | 20 ij (95%) |
RBR | 360 b | 190 c (47%) | 40 ghi (89%) | 30 hij (92%) | |
CMU168 | 160 d | 60 fg (65%) | 20 ij (88%) | 10 j (94%) | |
CMU107 | 120 e | 70 f (44%) | 20 ij (83%) | 10 j (93%) | |
GR | KDK | 420 f | 220 gh (47%) | 50 j (87%) | 40 j (89%) |
CMU125 | 1 460 c | 970 d (34%) | 280 g (81%) | 230 gh (84%) | |
KHCMU | 580 e | 420 f (27%) | 100 ij (83%) | 160 hi (73%) | |
PES | 2 710 a | 2 270 b (16%) | 900 d (67%) | 650 e (76%) | |
Genotype (G) | Cooking method (C) | G × C | 5% LSD (G × C) | ||
NGR | ** | ** | ** | 2 | |
GR | ** | ** | ** | 9 |
Table 3 Anthocyanin concentration of four non-glutinous and four glutinous genotypes after cooking with different methods. mg/kg
Rice type | Genotype | Raw rice | Cooking method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SR (Reduction percentage) | WC (Reduction percentage) | S-WC (Reduction percentage ) | |||
NGR | HN | 400 a | 160 d (60%) | 50 fgh (88%) | 20 ij (95%) |
RBR | 360 b | 190 c (47%) | 40 ghi (89%) | 30 hij (92%) | |
CMU168 | 160 d | 60 fg (65%) | 20 ij (88%) | 10 j (94%) | |
CMU107 | 120 e | 70 f (44%) | 20 ij (83%) | 10 j (93%) | |
GR | KDK | 420 f | 220 gh (47%) | 50 j (87%) | 40 j (89%) |
CMU125 | 1 460 c | 970 d (34%) | 280 g (81%) | 230 gh (84%) | |
KHCMU | 580 e | 420 f (27%) | 100 ij (83%) | 160 hi (73%) | |
PES | 2 710 a | 2 270 b (16%) | 900 d (67%) | 650 e (76%) | |
Genotype (G) | Cooking method (C) | G × C | 5% LSD (G × C) | ||
NGR | ** | ** | ** | 2 | |
GR | ** | ** | ** | 9 |
Rice type | Genotype | Raw rice | Cooking method | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SR (Reduction percentage) | WC (Reduction percentage ) | S-WC (Reduction percentage ) | ||||
NGR | HN | 2 050 a | 1 440 cd (30%) | 1 040 fgh (49%) | 910 hi (56%) | |
RBR | 2 120 a | 1 560 bc (27%) | 1 160 efg (45%) | 970 ghi (54%) | ||
CMU168 | 1 270 de | 1 100 efg (13%) | 980 ghi (23%) | 640 j (50%) | ||
CMU107 | 1 730 b | 1 250 e (28%) | 1 000 fghi (42%) | 820 i (53%) | ||
GR | KDK | 2 210 fg | 1 280 hi (18%) | 880 jk (60%) | 800 k (64%) | |
CMU125 | 4 190 c | 3 570 d (15%) | 1 570 l (62%) | 1 120 j (73%) | ||
KHCMU | 2 580 e | 2 010 gh (22%) | 1 000 jk (61%) | 810 k (69%) | ||
PES | 6 160 a | 5 290 b (14%) | 2 320 ef (62%) | 1 680 l (73%) | ||
Genotype (G) | Cooking method (C) | G × C | 5% LSD (G × C) | |||
NGR | ** | ** | ** | 18 | ||
GR | ** | ** | ** | 28 |
Table 4 DPPH [1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical-2,2-diphenyl-1-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) hydrazyl] activity of purple rice after cooking with different methods. mg/kg
Rice type | Genotype | Raw rice | Cooking method | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SR (Reduction percentage) | WC (Reduction percentage ) | S-WC (Reduction percentage ) | ||||
NGR | HN | 2 050 a | 1 440 cd (30%) | 1 040 fgh (49%) | 910 hi (56%) | |
RBR | 2 120 a | 1 560 bc (27%) | 1 160 efg (45%) | 970 ghi (54%) | ||
CMU168 | 1 270 de | 1 100 efg (13%) | 980 ghi (23%) | 640 j (50%) | ||
CMU107 | 1 730 b | 1 250 e (28%) | 1 000 fghi (42%) | 820 i (53%) | ||
GR | KDK | 2 210 fg | 1 280 hi (18%) | 880 jk (60%) | 800 k (64%) | |
CMU125 | 4 190 c | 3 570 d (15%) | 1 570 l (62%) | 1 120 j (73%) | ||
KHCMU | 2 580 e | 2 010 gh (22%) | 1 000 jk (61%) | 810 k (69%) | ||
PES | 6 160 a | 5 290 b (14%) | 2 320 ef (62%) | 1 680 l (73%) | ||
Genotype (G) | Cooking method (C) | G × C | 5% LSD (G × C) | |||
NGR | ** | ** | ** | 18 | ||
GR | ** | ** | ** | 28 |
Fig. 1. Relationship between anthocyanin concentration and DPPH [1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical-2,2-diphenyl-1-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) hydrazyl] activity among non-glutinous (A) and glutinous rice (B) genotypes (n = 12).
Cooking method | Cooking type | ATC (Reduction percentage) | DPPH activity (Reduction percentage) |
---|---|---|---|
RR | 1 440 a (0%) | 4 430 a (0%) | |
ERC | WC | 140 bcd (90%) | 1 360 b (69%) |
PRC | WC | 70 e (95%) | 1 390 b (69%) |
ERC | ST-4 | 140 bcd (90%) | 850 c (81%) |
PRC | ST-4 | 100 cde (93%) | 1 000 c (78%) |
ERC | ST-8 | 170 b (88%) | 940 c (79%) |
PRC | ST-8 | 90 de (94%) | 940 c (79%) |
ERC | ST-12 | 160 bc (89%) | 1 090 c (75%) |
PRC | ST-12 | 70 e (95%) | 960 c (78%) |
5% LSD | 6** | 25** |
Table 5 Anthocyanin concentration (ATC) and DPPH [1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical-2,2-diphenyl-1-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) hydrazyl] radical scavenging activity (DPPH activity) after cooking with different cooking methods of glutinous CMU125. mg/kg
Cooking method | Cooking type | ATC (Reduction percentage) | DPPH activity (Reduction percentage) |
---|---|---|---|
RR | 1 440 a (0%) | 4 430 a (0%) | |
ERC | WC | 140 bcd (90%) | 1 360 b (69%) |
PRC | WC | 70 e (95%) | 1 390 b (69%) |
ERC | ST-4 | 140 bcd (90%) | 850 c (81%) |
PRC | ST-4 | 100 cde (93%) | 1 000 c (78%) |
ERC | ST-8 | 170 b (88%) | 940 c (79%) |
PRC | ST-8 | 90 de (94%) | 940 c (79%) |
ERC | ST-12 | 160 bc (89%) | 1 090 c (75%) |
PRC | ST-12 | 70 e (95%) | 960 c (78%) |
5% LSD | 6** | 25** |
1 | Abdel-Aal E S M, Hucl P.1999. A rapid method for quantifying total anthocyanins in blue aleurone and purple pericarp wheats.Cereal Chem, 76(3): 350-354. |
2 | Amarowicz R, Pegg R B, Rahimi-Moghaddam P, Barl B, Weil J A.2004. Free-radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity of selected plant species from the Canadian prairies.Food Chem, 84(4): 551-562. |
3 | Andersen O M, Jordheim M.2006. The anthocyanins. In: Andersen O M, Markham K R. Flavonoids: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Applications. Boca Raton, London, New York: Taylor & Francis Group: 471-523. |
4 | Appa Rao S, Schiller J M, Bounphanousay C, Inthapanya P, Jackson M T.2006. The colored pericarp (black) rice of Laos. In: Schiller J M, Chanphengxay M B, Appa Rao B. Rice in Laos. Laos Banos, the Philippines: International Rice Research Institute: 175-187. |
5 | Bhawamai S, Lin S H, Hou Y Y, Chen Y H.2016. Thermal cooking changes the profile of phenolic compounds, but does not attenuate the anti-inflammatory activities of black rice.Food Nutr Res, 60: 32941. |
6 | Buckow R, Kastell A, Terefe N S, Versteeg C.2010. Pressure and temperature effects on degradation kinetics and storage stability of total anthocyanins in blueberry juice.J Agric Food Chem, 58: 10076-10084. |
7 | Chatthongpisut R, Schwartz S J, Yongsawatdigul J.2015. Antioxidant activities and antiproliferative activity of Thai purple rice cooked by various methods on human colon cancer cells.Food Chem, 188: 99-105. |
8 | Chaudhary R C.2003. Speciality rices of the world: Effect of WTO and IPR on its production trend and marketing.J Food Agric Environ, 1: 34-41. |
9 | Dutta H, Mahanta C L.2012. Effect of hydrothermal treatment varying in time and pressure on the properties of parboiled rices with different amylose content.Food Res Int, 49: 655-663. |
10 | Goufo P, Trindade H.2014. Rice antioxidants: Phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, tocopherols, tocotrienols, γ-oryzanol, and phytic acid.Food Sci Nutr, 2(2): 75-104. |
11 | Juliano B O.1971. A simplified assay for milled-rice amylose.Cereal Sci Today, 16: 334-338. |
12 | Min B, McClung A M, Chen M H.2014. Effects of hydrothermal processes on antioxidants in brown, purple and red bran whole grain rice (Oryza sativa L.).Food Chem, 159: 106-115. |
13 | Minh N P.2014. Different factors affecting to waxy black rice malt production.Int J Multidiscip Res Dev, 1(3): 41-48. |
14 | Paiva F F, Vanier N L, Berrios J D J, Pinto V Z, Wood D, Williams T, Pan J, Elias M C.2016. Polishing and parboiling effect on the nutritional and technological properties of pigmented rice.Food Chem, 191: 105-112. |
15 | Rerkasem B, Sangruan P, Prom-u-thai C T.2015. Effect of polishing time on distribution of monomeric anthocyanin, iron and zinc content in different grain layers of four Thai purple rice varieties. Int J Agric Biol, 17(4): 828‒832. |
16 | Ryu D, Koh E.2017. Influence of cooking methods in free and bound phenolic acids in Korean black rice.J Food Process Preserv, 41(2): e12873. |
17 | Setyaningsih W, Hidayah N, Saputro I E, Lovillo M P, Barroso C G.2015. Study of glutinous and non-glutinous rice (Oryza sativa) varieties on their antioxidant compounds. International Conference on Plant, Marine and Environmental Sciences. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 1-2. |
18 | Sies H.1997. Oxidative stress: Oxidants and antioxidants.Exp Physiol, 82(2): 291-295. |
19 | Son J S, Do V B, Kim K O, Cho M S, Suwonsichon T, Valentin D.2013. Consumers’ attitude towards rice cooking processes in Korea, Japan, Thailand and France.Food Qual Prefer, 29(1): 65-75. |
20 | Sukhonthara S, Theerakulkait C, Miyazawa M.2009. Characterization of volatile aroma compounds from red and black rice bran.J Oleo Sci, 58: 155-161. |
21 | Surarit W, Jansom C, Lerdvuthisopon N, Kongkham S, Hansakul P.2015. Evaluation of antioxidant activities and phenolic subtype contents of ethanolic bran extracts of Thai pigmented rice varieties through chemical and cellular assays.Int J Food Sci Tech, 50(4): 990-998. |
22 | Surh J, Koh E.2014. Effects of four different cooking methods on anthocyanins, total phenolics and antioxidant activity of black rice.J Sci Food Agric, 94(15): 3296-3304. |
23 | Suwannakul N, Punvittayagul C, Jarukamjorn K, Wongpoomchai R.2015. Purple rice bran extract attenuates the aflatoxin B1-induced initiation stage of hepatocarcinogenesis by alteration of xenobiotic metabolising enzymes.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16(8): 3371-3376. |
24 | Tang Y Y, Cai W X, Xu B J.2016. From rice bag to table: Fate of phenolic chemical compositions and antioxidant activities in waxy and non-waxy black rice during home cooking.Food Chem, 191: 81-90. |
25 | Thammapat P, Meeso N, Siriamornpun S.2016. Effects of the traditional method and an alternative parboiling process on the fatty acids, vitamin E, γ-oryzanol and phenolic acids of glutinous rice.Food Chem, 194: 230-236. |
26 | Wu J Y, Chen J, Liu W, Liu C M, Zhong Y J, Luo D W, Li Z Q, Guo X J.2016. Effects of aleurone layer on rice cooking: A histological investigation.Food Chem, 191: 28-35. |
27 | Xia X D, Ling W H, Ma J, Xia M, Hou M J, Wang Q, Zhu H L, Tang Z H.2006. An anthocyanin-rich extract from black rice enhances atherosclerotic plaque stabilisation in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice.J Nutr, 136(8): 2220-2225. |
28 | Xia Q, Wang L P, Xu C C, Mei J, Li Y F.2017. Effects of germination and high hydrostatic pressure processing on mineral elements, amino acids and antioxidants in vitro bioaccessibility, as well as starch digestibility in brown rice (Oryza sativa L.).Food Chem, 214: 533-542. |
29 | Xu Z M, Godbe J S.1999. Purification and identification of components of γ-oryzanol in rice bran oil.J Agric Food Chem, 47(7): 2724-2728. |
30 | Yu L, Turner M S, Fitzgerald M, Stokes J R, Witt T.2017. Review of the effects of different processing technologies on cooked and convenience rice quality.Trends Food Sci Technol, 59: 124-138. |
31 | Zaupa M, Calani L, Rio D D, Brighenti F, Pellegrin N.2015. Characterization of total antioxidant capacity and (poly) phenolic compounds of differently pigmented rice varieties and their changes during domestic cooking.Food Chem, 187: 338-347. |
32 | Zaupa M, Ganino T, Dramis L, Pellegrini N.2016. Anatomical study of the effect of cooking on differently pigmented rice varieties.Food Struct, 7: 6-12. |
33 | Zhang M W, Zhang R F, Zhang F X, Liu R H.2010. Phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of black rice bran of different commercially available varieties.J Agric Food Chem, 58(13): 7580-7587. |
34 | Zorić Z, Dragović-Uzelac V, Pedisić S, Kurtanjek Z, Garofulić I E.2014. Kinetics of the degradation of anthocyanins, phenolic acids and flavonols during heat treatments of freeze-dried sour cherry marasca paste.Food Technol Biotechnol, 52(1): 101-108. |
[1] | Du Shuanglin, Wang Zhongwei, Chen Yun, Tan Yao, Li Xiang, Zhu Wenping, He Guanghua, Lei Kairong, Guo Longbiao, Zhang Yi. Coleoptile Purple Line Regulated by A-P Gene System Is a Valuable Marker Trait for Seed Purity Identification in Hybrid Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(5): 451-461. |
[2] | Suchila Utasee, Sansanee Jamjod, Sittisavet Lordkaew, Chanakan Prom-U-Thai. Improve Anthocyanin and Zinc Concentration in Purple Rice by Nitrogen and Zinc Fertilizer Application [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(5): 435-450. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||