Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties in the Global South: A Review

doi:10.1016/j.rsci.2023.03.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Improved rice varieties (IRVs) play a significant role in establishing food security and improving livelihood in the Global South since its introduction in the 1960s. However, the adoption of new IRVs has remained relatively low. This low adoption poses a challenge to rice-producing and consuming countries as they are increasingly threatened by production shortages, malnutrition, and poor rice quality. Many empirical studies have attempted to identify the determinants influencing the adoption of IRVs by distinguishing the characteristics between adopters and non-adopters. This review showed a consensus on the important determinants influencing the adoption of IRVs in the Global South. Findings synthesized from 99 studies suggested that variables (farm size, education, information access and farm location) examined extensively are not necessarily the most important determinants of adoption when undertaking a weighted analysis. Terrain, source of seed and technology-related attributes (perceived yield, maturity, ease of use, marketability and technical efficiency) are more important determinants of adoption, with determinants changing according to adoption type (probability or intensity of adoption), variety type and region. The recommendations for future adoption studies include: incorporating more technology-specific variables, increasing research for overlooked regions and variety types, shifting away from predominant static analysis by capturing the dynamics of the adoption process, and considering the potential biases in analyses. This review will facilitate the development of targeted interventions and policies that promote IRV adoption in the Global South.

Key words: technology adoption, improved rice variety, systematic literature review, the Global South

Julia Checco, Fathin Ayuni Azizan, Jaquie Mitchell, Ammar Abdul Aziz. Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties in the Global South: A Review[J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(3): 186-206.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig. 1. Selection process using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. Ineligible studies were excluded at each stage of the selection process. Google Scholar only exhibited the results for the first 1 000 relevant papers. Despite this limitation, 15% of unique papers were found in the search engine.

Fig. 2. Characteristics of reviewed adoption studies. A, Publication number in Africa, Asia and LAC (Latin America and the Caribbean). B, Publication number by countries and paddy rice production. The number of observations is 100 (One study studied two countries). C, Mean sample size (number of households) across the years, including trend line in time and standard error of mean sample size. D, Publication number for each rice variety type.

Fig. 3. Number of studies examined for probability, intensity and speed of adoption, classified into region and variety type. HYV, High-yielding variety; LAC, Latin America and the Caribbean.

Fig. 4. Number of observations that are positively significant, negatively significant, and not significant for each variable, grouped into farm biophysical, household and farmer, institutional and access-related, and technology-specific characteristics.

Fig. 5. Proportion of variables that are statistically significant for adoption probability, adoption intensity, and combination of all adoption types (probability, intensity and speed). Only variables examined at least five times for each category (i.e. combined, probability and intensity) are included.

Fig. 6. Number of total observations and proportion of significant observations for each variable, grouped into region and variety type.

Table 1. Adoption probability and intensity levels based on region or variety type.

Region/variety type ^a	Adoption probability ^b	Adoption intensity ^b	Studies for area ^c (%)	Studies for farmer ^d (%)
Region
Asia (50p, 13i)	17 (16)	61 (21)	53	81
South Asia (27p, 11i)	14 (10)	64 (21)	57	85
South East Asia (17p, 1i)	62 (48)	47 (0)	60	80
East Asia (5p, 1i)	52 (26)	34 (0)	0	100
Africa (33p, 2i)	36 (30)	19 (28)	50	90
West Africa (30p, 1i)	45 (28)	22 (0)	54	92
East Africa (35p, 1i)	40 (16)	18 (0)	25	75
Total (85p, 16i)	17 (16)	34 (23)	50	83
Variety type
Modern (17p, 9i)	43 (22)	66 (19)	55	90
Hybrid (15p, 2i)	12 (7)	21 (4)	25	85
High-yielding (13p,3i)	67 (22)	26 (10)	15	58
Climate-smart (8p, 1i)	36 (16)	47 (0)	63	75
Certified (5p)	35 (17)	-	75	67
Premium (2p)	60 (7)	-	50	100
Unclassified (25p, 1i)	50 (25)	55(0)	63	87

References 141

[1]	Abdallah W, Goergen M, O’Sullivan N. 2015. Endogeneity: How failure to correct for it can cause wrong inferences and some remedies. Brit J Manage, 26(4): 791-804. DOI URL
[2]	Abdul-Rahaman A, Issahaku G, Zereyesus Y A. 2021. Improved rice variety adoption and farm production efficiency: Accounting for unobservable selection bias and technology gaps among smallholder farmers in Ghana. Technol Soc, 64: 101471. DOI URL
[3]	Abebrese S O, Yeboah A. 2020. Hybrid rice in Africa: Progress, prospects, and challenges. In: Ansari M R. Recent Advances in Rice Research. IntechOpen: 1-12.
[4]	Acevedo M, Pixley K, Zinyengere N, Meng S, Tufan H, Cichy K, Bizikova L, Isaacs K, Ghezzi-Kopel K, Porciello J. 2020. A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low-and middle-income countries. Nat Plants, 6(10): 1231-1241. DOI
[5]	Addison M, Ohene-Yankyera K, Aidoo R. 2018. Gender effect on adoption of selected improved rice technologies in Ghana. J Agric Sci, 10(7): 390.
[6]	Adesina A A, Zinnah M M. 1993. Technology characteristics, farmers’ perceptions and adoption decisions: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agric Econ, 9(4): 297-311. DOI URL
[7]	Adesina A A, Baidu-Forson J. 1995. Farmers’ perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: Evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agric Econ, 13(1): 1-9. DOI URL
[8]	Akinnagbe O M, Akinbobola T P. 2022. Farmers adoption level of new rice for Africa (NERICA) varieties in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Agric Res, 11(2): 321-329. DOI
[9]	Al-Amin A K M A, Akhter T, Islam A H M S, Jahan H, Hossain M J, Prodhan M M H, Mainuddin M, Kirby M. 2019. An intra-household analysis of farmers’ perceptions of and adaptation to climate change impacts: Empirical evidence from drought prone zones of Bangladesh. Climatic Change, 156(4): 545-565. DOI
[10]	Alcon F, de Miguel M D, Burton M. 2011. Duration analysis of adoption of drip irrigation technology in southeastern Spain. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 78(6): 991-1001. DOI URL
[11]	Ali A, Erenstein O. 2017. Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan. Clim Risk Manag, 16: 183-194.
[12]	Anang B T. 2018. Farm technology adoption by smallholder farmers in Ghana. Rev Agric Appl Econ, 21(2): 41-47.
[13]	Arouna A, Lokossou J C, Wopereis M C S, Bruce-Oliver S, Roy-Macauley H. 2017. Contribution of improved rice varieties to poverty reduction and food security in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Food Sec, 14: 54-60.
[14]	Asaduzzaman M. 1979. Adoption of HYV rice in Bangladesh. Bangl Dev Stud, 7(3): 23-52.
[15]	Ashoori D, Allahyari M S, Bagheri A, Damalas C A. 2019. Adoption determinants of modern rice cultivars among smallholders of Northern Iran. Agriculture, 9(11): 232. DOI URL
[16]	Awotide B, Diagne A, Wiredu A, Ojehomon V. 2012. Wealth status and agricultural technology adoption among smallholder rice farmers in Nigeria. OIDA Int J Sustain Dev, 5(2): 97-108.
[17]	Ba H A, de Mey Y, Thoron S, Demont M. 2019. Inclusiveness of contract farming along the vertical coordination continuum: Evidence from the Vietnamese rice sector. Land Use Policy, 87: 104050. DOI URL
[18]	Bannor R K, Kumar G A K, Oppong-kyeremeh O, Wongnaa C A. 2020. Adoption and impact of modern rice varieties on poverty in eastern India. Rice Sci, 27(1): 56-66. DOI
[19]	Barthel S, Isendahl C, Vis B N, Drescher A, Evans D L,van Timmeren A. 2019. Global urbanization and food production in direct competition for land: Leverage places to mitigate impacts on SDG2 and on the Earth System. Anthr Rev, 6: 71-97.
[20]	Begho T. 2021. Using farmers’ risk tolerance to explain variations in adoption of improved rice varieties in Nepal. J South Asian Dev, 16(2): 171-193. DOI URL
[21]	Begho T, Glenk K, Anik A R, Eory V. 2022. A systematic review of factors that influence famers’ adoption of sustainable crop farming practices: Lessons for sustainable nitrogen management in South Asia. J Sustain Agric Env, 1(2): 149-160.
[22]	Beke T E. 2011. Institutional constraints and adoption of improved rice varieties: Econometric evidence from Ivory Coast. Rev Agric Environ Stud, 92(2): 117-141.
[23]	Bello L O, Baiyegunhi L J S, Danso-Abbeam G. 2020. Productivity impact of improved rice varieties’ adoption: Case of smallholder rice farmers in Nigeria. Econ Innov New Technol, 30(7): 750-766. DOI URL
[24]	Budhathoki N, Bhatta G D. 2016. Adoption of improved rice varieties in Nepal: Impact on household wellbeing. Agric Res, 5(4): 420-432. DOI URL
[25]	Burton M, Rigby D, Young T. 2003. Modelling the adoption of organic horticultural technology in the UK using duration analysis. Aust J Agric Resour Econ, 47(1): 29-54. DOI URL
[26]	Case A. 1992. Neighborhood influence and technological change. Reg Sci Urban Econ, 22(3): 491-508. DOI URL
[27]	Chandio A A, Jiang Y S. 2018. Determinants of adoption of improved rice varieties in northern Sindh, Pakistan. Rice Sci, 25(2): 103-110. DOI
[28]	Connor M, San S S. 2020. Sustainable rice farming and its impact on rural women in Myanmar. Dev Pract, 31(1): 49-58. DOI URL
[29]	Cuevas A C. 2016. Effects of transaction costs on rice farmers’ adoption of certified seeds in the Philippines. J Econ Manag Agric Dev, 2(1): 309272.
[30]	Dadi L, Burton M, Ozanne A. 2004. Duration analysis of technological adoption in Ethiopian agriculture. J Agric Econ, 55(3): 613-631. DOI URL
[31]	Dalrymple D G. 1979. The adoption of high-yielding grain varieties in developing nations. Agric Hist, 53(4): 704-726.
[32]	Davis F D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart, 13(3): 319-340. DOI URL
[33]	Demont M, Rutsaert P. 2017. Restructuring the Vietnamese rice sector: Towards increasing sustainability. Sustainability, 9(2): 325. DOI URL
[34]	Devkota N, Phuyal R K, Shrestha D L. 2018. Perception, determinants and barriers for the adoption of climate change adaptation options among Nepalese rice farmers. Agric Sci, 9(3): 272-298.
[35]	Diagne A. 2006. Diffusion and adoption of NERICA rice varieties in Côte d’Ivoire. Dev Econ, 44: 208-231. DOI URL
[36]	Diagne A, Demont M. 2007. Taking a new look at empirical models of adoption: Average treatment effect estimation of adoption rates and their determinants. Agric Econ, 37: 201-210. DOI URL
[37]	Diagne A, Glover S M, Groom B, Phillips J. 2012. Africa’s Green Revolution? The determinants of the adoption of NERICAs in West Africa. SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper Series, No. 174. SOAS, University of London.
[38]	Diagne M, Demont M, Ndour M. 2016. Consumer willingness to pay for rice fragrance. In: Evidence from Senegal 5th International Conference of AAAE. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[39]	Doss C R. 2006. Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: Limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement. Agric Econ, 34(3): 207-219. DOI URL
[40]	Douthwaite B, Keatinge J D H, Park J R. 2001. Why promising technologies fail: The neglected role of user innovation during adoption. Res Policy, 30(5): 819-836. DOI URL
[41]	Duong P B, Thanh P T. 2019. Adoption and effects of modern rice varieties in Vietnam: Micro-econometric analysis of household surveys. Econ Anal Policy, 64: 282-292. DOI
[42]	Fadeyi O A, Ariyawardana A, Aziz A A. 2022. Factors influencing technology adoption among smallholder farmers: A systematic review in Africa. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop, 123(1): 13-30.
[43]	FAO. 2021. FAO FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
[44]	Feder G, Just R E, Zilberman D. 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Econ Dev Cult Change, 33(2): 255-298. DOI URL
[45]	Feder G, Slade R. 1986. The impact of agricultural extension: The training and visit system in India. World Bank Res Obs, 1(2): 139-161. DOI URL
[46]	Feyisa B W. 2020. Determinants of agricultural technology adoption in Ethiopia: A meta-analysis. Cogent Food Agric, 6(1): 1855817.
[47]	Filippini R, Merascotti M E, Demartini E, Gaviglio A. 2020. Social networks as drivers for technology adoption: A study from a rural mountain area in Italy. Sustainability, 12(22): 9392. DOI URL
[48]	Fisher D K, Norvell J, Sonka S, Nelson M J. 2000. Understanding technology adoption through system dynamics modeling: Implications for agribusiness management. Int Food Agribus Manag Rev, 3(3): 281-296. DOI URL
[49]	García B. 2013. Implementation of a double-hurdle model. Stata J, 13(4): 776-794. DOI URL
[50]	Ghimire G, Huang W C, Shrestha R B. 2015. Factors affecting adoption of improved rice varieties among rural farm households in central Nepal. Rice Sci, 22(1): 35-43. DOI
[51]	Ghimire R, Huang W C. 2016. Adoption pattern and welfare impact of agricultural technology: Empirical evidence from rice farmers in Nepal. J South Asian Dev, 11(1): 113-137. DOI URL
[52]	Glover D, Sumberg J, Andersson J A. 2016. The adoption problem, or why we still understand so little about technological change in African agriculture. Outlook Agric, 45(1): 3-6. DOI URL
[53]	Godoy R, O’Neill K, McSweeney K, Wilkie D, Flores V, Bravo D, Kostishack P, Cubas A. 2000. Human capital, wealth, property rights, and the adoption of new farm technologies: The Tawahka Indians of Honduras. Hum Organ, 59(2): 222-233. DOI URL
[54]	Greene J C, Caracelli V J, Graham W F. 1989. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal, 11(3): 255-274. DOI URL
[55]	Hagos A, Zemedu L. 2015. Determinants of improved rice varieties adoption in Fogera district of Ethiopia. Sci Technol Arts Res J, 4(1): 221-228. DOI URL
[56]	Hiebert L D. 1974. Risk, learning, and the adoption of fertilizer responsive seed varieties. Am J Agric Econ, 56(4): 764-768. DOI URL
[57]	Ho T D N, Tsusaka T W, Kuwornu J K M, Datta A, Nguyen L T. 2022. Do rice varieties matter? Climate change adaptation and livelihood diversification among rural smallholder households in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 27(1): 8. DOI
[58]	Holloway G, Shankar B, Rahman S. 2002. Bayesian spatial probit estimation: A primer and an application to HYV rice adoption. Agric Econ, 27(3): 383-402. DOI URL
[59]	Hossain M, Ut T T, Janaiah A. 2003. Vietnam’s experience with hybrid rice. Econ Polit Wkly, 38(25): 2523-2529.
[60]	IRRI. 2020. Going Beyond Rice. Los Baños, the Philippines. International Rice Research Institute.
[61]	Islam K M Z, Sumelius J, Bäckman S. 2012. Do differences in technical efficiency explain the adoption rate of HYV rice? Evidence from Bangladesh. Agric Econ Rev, 13: 93-110.
[62]	Islam M A. 2018. Impact of improved rice varieties adoption on farmers’ well-being (livelihood) in rural Bangladesh. Bangl J Agric Econs, 38(1): 35-54.
[63]	Jeyaraj A, Rottman J W, Lacity M C. 2006. A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. J Inf Technol, 21(1): 1-23.
[64]	Johnson R B, Onwuegbuzie A J. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res, 33(7): 14-26.
[65]	Jones-Garcia E, Krishna V V. 2021. Farmer adoption of sustainable intensification technologies in the maize systems of the Global South. A review. Agron Sustain Dev, 41(1): 8. DOI
[66]	Joshi G, Bauer S. 2006. Farmers’ choice of the modern rice varieties in the rainfed ecosystem of Nepal. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop, 107(2): 129-138.
[67]	Khan N A, Qiao J M, Abid M, Gao Q J. 2021. Understanding farm-level cognition of and autonomous adaptation to climate variability and associated factors: Evidence from the rice-growing zone of Pakistan. Land Use Policy, 105: 105427. DOI URL
[68]	Kiloes A M, Azizan F A, Checco J, Joyce D, Aziz A A. 2022. What do consumers want in fresh mangoes? A systematic literature review. Int J Food Sci Technol, 57(3): 1473-1492. DOI URL
[69]	Koutsos T M, Menexes G C, Dordas C A. 2019. An efficient framework for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences. Sci Total Environ, 682: 106-117. DOI
[70]	Kumar A, Singh R K P, Kumar A, Betne R, Singh K M. 2016. Adoption of modern rice cultivation practices in Bihar, India: Micro-level evidences from village-level studies. Agric Res, 5(4): 433-439. DOI
[71]	Kumar A, Tripathi G, Joshi P K. 2020. Adoption and impact of modern varieties of paddy in India: Evidence from a nationally representative field survey. J Agribusiness Dev Emerg Econ, 11(3): 255-279.
[72]	Laborte A G, Velasco M L, Wang H, Behura D, Pagnchak M R, Singh H N, Wardana I P, Vilayvong S, Shah H. 2017. Release and adoption of improved cultivars in South and Southeast Asia: Rice. In: 2017 ASAE 9th International Conference. 11-13 January, 2017. Bangkok, Thailand.
[73]	Lancon F, David-Benz H. 2007. Rice imports in West Africa: Trade regime and food policy formulation. In: European Association of Agricultural Economists. 106th Seminar, 25-27 October, 2007. Montpellier, France.
[74]	Lee C L, Strong R, Dooley K E. 2021. Analyzing precision agriculture adoption across the globe: A systematic review of scholarship from 1999-2020. Sustainability, 13(18): 10295. DOI URL
[75]	Lu W C, Chen N L, Qian W X. 2017. Modeling the effects of urbanization on grain production and consumption in China. J Integr Agric, 16(6): 1393-1405. DOI URL
[76]	Mabe F N, Ehiakpor D S, Adam B, Dumasi D E. 2018. Determinants of adoption of improved rice varieties: Effects on output in Volta region. UDS Int J Dev, 5(2): 28-37.
[77]	Majumder S, Datta K, Datta S K. 2019. Rice biofortification: High iron, zinc, and vitamin-A to fight against ‘hidden hunger’. Agronomy, 9(12): 803. DOI URL
[78]	Mansaray B, Jin S S. 2020. Do the determinants of food security differ in improved rice variety adoption? Evidence from Sierra Leone. Open Agric, 5: 466-484.
[79]	Mansaray B, Jin S S, Horlu G A. 2019. Do land ownership and agro-ecological location of farmland influence adoption of improved rice varieties? Evidence from Sierra Leone. Agriculture, 9: 256. DOI URL
[80]	Mazoyer M. 2008. Technology adoption and productivity difference among growers of new rice for Africa in Savanna Zone of Nigeria. Tropicultura, 15(6): 385-390.
[81]	Mariano M J, Villano R, Fleming E. 2012. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines. Agric Syst, 110: 41-53. DOI URL
[82]	Massresha S E, Lema T Z, Neway M M, Degu W A. 2021. Perception and determinants of agricultural technology adoption in North Shoa Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Cogent Econ Finance, 9(1): 1956774. DOI URL
[83]	Mehar M, Yamano T, Panda A. 2017. The role of gender, risk, and time preferences in farmers’ rice variety selection in Eastern India. Asian J Agric Dev, 14(1): 17-36.
[84]	Mektel A, Mohammed A. 2021. Determinants of farmers adoption decision of improved crop varieties in Ethiopia: Systematic review. Afr J Agric Res, 17(7): 953-960. DOI URL
[85]	Mendola M. 2007. Agricultural technology adoption and poverty reduction: A propensity-score matching analysis for rural Bangladesh. Food Policy, 32(3): 372-393. DOI URL
[86]	Mesfin A H, Zemedu L. 2018. Choices of varieties and demand for improved rice seed in Fogera district of Ethiopia. Rice Sci, 25(6): 350-356. DOI
[87]	Miguel C B, Sarmiento J M P, Estaña L M B, Limpoco M A A A, Calag V B, Novero A U, Alviola IV P A. 2021. Neighborhood effects in hybrid rice adoption in Davao del Sur, Philippines. Philipp J Sci, 150: 1461.
[88]	Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D G, Group P A. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339: b2535. DOI URL
[89]	Montes de Oca Mungula O, Pannell D J, Llewellyn R. 2021. Understanding the adoption of innovations in agriculture: A review of selected conceptual models. Agronomy, 11(1): 139. DOI URL
[90]	Morse J M. 1991. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res, 40(2): 120-123. PMID
[91]	Mottaleb K A, Mohanty S, Nelson A. 2015. Factors influencing hybrid rice adoption: A Bangladesh case. Aust J Agric Resour Econ, 59(2): 258-274. DOI URL
[92]	Muflikh Y N, Smith C, Aziz A A. 2021. A systematic review of the contribution of system dynamics to value chain analysis in agricultural development. Agric Syst, 189: 103044. DOI URL
[93]	Muthayya S, Sugimoto J D, Montgomery S, Maberly G F. 2014. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1324: 7-14. DOI URL
[94]	Myint P L, Napasintuwong O. 2016. Economic analysis of paw san rice adoption in Myanmar. Asian J Agric Res, 10(5): 175-184.
[95]	Napasinuwong O, Pray C. 2014. Adoption of drought-tolerant rice in Thailand: Participatory varietal selection and implications for breeding programs. J Dev Agric Econ, 6(9): 394-404. DOI URL
[96]	Nguezet D, Martin P, Diagne A. 2013. Estimation of actual and potential adoption rates and determinants of improved rice variety among rice farmers in Nigeria. J Crop Improv, 27(5): 561-585. DOI URL
[97]	Nguyen L. 2020. Land rights and technology adoption: Improved rice varieties in Vietnam. J Dev Stud, 56(8): 1489-1507. DOI
[98]	Noltze M, Schwarze S, Qaim M. 2012. Understanding the adoption of system technologies in smallholder agriculture: The system of rice intensification (SRI) in Timor Leste. Agric Syst, 108: 64-73. DOI URL
[99]	Nonvide G M A. 2020. Identification of factors affecting adoption of improved rice varieties among smallholder farmers in the municipality of Malanville, Benin. J Agric Sci Technol, 22(2): 305-316.
[100]	Norris M, Oppenheim C, Rowland F. 2008. Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR. Online Inf Rev, 32(6): 709-715. DOI URL
[101]	Oladeji O O, Okoruwa V, Ojehomon V E T, Diagne A, Obasoro O A. 2015. Determinants of awareness and adoption of improved rice varieties in north central, Nigeria. Rice Genom Genet, 6(7): 1-10.
[102]	Oladele I O, Wakatsuki T. 2011. Replacement adoption: A case of varietal substitution among farmers adopting Sawah rice production technology in Nigeria and Ghana. South Afr J Agric Ext, 39(2): 79-90.
[103]	Ologbon O A C, Ikheloa E E, Akerele E O. 2012. Adoption of ‘Ofada’ rice variety and technical efficiency of rice-based production systems in Ogun State, Nigeria. World J Agric Sci, 8(6): 624-631.
[104]	Olum S, Gellynck X, Juvinal J, Ongeng D,De Steur H. 2020. Farmers’ adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies. Outlook Agric, 49(3): 187-203. DOI URL
[105]	Onyeneke R U. 2021. Does climate change adaptation lead to increased productivity of rice production? Lessons from Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Renew Agric Food Syst, 36(1): 54-68. DOI URL
[106]	Owens J K. 2021. Systematic reviews: Brief overview of methods, limitations and resources. Nurse Author Editor, 31: 69-72. DOI URL
[107]	Paik S, Le D T P, Nhu L T, Mills B F. 2020. Salt-tolerant rice variety adoption in the Mekong River Delta: Farmer adaptation to sea-level rise. PLoS One, 15(3): e0229464. DOI URL
[108]	Paltasingh K R. 2018. Land tenure security and adoption of modern rice technology in Odisha, Eastern India: Revisiting Besley’s hypothesis. Land Use Policy, 78: 236-244. DOI URL
[109]	Paltasingh K R, Goyari P. 2018. Impact of farmer education on farm productivity under varying technologies: Case of paddy growers in India. Agric Econ, 6(1): 7. DOI
[110]	Paltasingh K R, Goyari P, Tochkov K. 2017. Rice ecosystems and adoption of modern rice varieties in Odisha, East India: Intensity, determinants and policy implications. J Dev Areas, 51(3): 197-213. DOI URL
[111]	Peng S B, Huang J L, Cassman K G, Laza R C, Visperas R M, Khush G S. 2010. The importance of maintenance breeding: A case study of the first miracle rice variety: IR8. Field Crops Res, 119: 342-347. DOI URL
[112]	Pingali P L. 2012. Green revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109(31): 12302-12308. DOI PMID
[113]	Rahman S, Chima C D. 2015. Determinants of modern technology adoption in multiple food crops in Nigeria: A multivariate probit approach. Int J Agric Manag, 4(3): 10.
[114]	Redfern S K, Azzu N, Binamira J S. 2012. Rice in Southeast Asia:Facing risks and vulnerabilities to respond to climate change. In: Proceedings of a Joint FAO/OECD Workshop. Rome, Italy: FAO: 1-13.
[115]	Ruzzante S, Labarta R, Bilton A. 2021. Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. World Dev, 146: 105599. DOI URL
[116]	Saka J O, Lawal B O. 2009. Determinants of adoption and productivity of improved rice varieties in southwestern Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol, 8(19): 4923-4932.
[117]	Saka J O, Okoruwa V O, Lawal B O, Ajijola S. 2005. Adoption of improved rice varieties among small-holder farmers in South-Western Nigeria. World J Agric Sci, 1(1): 42-49.
[118]	Sall S, Norman D, Featherstone A M. 2000. Quantitative assessment of improved rice variety adoption: The farmer’s perspective. Agric Syst, 66(2): 129-144. DOI URL
[119]	Samal P, Pandey S, Kumar G A K, Barah B C. 2011. Rice ecosystems and factors affecting varietal adoption in rainfed coastal Orissa: A multivariate probit analysis. Agric Econ Res Rev, 24(1): 161-167.
[120]	Samberg L H, Gerber J S, Ramankutty N, Herrero M, West P C. 2016. Subnational distribution of average farm size and smallholder contributions to global food production. Env Res Lett, 11(12): 124010. DOI URL
[121]	Sánchez-Toledano B I, Kallas Z, Palmeros Rojas O, Gil J M. 2018. Determinant factors of the adoption of improved maize seeds in Southern Mexico: A survival analysis approach. Sustainability, 10(10): 3543. DOI URL
[122]	Sarap K, Vashist D C. 1994. Adoption of modern varieties of rice in Orissa: A farm level analysis. Ind J Agric Econ, 49(1): 88-93.
[123]	Schultz T W. 1982. Investing in people: The economics of population quality. J Policy Analysis Manag, 1(2): 278-279.
[124]	Seck P A, Diagne A, Mohanty S, Wopereis M C S. 2012. Crops that feed the world 7: Rice. Food Sec, 4(1): 7-24. DOI URL
[125]	Siddaway A P, Wood A M, Hedges L V. 2019. How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol, 70: 747-770. DOI PMID
[126]	Straub E T. 2009. Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Rev Educ Res, 79(2): 625-649. DOI URL
[127]	Thanh P T, Duong P B. 2021. Determinants of adoption of modern rice varieties in rural Vietnam: A double-hurdle approach. J Agribusiness Dev Emerg Econ, 11(3): 313-326.
[128]	Tripathy T, Harisson S, Mohanty B K. 2006. Trend of production, adoption and utilisation of high quality paddy seeds: A study in Orissa. Ind J Agric Econ, 61(1): 90-107.
[129]	Udoh E J, Omonona B T. 2008. Improved rice variety adoption and its welfare impact on rural farming households in Akwa Ibom State of Nigeria. J New Seeds, 9(2): 156-173. DOI URL
[130]	Ut T T, Kajisa K. 2006. The impact of green revolution on rice production in Vietnam. Dev Econ, 44(2): 167-189. DOI URL
[131]	Valente T W, Rogers E M. 1995. The origins and development of the diffusion of innovations paradigm as an example of scientific growth. Sci Commun, 16(3): 242-273. DOI PMID
[132]	Vergara B S, Tanaka A, Lilis R, Puranabhavung S. 1996. Relationship between growth duration and grain yield of rice plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 12(1): 31-39.
[133]	Villano R, Bravo-Ureta B, Solís D, Fleming E. 2015. Modern rice technologies and productivity in the Philippines: Disentangling technology from managerial gaps. J Agric Econ, 66(1): 129-154. DOI URL
[134]	Wang H Y, Pandey S, Velarde O. 2012. Pattern of adoption of improved rice varieties and its determinants in Cambodia. Procedia Econ Financ, 2: 335-343.
[135]	Wang H Y, Pandey S, Feng L. 2020. Econometric analyses of adoption and household-level impacts of improved rice varieties in the uplands of Yunnan, China. Sustainability, 12(17): 6873. DOI URL
[136]	Ward P S, Pede V O. 2014. Capturing social network effects in technology adoption: The spatial diffusion of hybrid rice in Bangladesh. Aust J Agric Econ, 59(2): 225-241. DOI URL
[137]	Wu H T, Ding S J, Pandey S, Tao D Y. 2010. Assessing the impact of agricultural technology adoption on farmers’ well-being using propensity-score matching analysis in rural China. Asian Econ J, 24(2): 141-160. DOI URL
[138]	Xiao Y, Watson M. 2019. Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. J Plan Educ Res, 39(1): 93-112. DOI
[139]	Yadav V S, Singh A R, Gunasekaran A, Raut R D, Narkhede B E. 2022. A systematic literature review of the agro-food supply chain: Challenges, network design, and performance measurement perspectives. Sustain Prod Consum, 29: 685-704.
[140]	Zeigler R S, Barclay A. 2008. The relevance of rice. Rice, 1(1): 3-10. DOI URL
[141]	Zhou J H, Tang L Q, Yu X H. 2018. Estimating the average treatment effect of adopting stress tolerant variety on rice yield in China. J Integr Agric, 17(4): 940-948. DOI URL