Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 32-40.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2016.05.006
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Vivitha P., Raveendran M., Vijayalakshmi D.()
Received:
2016-02-24
Accepted:
2016-05-05
Online:
2017-01-10
Published:
2016-11-01
Vivitha P., Raveendran M., Vijayalakshmi D.. Introgression of QTLs Controlling Spikelet Fertility Maintains Membrane Integrity and Grain Yield in Improved White Ponni Derived Progenies Exposed to Heat Stress[J]. Rice Science, 2017, 24(1): 32-40.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
QTL | Marker | Plant number |
---|---|---|
qHTSF1.1 | RM431 | IWP-201, IWP-143, IWP-245, IWP-215, IWP-275 |
qHTSF4.1 | RM5757 | IWP-129, IWP-101, IWP-105, IWP-116, IWP-240 |
qHTSF1.1 and qHTSF4.1 | RM431, RM5757 | IWP-295, IWP-277, IWP-246, IWP-296, IWP-166, IWP-158, IWP-265, IWP-153, IWP-139, IWP-233 |
Absence of qHTSF1.1 and qHTSF4.1 | RM431, RM5757 | IWP-147, IWP-142, IWP-141, IWP-146, IWP-104 |
Table 1 Segregating progenies selected with different combinations of QTLs related to high-temperature stress in rice.
QTL | Marker | Plant number |
---|---|---|
qHTSF1.1 | RM431 | IWP-201, IWP-143, IWP-245, IWP-215, IWP-275 |
qHTSF4.1 | RM5757 | IWP-129, IWP-101, IWP-105, IWP-116, IWP-240 |
qHTSF1.1 and qHTSF4.1 | RM431, RM5757 | IWP-295, IWP-277, IWP-246, IWP-296, IWP-166, IWP-158, IWP-265, IWP-153, IWP-139, IWP-233 |
Absence of qHTSF1.1 and qHTSF4.1 | RM431, RM5757 | IWP-147, IWP-142, IWP-141, IWP-146, IWP-104 |
Date | Ambient chamber | Elevated chamber | Date | Ambient chamber | Elevated chamber | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | ||||
2015-03-01 | 34.0 | 86.3 | 36.2 | 84.1 | 2015-03-19 | 35.8 | 78.7 | 37.1 | 77.8 | ||
2015-03-02 | 34.2 | 85.6 | 36.2 | 83.7 | 2015-03-20 | 35.6 | 80.3 | 37.7 | 78.4 | ||
2015-03-03 | 34.0 | 85.9 | 36.1 | 83.0 | 2015-03-21 | 35.2 | 82.8 | 37.2 | 81.5 | ||
2015-03-04 | 33.0 | 90.3 | 35.2 | 88.1 | 2015-03-22 | 35.5 | 69.1 | 37.3 | 67.6 | ||
2015-03-05 | 34.4 | 85.1 | 36.7 | 84.2 | 2015-03-23 | 36.5 | 81.5 | 38.2 | 79.7 | ||
2015-03-06 | 34.0 | 83.2 | 36.5 | 82.5 | 2015-03-24 | 37.0 | 86.2 | 39.9 | 85.2 | ||
2015-03-07 | 34.0 | 89.6 | 36.1 | 88.7 | 2015-03-25 | 37.0 | 82.4 | 39.4 | 80.4 | ||
2015-03-08 | 33.7 | 83.7 | 35.8 | 81.0 | 2015-03-26 | 36.2 | 74.5 | 38.1 | 72.0 | ||
2015-03-09 | 33.2 | 80.0 | 35.4 | 78.5 | 2015-03-27 | 34.5 | 87.6 | 36.3 | 85.4 | ||
2015-03-10 | 33.0 | 81.4 | 36.5 | 80.4 | 2015-03-28 | 35.0 | 85.8 | 37.2 | 83.1 | ||
2015-03-11 | 33.8 | 79.4 | 36.0 | 77.2 | 2015-03-29 | 34.8 | 84.9 | 36.1 | 82.9 | ||
2015-03-12 | 33.2 | 83.5 | 35.7 | 81.9 | 2015-03-30 | 36.0 | 84.1 | 38.9 | 82.7 | ||
2015-03-13 | 32.5 | 79.1 | 35.3 | 77.8 | 2015-03-31 | 35.4 | 78.0 | 35.6 | 76.5 | ||
2015-03-14 | 33.6 | 78.9 | 35.2 | 77.5 | 2015-04-01 | 36.2 | 80.4 | 38.1 | 78.1 | ||
2015-03-15 | 33.5 | 82.8 | 35.5 | 80.1 | 2015-04-02 | 37.4 | 76.2 | 39.5 | 74.2 | ||
2015-03-16 | 31.7 | 85.6 | 33.6 | 84.6 | 2015-04-03 | 38.7 | 86.1 | 40.0 | 85.5 | ||
2015-03-17 | 33.4 | 83.5 | 36.2 | 81.7 | 2015-04-04 | 38.4 | 87.5 | 40.2 | 85.4 | ||
2015-03-18 | 34.8 | 77.4 | 36.0 | 75.6 | 2015-04-05 | 39.8 | 81.7 | 41.2 | 80.6 |
Table 2 Maximum temperature (Tmax) and related humidity (RH) in ambient and elevated chambers from 1 March to 5 April in 2015.
Date | Ambient chamber | Elevated chamber | Date | Ambient chamber | Elevated chamber | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | Tmax (ºC) | RH (%) | ||||
2015-03-01 | 34.0 | 86.3 | 36.2 | 84.1 | 2015-03-19 | 35.8 | 78.7 | 37.1 | 77.8 | ||
2015-03-02 | 34.2 | 85.6 | 36.2 | 83.7 | 2015-03-20 | 35.6 | 80.3 | 37.7 | 78.4 | ||
2015-03-03 | 34.0 | 85.9 | 36.1 | 83.0 | 2015-03-21 | 35.2 | 82.8 | 37.2 | 81.5 | ||
2015-03-04 | 33.0 | 90.3 | 35.2 | 88.1 | 2015-03-22 | 35.5 | 69.1 | 37.3 | 67.6 | ||
2015-03-05 | 34.4 | 85.1 | 36.7 | 84.2 | 2015-03-23 | 36.5 | 81.5 | 38.2 | 79.7 | ||
2015-03-06 | 34.0 | 83.2 | 36.5 | 82.5 | 2015-03-24 | 37.0 | 86.2 | 39.9 | 85.2 | ||
2015-03-07 | 34.0 | 89.6 | 36.1 | 88.7 | 2015-03-25 | 37.0 | 82.4 | 39.4 | 80.4 | ||
2015-03-08 | 33.7 | 83.7 | 35.8 | 81.0 | 2015-03-26 | 36.2 | 74.5 | 38.1 | 72.0 | ||
2015-03-09 | 33.2 | 80.0 | 35.4 | 78.5 | 2015-03-27 | 34.5 | 87.6 | 36.3 | 85.4 | ||
2015-03-10 | 33.0 | 81.4 | 36.5 | 80.4 | 2015-03-28 | 35.0 | 85.8 | 37.2 | 83.1 | ||
2015-03-11 | 33.8 | 79.4 | 36.0 | 77.2 | 2015-03-29 | 34.8 | 84.9 | 36.1 | 82.9 | ||
2015-03-12 | 33.2 | 83.5 | 35.7 | 81.9 | 2015-03-30 | 36.0 | 84.1 | 38.9 | 82.7 | ||
2015-03-13 | 32.5 | 79.1 | 35.3 | 77.8 | 2015-03-31 | 35.4 | 78.0 | 35.6 | 76.5 | ||
2015-03-14 | 33.6 | 78.9 | 35.2 | 77.5 | 2015-04-01 | 36.2 | 80.4 | 38.1 | 78.1 | ||
2015-03-15 | 33.5 | 82.8 | 35.5 | 80.1 | 2015-04-02 | 37.4 | 76.2 | 39.5 | 74.2 | ||
2015-03-16 | 31.7 | 85.6 | 33.6 | 84.6 | 2015-04-03 | 38.7 | 86.1 | 40.0 | 85.5 | ||
2015-03-17 | 33.4 | 83.5 | 36.2 | 81.7 | 2015-04-04 | 38.4 | 87.5 | 40.2 | 85.4 | ||
2015-03-18 | 34.8 | 77.4 | 36.0 | 75.6 | 2015-04-05 | 39.8 | 81.7 | 41.2 | 80.6 |
Fig. 1. Changes in chlorophyll stability index in parents (IWP and N22), progenies with target QTLs (IWP-295, IWP-277, IWP-246, IWP-296 and IWP-233) and progenies without target QTLs (IWP-147, IWP-142, IWP-141, IWP-146 and IWP-104).Bars represent the standard errors of the mean values (n = 5).
Progeny of IWP × N22 | MDA content (µmol/g) | Percent increase over control (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Ambient temperature | High temperature | ||
Progeny only with allele of RM431 | |||
IWP-201 | 0.359 ± 0.004 | 0.690 ± 0.007 | 92.20 |
IWP-143 | 0.311 ± 0.003 | 0.500 ± 0.005 | 60.77 |
IWP-245 | 0.401 ± 0.004 | 0.608 ± 0.007 | 51.62 |
IWP-215 | 0.305 ± 0.004 | 0.502 ± 0.006 | 64.59 |
IWP-275 | 0.388 ± 0.004 | 0.676 ± 0.007 | 74.23 |
Progeny only with allele of RM5757 | |||
IWP-129 | 0.349 ± 0.004 | 0.655 ± 0.007 | 87.68 |
IWP-107 | 0.374 ± 0.004 | 0.599 ± 0.006 | 60.16 |
IWP-105 | 0.239 ± 0.003 | 0.550 ± 0.006 | 130.13 |
IWP-116 | 0.244 ± 0.003 | 0.642 ± 0.008 | 163.11 |
IWP-240 | 0.254 ± 0.003 | 0.542 ± 0.006 | 113.39 |
Progeny with both alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||
IWP-295 | 0.418 ± 0.005 | 0.572 ± 0.006 | 36.84 |
IWP-277 | 0.308 ± 0.003 | 0.456 ± 0.005 | 48.05 |
IWP-246 | 0.319 ± 0.004 | 0.412 ± 0.005 | 29.15 |
IWP-296 | 0.335 ± 0.004 | 0.509 ± 0.006 | 51.94 |
IWP-166 | 0.216 ± 0.002 | 0.447 ± 0.005 | 106.94 |
IWP-158 | 0.352 ± 0.004 | 0.578 ± 0.006 | 64.20 |
IWP-265 | 0.245 ± 0.003 | 0.472 ± 0.005 | 92.65 |
IWP-153 | 0.294 ± 0.003 | 0.604 ± 0.007 | 105.44 |
IWP-139 | 0.350 ± 0.004 | 0.667 ± 0.007 | 90.57 |
IWP-233 | 0.300 ± 0.003 | 0.502 ± 0.005 | 67.33 |
Progeny without alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||
IWP-147 | 0.350 ± 0.004 | 0.843 ± 0.009 | 140.86 |
IWP-142 | 0.365 ± 0.004 | 0.898 ± 0.010 | 146.03 |
IWP-141 | 0.498 ± 0.006 | 0.943 ± 0.010 | 89.36 |
IWP-146 | 0.314 ± 0.004 | 0.874 ± 0.010 | 178.34 |
IWP-104 | 0.341 ± 0.004 | 0.988 ± 0.011 | 189.74 |
Parent | |||
IWP | 0.326 ± 0.004 | 0.675 ± 0.007 | 107.06 |
N22 | 0.309 ± 0.003 | 0.423 ± 0.005 | 36.89 |
SE = 0.0082; CD = 0.0163 (P < 0.05). |
Table 3 Malondialdehyde (MDA) content (Mean ± SE, n = 5) in progenies of IWP × N22 exposed to high-temperature stress.
Progeny of IWP × N22 | MDA content (µmol/g) | Percent increase over control (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Ambient temperature | High temperature | ||
Progeny only with allele of RM431 | |||
IWP-201 | 0.359 ± 0.004 | 0.690 ± 0.007 | 92.20 |
IWP-143 | 0.311 ± 0.003 | 0.500 ± 0.005 | 60.77 |
IWP-245 | 0.401 ± 0.004 | 0.608 ± 0.007 | 51.62 |
IWP-215 | 0.305 ± 0.004 | 0.502 ± 0.006 | 64.59 |
IWP-275 | 0.388 ± 0.004 | 0.676 ± 0.007 | 74.23 |
Progeny only with allele of RM5757 | |||
IWP-129 | 0.349 ± 0.004 | 0.655 ± 0.007 | 87.68 |
IWP-107 | 0.374 ± 0.004 | 0.599 ± 0.006 | 60.16 |
IWP-105 | 0.239 ± 0.003 | 0.550 ± 0.006 | 130.13 |
IWP-116 | 0.244 ± 0.003 | 0.642 ± 0.008 | 163.11 |
IWP-240 | 0.254 ± 0.003 | 0.542 ± 0.006 | 113.39 |
Progeny with both alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||
IWP-295 | 0.418 ± 0.005 | 0.572 ± 0.006 | 36.84 |
IWP-277 | 0.308 ± 0.003 | 0.456 ± 0.005 | 48.05 |
IWP-246 | 0.319 ± 0.004 | 0.412 ± 0.005 | 29.15 |
IWP-296 | 0.335 ± 0.004 | 0.509 ± 0.006 | 51.94 |
IWP-166 | 0.216 ± 0.002 | 0.447 ± 0.005 | 106.94 |
IWP-158 | 0.352 ± 0.004 | 0.578 ± 0.006 | 64.20 |
IWP-265 | 0.245 ± 0.003 | 0.472 ± 0.005 | 92.65 |
IWP-153 | 0.294 ± 0.003 | 0.604 ± 0.007 | 105.44 |
IWP-139 | 0.350 ± 0.004 | 0.667 ± 0.007 | 90.57 |
IWP-233 | 0.300 ± 0.003 | 0.502 ± 0.005 | 67.33 |
Progeny without alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||
IWP-147 | 0.350 ± 0.004 | 0.843 ± 0.009 | 140.86 |
IWP-142 | 0.365 ± 0.004 | 0.898 ± 0.010 | 146.03 |
IWP-141 | 0.498 ± 0.006 | 0.943 ± 0.010 | 89.36 |
IWP-146 | 0.314 ± 0.004 | 0.874 ± 0.010 | 178.34 |
IWP-104 | 0.341 ± 0.004 | 0.988 ± 0.011 | 189.74 |
Parent | |||
IWP | 0.326 ± 0.004 | 0.675 ± 0.007 | 107.06 |
N22 | 0.309 ± 0.003 | 0.423 ± 0.005 | 36.89 |
SE = 0.0082; CD = 0.0163 (P < 0.05). |
Fig. 2. Spikelet fertility in parents (IWP and N22), progenies with target QTLs (IWP-295, IWP-277, IWP-246, IWP-296 and IWP-233) (A) and progenies without target QTLs (IWP-147, IWP-142, IWP-141, IWP-146 and IWP-104) (B).Bars represent the standard errors of the mean values (n = 5).
Progeny of IWP × N22 | Grain yield/plant | TDM | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambient temperature | High temperature | Ambient temperature | High temperature | ||||||
Progeny only with allele of RM431 | |||||||||
IWP-201 | 39.18 | 35.97 | 125.8 | 118.7 | |||||
IWP-143 | 36.52 | 33.81 | 117.7 | 109.7 | |||||
IWP-245 | 32.71 | 29.26 | 109.8 | 97.7 | |||||
IWP-215 | 33.68 | 30.92 | 112.7 | 105.7 | |||||
IWP-275 | 37.79 | 33.26 | 123.9 | 107.7 | |||||
Progeny only with allele of RM5757 | |||||||||
IWP-129 | 38.51 | 34.49 | 125.8 | 115.7 | |||||
IWP-107 | 31.89 | 28.37 | 105.7 | 95.6 | |||||
IWP-105 | 34.05 | 30.70 | 114.8 | 101.7 | |||||
IWP-116 | 31.64 | 27.53 | 104.6 | 98.6 | |||||
IWP-240 | 36.97 | 33.64 | 120.8 | 108.8 | |||||
Progeny with both alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||||||||
IWP-295 | 38.68 | 36.21 | 128.8 | 121.8 | |||||
IWP-277 | 40.42 | 38.86 | 152.9 | 148.9 | |||||
IWP-246 | 39.57 | 36.95 | 139.0 | 133.9 | |||||
IWP-296 | 37.94 | 35.41 | 129.8 | 123.8 | |||||
IWP-166 | 32.68 | 29.73 | 108.8 | 98.7 | |||||
IWP-158 | 35.67 | 32.86 | 116.8 | 107.7 | |||||
IWP-265 | 31.03 | 28.98 | 102.7 | 97.7 | |||||
IWP-153 | 33.08 | 30.19 | 110.8 | 101.7 | |||||
IWP-139 | 37.45 | 34.44 | 126.9 | 119.8 | |||||
IWP-233 | 36.75 | 33.14 | 122.8 | 118.7 | |||||
Progeny without alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||||||||
IWP-147 | 36.74 | 30.14 | 118.7 | 101.6 | |||||
IWP-142 | 32.25 | 26.49 | 107.7 | 92.6 | |||||
IWP-141 | 30.44 | 25.21 | 101.7 | 89.6 | |||||
IWP-146 | 34.90 | 28.97 | 114.7 | 97.6 | |||||
IWP-104 | 33.17 | 28.63 | 110.8 | 95.7 | |||||
Parent | |||||||||
IWP | 38.41 | 32.87 | 124.8 | 107.7 | |||||
N22 | 32.55 | 30.29 | 108.7 | 101.6 | |||||
SE = 1.768; CD = 3.504 (P < 0.05). |
Table 4 Genetic variation of grain yield and total dry matter (TDM) in IWP, N22 and their progenies.
Progeny of IWP × N22 | Grain yield/plant | TDM | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ambient temperature | High temperature | Ambient temperature | High temperature | ||||||
Progeny only with allele of RM431 | |||||||||
IWP-201 | 39.18 | 35.97 | 125.8 | 118.7 | |||||
IWP-143 | 36.52 | 33.81 | 117.7 | 109.7 | |||||
IWP-245 | 32.71 | 29.26 | 109.8 | 97.7 | |||||
IWP-215 | 33.68 | 30.92 | 112.7 | 105.7 | |||||
IWP-275 | 37.79 | 33.26 | 123.9 | 107.7 | |||||
Progeny only with allele of RM5757 | |||||||||
IWP-129 | 38.51 | 34.49 | 125.8 | 115.7 | |||||
IWP-107 | 31.89 | 28.37 | 105.7 | 95.6 | |||||
IWP-105 | 34.05 | 30.70 | 114.8 | 101.7 | |||||
IWP-116 | 31.64 | 27.53 | 104.6 | 98.6 | |||||
IWP-240 | 36.97 | 33.64 | 120.8 | 108.8 | |||||
Progeny with both alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||||||||
IWP-295 | 38.68 | 36.21 | 128.8 | 121.8 | |||||
IWP-277 | 40.42 | 38.86 | 152.9 | 148.9 | |||||
IWP-246 | 39.57 | 36.95 | 139.0 | 133.9 | |||||
IWP-296 | 37.94 | 35.41 | 129.8 | 123.8 | |||||
IWP-166 | 32.68 | 29.73 | 108.8 | 98.7 | |||||
IWP-158 | 35.67 | 32.86 | 116.8 | 107.7 | |||||
IWP-265 | 31.03 | 28.98 | 102.7 | 97.7 | |||||
IWP-153 | 33.08 | 30.19 | 110.8 | 101.7 | |||||
IWP-139 | 37.45 | 34.44 | 126.9 | 119.8 | |||||
IWP-233 | 36.75 | 33.14 | 122.8 | 118.7 | |||||
Progeny without alleles of RM431 and RM5757 | |||||||||
IWP-147 | 36.74 | 30.14 | 118.7 | 101.6 | |||||
IWP-142 | 32.25 | 26.49 | 107.7 | 92.6 | |||||
IWP-141 | 30.44 | 25.21 | 101.7 | 89.6 | |||||
IWP-146 | 34.90 | 28.97 | 114.7 | 97.6 | |||||
IWP-104 | 33.17 | 28.63 | 110.8 | 95.7 | |||||
Parent | |||||||||
IWP | 38.41 | 32.87 | 124.8 | 107.7 | |||||
N22 | 32.55 | 30.29 | 108.7 | 101.6 | |||||
SE = 1.768; CD = 3.504 (P < 0.05). |
CSI | MDA | Sterility | Yield | TDM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSI | 1.0000 | ||||
MDA | -0.3476* | 1.0000 | |||
Sterility | -0.3006* | 0.7759** | 1.0000 | ||
Yield | 0.6209** | -0.5207** | -0.5358** | 1.0000 | |
TDM | 0.5621** | -0.4921** | -0.5256** | 0.9633** | 1.0000 |
CSI, Chlorophyll stability index; MDA, Malondialdehyde content; TDM, Total dry matter. * and ** mean significant difference at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, repectively, by two tailed Pearson’s correlation. |
Table 5 Correlation of physiological traits with yield under high- temperature stress.
CSI | MDA | Sterility | Yield | TDM | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSI | 1.0000 | ||||
MDA | -0.3476* | 1.0000 | |||
Sterility | -0.3006* | 0.7759** | 1.0000 | ||
Yield | 0.6209** | -0.5207** | -0.5358** | 1.0000 | |
TDM | 0.5621** | -0.4921** | -0.5256** | 0.9633** | 1.0000 |
CSI, Chlorophyll stability index; MDA, Malondialdehyde content; TDM, Total dry matter. * and ** mean significant difference at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, repectively, by two tailed Pearson’s correlation. |
1 | Cao L Y, Zhao J G, Zhan X D, Li D L, He L B, Cheng S H.2003. Mapping QTLs for heat tolerance and correlation between heat tolerance and photosynthetic rate in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 17(3): 223-227. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
2 | Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Maatougui M, Michael M, Slash M, Haghparast R, Rahmanian M, Taheri A, Al-Yassin A, Benbelkacem A, Labdi M, Mimoun H, Nachit M.2010. Plant breeding and climate changes.J Agric Sci, 148(6): 627-637. |
3 | Funaba M, Ishibashi Y, Molla A H, Iwanami K, Iwaya-Inone M.2006. Influence of low/high temperature on water status in developing and maturing rice grains.Plant Prod Sci, 9: 347-354. |
4 | Gomez K A, Gomez A A.2010. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons. |
5 | Heath R L, Packer L.1968. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation.Arch Biochem Biophys, 125(1): 189-198. |
6 | Jagadish S V K, Cairns J, Lafitte R, Wheeler T R, Price A H, Craufurd P Q.2010. Genetic analysis of heat tolerance at anthesis in rice.Crop Sci, 50(5): 1633-1641. |
7 | Jagadish S V K, Craufurd P Q, Wheeler T R.2007. High temperature stress and spikelet fertility in rice (Oryza sativa L.).J Exp Bot, 58(7): 1627-1635. |
8 | Jiang J, Zhuang J Y, Fan Y Y, Shen B.2009. Mapping of QTLs for leaf malondialdehyde content associated with stress tolerance in rice.Rice Sci, 16(1): 72-74. |
9 | Koleyoras A S.1958. A new method of determining drought resistance.Plant Physiol, 33(3): 232-233. |
10 | Kumari M, Dass S M, Virnala Y, Arora P.2004. Physiological parameters governing drought in maize.Ind J Plant Physiol, 9(2): 203-207. |
11 | Lan L, Chen W, Lai Y, Suo J F, Kong Z S, Li C, Lu Y, Zhang Y J, Zhao X Y, Zhang X S, Zhang Y S, Han B, Cheng J, Xue Y B.2004. Monitoring of gene expression profiles and isolation of candidate genes involved in pollination and fertilization in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with a 10 K cDNA microarray.Plant Mol Biol, 54: 471-487. |
12 | Los D A, Murata N.2004. Membrane fluidity and its roles in the perception of environmental signals.Biochem Biophys Acta, 1666: 142-157. |
13 | Mohammed A R, Tarpley L.2009. Impact of high nighttime temperature on respiration, membrane stability, antioxidant capacity, and yield of rice plants.Crop Sci, 49: 313-322. |
14 | Mohan M M, Narayanan S L, Ibrahim S M.2000. Chlorophyll stability index (CSI): Its impact on salt tolerance in rice.Int Rice Res Notes, 25(2): 38-39. |
15 | Muthulakshmi S.2014. Molecular Breeding for Improving Submergence Tolerance in Rice. Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. |
16 | Prasad P V, Boote K J, Allen Jr L H, Sheehy J E, Thomas J M G.2006. Species, ecotype and cultivar differences in spikelet fertility and harvest index of rice in response to high temperature stress.Field Crops Res, 95: 398-411. |
17 | Ristic Z, Bukovnik U, Prasad P V V.2007. Correlation between heat stability of thylakoid membranes and loss of chlorophyll in winter wheat under heat stress.Crop Sci, 47: 2067-2073. |
18 | Ristic Z, Bukovnik U, Momcilovi I, Fu J, Prasad P V V.2008. Heat induced accumulation of chloroplast protein synthesis elongation factor, EF-Tu, in winter wheat.J Plant Physiol, 165: 192-202. |
19 | Sairam R K, Desmukh P S, Shukla D S.1997. Tolerance of drought and temperature stress in relation to increased antioxidant enzyme activity in wheat.J Agron Crop Sci, 178(3): 171-177. |
20 | Samundeswari.2013. Genetic and Physiological Improvement of Rice Variety CO43 for Submergence Tolerance. Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University. |
21 | Savchenko G E, Klyuchareva E A, Abrabchik L M, Serdyuchenko E V.2002. Effect of periodic heat shock on the membrane system of etioplasts.Russ J Plant Physiol, 49(3): 349-359. |
22 | Snedecor, G W, Cochran W G. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press. |
23 | Todorov D T, Karanov E N, Smith A R, Hall M A.2003. Chlorophyllase activity and chlorophyll content in wild type and eti5 mutant of A. thaliana subjected to low and high temperature.Biol Plant, 46(4): 633-636. |
24 | Talukder S K, Babar M A, Vijayalakshmi K, Poland J, Prasad P V V, Bowden R, Fritz A.2014. Mapping QTL for the traits associated with heat tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).BMC Genet, 15: 97. |
25 | Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad M R.2007. Heat tolerance in plants: An overview.Environ Exp Bot, 61(3): 199-233. |
26 | Wassmann R, Jagadish S V K, Heuer S, Ismail A, Redona E, Serraj R, Singh R K, Howell G, Pathak H, Sumfleth K.2009. Climate change affecting rice production: The physiological and agronomic basis for possible adaptation strategies.Adv Agron, 101: 59-122. |
27 | Watanabe T, Kume T.2009. A general adaptation strategy for climate change impacts on paddy cultivation: Special reference to the Japanese context.Paddy Water Environ, 7(4): 313-320. |
28 | Xiao Y H, Pan Y, Luo L H, Zhang G L, Deng H B, Dai L Y, Liu X L, Tang W B, Chen L Y, Wang G L.2011. Quantitative trait loci associated with seed set under high temperature stress at the flowering stage in rice.Euphytica, 178(3): 331-338. |
29 | Ye C R, Argayoso M A, Redoña E D, Sierra S N, Laza M A, Dilla C J, Mo Y J, Thomson M J, Chin J, Delaviña C B, Diaz G Q, Hernandez J E.2012. Mapping QTL for heat tolerance at flowering stage in rice using SNP markers.Plant Breeding, 131(1): 33-41. |
30 | Zhang G Z, Chen L Y, Zhang S T, Xiao Y J, He Z Z, Lei D Y.2006. Effect of high temperature stress on protective enzyme activities and membrane permeability of flag leaf in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 32(9): 1306-1310. |
31 | Zhou W H, Xue D W, Zhang G P.2012. Identification and physiological characterization of thermo-tolerant rice genotypes.J Zhejiang Univ, 38: 1-9. |
32 | Zhu X, Gong H, Chen G, Wang S, Zhang C.2005. Different solute levels in two spring wheat cultivars induced by progressive field water stress at different developmental stages.J Arid Environ, 62(1): 1-14. |
[1] | Prathap V, Suresh KUMAR, Nand Lal MEENA, Chirag MAHESHWARI, Monika DALAL, Aruna TYAGI. Phosphorus Starvation Tolerance in Rice Through a Combined Physiological, Biochemical and Proteome Analysis [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 8-. |
[2] | Serena REGGI, Elisabetta ONELLI, Alessandra MOSCATELLI, Nadia STROPPA, Matteo Dell’ANNO, Kiril PERFANOV, Luciana ROSSI. Seed-Specific Expression of Apolipoprotein A-IMilano Dimer in Rice Engineered Lines [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 6-. |
[3] | Sundus ZAFAR, XU Jianlong. Recent Advances to Enhance Nutritional Quality of Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 4-. |
[4] | Kankunlanach KHAMPUANG, Nanthana CHAIWONG, Atilla YAZICI, Baris DEMIRER, Ismail CAKMAK, Chanakan PROM-U-THAI. Effect of Sulfur Fertilization on Productivity and Grain Zinc Yield of Rice Grown under Low and Adequate Soil Zinc Applications [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 9-. |
[5] | FAN Fengfeng, CAI Meng, LUO Xiong, LIU Manman, YUAN Huanran, CHENG Mingxing, Ayaz AHMAD, LI Nengwu, LI Shaoqing. Novel QTLs from Wild Rice Oryza longistaminata Confer Rice Strong Tolerance to High Temperature at Seedling Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 14-. |
[6] | LIN Shaodan, YAO Yue, LI Jiayi, LI Xiaobin, MA Jie, WENG Haiyong, CHENG Zuxin, YE Dapeng. Application of UAV-Based Imaging and Deep Learning in Assessment of Rice Blast Resistance [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 10-. |
[7] | Md. Forshed DEWAN, Md. AHIDUZZAMAN, Md. Nahidul ISLAM, Habibul Bari SHOZIB. Potential Benefits of Bioactive Compounds of Traditional Rice Grown in South and South-East Asia: A Review [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 5-. |
[8] | Raja CHAKRABORTY, Pratap KALITA, Saikat SEN. Phenolic Profile, Antioxidant, Antihyperlipidemic and Cardiac Risk Preventive Effect of Chakhao Poireiton (A Pigmented Black Rice) in High-Fat High-Sugar induced Rats [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 11-. |
[9] | LI Qianlong, FENG Qi, WANG Heqin, KANG Yunhai, ZHANG Conghe, DU Ming, ZHANG Yunhu, WANG Hui, CHEN Jinjie, HAN Bin, FANG Yu, WANG Ahong. Genome-Wide Dissection of Quan 9311A Breeding Process and Application Advantages [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 7-. |
[10] | JI Dongling, XIAO Wenhui, SUN Zhiwei, LIU Lijun, GU Junfei, ZHANG Hao, Tom Matthew HARRISON, LIU Ke, WANG Zhiqin, WANG Weilu, YANG Jianchang. Translocation and Distribution of Carbon-Nitrogen in Relation to Rice Yield and Grain Quality as Affected by High Temperature at Early Panicle Initiation Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 12-. |
[11] | Nazaratul Ashifa Abdullah Salim, Norlida Mat Daud, Julieta Griboff, Abdul Rahim Harun. Elemental Assessments in Paddy Soil for Geographical Traceability of Rice from Peninsular Malaysia [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 486-498. |
[12] | Ammara Latif, Sun Ying, Pu Cuixia, Noman Ali. Rice Curled Its Leaves Either Adaxially or Abaxially to Combat Drought Stress [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 405-416. |
[13] | Liu Qiao, Qiu Linlin, Hua Yangguang, Li Jing, Pang Bo, Zhai Yufeng, Wang Dekai. LHD3 Encoding a J-Domain Protein Controls Heading Date in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 437-448. |
[14] | Lu Xuedan, Li Fan, Xiao Yunhua, Wang Feng, Zhang Guilian, Deng Huabing, Tang Wenbang. Grain Shape Genes: Shaping the Future of Rice Breeding [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 379-404. |
[15] | Zhang Guomei, Li Han, Liu Shanshan, Zhou Xuming, Lu Mingyang, Tang Liang, Sun Lihua. Water Extract of Rice False Smut Balls Activates Nrf2/HO-1 and Apoptosis Pathways, Causing Liver Injury [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 473-485. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||