Rice Science ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 32-41.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2017.09.001
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Gaofeng Xu1, Shicai Shen1, Fudou Zhang1(), Yun Zhang2, Hisashi Kato-Noguchi3, Clements David Roy4
Received:
2016-12-30
Accepted:
2017-09-25
Online:
2018-01-28
Published:
2017-11-16
Gaofeng Xu, Shicai Shen, Fudou Zhang, Yun Zhang, Hisashi Kato-Noguchi, Clements David Roy. Relationship Between Allelopathic Effects and Functional Traits of Different Allelopathic Potential Rice Accessions at Different Growth Stages[J]. Rice Science, 2018, 25(1): 32-41.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Accession | Leaf | LP | MP | SP | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
stage | HT | MT | LT | HT | MT | LT | HT | MT | LT | |||
O. longistaminata | 2-3 | -0.51 Bh | -0.57 Bh | -0.07 Acde | -0.51 Bg | -0.58 Bg | -0.07 Abc | -0.50 Be | -0.53 Bf | -0.05 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.33 Ede | -0.26 Dcd | -0.08 Adef | -0.26 Dbcd | -0.17 Cb | -0.07 Abc | -0.16 BCcd | -0.13 Bbc | -0.06 Abc | |||
7-8 | -0.41 Efg | -0.38 DEf | -0.10 Af | -0.32 CDe | -0.30 Cde | -0.09 Ac | -0.23 Bd | -0.20 Bd | -0.08 Ac | |||
RD23 | 2-3 | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | ||
5-6 | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | |||
7-8 | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | |||
F1 | 2-3 | -0.44 Bg | -0.48 Bg | -0.06 Abcde | -0.45 Bf | -0.51 Bf | -0.06 Aabc | -0.43 Be | -0.46 Be | -0.05 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.31 Dcde | -0.23 Cbc | -0.07 Acde | -0.23 Cbc | -0.18 Bb | -0.06 Aabc | -0.17 Bcd | -0.15 Bbcd | -0.05 Aabc | |||
7-8 | -0.37 Eef | -0.34 Eef | -0.08 Adef | -0.28 Dcde | -0.26 CDcde | -0.07 Abc | -0.20 BCcd | -0.18 Bcd | -0.07 Abc | |||
RL159 | 2-3 | -0.47 Bgh | -0.51 Bg | -0.05 Aabc | -0.49 Bfg | -0.53 Bfg | -0.05 Aab | -0.45 Be | -0.50 Bef | -0.04 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.32 Ede | -0.24 Dbc | -0.06 Abcde | -0.26 Dbcd | -0.15 Bb | -0.07 Abc | -0.19 Ccd | -0.16 BCbcd | -0.06 Abc | |||
7-8 | -0.37 Eef | -0.35 DEef | -0.08 Adef | -0.31 Dde | -0.25 Ccd | -0.07 Abc | -0.21 BCd | -0.17 Bbcd | -0.06 Abc | |||
RL169 | 2-3 | -0.29 Ccd | -0.30 Cde | -0.04 Aab | -0.30 Cde | -0.32 Ce | -0.04 Aa | -0.24 Bd | -0.21 Bd | -0.04 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.25 Dbc | -0.21 CDbc | -0.05 Aabc | -0.21 CDb | -0.20 CDbc | -0.05 Aab | -0.16 BCcd | -0.13 Bbc | -0.04 Aabc | |||
7-8 | -0.22 Cb | -0.18 Cb | -0.04 Aab | -0.20 Cb | -0.18 Cb | -0.05 Aab | -0.11 Bbc | -0.10 Bb | -0.03 Aab | |||
RL219 | 2-3 | -0.08 Ba | -0.06 ABa | -0.06 ABbcde | -0.06 ABa | -0.06 ABa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aab | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aab | ||
5-6 | -0.06 Aa | -0.05 Aa | -0.04 Aab | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aab | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab | |||
7-8 | -0.06 Aa | -0.06 Aa | -0.05 Aabc | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aab | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab |
Table 1 Effects of temperature and light on allelopathic synthetic effect of O. longistaminata and its descendants at different growth stages.
Accession | Leaf | LP | MP | SP | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
stage | HT | MT | LT | HT | MT | LT | HT | MT | LT | |||
O. longistaminata | 2-3 | -0.51 Bh | -0.57 Bh | -0.07 Acde | -0.51 Bg | -0.58 Bg | -0.07 Abc | -0.50 Be | -0.53 Bf | -0.05 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.33 Ede | -0.26 Dcd | -0.08 Adef | -0.26 Dbcd | -0.17 Cb | -0.07 Abc | -0.16 BCcd | -0.13 Bbc | -0.06 Abc | |||
7-8 | -0.41 Efg | -0.38 DEf | -0.10 Af | -0.32 CDe | -0.30 Cde | -0.09 Ac | -0.23 Bd | -0.20 Bd | -0.08 Ac | |||
RD23 | 2-3 | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | ||
5-6 | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | |||
7-8 | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.02 Aa | |||
F1 | 2-3 | -0.44 Bg | -0.48 Bg | -0.06 Abcde | -0.45 Bf | -0.51 Bf | -0.06 Aabc | -0.43 Be | -0.46 Be | -0.05 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.31 Dcde | -0.23 Cbc | -0.07 Acde | -0.23 Cbc | -0.18 Bb | -0.06 Aabc | -0.17 Bcd | -0.15 Bbcd | -0.05 Aabc | |||
7-8 | -0.37 Eef | -0.34 Eef | -0.08 Adef | -0.28 Dcde | -0.26 CDcde | -0.07 Abc | -0.20 BCcd | -0.18 Bcd | -0.07 Abc | |||
RL159 | 2-3 | -0.47 Bgh | -0.51 Bg | -0.05 Aabc | -0.49 Bfg | -0.53 Bfg | -0.05 Aab | -0.45 Be | -0.50 Bef | -0.04 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.32 Ede | -0.24 Dbc | -0.06 Abcde | -0.26 Dbcd | -0.15 Bb | -0.07 Abc | -0.19 Ccd | -0.16 BCbcd | -0.06 Abc | |||
7-8 | -0.37 Eef | -0.35 DEef | -0.08 Adef | -0.31 Dde | -0.25 Ccd | -0.07 Abc | -0.21 BCd | -0.17 Bbcd | -0.06 Abc | |||
RL169 | 2-3 | -0.29 Ccd | -0.30 Cde | -0.04 Aab | -0.30 Cde | -0.32 Ce | -0.04 Aa | -0.24 Bd | -0.21 Bd | -0.04 Aabc | ||
5-6 | -0.25 Dbc | -0.21 CDbc | -0.05 Aabc | -0.21 CDb | -0.20 CDbc | -0.05 Aab | -0.16 BCcd | -0.13 Bbc | -0.04 Aabc | |||
7-8 | -0.22 Cb | -0.18 Cb | -0.04 Aab | -0.20 Cb | -0.18 Cb | -0.05 Aab | -0.11 Bbc | -0.10 Bb | -0.03 Aab | |||
RL219 | 2-3 | -0.08 Ba | -0.06 ABa | -0.06 ABbcde | -0.06 ABa | -0.06 ABa | -0.04 Aa | -0.04 Aab | -0.04 Aa | -0.03 Aab | ||
5-6 | -0.06 Aa | -0.05 Aa | -0.04 Aab | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aab | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab | |||
7-8 | -0.06 Aa | -0.06 Aa | -0.05 Aabc | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aa | -0.05 Aab | -0.03 Aab | -0.03 Aa | -0.03 Aab |
O. longistaminata | Light | 2 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 33.249 | 0.0001 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature | 2 | 1.411 | 0.706 | 468.443 | 0.0001 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.613 | 0.306 | 203.376 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.03 | 0.008 | 5.046 | 0.0016 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.028 | 0.007 | 4.612 | 0.0028 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.375 | 0.094 | 62.178 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 1.497 | 0.1801 | |
RD23 | Light | 2 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 3.822 | 0.028 |
Temperature | 2 | 0.001 | 0 | 1.939 | 0.1537 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.001 | 0 | 1.606 | 0.2102 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.064 | 0.9923 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.106 | 0.9801 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.247 | 0.9101 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.135 | 0.9973 | |
F1 | Light | 2 | 0.066 | 0.033 | 30.301 | 0.0001 |
Temperature | 2 | 1.131 | 0.566 | 517.067 | 0.0001 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.397 | 0.199 | 181.639 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.022 | 0.006 | 5.032 | 0.0016 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.026 | 0.007 | 5.997 | 0.0005 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.247 | 0.062 | 56.43 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.014 | 0.002 | 1.551 | 0.1618 | |
RL159 | Light | 2 | 0.064 | 0.032 | 28.212 | 0.0001 |
Temperature | 2 | 1.308 | 0.654 | 573.287 | 0.0001 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.459 | 0.229 | 201.008 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.026 | 0.006 | 5.636 | 0.0007 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.03 | 0.007 | 6.477 | 0.0002 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.324 | 0.081 | 71.094 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 1.939 | 0.0726 | |
RL169 | Light | 2 | 0.059 | 0.03 | 40.951 | 0.0593 |
Temperature | 2 | 0.521 | 0.26 | 360.005 | 0.5209 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.077 | 0.039 | 53.36 | 0.0772 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.024 | 0.006 | 8.135 | 0.0235 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.84 | 0.0024 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.044 | 0.011 | 15.207 | 0.044 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.622 | 0.0036 | |
RL219 | Light | 2 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 15.109 | 0.0001 |
Temperature | 2 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 2.404 | 0.0999 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.001 | 0 | 1.413 | 0.2523 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.239 | 0.915 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.304 | 0.8738 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.278 | 0.8908 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.001 | 0 | 0.304 | 0.9612 |
Table 2 Effects of temperature, light and leaf stage on rice allelopathy (three-way mixed AVOVA results).
O. longistaminata | Light | 2 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 33.249 | 0.0001 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature | 2 | 1.411 | 0.706 | 468.443 | 0.0001 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.613 | 0.306 | 203.376 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.03 | 0.008 | 5.046 | 0.0016 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.028 | 0.007 | 4.612 | 0.0028 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.375 | 0.094 | 62.178 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 1.497 | 0.1801 | |
RD23 | Light | 2 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 3.822 | 0.028 |
Temperature | 2 | 0.001 | 0 | 1.939 | 0.1537 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.001 | 0 | 1.606 | 0.2102 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.064 | 0.9923 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.106 | 0.9801 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.247 | 0.9101 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0.135 | 0.9973 | |
F1 | Light | 2 | 0.066 | 0.033 | 30.301 | 0.0001 |
Temperature | 2 | 1.131 | 0.566 | 517.067 | 0.0001 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.397 | 0.199 | 181.639 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.022 | 0.006 | 5.032 | 0.0016 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.026 | 0.007 | 5.997 | 0.0005 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.247 | 0.062 | 56.43 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.014 | 0.002 | 1.551 | 0.1618 | |
RL159 | Light | 2 | 0.064 | 0.032 | 28.212 | 0.0001 |
Temperature | 2 | 1.308 | 0.654 | 573.287 | 0.0001 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.459 | 0.229 | 201.008 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.026 | 0.006 | 5.636 | 0.0007 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.03 | 0.007 | 6.477 | 0.0002 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.324 | 0.081 | 71.094 | 0.0001 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.018 | 0.002 | 1.939 | 0.0726 | |
RL169 | Light | 2 | 0.059 | 0.03 | 40.951 | 0.0593 |
Temperature | 2 | 0.521 | 0.26 | 360.005 | 0.5209 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.077 | 0.039 | 53.36 | 0.0772 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0.024 | 0.006 | 8.135 | 0.0235 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.84 | 0.0024 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0.044 | 0.011 | 15.207 | 0.044 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.622 | 0.0036 | |
RL219 | Light | 2 | 0.009 | 0.004 | 15.109 | 0.0001 |
Temperature | 2 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 2.404 | 0.0999 | |
Leaf stage | 2 | 0.001 | 0 | 1.413 | 0.2523 | |
Light × Temperature | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.239 | 0.915 | |
Light × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.304 | 0.8738 | |
Temperature × Leaf stage | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.278 | 0.8908 | |
Light × Temperature × Leaf stage | 8 | 0.001 | 0 | 0.304 | 0.9612 |
Treatment | O. longistaminata | RD23 | F1 | RL159 | RL169 | RL219 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LP | HT | 384.27 ± 11.91 ABd | 352.81 ± 7.29 Bc | 391.34 ± 10.70 Ac | 395.54 ± 14.38 Ac | 389.45 ± 9.24 Ac | 361.81 ± 8.37 ABb |
MT | 421.43 ± 13.84 ABCbcd | 393.41 ± 9.16 BCab | 427.86 ± 7.24 ABbc | 432.33 ± 11.01 Aabc | 419.74 ± 10.82 ABCabc | 389.14 ± 9.28 Cab | |
LT | 456.29 ± 10.73 Aab | 419.17 ± 8.42 ABa | 441.71 ± 12.44 ABab | 445.57 ± 9.11 ABab | 443.07 ± 13.81 ABabc | 417.32 ± 10.67 Ba | |
MP | HT | 392.54 ± 17.93 Acd | 369.64 ± 7.69 Abc | 395.57 ± 11.28 Ac | 404.94 ± 18.89 Abc | 393.56 ± 13.89 Abc | 378.13 ± 9.64 Ab |
MT | 436.19 ± 15.48 Aabc | 399.14 ± 10.55 Aab | 438.52 ± 13.59 Aab | 435.14 ± 12.46 Aabc | 432.33 ± 12.60 Aabc | 394.82 ± 13.04 Aab | |
LT | 451.76 ± 11.02 Aab | 423.19 ± 11.60 Aa | 465.15 ± 16.48 Aab | 459.86 ± 13.21 Ab | 455.84 ± 14.61 Aab | 419.19 ± 13.78 Aa | |
SP | HT | 466.43 ± 21.35 Aab | 409.62 ± 12.83 Ba | 468.13 ± 14.75 Aab | 457.28 ± 18.15 ABc | 451.88 ± 9.41 ABabc | 416.78 ± 11.80 ABa |
MT | 473.44 ± 16.56 Aa | 415.69 ± 10.09 Ba | 471.76 ± 15.90 Aab | 470.56 ± 14.88 Aa | 463.16 ± 14.25 Aa | 417.39 ± 13.10 Ba | |
LT | 482.86 ± 15.12 Aa | 417.62 ± 11.47 Ba | 476.19 ± 14.17 Aa | 475.53 ± 11.89 Aa | 471.12 ± 15.24 Aa | 421.03 ± 10.73 Ba |
Table 3 Specific leaf area (SLA) of different accessions in response to various temperature and light conditions. cm2/g
Treatment | O. longistaminata | RD23 | F1 | RL159 | RL169 | RL219 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LP | HT | 384.27 ± 11.91 ABd | 352.81 ± 7.29 Bc | 391.34 ± 10.70 Ac | 395.54 ± 14.38 Ac | 389.45 ± 9.24 Ac | 361.81 ± 8.37 ABb |
MT | 421.43 ± 13.84 ABCbcd | 393.41 ± 9.16 BCab | 427.86 ± 7.24 ABbc | 432.33 ± 11.01 Aabc | 419.74 ± 10.82 ABCabc | 389.14 ± 9.28 Cab | |
LT | 456.29 ± 10.73 Aab | 419.17 ± 8.42 ABa | 441.71 ± 12.44 ABab | 445.57 ± 9.11 ABab | 443.07 ± 13.81 ABabc | 417.32 ± 10.67 Ba | |
MP | HT | 392.54 ± 17.93 Acd | 369.64 ± 7.69 Abc | 395.57 ± 11.28 Ac | 404.94 ± 18.89 Abc | 393.56 ± 13.89 Abc | 378.13 ± 9.64 Ab |
MT | 436.19 ± 15.48 Aabc | 399.14 ± 10.55 Aab | 438.52 ± 13.59 Aab | 435.14 ± 12.46 Aabc | 432.33 ± 12.60 Aabc | 394.82 ± 13.04 Aab | |
LT | 451.76 ± 11.02 Aab | 423.19 ± 11.60 Aa | 465.15 ± 16.48 Aab | 459.86 ± 13.21 Ab | 455.84 ± 14.61 Aab | 419.19 ± 13.78 Aa | |
SP | HT | 466.43 ± 21.35 Aab | 409.62 ± 12.83 Ba | 468.13 ± 14.75 Aab | 457.28 ± 18.15 ABc | 451.88 ± 9.41 ABabc | 416.78 ± 11.80 ABa |
MT | 473.44 ± 16.56 Aa | 415.69 ± 10.09 Ba | 471.76 ± 15.90 Aab | 470.56 ± 14.88 Aa | 463.16 ± 14.25 Aa | 417.39 ± 13.10 Ba | |
LT | 482.86 ± 15.12 Aa | 417.62 ± 11.47 Ba | 476.19 ± 14.17 Aa | 475.53 ± 11.89 Aa | 471.12 ± 15.24 Aa | 421.03 ± 10.73 Ba |
Treatment | O. longistaminata | RD23 | F1 | RL159 | RL169 | RL219 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LP | HT | 58.77 ± 1.25 bc | 60.15 ± 0.94 bc | 60.83 ± 1.43 bc | 58.66 ± 1.48 bc | 61.61 ± 1.10 b | 60.32 ± 1.11 b |
MT | 60.87 ± 1.21 b | 62.03 ± 1.08 b | 63.17 ± 0.88 b | 60.77 ± 1.56 b | 63.91 ± 0.79 b | 62.69 ± 1.06 b | |
LT | 66.95 ± 1.28 a | 70.81 ± 0.91 a | 68.75 ± 1.58 a | 67.92 ± 0.84 a | 69.38 ± 0.63 a | 68.35 ± 0.89 a | |
MP | HT | 56.06 ± 1.06 cd | 57.06 ± 0.76 c | 57.79 ± 1.55 cd | 55.46 ± 1.36 cd | 58.63 ± 1.18 c | 57.24 ± 1.08 c |
MT | 60.62 ± 1.45 b | 61.78 ± 0.74 b | 62.93 ± 1.22 b | 60.51 ± 1.32 b | 63.67 ± 0.99 b | 62.45 ± 0.94 b | |
LT | 67.43 ± 1.54 a | 70.27 ± 0.69 a | 68.19 ± 1.15 a | 67.34 ± 0.91 a | 68.82 ± 0.67 a | 67.77 ± 0.80 a | |
SP | HT | 52.43 ± 1.31 d | 53.39 ± 1.28 d | 45.26 ± 2.06 e | 42.24 ± 1.99 e | 46.36 ± 1.25 e | 44.55 ± 1.13 e |
MT | 44.11 ± 0.82 e | 53.93 ± 1.41 d | 47.39 ± 2.15 e | 43.96 ± 3.66 e | 48.44 ± 1.06 e | 46.71 ± 1.11 e | |
LT | 52.28 ± 1.07 d | 59.29 ± 1.15 bc | 53.53 ± 0.99 d | 52.15 ± 2.26 d | 54.46 ± 0.94 d | 52.92 ± 0.92 d |
Table 4 Stem mass fraction (SMF) of different accessions in response to various temperature and light conditions. g/g
Treatment | O. longistaminata | RD23 | F1 | RL159 | RL169 | RL219 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LP | HT | 58.77 ± 1.25 bc | 60.15 ± 0.94 bc | 60.83 ± 1.43 bc | 58.66 ± 1.48 bc | 61.61 ± 1.10 b | 60.32 ± 1.11 b |
MT | 60.87 ± 1.21 b | 62.03 ± 1.08 b | 63.17 ± 0.88 b | 60.77 ± 1.56 b | 63.91 ± 0.79 b | 62.69 ± 1.06 b | |
LT | 66.95 ± 1.28 a | 70.81 ± 0.91 a | 68.75 ± 1.58 a | 67.92 ± 0.84 a | 69.38 ± 0.63 a | 68.35 ± 0.89 a | |
MP | HT | 56.06 ± 1.06 cd | 57.06 ± 0.76 c | 57.79 ± 1.55 cd | 55.46 ± 1.36 cd | 58.63 ± 1.18 c | 57.24 ± 1.08 c |
MT | 60.62 ± 1.45 b | 61.78 ± 0.74 b | 62.93 ± 1.22 b | 60.51 ± 1.32 b | 63.67 ± 0.99 b | 62.45 ± 0.94 b | |
LT | 67.43 ± 1.54 a | 70.27 ± 0.69 a | 68.19 ± 1.15 a | 67.34 ± 0.91 a | 68.82 ± 0.67 a | 67.77 ± 0.80 a | |
SP | HT | 52.43 ± 1.31 d | 53.39 ± 1.28 d | 45.26 ± 2.06 e | 42.24 ± 1.99 e | 46.36 ± 1.25 e | 44.55 ± 1.13 e |
MT | 44.11 ± 0.82 e | 53.93 ± 1.41 d | 47.39 ± 2.15 e | 43.96 ± 3.66 e | 48.44 ± 1.06 e | 46.71 ± 1.11 e | |
LT | 52.28 ± 1.07 d | 59.29 ± 1.15 bc | 53.53 ± 0.99 d | 52.15 ± 2.26 d | 54.46 ± 0.94 d | 52.92 ± 0.92 d |
Trait | Accession | 2-3 leaf stage | 4-5 leaf stage | 7-8 leaf stage |
---|---|---|---|---|
SLA | O. longistaminata | 0.49 | 0.89** | 0.81** |
RD23 | 0.75* | 0.43 | 0.74* | |
F1 | 0.44 | 0.79** | 0.76* | |
RL159 | 0.49 | 0.80** | 0.81** | |
RL169 | 0.68 | 0.81** | 0.87** | |
RL219 | 0.75* | 0.76* | 0.65* | |
SMF | O. longistaminata | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.08 |
RD23 | 0.03 | -0.19 | 0.07 | |
F1 | 0.37 | 0.11 | 0.05 | |
RL159 | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.1 | |
RL169 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.01 | |
RL219 | -0.47 | -0.68 | -0.79 |
Table 5 Regression coefficients of the relationship between IRSE and rice functional traits at different growth stages.
Trait | Accession | 2-3 leaf stage | 4-5 leaf stage | 7-8 leaf stage |
---|---|---|---|---|
SLA | O. longistaminata | 0.49 | 0.89** | 0.81** |
RD23 | 0.75* | 0.43 | 0.74* | |
F1 | 0.44 | 0.79** | 0.76* | |
RL159 | 0.49 | 0.80** | 0.81** | |
RL169 | 0.68 | 0.81** | 0.87** | |
RL219 | 0.75* | 0.76* | 0.65* | |
SMF | O. longistaminata | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.08 |
RD23 | 0.03 | -0.19 | 0.07 | |
F1 | 0.37 | 0.11 | 0.05 | |
RL159 | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.1 | |
RL169 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.01 | |
RL219 | -0.47 | -0.68 | -0.79 |
[1] | Bastiaans L, Kropff M J, Kempuchetty N, Rajan A, Migo T R.1997. Can simulation models help design rice cultivars that are more competitive against weeds?Field Crops Res, 51(1/2): 101-111. |
[2] | Bhowmik P C, Doll J D.1983. Growth analysis of corn and soybean response to allellopathic effects of weed residues at various and photosynthetic flux densities.J Chem Ecol, 9(8): 1263-1280. |
[3] | Blum U.2011. Plant-Plant Allelopathic Interactions: Phenolic Acids, Cover Crops and Weed Emergence. Dordrecht: Springer Science Business Media. |
[4] | Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis S L, Swenson N G, Zanne A E.2009. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum.Ecol Letter, 12(4): 351-366. |
[5] | Dilday R H, Lin J, Yan W.1994. Identification of allelopathy in the USDA-ARS rice germplam collection.Aust J Exp Agric, 34(7): 907-910. |
[6] | Duke S O.2010. Allelopathy: Current status of research and future of the discipline: A commentary.Allel J, 25(1): 17-30. |
[7] | Evans G C.1972. The Quantitative Analysis of Plant Growth. Blackwell: Oxford. |
[8] | Fang C X, Zhuang Y E, Xu T C, Li Y Z, Li Y, Lin W X.2013. Changes in rice allelopathy and rhizosphere microflora by inhibiting rice phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene expression.J Chem Ecol, 39(2): 204-212. |
[9] | Gibson K D, Hill J E, Foin T C, Caton B P, Fischer A J.2001. Water-seeded rice cultivars differ in ability to interfere with watergrass.Agron J, 93(2): 326-332. |
[10] | Guo Y Q, Zhang F D, Tao D Y, Yu L Q.2004. A preliminary study on the allelopathic activity of wild rice germplasm.Southwest China J Agric Sci, 17(3): 295-298. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Guo Y Q, Zhang F D, Tao D, Yu L Q, David G.2005. Preliminary studies on the allelopathic potential of wild rice (Oryza) germplasm. Allel J, 15(1): 13-19. |
[12] | Hu F, Kong C H, Chen X H, Zhang Z X.2003. Effects of different water, fertility, and light conditions on allelopathic traits of rice.Chin J Appl Ecol, 14(12): 2265-2268. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Huang Q Q, Shen Y D, Li X X, Zhang G L, Huang D D, Fan Z W.2015. Effects of light and water availabilityon the morphology and allelopathy of the native outbreak species Merremia boisiana (Gagnep.) Oostr. Chin J of Ecol, 34(2): 438-444. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Kato-Noguchi H, Ino K.2003. Rice seedling release momilactone B into the environment.Phytochemistry, 63(5): 551-554. |
[15] | Kaur H, Kaur R, Kaur S, Baldwin I T, Inderjit.2009. Taking ecological function seriously: Soil microbial communities can obviate allelopathic effects of released metabolites.PLoS One, 3: e4700. |
[16] | Khanh T D, Xuan T D, Chung M I.2007. Rice allelopathy and the possibility for weed management.Ann Appl Biol, 151(3): 325-339. |
[17] | Kim K U.2001. Trends and expectations for research and technology in the Asia-Pacific region.Weed Biol Manag, 1(1): 20-24. |
[18] | Kim K U, Shin D H.2008. Progress and prospect of rice allelopathy research. In: Zeng R S, Mallik A U, Lou S M. Allelopathy in Sustainable Agriculture and Forestry. New York, USA: Sprimger-Verlag: 189-213. |
[19] | Kong C H, Hu F, Liang W, Peng W, Jiang Y.2004. Allelopathic potential of Ageratum conyzoides at various growth stages in different habitats. Allel J, 13: 233-240. |
[20] | Kong C H, Hu F, Wang P, Wu J L.2008. Effect of allelopathic rice varieties combined with cultural management options on paddy field weeds.Pest Manag Sci, 64(3): 276-282. |
[21] | Kong C H, Chen X H, Hu F, Zhang S Z.2011. Breeding of commercially acceptable allelopathic rice cultivars in China.Pest Manag Sci, 67(9): 1100-1106. |
[22] | Lin W X, Dong Z H, Chen X X, He H Q, Shen L H, Guo Y C, Liang Y Y, Chen F Y, Liang K J.2003. Analysis on dynamic heterosis for allelopathy in rice under different environment conditions.Agric Sci China, 2(7): 707-714. |
[23] | Lin W X, Fang C X, Chen T, Lin R Y, Xiong J, Wang H B.2010. Rice allelopathy and its properties of molecular ecology.Front Biol, 5(3): 255-262. |
[24] | Liao Z Y, Zhao Z H, Hou Y P, Peng S L.2007. Allelopathic effects of Ipomoea cairica on Mikania micrantha. Ecol Environ, 16(3): 939-943. |
[25] | Monaco T A, Johnson D A, Creech J E.2005. Morphological and physiological responses of the invasive weed Isatis tinctoria to contrasting light, soil-nitrogen and water. Weed Res, 45(6): 460-466. |
[26] | Olofsdotter M, Malik A U.2011. Allelopathy symposium- introduction.Agron J, 93(1): 1-2. |
[27] | Poorter L.1999. Growth response of 15 rain forest tree species to a light gradient: The relative importance of morphological and physiological traits.Funct Ecol, 13: 396-410. |
[28] | Quero J L, Villar R, Marañón T, Zamora R.2006. Interactions of drought and shade effects on seedlings of four Quercus species: Physiological and structural leaf responses.New Phytol, 170(4): 819-834. |
[29] | Reich P B, Ellsworth D S, Walters M B, Vose J M, Cresham C, Volin J C, Bowman W D.1999. Generality of leaf trait relationships: A test across six biomes.Ecology, 80(6): 1955-1969. |
[30] | Rice E L.1995. Biological control of weeds and plant diseases: Advances in applied allelopathy. Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press: 448. |
[31] | Rivoal A, Fernandez C, Greff S, Montes N, Vila B.2011. Does competition stress decrease allelopathic potential? Biochem Syst Ecol, 39: 401-407. |
[32] | Shen L H, Li B L, Ren Y J, Li C X, Zhong Y J, Fang C X, Lin W X.2015. Phonolic acid synthesis of allelopathic rice regulated by OsMYB and its weed inhibition. Acta Agron Sin, 41(4): 531-538. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Shen S C, Xu G F, David R C, Jin G M, Zhang F D, Tao D Y, Xu P.2016. Competitive and allelopathic effects of wild rice accessions (Oryza longistaminata) at different growth stages. Pak J Biol Sci, 19(2): 82-88. |
[34] | Sweet J, Kostov K.2014. What are the effects of the cultivation of GM herbicide tolerant crops on botanical diversity? A systematic review protocol.Environ Evid, 3(1): 8-10. |
[35] | Xiong J, Jia X L, Deng J Y, Jiang B Y, He H B, Lin W X.2007. Analysis of epistatic effect and QTL interactions with environment for allelopathy in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Allel J, 20: 259-267. |
[36] | Xu G F, Shen S C, Zhang F D, Zhang Y H.2014. Relationships among the weed suppression effect, allelopathy and agronomic characters ofOryza longistaminata and their descendants. Chin J Eco-Agric, 22(11): 1348-1356. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[37] | Xu G F, Zhang F D, Li T L, Wu D, Zhang Y H.2010. Induced effects of exogenous phenolic acids on allelopathy of a wild rice accession (Oryza longistaminata, S37). Rice Sci, 17: 135-140. |
[38] | Yu L Q, Xu Z H, Guo Y Q, Tao D Y.2002. Resistance function on barnyardgrass in wild rice and African rice cultivars.Chin J Rice Sci, 16(3): 288-290. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[39] | Zar J H.1999. Biostatistical Analysis. IV. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River: 663. |
[40] | Zhang F D, Guo Y Q, Yu L Q, Tao D Y.2004. Evaluation and screening of resistance to barnyardgrass in germplasm of wild rice (Oryza sativa) and African cultivar. Acta Agron Sin, 30(11): 1144-1148. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[41] | Zhang F D, Li T L, Shan Q L, Guo Y Q, Xu P, Hu F Y, Tao D Y.2008. Weed-suppression ability of Oryza longistaminata and Oryza sativa. Allel J, 22:345-352. |
[42] | Zhang F D, Xu G F, Li T L, Zhang Y H.2011. Allelopathy and weed-suppression of Oryza longistaminata under water-nitrogen interactions in the field. Acta Agron Sin, 37(1): 170-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[43] | Zhou S C, Kong C H, Li H, Lu D C, Hu F.2005. Relationships between allelopathic traits and agronomic characters of allelopathic rice varieties.Chin J Appl Ecol, 16(4): 737-739. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[44] | Wang J F, Feng Y L, Li Z.2003. Acclimation of photosynthesis to growth light intensity in Chromolaena odorata L. and Gynura sp. Acta Photophysiol Sin, 29(6): 542-548. |
[45] | Wang Q, Hillwig M L, Peters R J.2011. CYP99A3: Functional identification of a diterpene oxidase from the momilactone biosynthetic gene cluster in rice.Plant J, 65(1): 87-95. |
[46] | Williamson G B, Richardson D.1988. Bioassays for allelopathy: Measuring treatment responses within dependent controls.J Chem Ecol, 14(1): 181-187. |
[1] | Prathap V, Suresh KUMAR, Nand Lal MEENA, Chirag MAHESHWARI, Monika DALAL, Aruna TYAGI. Phosphorus Starvation Tolerance in Rice Through a Combined Physiological, Biochemical and Proteome Analysis [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 8-. |
[2] | Serena REGGI, Elisabetta ONELLI, Alessandra MOSCATELLI, Nadia STROPPA, Matteo Dell’ANNO, Kiril PERFANOV, Luciana ROSSI. Seed-Specific Expression of Apolipoprotein A-IMilano Dimer in Rice Engineered Lines [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 6-. |
[3] | Sundus ZAFAR, XU Jianlong. Recent Advances to Enhance Nutritional Quality of Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 4-. |
[4] | Kankunlanach KHAMPUANG, Nanthana CHAIWONG, Atilla YAZICI, Baris DEMIRER, Ismail CAKMAK, Chanakan PROM-U-THAI. Effect of Sulfur Fertilization on Productivity and Grain Zinc Yield of Rice Grown under Low and Adequate Soil Zinc Applications [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 9-. |
[5] | FAN Fengfeng, CAI Meng, LUO Xiong, LIU Manman, YUAN Huanran, CHENG Mingxing, Ayaz AHMAD, LI Nengwu, LI Shaoqing. Novel QTLs from Wild Rice Oryza longistaminata Confer Rice Strong Tolerance to High Temperature at Seedling Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 14-. |
[6] | LIN Shaodan, YAO Yue, LI Jiayi, LI Xiaobin, MA Jie, WENG Haiyong, CHENG Zuxin, YE Dapeng. Application of UAV-Based Imaging and Deep Learning in Assessment of Rice Blast Resistance [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 10-. |
[7] | Md. Forshed DEWAN, Md. AHIDUZZAMAN, Md. Nahidul ISLAM, Habibul Bari SHOZIB. Potential Benefits of Bioactive Compounds of Traditional Rice Grown in South and South-East Asia: A Review [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 5-. |
[8] | Raja CHAKRABORTY, Pratap KALITA, Saikat SEN. Phenolic Profile, Antioxidant, Antihyperlipidemic and Cardiac Risk Preventive Effect of Chakhao Poireiton (A Pigmented Black Rice) in High-Fat High-Sugar induced Rats [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 11-. |
[9] | LI Qianlong, FENG Qi, WANG Heqin, KANG Yunhai, ZHANG Conghe, DU Ming, ZHANG Yunhu, WANG Hui, CHEN Jinjie, HAN Bin, FANG Yu, WANG Ahong. Genome-Wide Dissection of Quan 9311A Breeding Process and Application Advantages [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 7-. |
[10] | JI Dongling, XIAO Wenhui, SUN Zhiwei, LIU Lijun, GU Junfei, ZHANG Hao, Tom Matthew HARRISON, LIU Ke, WANG Zhiqin, WANG Weilu, YANG Jianchang. Translocation and Distribution of Carbon-Nitrogen in Relation to Rice Yield and Grain Quality as Affected by High Temperature at Early Panicle Initiation Stage [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 12-. |
[11] | Nazaratul Ashifa Abdullah Salim, Norlida Mat Daud, Julieta Griboff, Abdul Rahim Harun. Elemental Assessments in Paddy Soil for Geographical Traceability of Rice from Peninsular Malaysia [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 486-498. |
[12] | Monica Ruffini Castiglione, Stefania Bottega, Carlo Sorce, Carmelina SpanÒ. Effects of Zinc Oxide Particles with Different Sizes on Root Development in Oryza sativa [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 449-458. |
[13] | Tan Jingyi, Zhang Xiaobo, Shang Huihui, Li Panpan, Wang Zhonghao, Liao Xinwei, Xu Xia, Yang Shihua, Gong Junyi, Wu Jianli. ORYZA SATIVA SPOTTED-LEAF 41 (OsSPL41) Negatively Regulates Plant Immunity in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 426-436. |
[14] | Ammara Latif, Sun Ying, Pu Cuixia, Noman Ali. Rice Curled Its Leaves Either Adaxially or Abaxially to Combat Drought Stress [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 405-416. |
[15] | Liu Qiao, Qiu Linlin, Hua Yangguang, Li Jing, Pang Bo, Zhai Yufeng, Wang Dekai. LHD3 Encoding a J-Domain Protein Controls Heading Date in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 437-448. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||