Rice Science ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 42-51.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2017.08.003
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Fernando Polesi Luís1,2(), Bruder Silveira Sarmento Silene3, Guidolin Canniatti-Brazaca Solange3
Received:
2017-05-08
Accepted:
2017-08-31
Online:
2018-01-28
Published:
2017-11-16
Fernando Polesi Luís, Bruder Silveira Sarmento Silene, Guidolin Canniatti-Brazaca Solange. Starch Digestibility and Functional Properties of Rice Starch Subjected to Gamma Radiation[J]. Rice Science, 2018, 25(1): 42-51.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Type | Dose | RDS | SDS | RS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | ||||
Raw starch | 0 kGy | 31.3 ± 0.4 bA | 40.5 ± 0.4 aA | 51.4 ± 1.0 aC | 52.1 ± 0.8 aB | 16.5 ± 1.0 aA | 6.1 ± 0.3 bB | ||
1 kGy | 31.8 ± 0.6 bA | 40.4 ± 0.8 aA | 62.6 ± 0.8 aA | 47.4 ± 1.0 bC | 4.7 ± 0.8 bD | 10.8 ± 0.6 aA | |||
2 kGy | 29.2 ± 1.0 bB | 40.1 ± 0.5 aA | 59.4 ± 0.9 aB | 51.6 ± 0.9 bB | 10.5 ± 0.4 aB | 7.0 ± 0.6 bB | |||
5 kGy | 31.3 ± 0.2 bA | 40.7 ± 0.4 aA | 60.6 ± 0.9 aB | 55.0 ± 0.8 bA | 7.2 ± 1.0 aC | 3.0 ± 0.4 bC | |||
Cooked starch | 0 kGy | 87.6 ± 1.2 aB | 88.7 ± 1.1 aB | 7.8 ± 0.7 aB | 6.5 ± 1.0 aA | 3.8 ± 0.7 aB | 3.4 ± 0.7 aB | ||
1 kGy | 83.0 ± 0.6 bC | 92.6 ± 1.1 aA | 15.1 ± 1.4 aA | 5.1 ± 0.7 bAB | 1.1 ± 0.4 aC | 1.0 ± 0.7 aC | |||
2 kGy | 76.6 ± 0.8 bD | 88.6 ± 1.6 aB | 15.5 ± 0.5 aA | 4.5 ± 0.5 bB | 7.0 ± 0.8 aA | 5.7 ± 0.5 bA | |||
5 kGy | 95.2 ± 0.8 aA | 92.6 ± 0.4 bA | 2.6 ± 0.6 aC | 2.2 ± 0.3 aC | 1.4 ± 0.4 bC | 3.9 ± 0.4 aB |
Table 1 Starch digestibility of raw and cooked samples of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars. %
Type | Dose | RDS | SDS | RS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | ||||
Raw starch | 0 kGy | 31.3 ± 0.4 bA | 40.5 ± 0.4 aA | 51.4 ± 1.0 aC | 52.1 ± 0.8 aB | 16.5 ± 1.0 aA | 6.1 ± 0.3 bB | ||
1 kGy | 31.8 ± 0.6 bA | 40.4 ± 0.8 aA | 62.6 ± 0.8 aA | 47.4 ± 1.0 bC | 4.7 ± 0.8 bD | 10.8 ± 0.6 aA | |||
2 kGy | 29.2 ± 1.0 bB | 40.1 ± 0.5 aA | 59.4 ± 0.9 aB | 51.6 ± 0.9 bB | 10.5 ± 0.4 aB | 7.0 ± 0.6 bB | |||
5 kGy | 31.3 ± 0.2 bA | 40.7 ± 0.4 aA | 60.6 ± 0.9 aB | 55.0 ± 0.8 bA | 7.2 ± 1.0 aC | 3.0 ± 0.4 bC | |||
Cooked starch | 0 kGy | 87.6 ± 1.2 aB | 88.7 ± 1.1 aB | 7.8 ± 0.7 aB | 6.5 ± 1.0 aA | 3.8 ± 0.7 aB | 3.4 ± 0.7 aB | ||
1 kGy | 83.0 ± 0.6 bC | 92.6 ± 1.1 aA | 15.1 ± 1.4 aA | 5.1 ± 0.7 bAB | 1.1 ± 0.4 aC | 1.0 ± 0.7 aC | |||
2 kGy | 76.6 ± 0.8 bD | 88.6 ± 1.6 aB | 15.5 ± 0.5 aA | 4.5 ± 0.5 bB | 7.0 ± 0.8 aA | 5.7 ± 0.5 bA | |||
5 kGy | 95.2 ± 0.8 aA | 92.6 ± 0.4 bA | 2.6 ± 0.6 aC | 2.2 ± 0.3 aC | 1.4 ± 0.4 bC | 3.9 ± 0.4 aB |
Dose | TDF | L | b* | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 0.6 ± 0.2 aAB | 0.7 ± 0.2 aA | 99.4 ± 0.3 aA | 98.7 ± 0.3 bB | 6.0 ± 0.1 aD | 5.9 ± 0.0 bD | ||
1 kGy | 0.3 ± 0.1 bB | 0.7 ± 0.2 aA | 99.6 ± 0.2 aA | 99.5 ± 0.5 aA | 6.2 ± 0.0 aC | 6.2 ± 0.0 aC | ||
2 kGy | 0.4 ± 0.3 aB | 0.5 ± 0.1 aA | 99.2 ± 0.2 aA | 99.6 ± 0.2 aA | 6.4 ± 0.1 aB | 6.4 ± 0.1 aB | ||
5 kGy | 1.0 ± 0.2 aA | 0.6 ± 0.2 bA | 99.6 ± 0.3 aA | 99.4 ± 0.2 aA | 6.8 ± 0.1 aA | 6.9 ± 0.1 aA |
Table 2 Total dietary fiber content (% dry basis) and instrumental color of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars.
Dose | TDF | L | b* | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 0.6 ± 0.2 aAB | 0.7 ± 0.2 aA | 99.4 ± 0.3 aA | 98.7 ± 0.3 bB | 6.0 ± 0.1 aD | 5.9 ± 0.0 bD | ||
1 kGy | 0.3 ± 0.1 bB | 0.7 ± 0.2 aA | 99.6 ± 0.2 aA | 99.5 ± 0.5 aA | 6.2 ± 0.0 aC | 6.2 ± 0.0 aC | ||
2 kGy | 0.4 ± 0.3 aB | 0.5 ± 0.1 aA | 99.2 ± 0.2 aA | 99.6 ± 0.2 aA | 6.4 ± 0.1 aB | 6.4 ± 0.1 aB | ||
5 kGy | 1.0 ± 0.2 aA | 0.6 ± 0.2 bA | 99.6 ± 0.3 aA | 99.4 ± 0.2 aA | 6.8 ± 0.1 aA | 6.9 ± 0.1 aA |
Dose | WAI (g/g) | WSI (%) | Syneresis (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 2.08 ± 0.01 bB | 2.11 ± 0.02 aB | 0.05 ± 0.01 aD | 0.06 ± 0.04 aD | 0.28 ± 0.01 bA | 2.38 ± 0.09 aC | ||
1 kGy | 2.10 ± 0.02 aB | 2.12 ± 0.01 aAB | 0.11 ± 0.01 aC | 0.12 ± 0.01 aC | 0.33 ± 0.01 bA | 2.77 ± 0.21 aB | ||
2 kGy | 2.10 ± 0.02 bB | 2.15 ± 0.01 aA | 0.15 ± 0.01 aB | 0.16 ± 0.01 aB | 0.38 ± 0.02 bA | 3.93 ± 0.12 aA | ||
5 kGy | 2.17 ± 0.01 aA | 2.15 ± 0.01 aA | 0.27 ± 0.01 aA | 0.24 ± 0.02 bA | 0.42 ± 0.02 bA | 2.44 ± 0.06 aC |
Table 3 Water absorption index (WAI), water solubility index (WSI) and syneresis of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars.
Dose | WAI (g/g) | WSI (%) | Syneresis (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 2.08 ± 0.01 bB | 2.11 ± 0.02 aB | 0.05 ± 0.01 aD | 0.06 ± 0.04 aD | 0.28 ± 0.01 bA | 2.38 ± 0.09 aC | ||
1 kGy | 2.10 ± 0.02 aB | 2.12 ± 0.01 aAB | 0.11 ± 0.01 aC | 0.12 ± 0.01 aC | 0.33 ± 0.01 bA | 2.77 ± 0.21 aB | ||
2 kGy | 2.10 ± 0.02 bB | 2.15 ± 0.01 aA | 0.15 ± 0.01 aB | 0.16 ± 0.01 aB | 0.38 ± 0.02 bA | 3.93 ± 0.12 aA | ||
5 kGy | 2.17 ± 0.01 aA | 2.15 ± 0.01 aA | 0.27 ± 0.01 aA | 0.24 ± 0.02 bA | 0.42 ± 0.02 bA | 2.44 ± 0.06 aC |
Fig. 1. Swelling factor of granules in the aqueous slurry (2%) and amylose leaching of granules in the aqueous slurry (2%) of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars.
T | Cultivar | Swelling factor | Amylose leaching (%) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(°C) | 0 kGy | 1 kGy | 2 kGy | 5 kGy | 0 kGy | 1 kGy | 2 kGy | 5 kGy | ||
55 | IAC202 | 2.8 ± 0.2 bB | 4.0 ± 0.4 bA | 3.3 ± 0.5 aAB | 4.4 ± 0.6 bA | 0.02 ± 0.01 bB | 0.05 ± 0.02 bB | 0.14 ± 0.05 bA | 0.20 ± 0.03 bA | |
IRGA417 | 3.8 ± 0.4 aC | 5.7 ± 0.4 aB | 4.0 ± 0.8 aC | 7.7 ± 0.4 aA | 0.22 ± 0.02 aC | 0.27 ± 0.03 aBC | 0.32 ± 0.01 aB | 0.49 ± 0.02 aA | ||
65 | IAC202 | 4.8 ± 0.4 bC | 6.0 ± 0.2 bA | 5.8 ± 0.2 aAB | 5.2 ± 0.5 bBC | 1.55 ± 0.02 bD | 1.96 ± 0.02 bC | 2.37 ± 0.10 bB | 3.38 ± 0.16 bA | |
IRGA417 | 7.6 ± 0.1 aA | 8.2 ± 0.1 aA | 6.1 ± 0.2 aB | 7.9 ± 0.1 aA | 2.13 ± 0.06 aD | 2.72 ± 0.10 aC | 3.43 ± 0.07 aB | 5.13 ± 0.14 aA | ||
75 | IAC202 | 10.2 ± 0.6 aA | 10.4 ± 0.1 aA | 10.1 ± 0.3 aA | 7.8 ± 0.3 aB | 8.00 ± 0.32 aD | 9.79 ± 0.29 aC | 10.98 ± 0.09 aB | 13.92 ± 0.02 aA | |
IRGA417 | 9.2 ± 0.6 bA | 8.2 ± 0.4 bAB | 7.9 ± 0.7 bB | 7.6 ± 0.4 aB | 4.09 ± 0.08 bD | 5.14 ± 0.17 bC | 6.49 ± 0.31 bB | 8.99 ± 0.14 bA | ||
85 | IAC202 | 10.7 ± 0.3 aB | 11.7 ± 0.5 aA | 11.5 ± 0.1 aA | 10.8 ± 0.4 aB | 19.89 ± 0.29 aC | 23.23 ± 0.59 aB | 23.82 ± 0.58 aB | 27.46 ± 0.61 aA | |
IRGA417 | 10.5 ± 0.1 aA | 9.8 ± 0.1 bB | 10.3 ± 0.2 bAB | 8.3 ± 0.2 bC | 11.44 ± 0.45 bD | 14.38 ± 0.18 bC | 15.64 ± 0.45 bB | 19.78 ± 0.03 bA | ||
95 | IAC202 | 25.7 ± 0.5 aA | 23.8 ± 0.2 aC | 24.9 ± 0.1 aB | 24.4 ± 0.1 bB | 33.56 ± 0.22 aC | 36.46 ± 0.55 aB | 36.74 ± 0.78 aB | 42.29 ± 0.54 aA | |
IRGA417 | 18.7 ± 0.1 bC | 18.8 ± 0.3 bBC | 19.3 ± 0.1 bB | 24.8 ± 0.2 aA | 24.82 ± 0.15 bD | 27.99 ± 0.55 bC | 29.77 ± 0.26 bB | 33.75 ± 0.79 bA |
Table 4 Swelling factor and amylose leaching of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars.
T | Cultivar | Swelling factor | Amylose leaching (%) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(°C) | 0 kGy | 1 kGy | 2 kGy | 5 kGy | 0 kGy | 1 kGy | 2 kGy | 5 kGy | ||
55 | IAC202 | 2.8 ± 0.2 bB | 4.0 ± 0.4 bA | 3.3 ± 0.5 aAB | 4.4 ± 0.6 bA | 0.02 ± 0.01 bB | 0.05 ± 0.02 bB | 0.14 ± 0.05 bA | 0.20 ± 0.03 bA | |
IRGA417 | 3.8 ± 0.4 aC | 5.7 ± 0.4 aB | 4.0 ± 0.8 aC | 7.7 ± 0.4 aA | 0.22 ± 0.02 aC | 0.27 ± 0.03 aBC | 0.32 ± 0.01 aB | 0.49 ± 0.02 aA | ||
65 | IAC202 | 4.8 ± 0.4 bC | 6.0 ± 0.2 bA | 5.8 ± 0.2 aAB | 5.2 ± 0.5 bBC | 1.55 ± 0.02 bD | 1.96 ± 0.02 bC | 2.37 ± 0.10 bB | 3.38 ± 0.16 bA | |
IRGA417 | 7.6 ± 0.1 aA | 8.2 ± 0.1 aA | 6.1 ± 0.2 aB | 7.9 ± 0.1 aA | 2.13 ± 0.06 aD | 2.72 ± 0.10 aC | 3.43 ± 0.07 aB | 5.13 ± 0.14 aA | ||
75 | IAC202 | 10.2 ± 0.6 aA | 10.4 ± 0.1 aA | 10.1 ± 0.3 aA | 7.8 ± 0.3 aB | 8.00 ± 0.32 aD | 9.79 ± 0.29 aC | 10.98 ± 0.09 aB | 13.92 ± 0.02 aA | |
IRGA417 | 9.2 ± 0.6 bA | 8.2 ± 0.4 bAB | 7.9 ± 0.7 bB | 7.6 ± 0.4 aB | 4.09 ± 0.08 bD | 5.14 ± 0.17 bC | 6.49 ± 0.31 bB | 8.99 ± 0.14 bA | ||
85 | IAC202 | 10.7 ± 0.3 aB | 11.7 ± 0.5 aA | 11.5 ± 0.1 aA | 10.8 ± 0.4 aB | 19.89 ± 0.29 aC | 23.23 ± 0.59 aB | 23.82 ± 0.58 aB | 27.46 ± 0.61 aA | |
IRGA417 | 10.5 ± 0.1 aA | 9.8 ± 0.1 bB | 10.3 ± 0.2 bAB | 8.3 ± 0.2 bC | 11.44 ± 0.45 bD | 14.38 ± 0.18 bC | 15.64 ± 0.45 bB | 19.78 ± 0.03 bA | ||
95 | IAC202 | 25.7 ± 0.5 aA | 23.8 ± 0.2 aC | 24.9 ± 0.1 aB | 24.4 ± 0.1 bB | 33.56 ± 0.22 aC | 36.46 ± 0.55 aB | 36.74 ± 0.78 aB | 42.29 ± 0.54 aA | |
IRGA417 | 18.7 ± 0.1 bC | 18.8 ± 0.3 bBC | 19.3 ± 0.1 bB | 24.8 ± 0.2 aA | 24.82 ± 0.15 bD | 27.99 ± 0.55 bC | 29.77 ± 0.26 bB | 33.75 ± 0.79 bA |
Fig. 2. RVA pasting profile of aqueous slurry (9.2%) of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars.Black line shows data with pH unadjusted. Gray line shows data with pH adjusted to 7.
Dose | Peak viscosity (RVU) | Breakdown (RVU) | Final viscosity (RVU) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 164 ± 1 bA | 236 ± 1 aA | 73 ± 1 aC | 63 ± 1 bC | 230 ± 4 bA | 418 ± 2 aA | ||
1 kGy | 150 ± 1 bB | 177 ± 2 aB | 87 ± 3 aA | 69 ± 1 bB | 158 ± 5 bB | 289 ± 3 aB | ||
2 kGy | 131 ± 1 bC | 159 ± 4 aC | 82 ± 1 aB | 76 ± 1 bA | 122 ± 1 bC | 233 ± 3 aC | ||
5 kGy | 112 ± 4 aD | 111 ± 1 aD | 84 ± 2 aAB | 67 ± 0 bBC | 76 ± 6 bD | 127 ± 4 aD |
Table 5 Peak viscosity, breakdown and final viscosity of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars.
Dose | Peak viscosity (RVU) | Breakdown (RVU) | Final viscosity (RVU) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 164 ± 1 bA | 236 ± 1 aA | 73 ± 1 aC | 63 ± 1 bC | 230 ± 4 bA | 418 ± 2 aA | ||
1 kGy | 150 ± 1 bB | 177 ± 2 aB | 87 ± 3 aA | 69 ± 1 bB | 158 ± 5 bB | 289 ± 3 aB | ||
2 kGy | 131 ± 1 bC | 159 ± 4 aC | 82 ± 1 aB | 76 ± 1 bA | 122 ± 1 bC | 233 ± 3 aC | ||
5 kGy | 112 ± 4 aD | 111 ± 1 aD | 84 ± 2 aAB | 67 ± 0 bBC | 76 ± 6 bD | 127 ± 4 aD |
Dose | Setback (RVU) | Pasting temperature (°C) | Gel firmness (g) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 140 ± 3 bA | 245 ± 1 aA | 76.6 ± 0.2 bA | 83.3 ± 0.0 aC | 184 ± 3 bD | 225 ± 2 aA | ||
1 kGy | 95 ± 3 bB | 180 ± 2 aB | 74.1 ± 0.4 bC | 84.1 ± 0.0 aB | 194 ± 2 bC | 229 ± 3 aA | ||
2 kGy | 74 ± 1 bC | 150 ± 1 aC | 74.6 ± 0.2 bB | 83.5 ± 0.2 aC | 218 ± 2 aB | 223 ± 3 aA | ||
5 kGy | 49 ± 3 bD | 83 ± 3 aD | 72.8 ± 0.0 bD | 84.9 ± 0.0 aA | 228 ± 3 aA | 120 ± 5 bB |
Table 6 Setback, pasting temperature and gel firmness of native and irradiated starch of two rice cultivars.
Dose | Setback (RVU) | Pasting temperature (°C) | Gel firmness (g) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | IAC202 | IRGA417 | |||
0 kGy | 140 ± 3 bA | 245 ± 1 aA | 76.6 ± 0.2 bA | 83.3 ± 0.0 aC | 184 ± 3 bD | 225 ± 2 aA | ||
1 kGy | 95 ± 3 bB | 180 ± 2 aB | 74.1 ± 0.4 bC | 84.1 ± 0.0 aB | 194 ± 2 bC | 229 ± 3 aA | ||
2 kGy | 74 ± 1 bC | 150 ± 1 aC | 74.6 ± 0.2 bB | 83.5 ± 0.2 aC | 218 ± 2 aB | 223 ± 3 aA | ||
5 kGy | 49 ± 3 bD | 83 ± 3 aD | 72.8 ± 0.0 bD | 84.9 ± 0.0 aA | 228 ± 3 aA | 120 ± 5 bB |
[1] | Abu J O, Duodu K G, Minnaar A.2006. Effect of gamma- irradiation on some physicochemical and thermal properties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) starch. Food Chem, 95(3): 386-393. |
[2] | Anderson R A, Conway H F, Pfeifer V F, Griffin E L.1969. Gelatinization of corn grits by roll- and extrusion-cooking.Cereal Sci Today, 14(1): 4-12. |
[3] | AOAC.2005. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th edn. Arlington, Virginia: American Association of Cereal Chemists. |
[4] | Bao J S, Ao Z H, Jane J L.2005. Characterization of physical properties of flour and starch obtained from gamma-irradiated white rice.Starch-Starke, 57(10): 480-487. |
[5] | Beinner M A, Soares A D N, Barros A L A, Monteiro M A M.2010. Sensory evaluation of rice fortified with iron.Food Sci Technol, 30(2): 516-519. |
[6] | Bello-Pérez L A, Montealvo M G M, Acevedo E A.2006. Starch: Definition, structure and properties. In: Lajolo F M, Menezes E W. Carbohydrates in Regional Iberoamerican Foods. Sao Paulo: Edusp: 17-46. (in Spanish) |
[7] | Bhat R, Karim A A.2009. Impact of radiation processing on starch.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 8(2): 44-58. |
[8] | Chung H J, Liu Q, Hoover R, Warkentin T D, Vandenberg B.2008. In vitro starch digestibility, expected glycemic index, and thermal and pasting properties of flours from pea, lentil and chickpea cultivars. Food Chem, 111(2): 316-321. |
[9] | Chung H J, Liu Q.2009. Effect of gamma irradiation on molecular structure and physicochemical properties of corn starch.J Food Sci, 74(5): C353-C361. |
[10] | Chung H J, Liu Q.2010. Molecular structure and physicochemical properties of potato and bean starches as affected by gamma-irradiation.Int J Biol Macromol, 47(2): 214-222. |
[11] | Darfour B, Wilson D D, Ofosu D O, Ocloo F C K.2012. Physical, proximate, functional and pasting properties of flour produced from gamma irradiated cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Radiat Phys Chem, 81(4): 450-457. |
[12] | Englyst H N, Kingman S M, Cummings J H.1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions.Eur J Clin Nutr, 46: S33-S50. |
[13] | Englyst K N, Liu S, Englyst H N.2007. Nutritional characterization and measurement of dietary carbohydrates.Eur J Clin Nutr, 61: S19-S39. |
[14] | Falade K O, Kolawole T A.2013. Effect of gamma-irradiation on colour, functional and physicochemical properties of pearl millet [ Pennisetum glaucum(L.) R. Br.] cultivars. Food Bioprocess Technol, 6(9): 2429-2438. |
[15] | FAOSTAT. 2014. Statistics Database. . |
[16] | Gani A, Bashir M, Wani S M, Masoodi F A.2012. Modification of bean starch by gamma-irradiation: Effect on functional and morphological properties.Lwt-Food Sci Technol, 49(1): 162-169. |
[17] | Henry F, Costa L C, Aymes-Chodur C.2010. Influence of ionizing radiation on physical properties of native and chemically modified starches.Radiat Phys Chem, 79(1): 75-82. |
[18] | Jiang Q Q, Xu X M, Jin Z Y, Tian Y Q, Hu X T, Bai Y X.2011. Physico-chemical properties of rice starch gels: Effect of different heat treatments.J Food Eng, 107(3/4): 353-357. |
[19] | Kang I J, Byun M W, Yook H S, Bae C H, Lee H S, Kwon J H, Chung C K.1999. Production of modified starches by gamma irradiation.Radiat Phys Chem, 54(4): 425-430. |
[20] | Karim A A, Norziah M H, Seow C C.2000. Methods for the study of starch retrogradation.Food Chem, 71(1): 9-36. |
[21] | Lee J S, Ee M L, Chung K H, Othman Z.2013. Formation of resistant corn starches induced by gamma-irradiation.Carbohydr Polym, 97(2): 614-617. |
[22] | Lee J W, Oh S H, Kim J H, Byun E H, Kim M R, Baek M, Byun M W.2007. The effect of irradiation temperature on the non- enzymatic browning reaction in cooked rice.Radiat Phys Chem, 76(5): 886-892. |
[23] | Lee Y J, Kim S Y, Lim S T, Han S M, Kim H M, Kang I J.2006. Physicochemical properties of gamma-irradiated corn starch.J Food Sci Nutr, 11: 146-154. |
[24] | Liu T Y, Ma Y, Xue S, Shi J.2012. Modifications of structure and physicochemical properties of maize starch by gamma- irradiation treatments.Lwt-Food Sci Technol, 46(1): 156-163. |
[25] | Oladebeye A O, Oshodi A A, Amoo I A, Karim A A.2013. Functional, thermal and molecular behaviours of ozone-oxidised cocoyam and yam starches.Food Chem, 141(2): 1416-1423. |
[26] | Othman Z, Hassan O, Hashim K.2015. Physicochemical and thermal properties of gamma-irradiated sago (Metroxylon sagu) starch. Radiat Phys Chem, 109: 48-53. |
[27] | Patindol J, Wang Y J, Siebenmorgen T, Jay-lin J.2003. Properties of flours and starches as affected by rough rice drying regime.Cereal Chem, 80(1): 30-34. |
[28] | Polesi L F, Sarmento S B S, de Moraes J, Franco C M L, Canniatti-Brazaca S G.2016. Physicochemical and structural characteristics of rice starch modified by irradiation.Food Chem, 191: 59-66. |
[29] | Reddy C K, Suriya M, Vidya P V, Vijina K, Haripriya S.2015. Effect of γ-irradiation on structure and physico-chemical properties of Amorphophallus paeoniifolius starch. Int J Biol Macromol, 79: 309-315. |
[30] | Rombo G O, Taylor J R N, Minnaar A.2004. Irradiation of maize and bean flours: Effects on starch physicochemical properties.J Sci Food Agric, 84(4): 350-356. |
[31] | Silva F A S. 2014. ASSISTAT: Version 7.7 beta. . 2014. ASSISTAT: Version 7.7 beta. . |
[32] | Singh H, Chang Y H, Sodhi N S, Singh N.2011. Influence of prior acid treatment on physicochemical and structural properties of acetylated sorghum starch.Starch-Starke, 63(5): 291-301. |
[33] | Sodhi N S, Singh N.2003. Morphological, thermal and rheological properties of starches separated from rice cultivar’s grown in India.Food Chem, 80(1): 99-108. |
[34] | Tester R F, Morrison W R.1990. Swelling and gelatinization of cereal starches: 1. Effects of amylopectin, amylose, and lipids.Cereal Chem, 67(6): 551-557. |
[35] | Zavareze E R, Halal S L M, Pereira J M, Radünz A L, Elias M C, Dias A R G.2009. Chemical characterization and extraction yield of rice starch with different amylose contents. Braz J Food Technol, II SSA: 24-30. (in Portuguese with English abstract) |
[36] | Zhang G Y, Hamaker B R.2009. Slowly digestible starch: Concept, mechanism, and proposed extended glycemic index.Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 49(10): 852-867. |
[1] | Md. Dhin Islam, Adam H. Price, Paul D. Hallett. Effects of Root Growth of Deep and Shallow Rooting Rice Cultivars in Compacted Paddy Soils on Subsequent Rice Growth [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 459-472. |
[2] | Sheikh Faruk Ahmed, Hayat Ullah, May Zun Aung, Rujira Tisarum, Suriyan Cha-Um, Avishek Datta. Iron Toxicity Tolerance of Rice Genotypes in Relation to Growth, Yield and Physiochemical Characters [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(4): 321-334. |
[3] | Wang Cuili, Guo Wen, Hu Peisong, Wei Xiangjin, Tang Shaoqing, Jiao Guiai. Differences of Physicochemical Properties Between Chalky and Translucent Parts of Rice Grains [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(6): 577-588. |
[4] | Yousef Alhaj Hamoud, Hiba Shaghaleh, Wang Ruke, Willy Franz Gouertoumbo, Amar Ali Adam hamad, Mohamed Salah Sheteiwy, Wang Zhenchang, Guo Xiangping. Wheat Straw Burial Improves Physiological Traits, Yield and Grain Quality of Rice by Regulating Antioxidant System and Nitrogen Assimilation Enzymes under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(5): 473-488. |
[5] | Chen Wei, Cai Yicong, Shakeel Ahmad, Wang Yakun, An Ruihu, Tang Shengjia, Guo Naihui, Wei Xiangjin, Tang Shaoqing, Shao Gaoneng, Jiao Guiai, Xie Lihong, Hu Shikai, Sheng Zhonghua, Hu Peisong. NRL3 Interacts with OsK4 to Regulate Heading Date in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(3): 237-246. |
[6] | Lucas Ávila do Nascimento, Abhilasha Abhilasha, Jaspreet Singh, Moacir Cardoso Elias, Rosana Colussi. Rice Germination and Its Impact on Technological and Nutritional Properties: A Review [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(3): 201-215. |
[7] | Wenting Wang, Wenpei Cui, Ke Xu, Hui Gao, Haiyan Wei, Hongcheng Zhang. Effects of Early- and Late-Sowing on Starch Accumulation and Associated Enzyme Activities During Grain Filling Stage in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(2): 191-199. |
[8] | Yi Ding, Maike Wang, Yi Shen, Xiaoli Shu, Dianxing Wu, Wenjian Song. Physiochemical Properties of Resistant Starch and Its Enhancement Approaches in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(1): 31-42. |
[9] | Shuting Yuan, Chunjue Xu, Wei Yan, Zhenyi Chang, Xingwang Deng, Zhufeng Chen, Jianxin Wu, Xiaoyan Tang. Alternative Splicing of OsRAD1 Defines C-Terminal Domain Essential for Protein Function in Meiosis [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(4): 289-301. |
[10] | Vijayaraghavareddy Preethi, Xinyou Yin, C. Struik Paul, Makarla Udayakumar, Sreeman Sheshshayee. Responses of Lowland, Upland and Aerobic Rice Genotypes to Water Limitation During Different Phases [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(4): 345-354. |
[11] | Hussain Kashif, Yingxing Zhang, Anley Workie, Riaz Aamir, Abbas Adil, Hasanuzzaman Rani Md., Hong Wang, Xihong Shen, Liyong Cao, Shihua Cheng. Association Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Grain Size in Introgression Line Derived from Oryza rufipogon [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(3): 246-254. |
[12] | Yaling Chen, Yuehan Pang, Jinsong Bao. Expression Profiles and Protein Complexes of Starch Biosynthetic Enzymes from White-Core and Waxy Mutants Induced from High Amylose Indica Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(2): 152-161. |
[13] | Xiujie Zhang, Wujun Jin, Wentao Xu, Xiaying Li, Ying Shang, Sha Li, Hongsheng Ouyang. Comparison of Five Endogenous Reference Genes for Specific PCR Detection and Quantification of Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(4): 248-256. |
[14] | Yunyan Fei, Jie Yang, Fangquan Wang, Fangjun Fan, Wenqi Li, Jun Wang, Yang Xu, Jinyan Zhu, Weigong Zhong. Production of Two Elite Glutinous Rice Varieties by Editing Wx Gene [J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(2): 118-124. |
[15] | Shufen Chao, Yicong Cai, Baobing Feng, Guiai Jiao, Zhonghua Sheng, Ju Luo, Shaoqing Tang, Jianlong Wang, Peisong Hu, Xiangjin Wei. Editing of Rice Isoamylase Gene ISA1 Provides Insights into Its Function in Starch Formation [J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(2): 77-87. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||