Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 48-55.DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2016.07.005
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Fernando Polesi Luís1(), Divino da Matta Junior Manoel2, Bruder Silveira Sarmento Silene2, Guidolin Canniatti-Brazaca Solange2
Received:
2016-04-08
Accepted:
2016-07-03
Online:
2017-01-10
Published:
2016-11-01
Fernando Polesi Luís, Divino da Matta Junior Manoel, Bruder Silveira Sarmento Silene, Guidolin Canniatti-Brazaca Solange. Starch Digestibility and Physicochemical and Cooking Properties of Irradiated Rice Grains[J]. Rice Science, 2017, 24(1): 48-55.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
IAC202 | 26.4 ± 0.4 bA | 25.6 ± 0.1 bAB | 25.4 ± 0.3 bB | 25.5 ± 0.5 bB |
IRGA417 | 27.8 ± 0.3 aA | 27.6 ± 0.6 aA | 26.8 ± 0.4 aAB | 26.2 ± 0.6 aB |
Table 1 Apparent amylose content of two rice varieties according to radiation dose (Mean ± SD, n = 3). %
Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
IAC202 | 26.4 ± 0.4 bA | 25.6 ± 0.1 bAB | 25.4 ± 0.3 bB | 25.5 ± 0.5 bB |
IRGA417 | 27.8 ± 0.3 aA | 27.6 ± 0.6 aA | 26.8 ± 0.4 aAB | 26.2 ± 0.6 aB |
Parameter | Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
RDS (raw) | IAC202 | 32.3 ± 0.9 bC | 33.4 ± 0.2 bBC | 34.6 ± 0.1 bAB | 35.5 ± 0.4 aA |
IRGA417 | 35.3 ± 0.9 aB | 36.5 ± 1.3 aB | 40.8 ± 0.7 aA | 36.6 ± 0.8 aB | |
SDS (raw) | IAC202 | 44.0 ± 0.6 aC | 44.1 ± 0.2 aC | 49.4 ± 0.8 aB | 52.7 ± 0.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 41.1 ± 0.5 bA | 39.0 ± 0.3 bB | 34.7 ± 1.3 bC | 41.9 ± 0.8 bA | |
RS (raw) | IAC202 | 14.2 ± 0.9 aA | 13.0 ± 0.3 aA | 6.5 ± 0.3 bB | 2.2 ± 0.5 bC |
IRGA417 | 12.9 ± 0.3 bA | 13.7 ± 0.7 aA | 13.7 ± 0.9 aA | 10.7 ± 0.6 aB | |
RDS (cooked) | IAC202 | 74.0 ± 1.9 bA | 72.3 ± 0.5 bA | 74.0 ± 1.0 bA | 61.8 ± 2.5 bB |
IRGA417 | 80.4 ± 0.5 aA | 80.4 ± 0.4 aA | 82.6 ± 0.7 aA | 83.0 ± 1.9 aA | |
SDS (cooked) | IAC202 | 1.6 ± 0.3 aB | 1.5 ± 0.9 aB | 2.5 ± 0.4 aB | 11.5 ± 1.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 0.7 ± 0.1 aC | 2.6 ± 0.1 aB | 3.1 ± 1.0 aB | 4.9 ± 0.1 bA | |
RS (cooked) | IAC202 | 5.7 ± 0.3 bB | 9.1 ± 0.2 aA | 7.1 ± 0.9 aB | 10.0 ± 1.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 7.3 ± 0.5 aA | 8.8 ± 0.7 aA | 4.1 ± 0.5 bB | 1.1 ± 0.1 bC | |
TDF | IAC202 | 1.5 ± 0.5 aA | 2.1 ± 0.5 aA | 2.5 ± 0.5 aA | 1.5 ± 0.6 aA |
IRGA417 | 1.6 ± 0.3 aA | 1.6 ± 0.4 aA | 1.5 ± 0.4 aA | 1.3 ± 0.4 aA |
Table 2 Starch digestibility of raw and cooked samples and total dietary fiber of raw samples of two rice varieties (Mean ± SD, n = 3). %
Parameter | Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
RDS (raw) | IAC202 | 32.3 ± 0.9 bC | 33.4 ± 0.2 bBC | 34.6 ± 0.1 bAB | 35.5 ± 0.4 aA |
IRGA417 | 35.3 ± 0.9 aB | 36.5 ± 1.3 aB | 40.8 ± 0.7 aA | 36.6 ± 0.8 aB | |
SDS (raw) | IAC202 | 44.0 ± 0.6 aC | 44.1 ± 0.2 aC | 49.4 ± 0.8 aB | 52.7 ± 0.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 41.1 ± 0.5 bA | 39.0 ± 0.3 bB | 34.7 ± 1.3 bC | 41.9 ± 0.8 bA | |
RS (raw) | IAC202 | 14.2 ± 0.9 aA | 13.0 ± 0.3 aA | 6.5 ± 0.3 bB | 2.2 ± 0.5 bC |
IRGA417 | 12.9 ± 0.3 bA | 13.7 ± 0.7 aA | 13.7 ± 0.9 aA | 10.7 ± 0.6 aB | |
RDS (cooked) | IAC202 | 74.0 ± 1.9 bA | 72.3 ± 0.5 bA | 74.0 ± 1.0 bA | 61.8 ± 2.5 bB |
IRGA417 | 80.4 ± 0.5 aA | 80.4 ± 0.4 aA | 82.6 ± 0.7 aA | 83.0 ± 1.9 aA | |
SDS (cooked) | IAC202 | 1.6 ± 0.3 aB | 1.5 ± 0.9 aB | 2.5 ± 0.4 aB | 11.5 ± 1.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 0.7 ± 0.1 aC | 2.6 ± 0.1 aB | 3.1 ± 1.0 aB | 4.9 ± 0.1 bA | |
RS (cooked) | IAC202 | 5.7 ± 0.3 bB | 9.1 ± 0.2 aA | 7.1 ± 0.9 aB | 10.0 ± 1.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 7.3 ± 0.5 aA | 8.8 ± 0.7 aA | 4.1 ± 0.5 bB | 1.1 ± 0.1 bC | |
TDF | IAC202 | 1.5 ± 0.5 aA | 2.1 ± 0.5 aA | 2.5 ± 0.5 aA | 1.5 ± 0.6 aA |
IRGA417 | 1.6 ± 0.3 aA | 1.6 ± 0.4 aA | 1.5 ± 0.4 aA | 1.3 ± 0.4 aA |
Parameter | Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
PT (ºC) | IAC202 | 81.8 ± 0.6 bB | 82.2 ± 0.5 bB | 82.3 ± 0.9 bB | 85.6 ± 0.1 bA |
IRGA417 | 84.6 ± 0.6 aB | 85.9 ± 0.8 aB | 84.8 ± 0.7 aB | 88.2 ± 0.8 aA | |
PV (RVU) | IAC202 | 126.9 ± 3.2 bA | 88.2 ± 2.1 bB | 75.7 ± 1.2 bC | 36.7 ± 2.8 bD |
IRGA417 | 186.3 ± 2.2 aA | 130.8 ± 4.9 aB | 110.6 ± 4.9 aC | 50.4 ± 3.0 aD | |
BD (RVU) | IAC202 | 39.3 ± 3.7 aA | 37.5 ± 2.2 aA | 36.6 ± 0.3 aA | 20.8 ± 1.4 aB |
IRGA417 | 13.2 ± 2.6 bC | 20.6 ± 1.9 bB | 26.8 ± 2.6 bA | 19.0 ± 2.6 aB | |
FV (RVU) | IAC202 | 175.1 ± 6.9 bA | 103.8 ± 3.5 bB | 79.1 ± 1.5 bC | 33.9 ± 2.6 bD |
IRGA417 | 284.6 ± 7.2 aA | 166.9 ± 10.1 aB | 128.7 ± 7.7 aC | 48.8 ± 4.7 aD | |
SB (RVU) | IAC202 | 87.6 ± 7.6 bA | 53.1 ± 2.0 aB | 39.9 ± 0.6 aB | 18.1 ± 1.1 aC |
IRGA417 | 111.5 ± 11.8 aA | 56.7 ± 8.5 aB | 45.0 ± 8.5 aB | 17.4 ± 4.2 aC |
Table 3 Pasting properties of rice flour suspensions (9.4%) determined by Rapid Visco Analyzer according to radiation dose (Mean ± SD, n = 3).
Parameter | Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
PT (ºC) | IAC202 | 81.8 ± 0.6 bB | 82.2 ± 0.5 bB | 82.3 ± 0.9 bB | 85.6 ± 0.1 bA |
IRGA417 | 84.6 ± 0.6 aB | 85.9 ± 0.8 aB | 84.8 ± 0.7 aB | 88.2 ± 0.8 aA | |
PV (RVU) | IAC202 | 126.9 ± 3.2 bA | 88.2 ± 2.1 bB | 75.7 ± 1.2 bC | 36.7 ± 2.8 bD |
IRGA417 | 186.3 ± 2.2 aA | 130.8 ± 4.9 aB | 110.6 ± 4.9 aC | 50.4 ± 3.0 aD | |
BD (RVU) | IAC202 | 39.3 ± 3.7 aA | 37.5 ± 2.2 aA | 36.6 ± 0.3 aA | 20.8 ± 1.4 aB |
IRGA417 | 13.2 ± 2.6 bC | 20.6 ± 1.9 bB | 26.8 ± 2.6 bA | 19.0 ± 2.6 aB | |
FV (RVU) | IAC202 | 175.1 ± 6.9 bA | 103.8 ± 3.5 bB | 79.1 ± 1.5 bC | 33.9 ± 2.6 bD |
IRGA417 | 284.6 ± 7.2 aA | 166.9 ± 10.1 aB | 128.7 ± 7.7 aC | 48.8 ± 4.7 aD | |
SB (RVU) | IAC202 | 87.6 ± 7.6 bA | 53.1 ± 2.0 aB | 39.9 ± 0.6 aB | 18.1 ± 1.1 aC |
IRGA417 | 111.5 ± 11.8 aA | 56.7 ± 8.5 aB | 45.0 ± 8.5 aB | 17.4 ± 4.2 aC |
Parameter | Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
MCT (min) | IAC202 | 17.7 ± 0.6 aA | 17.7 ± 0.6 aA | 18.0 ± 1.0 aA | 18.0 ± 0.0 aA |
IRGA417 | 17.0 ± 0.0 aA | 16.0 ± 0.0 bAB | 15.3 ± 0.6 bB | 15.0 ± 0.0 bB | |
WA (%) | IAC202 | 459.5 ± 12.9 aA | 436.1 ± 4.5 aB | 376.4 ± 5.8 aC | 336.7 ± 1.1 aD |
IRGA417 | 384.4 ± 8.9 bA | 367.6 ± 5.0 bB | 347.2 ± 3.5 bC | 321.0 ± 2.5 bD | |
VE (%) | IAC202 | 529.2 ± 7.2 aA | 512.5 ± 12.5 aA | 481.0 ± 8.3 aB | 438.1 ± 8.3 aC |
IRGA417 | 495.2 ± 8.2 bA | 481.0 ± 8.3 bA | 442.9 ± 14.3 bB | 419.1 ± 8.3 bC | |
SL (%) | IAC202 | 4.9 ± 0.7 aB | 6.5 ± 0.5 aB | 7.0 ± 0.7 aB | 10.5 ± 2.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 2.3 ± 0.5 bB | 2.9 ± 0.2 bB | 3.8 ± 0.4 bB | 6.6 ± 0.9 bA |
Table 4 Cooking properties of two rice varieties according to radiation dose (Mean ± SD, n = 3).
Parameter | Variety | Dose (kGy) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 (Control) | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
MCT (min) | IAC202 | 17.7 ± 0.6 aA | 17.7 ± 0.6 aA | 18.0 ± 1.0 aA | 18.0 ± 0.0 aA |
IRGA417 | 17.0 ± 0.0 aA | 16.0 ± 0.0 bAB | 15.3 ± 0.6 bB | 15.0 ± 0.0 bB | |
WA (%) | IAC202 | 459.5 ± 12.9 aA | 436.1 ± 4.5 aB | 376.4 ± 5.8 aC | 336.7 ± 1.1 aD |
IRGA417 | 384.4 ± 8.9 bA | 367.6 ± 5.0 bB | 347.2 ± 3.5 bC | 321.0 ± 2.5 bD | |
VE (%) | IAC202 | 529.2 ± 7.2 aA | 512.5 ± 12.5 aA | 481.0 ± 8.3 aB | 438.1 ± 8.3 aC |
IRGA417 | 495.2 ± 8.2 bA | 481.0 ± 8.3 bA | 442.9 ± 14.3 bB | 419.1 ± 8.3 bC | |
SL (%) | IAC202 | 4.9 ± 0.7 aB | 6.5 ± 0.5 aB | 7.0 ± 0.7 aB | 10.5 ± 2.3 aA |
IRGA417 | 2.3 ± 0.5 bB | 2.9 ± 0.2 bB | 3.8 ± 0.4 bB | 6.6 ± 0.9 bA |
1 | AACC.2000. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 10th edn. Saint Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists. |
2 | AOAC.2006. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th edn. Arlington, Virginia: American Association of Cereal Chemists. |
3 | Bao J S, Shu Q Y, Xia Y W, Bergman C, McClung A.2001. Effects of gamma irradiation on aspects of milled rice (Oryza sativa) end-use quality.J Food Qual, 24(4): 327-336. |
4 | Bao J S, Ao Z H, Jane J I.2005. Characterization of physical properties of flour and starch obtained from gamma-irradiated white rice.Starch-Starke, 57(10): 480-487. |
5 | Bassinello P Z, Rocha M S, Cobucci R M A.2004. Evaluation of different cooking methods of upland rice for sensory testing: Technical Notice 84. Santo Antônio de Goiás, Brazil: Embrapa Rice and Beans. (in Portuguese) |
6 | Bello-Pérez L A, Montealvo M G M, Acevedo E A.2006. Starch: Definition, structure and properties. In: Lajolo F M, Menezes E W. Carbohydrates in Regional Iberoamerican Foods. Sao Paulo: Edusp: 17-46. (in Spanish) |
7 | Bhat R, Karim A A.2009. Impact of radiation processing on starch.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 8(2): 44-58. |
8 | Chung H J, Liu Q A.2009. Effect of gamma irradiation on molecular structure and physicochemical properties of corn starch.J Food Sci, 74(5): C353-C361. |
9 | Chung H J, Liu Q A.2010. Molecular structure and physicochemical properties of potato and bean starches as affected by gamma-irradiation.Int J Biol Macromol, 47(2): 214-222. |
10 | Chung H J, Lee S Y, Kim J H, Lee J W, Byun M W, Lim S T.2010. Pasting characteristics and in vitro digestibility of gamma-irradiated RS4 waxy maize starches.J Cereal Sci, 52(1): 53-58. |
11 | Cui L, Pan Z L, Yue T L, Atungulu G G, Berrios J.2010. Effect of ultrasonic treatment of brown rice at different temperatures on cooking properties and quality.Cereal Chem, 87(5): 403-408. |
12 | Englyst H N, Kingman S M, Cummings J H.1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions.Eur J Clin Nutr, 46: S33-S50. |
13 | Lee S L, Lee M S, Song K B.2005. Effect of gamma-irradiation on the physicochemical properties of gluten films.Food Chem, 92(4): 621-625. |
14 | Lehmann U, Robin F.2007. Slowly digestible starch: Its structure and health implications: A review.Trends Food Sci Technol, 18(7): 346-355. |
15 | Martínez C, Cuevas F.1989. Evaluation of the Culinary and Milling Quality of Rice. 3rd edn. Cali: International Center of Tropical Agriculture. (in Spanish) |
16 | Ogawa Y, Glenn G M, Orts W J, Wood D F.2003. Histological structures of cooked rice grain.J Agric Food Chem, 51: 7019-7023. |
17 | Polesi L F, Sarmento S B S.2011. Structural and physicochemical characterization of RS prepared using hydrolysis and heat treatments of chickpea starch.Starch-Starke, 63: 226-235. |
18 | Polesi L F, Sarmento S B S, de Moraes J, Franco C M L, Canniatti-Brazaca S G.2016. Physicochemical and structural characteristics of rice starch modified by irradiation.Food Chem, 191: 59-66. |
19 | Sajilata M G, Singhal R S, Kulkarni P R.2006. Resistant starch: A review.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf, 5: 1-17. |
20 | Silva F A S. 2014. ASSISTAT: Version 7.7 beta. . |
21 | Singh S, Singh N, Ezekiel R, Kaur A.2011. Effects of gamma-irradiation on the morphological, structural, thermal and rheological properties of potato starches.Carbohydr Polym, 83(4): 1521-1528. |
22 | Sirisoontaralak P, Noomhorm A.2006. Changes to physicochemical properties and aroma of irradiated rice.J Stored Prod Res, 42(3): 264-276. |
23 | Vidal V, Pons B, Brunnschweiler J, Handschin S, Rouau X, Mestres C.2007. Cooking behavior of rice in relation to kernel physicochemical and structural properties.J Agric Food Chem, 55(2): 336-346. |
24 | Walter M, de Silva L P, Emanuelli T.2005. Resistant starch: Physico-chemical characteristics, physiological properties and quantification methodologies.Ciencia Rural, 35(4): 974-980. |
25 | Walter M, Marchezan E, de Avila L A.2008. Rice: Composition and nutritional characteristics.Ciencia Rural, 38(4): 1184-1192. |
26 | Wootton M, Djojonegoro H, Driscoll R.1988. The effect of gamma-irradiation on the quality of Australian rice.J Cereal Sci, 7(3): 309-315. |
27 | Wu D X, Shu Q Y, Wang Z H, Xia Y W.2002. Effect of gamma irradiation on starch viscosity and physicochemical properties of different rice.Radiat Phys Chem, 65(1): 79-86. |
28 | Yoon H S, Yoo J Y, Kim J H, Lee J W, Byun M W, Baik B K, Lim S T.2010. In vitro digestibility of gamma-irradiated corn starches.Carbohydr Polym, 81(4): 961-963. |
29 | Zanao C F P, Canniatti-Brazaca S G, Sarmento S B S, Arthur V.2009. Effect of gamma irradiation on physico-chemical and sensorial characteristics of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and on the development of Sitophilus oryzae L.Food Sci Technol, 29(1): 46-55. |
30 | Zavareze E R, Halal S L M, Pereira J M, Radünz A L, Elias M C, Dias A R G.2009. Chemical characterization and extraction yield of rice starch with different amylose contents. Braz J Food Technol, II SSA: 24-30. (in Portuguese) |
31 | Zbikowska H M, Nowak P, Wachowicz B.2006. Protein modification caused by a high dose of gamma irradiation in cryo-sterilized plasma: Protective effects of ascorbate.Free Radical Biol Med, 40(3): 536-542. |
32 | Zhu L J, Liu Q Q, Wilson J D, Gu M H, Shi Y C.2011. Digestibility and physicochemical properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) flours and starches differing in amylose content.Carbohydr Polym, 86(4): 1751-1759. |
33 | Zuleta A, Dyner L, Sambucetti M E, Francisco A.2006. Effect of gamma irradiation on the functional and nutritive properties of rice flours from different cultivars.Cereal Chem, 83(1): 76-79. |
[1] | Md. Dhin Islam, Adam H. Price, Paul D. Hallett. Effects of Root Growth of Deep and Shallow Rooting Rice Cultivars in Compacted Paddy Soils on Subsequent Rice Growth [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(5): 459-472. |
[2] | Sheikh Faruk Ahmed, Hayat Ullah, May Zun Aung, Rujira Tisarum, Suriyan Cha-Um, Avishek Datta. Iron Toxicity Tolerance of Rice Genotypes in Relation to Growth, Yield and Physiochemical Characters [J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(4): 321-334. |
[3] | Wang Cuili, Guo Wen, Hu Peisong, Wei Xiangjin, Tang Shaoqing, Jiao Guiai. Differences of Physicochemical Properties Between Chalky and Translucent Parts of Rice Grains [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(6): 577-588. |
[4] | Yousef Alhaj Hamoud, Hiba Shaghaleh, Wang Ruke, Willy Franz Gouertoumbo, Amar Ali Adam hamad, Mohamed Salah Sheteiwy, Wang Zhenchang, Guo Xiangping. Wheat Straw Burial Improves Physiological Traits, Yield and Grain Quality of Rice by Regulating Antioxidant System and Nitrogen Assimilation Enzymes under Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(5): 473-488. |
[5] | Chen Wei, Cai Yicong, Shakeel Ahmad, Wang Yakun, An Ruihu, Tang Shengjia, Guo Naihui, Wei Xiangjin, Tang Shaoqing, Shao Gaoneng, Jiao Guiai, Xie Lihong, Hu Shikai, Sheng Zhonghua, Hu Peisong. NRL3 Interacts with OsK4 to Regulate Heading Date in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(3): 237-246. |
[6] | Lucas Ávila do Nascimento, Abhilasha Abhilasha, Jaspreet Singh, Moacir Cardoso Elias, Rosana Colussi. Rice Germination and Its Impact on Technological and Nutritional Properties: A Review [J]. Rice Science, 2022, 29(3): 201-215. |
[7] | Wenting Wang, Wenpei Cui, Ke Xu, Hui Gao, Haiyan Wei, Hongcheng Zhang. Effects of Early- and Late-Sowing on Starch Accumulation and Associated Enzyme Activities During Grain Filling Stage in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(2): 191-199. |
[8] | Yi Ding, Maike Wang, Yi Shen, Xiaoli Shu, Dianxing Wu, Wenjian Song. Physiochemical Properties of Resistant Starch and Its Enhancement Approaches in Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(1): 31-42. |
[9] | Shuting Yuan, Chunjue Xu, Wei Yan, Zhenyi Chang, Xingwang Deng, Zhufeng Chen, Jianxin Wu, Xiaoyan Tang. Alternative Splicing of OsRAD1 Defines C-Terminal Domain Essential for Protein Function in Meiosis [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(4): 289-301. |
[10] | Vijayaraghavareddy Preethi, Xinyou Yin, C. Struik Paul, Makarla Udayakumar, Sreeman Sheshshayee. Responses of Lowland, Upland and Aerobic Rice Genotypes to Water Limitation During Different Phases [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(4): 345-354. |
[11] | Hussain Kashif, Yingxing Zhang, Anley Workie, Riaz Aamir, Abbas Adil, Hasanuzzaman Rani Md., Hong Wang, Xihong Shen, Liyong Cao, Shihua Cheng. Association Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Grain Size in Introgression Line Derived from Oryza rufipogon [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(3): 246-254. |
[12] | Yaling Chen, Yuehan Pang, Jinsong Bao. Expression Profiles and Protein Complexes of Starch Biosynthetic Enzymes from White-Core and Waxy Mutants Induced from High Amylose Indica Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2020, 27(2): 152-161. |
[13] | Xiujie Zhang, Wujun Jin, Wentao Xu, Xiaying Li, Ying Shang, Sha Li, Hongsheng Ouyang. Comparison of Five Endogenous Reference Genes for Specific PCR Detection and Quantification of Rice [J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(4): 248-256. |
[14] | Shufen Chao, Yicong Cai, Baobing Feng, Guiai Jiao, Zhonghua Sheng, Ju Luo, Shaoqing Tang, Jianlong Wang, Peisong Hu, Xiangjin Wei. Editing of Rice Isoamylase Gene ISA1 Provides Insights into Its Function in Starch Formation [J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(2): 77-87. |
[15] | Yunyan Fei, Jie Yang, Fangquan Wang, Fangjun Fan, Wenqi Li, Jun Wang, Yang Xu, Jinyan Zhu, Weigong Zhong. Production of Two Elite Glutinous Rice Varieties by Editing Wx Gene [J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(2): 118-124. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||